Search

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues, namely, "Figure it Out" in the October 17, 2012 issue, an article featuring an interview with Elizabeth Truss in the November 12, 2012 issue, and an article by Nancy Stewart on the work of childcare practitioners in the November 12-25, 2012 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Learning and Development" in the December 13, 2011- January 9, 2012 issue, the British government response to the phonics test published online on December 8, 2011 and the British government's consultation on the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including one on the quality of teachers and teaching as the most important factor in determining how well children perform in the November 25, 2010 issue, one on the serious case review conducted by Plymouth Safeguarding Children Board and the possible consequences of its criticism of the inspection regime, and one on the 1,000 British pound donation received by Family Action in the November 25, 2010 issue.

Two letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Scrap EYES and Devolve Sure Start, Says Think-Tank," in the June 17, 2010 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Job of the Week," in the May 13, 2010 issue, "To the Point," in the October 15, 2009 issue, and another on sick pay in the April 8, 2010 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented which include a reader's letter that points out possible flaws in the proposed Level 3 Diploma for the Children and Young People's Workforce to be enacted in September 2010, and another one in response to an article on the alleged successes of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) in the October 15, 2009 issue.

Two letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including one about the Early Years Foundation Stage Framework and another on molluscum contagiosum.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including issues surrounding "Britain's Forgotten Children," recommendation of Sir Jim Rose to start school in September of the academic year, and the relationship between a volunteer mentor and a young person in the April 23-29, 2009 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including one about the early childhood education program of Open Eye group, and another one about the effect of screen technology on the behavior of children.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "The Minister's View" in the January 8, 2009 issue, one on cases of measles in children and another on the use of television in nurseries.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles which appeared in the September, 26 2008 issue including "Foundation stage targets set two years ahead are 'nonsense,'" "Watchdog savages testing regime," and "Phonics fails dyslexics, says head."

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Scrap Rules for Teachers to Lead EYFS," in the August 14, 2008 issue, and two other responses to the call of the union Voice for the Government to scrap the requirement to have nursery teachers be leading the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS).

The article presents letters to the editor regarding education in Great Britain and in response to previous topics in the publication, including reader's responses to the articles "Why Prince Charles is abusing his position," a commentary by Peter Wilby, "Governors in mass walkout over biting boy," and "Adviser says his ideas have been 'perverted'," by William Stewart, all from the November 23, 2007 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Ofsted's first 'dawn raid': the verdict," in the March 20, 2009 issue, "Universities to sponsor 14-19 vocational academies," in the March 13, 2009 issue and "When's their number up?" in the March 20, 2009 issue.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to the articles published in previous issues including "Primary Fails in High Court Bid to Overturn Ruling on ADHD Exclusion" in the July 31, 2009 issue, "Get the Right People on the Bus, Get Them in the Right Seats and Very Quickly Get The Wrong People Off the Bus" in the July 24, 2009 issue, and "Nursery Jobs Under Threat As Schools Remain Oblivious to Funding Switch" in the July 24, 2009 issue.

The article presents letters to the editor in response to previous topics, including "Teachers told 'boycott interviews by pupils'," and Sarah Wernham's article on learning through play, both from the May 25, 2007 issue, and John Cattermole's article on the cost of taking a summer vacation from the same issue.