15 results on '"Jongwook, Lee"'
Search Results
2. 공공도서관 메이커스페이스 담당자의 운영 경험 연구
- Author
-
Kim Soojung, Sanghee Oh, and Jongwook Lee
- Subjects
Library science ,Sociology - Published
- 2019
3. Characteristics of Faculty Mentors in Library and Information Science Doctoral Education
- Author
-
Jongwook Lee
- Subjects
ComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSION ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Perspective (graphical) ,Erikson's stages of psychosocial development ,Library science ,Interpersonal communication ,Guideline ,ComputingMilieux_GENERAL ,Perception ,0502 economics and business ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,0509 other social sciences ,Doctoral education ,050904 information & library sciences ,Psychology ,050203 business & management ,media_common - Abstract
Mentoring by faculty advisors is closely related to the personal and professional outcomes of doctoral students. However, few researchers have examined the characteristics of faculty mentors. To deal with this lack of research, the author attempted to explore the characteristics of faculty mentors from the perspective of Library and Information Science (LIS) doctoral students in the United States. In the study, the author combined interviews and a survey to examine the characteristics of faculty mentors. The interview and survey findings present a list of characteristics that are comprehensive and specific to LIS doctoral education. Specifically, the author describes a faculty mentor as a well-rounded person who possesses both professional and interpersonal characteristics. In addition, the findings show some aspects in which the current advising/mentoring could improve. The current study offers a guideline for the accomplishment of doctoral mentoring at a concrete level, rather than vaguely recommending that faculty advisors support the professional and psychosocial development of their students. In a following paper, the author will relate background characteristics of doctoral students to their perception of mentors.
- Published
- 2016
4. KCI vs. WoS: Comparative Analysis of Korean and International Journal Publications in Library and Information Science.
- Author
-
Kiduk Yang, Seonwook Kim, Dong-Geun Oh, Hyekyung Lee, and Jongwook Lee
- Subjects
LIBRARY science ,INFORMATION science ,COMPARATIVE studies ,CITATION indexes ,INTERNATIONAL agencies - Abstract
The study analyzed bibliometric data of papers published in Korea Citation Index (KCI) and Web of Science (WoS) journals from 2002 to 2021. After examining size differences of KCI and WoS domains in the number of authors, institutions, and journals to put publication and citations counts in perspective, the study investigated co-authorship patterns over time to compare collaboration trends of Korean and international scholars and analyzed the data at author, institution, and journal levels to explore how the influences of authors, institutions, and journals on research output differ across domains. The study also conducted frequencybased analysis of keywords to identify key topics and visualized keyword clusters to examine topic trends. The result showed Korean LIS authors to be twice as productive as international authors but much less impactful and Korean institutions to be at comparable levels of productivity and impact in contrast to much of productivity and impact concentrated in top international institutions. Citations to journals exhibited initially increasing pattern followed by a decreasing trend though WoS journals showed far more variance than KCI journals. Co-authorship trends were much more pronounced among international publication, where larger collaboration groups suggested multi-disciplinary and complex nature of international LIS research. Keyword analysis found continuing diversification of topics in international research compared to relatively static topic trend in Korea. Keyword visualization showed WoS keyword clusters to be much denser and diverse than KCI clusters. In addition, key keyword clusters of WoS were quite different from each other unlike KCI clusters which were similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Publication and citation patterns of Korean LIS research by subject areas
- Author
-
Jongwook Lee, Kiduk Yang, and Wonchan Choi
- Subjects
Future studies ,business.industry ,Computer science ,05 social sciences ,Library science ,Library and Information Sciences ,050905 science studies ,Field (geography) ,Publishing ,Multidisciplinary approach ,Subject areas ,0509 other social sciences ,050904 information & library sciences ,business ,Citation ,Discipline - Abstract
Many researchers have suggested careful application of bibliometric indicators to research evaluation because of many factors including disciplinary norms that influence the publication and citation behaviors of researchers. Although some researchers have examined different bibliometric patterns across disciplines, relatively few scholars have focused on whether research performance should be evaluated in a uniform manner across research domains within a single discipline, especially in a multi-disciplinary fields such as library and information science (LIS). In order to ascertain whether such subject-specific differences exist in the LIS field, we conducted a bibliometric study that examined the publication and citation patterns across subject areas of LIS research in Korea. The analysis of our study data, which consisted of 6,838 citations to 1,986 domestic papers published between 2001 and 2010 by 163 LIS faculty members in Korea, revealed some evidence of bibliometric pattern differences across subject areas. In particular, we found that the authors in Bibliographic Studies, who were almost twice as productive as authors in other subject areas, received the lowest citation counts, which might be attributed to their different publishing and citing behaviors. Publication and citation patterns across subject areas of LIS papers and observation of the possible effect of sub-disciplinary culture on citing behaviors suggest the need for subject-specific assessment of multidisciplinary research discipline such as LIS. In future studies, we will investigate different publication and citation behaviors of authors by subject areas.
- Published
- 2016
6. Characteristics of Korean Researchers through Bibliometric Analysis of Papers Published in International LIS Journals
- Author
-
Jongwook Lee and Hyerin Bak
- Subjects
Bibliometric analysis ,05 social sciences ,Library science ,Sociology ,0509 other social sciences ,Bibliometrics ,050905 science studies ,050904 information & library sciences - Published
- 2016
7. Comparison of Citation Indexes in Korea: An Exploratory Study
- Author
-
Seon-Heui Choi, Jongwook Lee, and Kiduk Yang
- Subjects
Geography ,Bibliometric analysis ,Impact factor ,Web of science ,Citation index ,Scopus ,Exploratory research ,Science Citation Index ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Library science ,Citation ,Data science ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Citation indexes are essential data sources for bibliometric analysis of research performance. However, the international coverage of popular citation indexes such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar is minimal since very few non-English publications are included in those indexes. Thus, one must look to Korean citation indexes for proper bibliometric assessment of research in Korea, rather than relying on conventional indexes that contain only a fraction of scholarly publications by Korean authors. Since the evaluative outcome of bibliometric analysis is only as reliable as the data from which they are drawn, the examination of Korean citation indexes is vital to establishing an effective approach to bibliometric analysis of research performance in Korea. The paper presents a study that investigates three key citation indexes in Korea, namely Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI), Korea Citation Index (KCI), and Korea Medical Citation Index (KoMCI). The study compares the impact factors of the jou...
- Published
- 2013
8. A Comparative Analysis of Editorial Leaders' Profiles of Major and Non-Western Library and Information Science Journals.
- Author
-
Dong-Geun Oh, Eungi Kim, Jisuk Yeo, Kiduk Yang, and Jongwook Lee
- Subjects
LIBRARY science ,INFORMATION science ,COMPARATIVE studies ,WESTERN countries ,ELECTRONIC journals - Abstract
Due to the competitive nature of journal publishing, editorial leadership has become an increasingly important issue on many editorial teams. This study aimed to compare the major and non-Western international journals in library and information science and reveal the differences between them. To conduct this study, journals indexed by Scopus and Web of Science were analyzed in terms of gender, professional position and rank, institutions, and the iSchool status of the editorial leaders' institutions. The most notable results were the following: a) As a whole, both types of journals lacked true internationalization. Editorial leaders of major journals tended to be from Western countries, whereas editorial leaders of non-Western journals tended to be from non-Western countries; b) Most non-Western journals tended to appoint editorial leaders from the same country as the publisher's country; and c) Almost all editorial leaders of non-Western journals were from various non-Western countries and tended to have lower h-index scores, and their institutions were not part of the iSchool. Future research should assess editorial leadership, compare the results of this study to other disciplines, and find effective ways to collect data on editorial leaders while minimizing ethical concerns in order to meet future research needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Bibliometric Approach to Research Assessment: Publication Count, Citation Count, & Author Rank
- Author
-
Kiduk Yang and Jongwook Lee
- Subjects
Information Systems and Management ,Research assessment ,Author Rank ,business.industry ,Rank (computer programming) ,Library science ,Library and Information Sciences ,Bibliometrics ,Research Assessment ,Data science ,lcsh:Z ,lcsh:Bibliography. Library science. Information resources ,Citation analysis ,Citation Analysis ,Psychology ,business ,Citation ,Citation data ,Publication ,Information Systems - Abstract
We investigated how bibliometric indicators such as publication count and citation count affect the assessment ofresearch performance by computing various bibliometric scores of the works of Korean LIS faculty members andcomparing the rankings by those scores. For the study data, we used the publication and citation data of 159 tenure-track faculty members of Library and Information Science departments in 34 Korean universities. The study resultsshowed correlation between publication count and citation count for authors with many publications but the oppo-site evidence for authors with few publications. The study results suggest that as authors publish more and morework, citations to their work tend to increase along with publication count. However, for junior faculty members whohave not yet accumulated enough publications, citations to their work are of great importance in assessing theirresearch performance. The study data also showed that there are marked differences in the magnitude of citationsbetween papers published in Korean journals and papers published in international journals.
- Published
- 2013
10. Difference in citation rates by subject areas of LIS in Korea
- Author
-
Wonchan Choi and Jongwook Lee
- Subjects
Work (electrical) ,Computer science ,Citation analysis ,Library science ,Subject areas ,Library and Information Sciences ,Citation ,GeneralLiterature_REFERENCE(e.g.,dictionaries,encyclopedias,glossaries) ,Information Systems - Abstract
Citation analysis, in addition to peer review, is one of the popular methods to assess faculty research performance. In some disciplines, the validity of citation counts for evaluating research has been proven by many studies. However, it should be used cautiously when different disciplines are concerned, because citation practices may vary across disciplines. Although there have been studies that have examined the different citation practices across disciplines, relatively little research has investigated the citation rates of subject areas within a single discipline. This study explores the citation rates of subject areas in library and information science (LIS) in Korea. The preliminary results of this study will provide the rationale for further work, analyzing the causes of different citation patterns in a discipline. Ultimately, the study could provide useful implications for understanding and using the citation counts in assessing research performance.
- Published
- 2013
11. Analysis of Korea Science Citation Database's effect on JCR
- Author
-
Byungkyu Kim, Kiduk Yang, Jongwook Lee, and Beom-Jong You
- Subjects
Reference data ,Potential impact ,Information retrieval ,Geography ,Web of science ,Ranking ,Citation analysis ,Library science ,Citation ,Citation data ,Citation database - Abstract
Citation analysis studies have reported many problems associated with data coverage problems common to popular citation databases such as Web of Science(WoS). In addition, the studies that analyzed citation patterns of Korean publications found that up to 75% of references in Korean publications were to international publications. As a first step in investigating the international coverage of WoS database, the study investigated the effect of adding citation data from Korea Science Citation Database(KSCD) to the impact factors and journal rankings of the journals listed in Journal Citation Reports. Specifically, the study mined the reference data from top 5 Korean Library and Information Science(KLIS) journals to recompute the impact factors reported in JCR 2009. Since the resulting journal rankings did not significantly differ from JCR 2009 rankings except for minor ranking changes, we analyzed additional citation data from 45 computer science and electrical engineering journals. Although the overall ranking difference was not statistically significant, one of the ranking partitions showed significant change. Such study findings despite its limited data sample suggest the potential impact of non-Western citation databases such as KSCD to bibliometric indicators provided by popular citation databases like WoS.
- Published
- 2012
12. A Bibliometric Study of Library and Information Science Research in Korea
- Author
-
Jongwook Lee and Kiduk Yang
- Subjects
Internationalization ,Bibliometric analysis ,Political science ,Library science ,Scholarly work - Abstract
This study assesses research patterns and trends of library and information science(LIS) in Korea by applying bibliometric analysis. For the study, 2,400 peer-reviewed publications from 2001 to 2010(including conference proceedings) published by 159 LIS professors in Korea were analyzed by year, author, affiliation and journal. The study findings showed an increasing trend in collaboration(52.75% of total publications with single authors and 47.25% with multiple authors) among LIS professors in Korea, robust publication patterns of Korean LIS faculty(average 1.51 publications per year), and an increasing number in foreign publications(170 publications). The study results also suggested an internationalization of LIS in Korea. Specifically, the study found a higher rate of Korean LIS faculty with foreign degrees than in previous years as well as a higher publication rate of professors with international degrees. The analysis of publication patterns conducted by the study, which is a first step in our aim to establish a multi-faceted approach for assessing the impact of scholarly work, will be followed up with analysis of references and citations to evaluate the quality of publications.
- Published
- 2011
13. A Study of Citing Patterns of Korean Scientists on Korean Journals
- Author
-
Mu-Yeong Kang, Jongwook Lee, Jae-Won Park, Seon-Heui Choi, Beom-Jong You, and Byungkyu Kim
- Subjects
Immediacy index ,Computer science ,Citation rate ,Immediacy ,Science Citation Index ,Library science ,Citation ,Data science ,Citation database - Abstract
A large and reliable citation database is necessary to identify and analyze citation behavior of Korean researchers in science and technology. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) built the Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD), and have provided Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI) and Korea Journal Citation Reports (KJCR) services. In this article, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was examined by using the KSCD that covers 459 Korean core journals. This research dealt with (1) statistical numeric information of journals in KSCD, (2) analysis of document types cited. (3) ratio of domestic to international documents cited and ratio of citing different disciplines. (4) analysis on immediacy index, peak time, and half-life of cited documents, and (5) analysis on impact of journals based on KJCR citation indicators. From this research, we could find the immediacy citation rate (average 2.36%), peak-time (average 1.7 years) and half-life (average 5.2 years) of cited journals in Korea. We also found that the average journal self-citation rate is more than 50% in every field. In sum, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was comprehensively identified from this research.
- Published
- 2011
14. Publication and citation patterns of Korean LIS research by subject areas.
- Author
-
Kiduk Yang, Jongwook Lee, and Wonchan Choi
- Subjects
- *
BIBLIOMETRICS , *CITATION analysis , *LIBRARY science , *INFORMATION science , *PROFESSIONAL peer review - Abstract
Many researchers have suggested careful application of bibliometric indicators to research evaluation because of many factors including disciplinary norms that influence the publication and citation behaviors of researchers. Although some researchers have examined different bibliometric patterns across disciplines, relatively few scholars have focused on whether research performance should be evaluated in a uniform manner across research domains within a single discipline, especially in a multi-disciplinary fields such as library and information science (LIS). In order to ascertain whether such subject-specific differences exist in the LIS field, we conducted a bibliometric study that examined the publication and citation patterns across subject areas of LIS research in Korea. The analysis of our study data, which consisted of 6,838 citations to 1,986 domestic papers published between 2001 and 2010 by 163 LIS faculty members in Korea, revealed some evidence of bibliometric pattern differences across subject areas. In particular, we found that the authors in Bibliographic Studies, who were almost twice as productive as authors in other subject areas, received the lowest citation counts, which might be attributed to their different publishing and citing behaviors. Publication and citation patterns across subject areas of LIS papers and observation of the possible effect of sub-disciplinary culture on citing behaviors suggest the need for subject-specific assessment of multidisciplinary research discipline such as LIS. In future studies, we will investigate different publication and citation behaviors of authors by subject areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Peer Relationships and Information Sharing between LIS Doctoral Students.
- Author
-
Jongwook Lee, Anderson, Amelia, and Burnett, Gary
- Subjects
- *
PEER relations , *INTERPERSONAL relations , *INFORMATION sharing , *DOCTORAL students , *LIBRARY science , *INFORMATION science , *INFORMATION resources - Abstract
Doctoral students rely on their peers as important information sources. However, information behavior studies in academic settings most often describe peers as intermediaries who simply assist individuals' information seeking for academic resources. To address this issue, the authors interviewed six LIS doctoral students at Florida State University in order to explore the types of peer relationships and information sharing between LIS doctoral students. The preliminary findings confirmed the existence of close, social/academic, and other peers that can be categorized as special, collegial, and information peers using Kram and Isabella's continuum of peer relationships. In addition, it was found that work-related and everyday life information is shared in all three types of peer relationships, while relational strength influences the scope and depth of information sharing. Future work will investigate the role of peers as mentors and agents of socialization in academic settings, and will further address the types of information shared as part of such mentoring relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.