Search

Myeloid and erythroid precursor vacuolation is a common dysplastic finding associated with myeloid malignancies, toxins, drug, and nutritional deficiencies. It has been described as a core morphologic feature in VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome. We sought to determine the number of cases attributable to VEXAS syndrome in bone marrow biopsies and aspirates (BAMB) reporting myeloid precursor vacuolation. We reviewed 1318 individual BAMB reports from January 2020 to July 2021 where "vacuole(s)," "vacuolation," or "vacuolated" was reported. Bone marrow biopsies with vacuolation confined to blasts or those completed as routine workup prior to stem cell transplant or post induction chemotherapy for AML (acute myeloid leukemia) were excluded. Myeloid and erythroid precursor vacuolation was noted in 219 reports representing 210 patients. The most common etiology was myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (38.6%), AML (16.7%), lymphoproliferative disorders and multiple myeloma (7.6%), drug or toxin exposure (5.2%) myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) or MPN/MDS overlap syndrome (4.3%). VEXAS syndrome was determined to be the etiology in 2.9% of patients. Two additional cases of VEXAS syndrome with bone marrow biopsies reported in the specified time frame did not explicitly report myeloid or erythroid precursor vacuolation but were identified based on clinical suspicion and repeat BAMB review. Myeloid and erythroid precursor vacuolation is a dysplastic feature attributable to VEXAS syndrome in at least 2.9% of cases. Standardized reporting of vacuolization, triaging of molecular sequencing and optimal treatment of this disorder are critical issues facing those seeing patients with suspected VEXAS syndrome., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a disease of older adults, who are vulnerable to socio-economic factors. We determined AML incidence in older adults and the impact of socio-economic factors on outcomes., Methods: We included 3024 AML patients (1996-2016) identified from a population-based registry., Results: AML incidence in patients ≥60 years increased from 11.01 (2001-2005) to 12.76 (2011-2016) per 100 000 population. Among 879 patients ≥60 years in recent eras (2010-2016), rural residents (<100 000 population) were less likely to be assessed by a leukaemia specialist (39% rural, 47% urban, p = .032); no difference was seen for lower (43%, quintile 1-3) vs. higher (47%, quintile 4-5) incomes (p = .235). Similar numbers received induction chemotherapy between residence (16% rural, 18% urban, p = .578) and incomes (17% lower, 17% high, p = 1.0). Differences between incomes were seen for hypomethylating agent treatment (14% low, 20% high, p = .041); this was not seen for residence (13% rural, 18% urban, p = .092). Among non-adverse karyotype patients ≥70 years, 2-year overall survival was worse for rural (5% rural, 12% urban, p = .006) and lower income (6% low, 15% high, p = .017) patients., Conclusions: AML incidence in older adults is increasing, and outcomes are worse for older rural and low-income residents; these patients face treatment barriers., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The 2017 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for acute myeloid leukemia have recommended performing bone marrow (BM) aspiration and BM trephine biopsy (BMTB) 14 to 21 days after starting induction therapy (commonly referred to as "day 14 [D14] marrow"). Those who do not achieve a hypoplastic marrow, with cellularity < 20% and blasts < 5%, are recommended to undergo 2-cycle induction (2CI). We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the impact of D14 BM characteristics in predicting for remission, association with overall survival (OS), and the effect of 2CI according to the D14 BM results., Patients and Methods: Patients aged 18 to 70 years undergoing induction therapy with standard "7 + 3" regimens were included. D14 cellularity was determined from BMTB samples and the blast percentage was assessed by morphology on BM aspiration and BMTB samples. The outcomes evaluated included the rates of complete remission (CR) and OS., Results: A total of 486 patients with results from D14 BM evaluation were included in the present study. On multivariate analysis, cytogenetic risk and D14 blasts < 5% were predictive of CR/CR with incomplete count recovery (P < .001). Cytogenetic risk (P < .001), age < 60 years (P = .001), and D14 blasts < 5% (P = .045) predicted for OS. 2CI was performed in 131 patients (27%). Patients with hypocellular D14 BM but residual blasts (n = 106) underwent 2CI in 46% of cases, with improved remission rates (43.9% vs. 72.0%; P = .004) but no difference in OS., Conclusions: The results from D14 BM evaluations are predictive of subsequent remission and OS. Our findings did not show a survival benefit with D14 BM-driven 2CI., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Optimal post-remission therapy (PRT) for intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia remains an area of ongoing research. We aimed to retrospectively compare outcomes following autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) with allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) and consolidation chemotherapy (CMT) in patients with intermediate-risk karyotype AML in first complete remission., Patients and Methods: We compared overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) using propensity score (PS)-adjusted analysis of patients receiving PRT with autoSCT, matched sibling (MSD) alloSCT, unrelated/mismatch (UD/MM) alloSCT, and CMT. We included patients diagnosed between 1984 and 2003 (period of autoSCT at our center) in CR1 following induction CMT and received at least 2 consolidative cycles., Results: We identified 190 patients (62 MSD-alloSCT, 18 UD/MM-alloSCT, 30 autoSCT, and 80 CMT). Baseline characteristics were used for PS calculation and were well-balanced after weight adjustment. The median follow-up for patients surviving beyond 1 year was 8.7 years. We excluded 55 patients based on PS calculation. Adjusted multivariate hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-value for OS, considering CMT as reference, were: MSD-alloSCT (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = .009), UD/MM-alloSCT (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.6-3.9; P = .363), and autoSCT (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1; P = .666), respectively. Adjusted multivariate HR, 95% CI and P-value for LFS were MSD-alloSCT (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < .001), UD/MM-alloSCT (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-2.7; P = .854), and autoSCT (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-2.2; P = .697), respectively., Conclusion: Patients with intermediate risk-karyotype acute myeloid leukemia who underwent MSD-alloSCT in first complete remission had the best outcomes. There were no survival differences between autoSCT, UD/MM-alloSCT, and CMT. Further study incorporating molecular changes and minimal residual disease status is warranted to select appropriate patients for autoSCT., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to describe the fate of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who did not achieve an initial remission while being treated on a contemporary cooperative group trial. We analyzed the outcome of patients entered into S0106, a recently reported cooperative group trial for patients with newly diagnosed AML. A total of 589 eligible patients was treated, of whom 150 (25%) did not achieve a remission while on study and were available for further analysis. The 4-year survival rate for the entire cohort of 150 patients was 23%. Among the 64 patients who received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, the 4-year survival rate was 48% compared with 4% for the 86 patients who did not undergo transplantation. Among those transplanted, we could not detect a difference in outcome according to remission status, donor source, type of preparative regimen, or cytogenetic risk category. More than 20% of patients with newly diagnosed AML who fail induction therapy can still be cured, particularly if they are able to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. These results suggest that early HLA typing and donor identification are important components of the initial therapy of AML., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluated the potential benefit of the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to standard induction and postconsolidation therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive daunorubicin (45 mg/m(2) per day on days 1, 2, and 3), cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion on days 1-7), and GO (6 mg/m(2) on day 4; DA+GO) vs standard induction therapy with daunorubicin (60 mg/m(2) per day on days 1, 2, and 3) and cytarabine alone (DA). Patients who achieved complete remission (CR) received 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine. Those remaining in CR after consolidation were randomly assigned to receive either no additional therapy or 3 doses of GO (5 mg/m(2) every 28 days). From August 2004 until August 2009, 637 patients were registered for induction. The CR rate was 69% for DA+GO and 70% for DA (P = .59). Among those who achieved a CR, the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 43% in the DA+GO group and 42% in the DA group (P = .40). The 5-year overall survival rate was 46% in the DA+GO group and 50% in the DA group (P = .85). One hundred seventy-four patients in CR after consolidation underwent the postconsolidation randomization. Disease-free survival was not improved with postconsolidation GO (HR, 1.48; P = .97). In this study, the addition of GO to induction or postconsolidation therapy failed to show improvement in CR rate, disease-free survival, or overall survival.

Acute myelogenous leukemia with t(8;21) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity in which the malignant myeloblasts display a characteristic pattern of surface antigen expression. Quantitative analysis of surface marker expression in patients with this chromosomal abnormality compared to acute myelogenous leukemia patients with a different karyotype has not been reported. From 305 consecutive newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia patients underwent immunophenotyping and cytogenetic analysis at our center; 16 patients (5.2%) had a t(8;21). Fluorescence intensity values were obtained, using a set of reference microbeads, by conversion of mean channel fluorescence to molecular equivalent of soluble fluorochrome. Patients with t(8;21) displayed higher levels of CD34, HLA-DR and MPO expression (P < 0.001 for each) and lower levels of CD13 (P = 0.03) and CD33 (P = 0.02) expression. In order to study the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of these markers, molecular equivalent of soluble fluorochrome thresholds were statistically determined. The statistically established threshold for each of the individual markers (CD34 > 60.5 x 10(3), HLA-DR > 176.1 x 10(3), MPO > 735.1 x 10(3), CD13 < 24.3 x 10(3) and CD33 < 17.3 x 10(3)) had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 62-92% and a positive predictive value of 7-45%. In multivariate analysis, two quantitative patterns (CD34 > 60.5 x 10(3) and MPO > 176.1 x 10(3); CD33 < 17.3 x 10(3) and MPO > 176.1 x 10(3)) had a sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. These aberrant phenotypic patterns might help identify patients with t(8;21) at diagnosis and could be useful in minimal residual disease monitoring.

Association between certain surface markers and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) has been described. The specificity and the predictive values of these markers have never been assessed. In this study, we aimed, to explore whether a specific pattern could predict for this translocation. Of 405 consecutive AML, 18 (4.4%) had the t(8;21). Patients with this cytogenetic abnormality showed higher frequency of CD34 (P = 0.003), HLA-DR (P = 0.03), Tdt (P = 0.02), CD19 (P < 0.0001), and CD56 (P < 0.0001) and lower CD33 (P = 0.0001). Taken singly, the sensitivity of these markers for AML with t(8;21) ranged between 39 and 100% with CD34+ having the highest and CD33- having the lowest and the positive predictive values (PPV) ranged between 5 and 21% with CD19+ having the highest and HLA-DR+ having the lowest. When combinations of different markers were analyzed by multivariate analysis, the pattern CD34+/HLA-DR+/MPO+ was found to have the highest sensitivity (100%) with a PPV of 14% and the pattern CD34+/CD19+/CD56+ had the highest PPV (100%) with a sensitivity of 67%. We conclude that AML with t(8;21) is better identified by a combination of markers than by a single antigen pattern, the absence of CD34+, HLA-DR+ or MPO+ would preclude and the expression of the pattern CD34+/CD19+/CD56+ is highly predictive and could serve as a screening criteria for the t(8;21).