Search

Predictors for response to intensive therapy in AML have focused on baseline factors: percent leukemic blasts in marrow, cytogenetic/molecular genetic abnormalities, and presence of secondary AML. Non-baseline dynamic factors, occurring after induction but before response, may be useful for decisions related to salvage chemotherapy. We hypothesized white blood cell (WBC) count nadir after induction may be a real time indicator of treatment efficacy. We also examined whether time to stem cell transplant (SCT) or baseline molecular genetic abnormalities are associated with a low nadir. Data showed WBC nadir = 0 was a negative predictor for response to intensive induction and was correlated with reduced overall survival and progression free survival. Patients with WBC nadir = 0 did not have a significantly longer time to SCT, and none of the mutations increased the likelihood of reaching WBC nadir = 0. WBC nadir may be a useful real-time monitor in AML patients receiving intensive induction chemotherapy.

Venetoclax with azacitidine (ven/aza) is a lower-intensity therapeutic regimen that has been shown to improve outcomes in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Measurable residual disease (MRD) using flow cytometry is a valuable tool for the prediction of relapse in AML using conventional therapies and ven/aza; however, the prognostic value for broadscale molecular MRD after ven/aza treatment is less clear. We aimed to determine the utility of retrospective assessment using multi-gene molecular MRD by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). We found this approach correlates with outcomes in a cohort of patients receiving frontline ven/aza for AML. The predictive value of ddPCR MRD persisted when NPM1 mutations were removed from analysis, as well as after adjustment for the impact of stem cell transplant on outcomes. Late achievement of MRD negativity, including after SCT, was still associated with superior outcomes compared to persistently detectable MRD. We further explored the impact of ven/aza on the burden of different classes of mutations, and identified the persistence of splicing factor mutations, commonly associated with MDS, as a consistent finding after ven/aza treatment. These data add to our understanding of the effects of ven/aza on AML disease biology and provide details on molecular depth of remission that can guide prospective trials in the future.

Venetoclax+azacitidine is the standard of care for newly-diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom intensive chemotherapy is inappropriate. Efforts to optimize this regimen are necessary. We designed a clinical trial to investigate two hypotheses: i) higher doses of venetoclax are tolerable and more effective, and ii) azacitidine can be discontinued after deep remissions. Forty-two newly diagnosed AML patients were enrolled in the investigator-initiated High Dose Discontinuation Azacitidine+Venetoclax (HiDDAV) Study (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03466294). Patients received one to three "induction" cycles of venetoclax 600 mg daily with azacitidine. Responders received MRD-positive or MRDnegative "maintenance" arms: azacitidine with 400 mg venetoclax or 400 mg venetoclax alone, respectively. The toxicity profile of HiDDAV was similar to 400 mg venetoclax. The overall response rate was 66.7%; the duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival were 12.9, 7.8 and 9.8 months, respectively. The MRD negativity rate was 64.3% by flow cytometry and 25.0% when also measured by droplet digital polymerase chain recation. MRD-negative patients by flow cytometry had improved DOR and EFS; more stringent measures of MRD negativity were not associated with improved OS, DOR or EFS. Using MRD to guide azacitidine discontinuation did not lead to improved DOR, EFS or OS compared to patients who discontinued azacitidine without MRD guidance. Within the context of this study design, venetoclax doses >400 mg with azacitidine were well tolerated but not associated with discernible clinical improvement, and MRD may not assist in recommendations to discontinue azacitidine. Other strategies to optimize, and for some patients, de-intensify, venetoclax+azacitidine regimens are needed.

Relapse is the most common cause of mortality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Post-SCT maintenance strategies that prevent relapse are desirable but must be well tolerated and convenient to administer. We hypothesized single agent venetoclax (ven) may be an effective maintenance therapy among high relapse risk patients. Between February 2019 and December 2021, we administered post-SCT ven maintenance to 49 AML patients at high-risk for relapse as a prospectively defined off-label practice at our institution. Ven was planned to be administered until 1-year post-SCT. While temporary interruptions were common (67.3% of all patients), of those with >1 year follow up, 22/25 (88%) completed the full year of planned therapy. Cytopenias (40.8%) and gastrointestinal adverse events (34.7%) were the most common toxicities. At 1-year post-SCT, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 70% and 67% respectively. Our experience demonstrates single agent ven is a safe, tolerable, and feasible maintenance therapy that may improve RFS and OS in high relapse risk post-SCT patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative approach for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse is a common occurrence. Several strategies, such as choice of conditioning regimen, donor lymphocyte infusions, pharmacologic agents, and cellular therapy approaches, are currently being developed to improve transplantation outcomes. This review outlines some important interventions and considerations to lower the burden of post-transplantation relapse in AML., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No financial relationships to report., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) after a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieves a remission from intensive chemotherapy (IC) is given with curative intent. Recently, venetoclax-based regimens have become the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are unfit for IC. If these patients achieve remission, they may also be considered for potentially curative consolidation with SCT. There are limited data comparing outcomes after SCT with these different induction strategies. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate depth of remission before SCT and outcomes after SCT in adults with nonrelapsed/refractory AML receiving pre-SCT therapy with either venetoclax/azacitidine (ven/aza) or IC. This was a retrospective, single-institution analysis of 169 patients receiving SCT in first remission after IC or ven/aza. Patient demographics and AML risk features were collected, as well as pre-SCT measurable residual disease (MRD) assessed by flow cytometry and molecular methods. Relapse, transplantation-related mortality, incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), and death from any cause were also recorded. Descriptive and survival statistics were applied to these data to compare IC and ven/aza groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. We demonstrate that despite differences in baseline factors between these groups, outcomes were similar. Relapse-free and overall survival, as well as cumulative incidences of transplantation-related mortality, relapse, and acute and chronic GVHD were comparable between groups. Exploring survival in younger (<65 years) versus older (≥65 years) patients by treatment group did not alter these results. Finally, although pre-SCT MRD by flow cytometry was significantly predictive of post-SCT relapse and survival in the IC + SCT patients, it was not significantly predictive of relapse and survival in the ven/aza + SCT patients. Although these findings require prospective validation in a larger cohort of patients, they suggest that ven/aza followed by SCT is a reasonable management strategy for transplantation candidates at any age., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The combination of venetoclax (ven) and azacitidine (aza) has resulted in high response rates in the upfront treatment of AML in patients age > 75 and patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Given the poor historical outcomes in patients age ≥ 60 treated with induction chemotherapy, ven/aza has become our institutional preference for the initial treatment of non-core binding factor (CBF) AML patients age ≥ 60. The benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in patients who achieve response to ven/aza is uncertain. We report outcomes of SCT-eligible patients treated at our center. Between 1/2015 and 1/2020, 119 newly diagnosed non-CBF AML patients age ≥ 60 received ven/aza as initial therapy. 21 patients underwent SCT; 31 additional patients were potentially SCT eligible but deferred SCT. Overall survival (OS) was significantly greater among SCT patients (median survival not reached) versus potentially SCT eligible patients not undergoing SCT (median 518 days) (p = 0.01). Our data suggest that ven/aza followed by SCT in newly diagnosed AML patients older than ≥ 60 results in excellent outcomes and likely improves outcomes over maintenance therapy. Ongoing investigation will further refine the optimal timing of and selection of patients for SCT based on prognostic disease features and response assessments., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Venetoclax (ven) plus azacitidine (aza) is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC). Some patients who are IC candidates instead receive ven/aza. We retrospectively analyzed patients with newly diagnosed AML who received ven/aza (n = 143) or IC (n = 149) to compare outcomes, seek variables that could predict response to 1 therapy or the other, and ascertain whether treatment recommendations could be refined. The response rates were 76.9% for ven/aza and 70.5% for IC. The median overall survival (OS) was 884 days for IC compared with 483 days for ven/aza (P = .0020). A propensity-matched cohort was used to compare outcomes in the setting of equivalent baseline variables, and when matched for age, biological risk, and transplantation, the median OS was 705 days for IC compared with not reached for ven/aza (P = .0667). Variables that favored response to ven/aza over IC included older age, secondary AML, and RUNX1 mutations. AML M5 favored response to IC over ven/aza. In the propensity-matched cohort analyzing OS, older age, adverse risk, and RUNX1 mutations favored ven/aza over IC, whereas intermediate risk favored IC over ven/aza. In conclusion, patients receiving IC have improved OS compared with those receiving ven/aza. However, in a propensity-matched cohort of patients with equivalent baseline factors, there was a trend toward favorable OS for ven/aza. Specific variables, such as RUNX1 mutations, reported here for the first time, can be identified that favor ven/aza or IC, helping to guide treatment decisions for patients who may be eligible candidates for either therapy., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Widely-used response criteria, conditional upon count recovery, were developed for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the context of intensive chemotherapy (IC). Extending these definitions to continuously-administered venetoclax-based therapies might underestimate responses. Best practices for venetoclax-based therapies mandate interruption after an end-of-cycle 1 bone marrow biopsy shows morphologic remission with cytopenias. We analyzed 435 patients with newly-diagnosed AML and follow-up response assessments. Of the 101 who responded to venetoclax + azacitidine, overall survival for patients whose response was upgraded due to count recovery during a 14-day post-disease assessment period, from complete remission (CR) with incomplete recovery of blood counts to CR, was not different compared to patients who did not need the 14-day period for count recovery. These results were distinct from 138 IC patients. Although sample sizes for the comparison groups were small, and conclusions are exploratory and must be verified, these findings support consideration of new response criteria for venetoclax-based regimens.

Background: A 30-year-old man underwent double umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with reduced intensity conditioning. The cords had identical HLA types and were each a 5/6 match to the patient. Following transplantation, cord 2 initially dominated all tested cell populations. At day +306, we observed an unusual reversal of dominance chimerism pattern in which cord 1 instead dominated all tested populations., Study Design & Methods: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based short tandem repeat (STR) assays were performed on the peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. The white blood cell (WBC) populations from the peripheral blood were manipulated for testing to create subpopulations enriched for CD3, CD33, and CD56., Results: Chimerism studies on day +77 showed the following: cord 1: 44%-CD3; 0%-CD33; 16%-CD56; cord 2: 56%-CD3; 100%-CD33; 84%-CD56. Cord 2 initially dominated in all tested cell populations. Chimerism studies performed on post-transplantation day +306 uncovered a reversal of dominance chimerism pattern in which cord 1 now dominated in all cell populations (cord 1: 82%-CD3; >95%-CD33; 67%-CD56; cord 2: 18%-CD3; <5%-CD33; 33%-CD56). Between days +127 and  +244, the patient's blood type shifted from B Rh-positive to A Rh-negative., Conclusion: The change in the patient's blood type identified a late reversal of dominance chimerism pattern. This is a rare occurrence, previously cited only once, which is inconsistent with published data that early high CD3 counts and unseparated bone marrow chimerism predominance at day +100 predict long-term cord dominance in double UCBT in the vast majority of cases., (© 2021 AABB.)

Venetoclax-based therapy can induce responses in approximately 70% of older previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, up-front resistance as well as relapse following initial response demonstrates the need for a deeper understanding of resistance mechanisms. In the present study, we report that responses to venetoclax +azacitidine in patients with AML correlate closely with developmental stage, where phenotypically primitive AML is sensitive, but monocytic AML is more resistant. Mechanistically, resistant monocytic AML has a distinct transcriptomic profile, loses expression of venetoclax target BCL2, and relies on MCL1 to mediate oxidative phosphorylation and survival. This differential sensitivity drives a selective process in patients which favors the outgrowth of monocytic subpopulations at relapse. Based on these findings, we conclude that resistance to venetoclax + azacitidine can arise due to biological properties intrinsic to monocytic differentiation. We propose that optimal AML therapies should be designed so as to independently target AML subclones that may arise at differing stages of pathogenesis. SIGNIFICANCE: Identifying characteristics of patients who respond poorly to venetoclax-based therapy and devising alternative therapeutic strategies for such patients are important topics in AML. We show that venetoclax resistance can arise due to intrinsic molecular/metabolic properties of monocytic AML cells and that such properties can potentially be targeted with alternative strategies., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose of Review: Since its approval in November 2018, venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent backbone has shown promising efficacy for older, newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are unfit for standard intensive induction chemotherapy. This regimen is well tolerated, allows for deep and durable responses and may be increasing the prevalence of the disease. Although there is justifiable excitement, it remains to be seen to what extent venetoclax-based regimens, as they are currently administered, will have a long-term impact on the treatment of AML. This review aims to evaluate the strengths of the regimen that deserve enthusiasm as well as its shortcomings, which should be viewed as opportunities for improvement., Recent Findings: The clinical efficacy as well as the novel mechanism of venetoclax with hypomethylating agents will be described here., Summary: Venetoclax with hypomethylating agents do not represent the holy grail for AML, but this regimen is a promising step in the right direction, and proof of principle that a low-intensity therapy can have a major impact on this disease.

Venetoclax is approved for older untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Venetoclax was available prior to approval off-label. We assessed our single-institution off-label experience with venetoclax/azacitidine, comparing outcomes with a clinical trial cohort that administered this regimen at the same institution. Thirty-three untreated AML patients unfit or unwilling to receive induction chemotherapy and prescribed venetoclax/azacitidine off-trial were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 33 patients who received the same therapy on trial. Outcomes were compared, and comparisons were made to a theoretical scenario in which off-trial patients received induction. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction evaluated measurable residual disease (MRD). Off-trial venetoclax was attainable in nearly all patients for whom this was desired. The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery rate was 63.3% for off-trial patients who received treatment and 84.9% for trial patients (P = .081). The median overall survival for off-trial patients who received treatment was 381 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 174, not reached) vs 880 days (95% CI, 384, not reached) for trial patients (P = .041). Prior exposure to hypomethylating agents was associated with worse outcomes. Response rates with venetoclax/azacitidine were not inferior to a theoretical scenario in which patients received induction, and early death rates were less than expected with induction. MRD negativity was achievable. Newly diagnosed AML patients treated in a "real-world" scenario with off-trial venetoclax/azacitidine had inferior outcomes compared with patients treated in the setting of a clinical trial. Additionally, this therapy may be as effective, and less toxic, when compared with induction chemotherapy., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have limited treatment options. Genomically-defined personalized therapies are only applicable for a minority of patients. Therapies without identifiable targets can be effective but patient selection is challenging. The sequential combination of azacitidine with high-dose lenalidomide has shown activity; we aimed to determine the efficacy of this genomically-agnostic regimen in patients with R/R AML, with the intention of applying sophisticated methods to predict responders., Methods: Thirty-seven R/R AML/myelodysplastic syndrome patients were enrolled in a phase 2 study of azacitidine with lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate. A computational biological modeling (CBM) approach was applied retrospectively to predict outcomes based on the understood mechanisms of azacitidine and lenalidomide in the setting of each patients' disease., Findings: Four of 37 patients (11%) had a CR/CRi; the study failed to meet the alternative hypothesis. Significant toxicity was observed in some cases, with three treatment-related deaths and a 30-day mortality rate of 14%. However, the CBM method predicted responses in 83% of evaluable patients, with a positive and negative predictive value of 80% and 89%, respectively., Interpretation: Sequential azacitidine and high-dose lenalidomide is effective in a minority of R/R AML patients; it may be possible to predict responders at the time of diagnosis using a CBM approach. More efforts to predict responses in non-targeted therapies should be made, to spare toxicity in patients unlikely to respond and maximize treatments for those with limited options., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults. Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) drive the initiation and perpetuation of AML, are quantifiably associated with worse clinical outcomes, and often persist after conventional chemotherapy resulting in relapse 1-5 . In this report, we show that treatment of older patients with AML with the B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax in combination with azacitidine results in deep and durable remissions and is superior to conventional treatments. We hypothesized that these promising clinical results were due to targeting LSCs. Analysis of LSCs from patients undergoing treatment with venetoclax + azacitidine showed disruption of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle manifested by decreased α-ketoglutarate and increased succinate levels, suggesting inhibition of electron transport chain complex II. In vitro modeling confirmed inhibition of complex II via reduced glutathionylation of succinate dehydrogenase. These metabolic perturbations suppress oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which efficiently and selectively targets LSCs. Our findings show for the first time that a therapeutic intervention can eradicate LSCs in patients with AML by disrupting the metabolic machinery driving energy metabolism, resulting in promising clinical activity in a patient population with historically poor outcomes.

Although multidrug approaches to cancer therapy are common, few strategies are based on rigorous scientific principles. Rather, drug combinations are largely dictated by empirical or clinical parameters. In the present study we developed a strategy for rational design of a regimen that selectively targets human acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) stem cells. As a starting point, we used parthenolide, an agent shown to target critical mechanisms of redox balance in primary AML cells. Next, using proteomic, genomic, and metabolomic methods, we determined that treatment with parthenolide leads to induction of compensatory mechanisms that include up-regulated NADPH production via the pentose phosphate pathway as well as activation of the Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response pathway. Using this knowledge we identified 2-deoxyglucose and temsirolimus as agents that can be added to a parthenolide regimen as a means to inhibit such compensatory events and thereby further enhance eradication of AML cells. We demonstrate that the parthenolide, 2-deoxyglucose, temsirolimus (termed PDT) regimen is a potent means of targeting AML stem cells but has little to no effect on normal stem cells. Taken together our findings illustrate a comprehensive approach to designing combination anticancer drug regimens., (© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

Despite an increasingly rich understanding of its pathogenesis, acute myeloid leukemia remains a disease with poor outcomes, overwhelmingly due to disease relapse. In recent years, work to characterize the leukemia stem cell population, the disease compartment most difficult to eliminate with conventional therapy and most responsible for relapse, has been undertaken. This, in conjunction with advances in drug development that have allowed for increasingly targeted therapies to be engineered, raises the hope that we are entering an era in which the leukemia stem cell population can be eliminated, resulting in therapeutic cures for acute myeloid leukemia patients. For these therapies to become available, they must be tested in the setting of clinical trials. A long-established clinical trials infrastructure has been employed to shepherd new therapies from proof-of-concept to approval. However, due to the unique features of leukemia stem cells, drugs that are designed to specifically eliminate this population may not be adequately tested when applied to this model. Therefore, in this review article, we seek to identify the relevant features of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells for clinical trialists, discuss potential strategies to target leukemia stem cells, and propose a set of guidelines outlining the necessary elements of clinical trials to allow for the successful testing of stem cell-directed therapies., (Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.)