6 results on '"Zenger M"'
Search Results
2. Gain of chromosome 21 or amplification of chromosome arm 21q is one mechanism for increased ERG expression in acute myeloid leukemia.
- Author
-
Weber S, Haferlach C, Jeromin S, Nadarajah N, Dicker F, Noël L, Zenger M, Alpermann T, Kern W, Haferlach T, and Schnittger S
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosome Duplication, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit genetics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Transcriptional Regulator ERG, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21 genetics, Gene Amplification, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Trans-Activators genetics
- Abstract
In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acquired genomic gains and losses are common and lead to altered expression of genes located within or nearby the affected regions. Increased expression of the ETS-related transcription factor gene ERG has been described in myeloid malignancies with chromosomal rearrangements involving chromosome band 21q22, but also in cytogenetically normal AML, where it is associated with adverse prognosis. In this study, fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase nuclei disclosed an amplification of the ERG gene (more than six copies) in 33 AML patients with structural rearrangements of 21q22. Array comparative genomic hybridization of these cases disclosed a minimal amplified region at the position 39.6-40.0 Mbp from pter that harbors ERG as the only gene. Analysis by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed significantly higher ERG mRNA expression in these patients and in a group of 95 AML patients with complete or partial gain of chromosome 21 (three to six copies) compared with 351 AML patients without gain of chromosome 21. Quantification of ERG DNA copy numbers revealed a strong correlation with ERG mRNA expression. Furthermore, in patients with gain of chromosome 21, higher ERG expression was found to be associated with RUNX1 mutations. Our results suggest that acquired gain of chromosome 21 or amplification of chromosome arm 21q is one mechanism contributing to increased ERG expression in AML., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Three novel cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements associated with increased EVI1 expression and poor prognosis identified in 27 acute myeloid leukemia cases.
- Author
-
Haferlach C, Bacher U, Grossmann V, Schindela S, Zenger M, Kohlmann A, Kern W, Haferlach T, and Schnittger S
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3 genetics, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7 genetics, Cohort Studies, Cytogenetics, DNA-Binding Proteins metabolism, Female, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Karyotyping, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute metabolism, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, MDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus Protein, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Transcription Factors metabolism, Translocation, Genetic, DNA-Binding Proteins genetics, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Proto-Oncogenes genetics, Transcription Factors genetics
- Abstract
In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), increased ecotropic virus integration site 1 protein homolog (EVI1) gene expression is prognostically unfavorable. Subsets of cases show 3q26 rearrangements, such as inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26), frequently accompanied by chromosome 7 abnormalities. We investigated whether cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements may cause EVI1 overexpression in myeloid malignancies without 3q26 abnormalities and investigated 983 patients with AML (n = 606) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n = 377) with normal karyotype (CN-AML/CN-MDS, n = 594) or chromosome 7 abnormalities (n = 389) for EVI1 rearrangements using interphase FISH. We identified cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements in 27 patients (19 AML, 8 MDS): inv(3)(p24q26) [n = 10]; t(3;21)(q26;q11) [n = 9]; and der(7)t(3;7)(q26;q21) [n = 8]. Elevated EVI1 expression was detected in nearly all cases with cryptic EVI1 rearrangements: Median %EVI1/ABL1 was 92.8 (range: 29.8-146.1) in inv(3)(p24q26), 104.9 (41.4-176.3) in t(3;21)(q26;q11), and 101.8 (4.4-210.4) in der(7)t(3;7)(q26;q21). This was similar to median %EVI1/ABL1 of 73.9 (range: 7.3-585.6) in an independent cohort of inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) and 67.1 (2.3-410.7) in other 3q26/EVI1 rearrangements. Healthy controls showed median EVI1 expression of 0.5 (range: 0.0-5.8). Using SNP microarray and sequencing analyses, the breakpoints of der(7)t(3;7)(q26;q21) were assigned to CDK6 and centromeric of EVI1, and of t(3;21)(q26;q11) to be within EVI1 and NRIP1. Median overall survival in patients with cryptic EVI1 rearrangements was short, comparable to patients with inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) or other EVI1 rearrangements. Cryptic EVI1 rearrangements contribute to explain the clinical heterogeneity of CN-AML and are associated with elevated EVI1 expression and an unfavorable prognosis. Screening for cryptic EVI1 rearrangements by FISH may be particularly appropriate in CN-AML with elevated EVI1 expression or in AML/MDS patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities., (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. ETV6 rearrangements are recurrent in myeloid malignancies and are frequently associated with other genetic events.
- Author
-
Haferlach C, Bacher U, Schnittger S, Alpermann T, Zenger M, Kern W, and Haferlach T
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antigens, CD34 biosynthesis, Antigens, CD7 biosynthesis, Chromosome Banding, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit genetics, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Immunophenotyping, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Karyotype, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Myelodysplastic Syndromes mortality, Myelodysplastic Syndromes pathology, Myeloproliferative Disorders mortality, Myeloproliferative Disorders pathology, Nuclear Proteins genetics, Nucleophosmin, Prognosis, Young Adult, ETS Translocation Variant 6 Protein, Gene Rearrangement, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Myelodysplastic Syndromes genetics, Myeloproliferative Disorders genetics, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ets genetics, Repressor Proteins genetics
- Abstract
ETV6 (TEL) rearrangements are favorable in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia but are less well characterized in myeloid malignancies. We investigated 9,550 patients with myeloid disorders for ETV6 rearrangements by chromosome banding analysis and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. ETV6 rearrangements were identified in 51 of 9,550 (0.5%) patients (range, 19.2-85.3 years). Frequencies were in detail: acute myeloid leukemia (AML): 40 of 3,798, 1.1%; myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): 6 of 3,375, 0.2%; myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): 5 of 1,720, 0.3%; MDS/MPN: 0 of 210; and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 0 of 447. Thirty-three different partner bands of ETV6 were identified, and most were recurrent: 3q26 (n = 10), 5q33 (n = 4), 17q11 (n = 3), 22q12 (n = 3), 5q31 (n = 2), and 2q31 (n = 2). Additional chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 29 of 51 (57%) ETV6 rearranged cases. In AML, ETV6 rearrangements were frequently associated with NPM1 (9/39, 23%) and RUNX1 mutations (6/31, 19%). The FAB M0 subtype was more frequent in ETV6 rearranged de novo AML than other AML (P < 0.001); expression of CD7 and CD34 by immunophenotyping was higher in ETV6 rearranged AML compared with other subgroups. Survival of 29 ETV6 rearranged de novo AML was compared with 818 AML from other cytogenetic subgroups. Median overall and event-free survival of ETV6 rearranged cases was similar to the intermediate-risk cohort (26.3 vs. 62.2 months and 14.0 vs. 15.4 months) defined according to Medical Research Council criteria. Our study confirms the variety of ETV6 rearrangements in AML, MDS, and MPNs often in association with other genetic events. Prognosis of ETV6 rearranged de novo AML seems to be intermediate, which should be independently confirmed., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Subclones with the t(9;22)/BCR-ABL1 rearrangement occur in AML and seem to cooperate with distinct genetic alterations.
- Author
-
Bacher U, Haferlach T, Alpermann T, Zenger M, Hochhaus A, Beelen DW, Uppenkamp M, Rummel M, Kern W, Schnittger S, and Haferlach C
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Chromosome Banding methods, Core Binding Factors genetics, Female, Gene Rearrangement, Humans, Karyotyping, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive genetics, Male, Middle Aged, Nucleophosmin, Retrospective Studies, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22 genetics, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9 genetics, Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl genetics, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Translocation, Genetic
- Abstract
In AML, cooperation of mutations suppressing differentiation ('class-II-mutations') with 'class-I-mutations' increasing cell proliferation is frequent. In rare cases of myeloid malignancies, the BCR-ABL1 fusion was reported to cooperate as class-I-mutation with class-II-mutations, but most cases had to be classified as blast phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). We identified five cases of Philadelphia positive subclones in AML occurring in coincidence with other genetic lesions: 1:220 patients with inv(16)/CBFB-MYH11 (0·5%), 2:272 AML cases with t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (0·7%), 1:1029 NPM1-mutated AML (0·1%), and one patient with s-AML following MDS with a 5q-deletion. Four patients had m-BCR (e1a2) BCR-ABL1 transcripts; one case only had an M-BCR (b3a2) breakpoint. These cases allow some interesting conclusions: The BCR-ABL1 rearrangement apparently can cooperate with the NPM1 mutation similar to other class-I-mutations. The identification of Philadelphia positive subclones in <1% of patients with CBF-leukaemias fits well with previous observations that most CBF-AML are accompanied by activating mutations in genes enhancing proliferation. Since we observed the occurrence of the Philadelphia positive subclones at diagnosis, at relapse, or throughout the disease, the time point of the emergence of Philadelphia subclones seems variable in AML. Clinical research should further concentrate on Philadelphia positive subclones in AML to assess the clinical impact., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Comparison of cytogenetic clonal evolution patterns following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation versus conventional treatment in patients at relapse of AML.
- Author
-
Bacher U, Haferlach T, Alpermann T, Zenger M, Kröger N, Beelen DW, Kern W, Schnittger S, and Haferlach C
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clone Cells pathology, Female, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Transplantation, Homologous, Young Adult, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute therapy
- Abstract
Relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia has been associated with clonal cytogenetic evolution, but no study focused specifically on relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We compared karyotypes in 160 patients at both diagnosis and relapse either after allo-HSCT (n = 26) or standard chemotherapy (n = 134) using chromosome banding analysis combined with fluorescein in situ hybridization. There were 71 females and 89 males (19.7-80.6 years). At diagnosis, aberrant karyotypes were more frequent in the HSCT than in the chemotherapy cohort (16 of 26; 61.5% versus 63 of 134; 47.0%). This was most obvious in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics (8 of 26; 30.8% versus 19 of 134; 14.2%; P = .032). Differences in the karyotypes between diagnosis and relapse were more frequent in the allo-cohort (14 of 26; 53.8% versus 49 of 134; 36.6%) than in the conventional cohort (n.s.), mainly because of newly emerging cytogenetic alterations. Appearance of ≥ 3 new clonal alterations was more frequent in the allo-cohort (6 of 12; 50.0% with clonal evolution versus 5 of 41; 12.2%, P = .005). The mean number of cytogenetic alterations per patient was increasing from 2.0 at diagnosis to 4.0 at relapse in the allo-cohort, in the conventionally treated patients from 0.9 to 1.3 (both P < .001). Thus, higher frequencies of clonal evolution and increasing cytogenetic complexity were observed in the stem cell recipients probably related to the more unfavorable cytogenetic profiles already depicted at diagnosis., (Copyright © 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.