Search

Purpose: To compare intraindividual monocular visual performance of a monofocal extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and a trifocal EDOF intraocular lens (IOL) following bilateral cataract surgery., Design: Single-center, prospective, fellow-eye comparison clinical trial., Methods: All patients received uneventful bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL in the dominant eye and the trifocal EDOF FineVision Triumf IOL in the nondominant eye. Intraindividual monocular comparison included visual acuity at various distances, defocus curves, internal total higher-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration (SA) Z(4.0), IOL decentration, and tilt. Additionally, subjective outcomes were evaluated using Halo and Glare simulation and the Seven-Item Visual-Functioning Index questionnaire., Results: In total, 25 patients (50 eyes) were included. Intraindividual monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity, and best-corrected near visual acuity were comparable (P > .05). However, monocular contrast acuity (P = .019), distance-corrected near visual acuity (P < .001), and defocus curves at defocus levels of 0.0 D (P = .005) and between -1.5 and -4.0 D (P < .001) differed significantly. At 5 mm, internal HOA and SA Z(4.0) were significantly different (P < .001) and comparable at 3-mm pupil diameter, as were IOL tilt and decentration (P > .05)., Conclusion: In this combined fellow-eye comparison, near vision was significantly better with the trifocal EDOF IOL. The monofocal EDOF IOL demonstrated similar distance and intermediate visual performance as the trifocal EDOF IOL. Overall, low values of photic phenomena and visual impairment were observed., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare intraindividual differences in visual performance of a monofocal and enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) of the same platform., Design: Prospective, interventional, fellow-eye comparison clinical study., Methods: In total, 55 patients (110 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. All patients received a monofocal ZCB00 IOL in the dominant and an enhanced monofocal Eyhance ICB00 IOL in the nondominant eye. After 2 to 4 months, monocular best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), contrast visual acuity, monocular defocus curves, internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations (SA), decentration, and tilt were compared., Results: The monocular mean BCDVA, DCIVA at 80 cm and 66 cm, and DCNVA were -0.03 ± 0.07, 0.24 ± 0.12, 0.32 ± 0.13, and 0.50 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for the enhanced ICB00 and -0.06 ± 0.06 (P = .014), 0.30 ± 0.11 (P = .005), 0.38 ± 0.12 (P = .004), and 0.55 ± 0.14 (P = .034) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for the ZCB00, respectively. Internal HOAs (P = .001) and negative SA (P < .001) were increased with the ICB00 at 3 mm and comparable at 5 mm (P > .05). Contrast acuity, tilt, and decentration were similar (P > .05)., Conclusions: Significantly increased monocular DCIVA at 80 cm and 66 cm and DCNVA at 40 cm were observed with the enhanced ICB00 IOL, and the ZCB00 IOL demonstrated better BCDVA. This would result in a mean gain of 2 to 3 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at near and intermediate distance. Monocular defocus curves displayed highest differences of 5 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at -1.25 diopters (D) and -1.50 D levels of defocus and a depth of focus of 1.23 D for the ICB00 IOL and 0.94 D for the ZCB00 IOL. Decentration, tilt, and HOAs were generally low., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a capsular tension ring (CTR) on rotational stability, decentration, tilt, and axial stability of an 11.0-mm plate haptic intraocular lens (IOL)., Design: Intraindividual, randomized, double-masked, controlled clinical trial., Participants: Patients scheduled for sequential same-day bilateral cataract surgery., Methods: All patients were randomized to receive a CTR and a plate haptic IOL in one eye and a plate haptic IOL in the fellow eye only. Intraocular lens axis assessment was performed at the end of surgery, 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months using a high-precision evaluation method. Decentration and tilt of the crystalline and pseudophakic lenses were assessed before surgery and at 1 week and 6 months using an anterior segment OCT., Main Outcome Measures: Rotational stability from the end of surgery to 6 months and at all follow-up visits, decentration and tilt at 6 months, and differences in axial shift between 1 week and 6 months., Results: One hundred thirty eyes of 65 patients were included in the study. Absolute rotation from the end of surgery to 6 months was 2.8 ± 3.9° and 3.2 ± 5.3° for the CTR and control groups, respectively (P = 0.613). Intraocular lens decentration and IOL tilt at 6 months were 0.29 ± 0.1 mm and 0.24 ± 0.1 mm and 6.7 ± 2.8° and 5.6 ± 1.6° for the CTR and control groups, respectively (P = 0.058; P < 0.01). A posterior IOL shift of 0.31 ± 0.31 mm and 0.19 ± 0.14 mm was observed in the CTR and control groups, respectively., Conclusions: Concomitant implantation of a CTR and a plate haptic IOL did not improve the overall rotational stability of the IOL compared with the control group. Against expectations, higher values of decentration, tilt, and axial shift were observed in the CTR group. The simultaneous use of a CTR and a plate haptic IOL in the absence of zonular weakness at the time of cataract surgery should be considered with caution., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess intra-individually visual acuity (VA) and subjective outcome after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF IOL and a diffractive trifocal IOL., Methods: The monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL was implanted in the dominant eye and the trifocal FineVision HP IOL in the non-dominant eye. Postoperative evaluation included VA at various distances, contrast acuity, monocular defocus curves, decentration and tilt, wavefront aberrometry, VF-7 questionnaire and a halo and glare simulator., Results: 50 eyes of 25 subjects were enroled. The trifocal IOL performed better at monocular DCNVA (p < 0.01) and at defocus levels of -1.5D to -4.0D (p < 0.01), the monofocal EDOF IOL was better at -0.5D (p = 0.013). No differences in monocular BCDVA, DCIVA, contrast acuity, decentration or tilt were observed (p > 0.05). Wavefront analysis revealed lower HOAs in the trifocal group at 5 mm (p < 0.01) and no difference (p = 0.107) at 3 mm pupil aperture. The monofocal EDOF IOL displayed increased negative SA at 5 mm (p < 0.01) and 3 mm (p < 0.01) pupil diameter. Low values of optical phenomena and satisfying results of the VF-7 questionnaire were obtained., Conclusion: Excellent visual performance and low rates of optical phenomena were achieved after mix-and-match implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL and the trifocal FineVision HP IOL. Trifocal IOL implantation in the non-dominant eye may decrease optical disturbing phenomena. Similar results were observed for monocular distance, intermediate and contrast VA. The trifocal IOL provided better monocular near VA. Decentration and tilt and HOAs were low., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.)

Background: We evaluated whether the best-fit intraocular lens (IOL) power formula for the first operated eye (BF1) was also the most accurate formula for the second eye., Methods: This was a retrospective study of 152 patients who underwent uncomplicated delayed bilateral cataract surgery with a minimum delay of 3 weeks using only one 1-piece IOL (HOYA, Vivinex) at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Seven different formulae (Barrett Universal II, Castrop, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T) were investigated to test the formula selection approach with regard to the calculated mean and median absolute prediction errors (MAE/MedAE)., Results: The mean intraindividual difference in axial length was 0.2 mm (±0.3 mm). BF1 coincided with the best-fit formula for the second eye (BF2) in 56% of patients (p < 0.05). Using BF1 for the second eye led to a lower MedAE (0.22 dioptre, D) than using a formula at random (0.33 D) and was less accurate than using the best-fit formula for each eye separately (0.1 D). The MedAEs of all formulae were generally low, ranging from 0.28 to 0.35 D., Conclusion: Using BF1 for the second eye led to a lower MedAE than the random selection of a formula. Therefore, BF1 can be used for the second eye if the surgeon is unsure of the choice of formula., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: To evaluate rotational stability, decentration and tilt of the monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) Nanex (NC1-SP; HOYA Surgical Optics)., Design: Prospective interventional case series., Methods: The study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna. The study population comprised 130 eyes of 68 patients with age-related cataract who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of a Nanex IOL. Baseline image for rotational stability evaluation was obtained at the end of surgery (EoS) and compared to retroillumination images taken at 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Axis alignment was assessed using nonmovable landmarks on the sclera and the optic-haptic junctions of the IOL. Anterior segment OCT images were performed to evaluate decentration and tilt. The main outcome measure was absolute rotation from EoS to 6 months postoperatively., Results: Median IOL rotation of all eyes from EoS to 6 months was 1.9° (interquartile range 0.1°-37.5°). Ten eyes (9.71%) rotated more than 5° and 2 eyes (1.94%), more than 10°. IOL rotation did not correlate with axial eye length (Spearman r = -0.042, P = .46), crystalline lens thickness (Spearman r = 0.134, P = .19), and crystalline lens equatorial diameter (Spearman r = 0.101, P = .325). IOL rotation positively correlated with anterior fibrosis severity (Spearman r = 0.321, P = .002). Preoperative decentration (0.2 ± 0.12 mm) and tilt (5.7 ± 1.6°) did not change significantly after surgery (0.22 ± 0.12 mm and 5.62 ± 1.49°, respectively)., Conclusion: The investigated IOL presented good rotational stability and low decentration and tilt values. Nevertheless, anterior capsule fibrosis development led to a higher tendency of IOL rotation after 1 week., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning model to automatically segment three structures using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): The intraocular lens (IOL), the retrolental space (IOL to the posterior lens capsule) and Berger's space (BS; posterior capsule to the anterior hyaloid membrane)., Methods: An artificial intelligence (AI) approach based on a deep learning model to automatically segment the IOL, the retrolental space, and BS in AS-OCT, was trained using annotations from an experienced clinician. The training, validation and test set consisted of 92 cross-sectional OCT slices, acquired in 47 visits from 41 eyes. Annotations from a second experienced clinician in the test set were additionally evaluated to conduct an inter-reader variability analysis., Results: The AI model achieved a Precision/Recall/Dice score of 0.97/0.90/0.93 for IOL, 0.54/0.65/0.55 for retrolental space, and 0.72/0.58/0.59 for BS. For inter-reader variability, Precision/Recall/Dice values were 0.98/0.98/0.98 for IOL, 0.74/0.59/0.62 for retrolental space, and 0.58/0.57/0.57 for BS. No statistical differences were observed between the automated algorithm and the inter-reader variability for BS segmentation., Conclusion: The deep learning model allows for fully automatic segmentation of all investigated structures, achieving human-level performance in BS segmentation. We, therefore, expect promising applications of the algorithm with particular interest in BS in automated big data analysis and real-time intra-operative support in ophthalmology, particularly in conjunction with primary posterior capsulotomy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery., (© 2022 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A 66-year-old patient underwent surgery for congenital cataract in both eyes in her first year of life without implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). In 1994, at the age of 39 years, both eyes received secondary Kelman multiflex-style angle-fixated anterior chamber IOLs (AC IOLs). The surgeries were followed by retinal detachments in both eyes, in the left eye in the same year and in the right eye 4 years later, which were successfully repaired. The patient presented with a decompensated cornea with epithelial and stromal edema in the left eye. The AC IOL axis was oriented from 5- to 8-o'clock position with the haptic contacting the cornea. The distal portion of the inferior-nasal haptic was deeply buried and entrapped in a broad iridocorneal synechia extending between 6- and 8-o'clock positions. The synechia also caused adjacent pupillary distortion and pigment leaf eversion (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202205000-00021/figure1/v/2022-04-22T173532Z/r/image-tiff). The AC IOL in the right eye was well positioned, and the cornea was clear with an endothelial cell count (ECC) of 2160 cells/mm2 and central corneal thickness (CCT) of 650 μm. No ECC was obtainable in the left eye, and CCT was 775 μm (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202205000-00021/figure2/v/2022-04-22T173532Z/r/image-tiff). Visual acuity was 0.8 corrected in the right eye and hand motion in the left eye. Both eyes were normotonic. On optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, a broad iridocorneal synechia was visible with a canal corresponding to the deeply buried haptic end of the AC IOL (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202205000-00021/figure3/v/2022-04-22T173532Z/r/image-tiff). Abundant condensed cortical material (Soemmerring's ring) was found behind the iris and above the ciliary body. What would be your surgical options to rehabilitate the patient's left eye considering corneal decompensation caused by haptic contact of an angle-fixated AC IOL and capture of 1 haptic within an iridocorneal synechia extending along 2 clock hours?, (Copyright © 2022 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Aims: To provide clinical guidance on the use of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas according to the biometric parameters., Methods: 611 eyes that underwent cataract surgery were retrospectively analysed in subgroups according to the axial length (AL) and corneal power (K). The predicted residual refractive error was calculated and compared to evaluate the accuracy of the following formulas: Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and SRK/T. Furthermore, the percentages of eyes with ≤±0.25, ≤±0.5 and 1 dioptres (D) of the prediction error were recorded., Results: The Haigis formula showed the highest percentage of cases with ≤0.5 D in eyes with a short AL and steep K (90%), average AL and steep cornea (73.2%) but also in long eyes with a flat and average K (65% and 72.7%, respectively). The Hoffer Q formula delivered the lowest median absolute error (MedAE) in short eyes with an average K (0.30 D) and Holladay 1 in short eyes with a steep K (Holladay 1 0.24 D). SRK/T presented the highest percentage of cases with ≤0.5 D in average long eyes with a flat and average K (80.5% and 68.1%, respectively) and the lowest MedAE in long eyes with an average K (0.29 D)., Conclusion: Overall, the Haigis formula shows accurate results in most subgroups. However, attention must be paid to the axial eye length as well as the corneal power when choosing the appropriate formula to calculate an IOL power, especially in eyes with an unusual biometry., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To assess the reliability and reproducibility of a new semiautomated evaluation method, "Rotix," for intraocular lens (IOL) rotation and to define a standardized evaluation method for future toric IOL studies., Design: Reliability and reproducibility study., Methods: Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna., Patient Population: A dataset of 25 patients with 2 consecutive follow-up visits was created to test the intra- and interrater reliability. A data test set of 10 patients including 30 pictures taken 5 minutes apart was created to test the short-term reproducibility., Intervention: Evaluation of IOL rotational stability using nontoric implants in 25 × 2 consecutive follow-up visits. Two experienced graders performed axis evaluation 3 times in a randomized order. One experienced grader performed axis evaluation for the short-term reproducibility study. Reference landmarks at the end of operation were used to assess the IOL axis., Main Outcome Measures: Intra- and interrater reliability and short-term reproducibility of axis measurements., Results: Mean standard deviation for intrarater reliability was 0.16 degrees. The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 for grader 1 and 0.96 for grader 2. A very high interrater correlation of 0.95 was found. The mean individual difference between grader 1 and grader 2 was 0.061 ± 0.28 degrees. Short-term reproducibility showed a mean standard deviation of 0.22 ± 0.14 degrees., Conclusion: The novel semiautomated evaluation method showed an accurate inter- and intrarater reliability. Short-term reproducibility was below 0.25 degrees. The method of using nonmovable reference landmarks showed reliable results and should be used as a standard in future toric IOL studies., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the axis position of the measured total corneal astigmatism (TCA) with the axis of the anterior keratometry and the calculated axis position of different toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators., Methods: A total of 163 astigmatic eyes of 163 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The axis of the actual TCA, measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography, was compared to the anterior keratometric value (Group I) and three different methods of TCA calculation for toric IOL power determination: Abulafia-Koch regression formula (Group II), Barrett Toric Calculator V2.0 (Group III), and Barrett Toric Calculator V2.0 including measured posterior keratometric value (Group IV). Eyes were assigned to three subgroups: with-the-rule, against-the-rule, and oblique astigmatism., Results: The mean deviation calculated from measured TCA was +0.56° (Group I), -0.32° (Group II), -0.37° (Group III), and -1.00° (Group IV). For with-the-rule astigmatism, the TCA axis agreed most with Group I (6.5% outliers > 5° deviation). For against-the-rule astigmatism, Group IV and Group II were closest to the measured TCA axis (1.5% and 3% outliers with > 5° deviation)., Conclusions: The means of the calculated axis were similar to the measured TCA, but the proportion of outliers with an axis deviation of greater than 5° showed remarkable differences. Isolated anterior keratometric value measurements showed the fewest outliers in with-the-rule astigmatism. In against-the-rule astigmatism, Abulafia-Koch calculation should be used for axis determination. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(9):642-647.] .

Background and Purpose: The effect of lens decentration and tilt on retinal image quality has been extensively studied in the past in simulations and clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of combined lens decentration and tilt on the induction of defocus, astigmatism and coma in phakic and pseudophakic eyes., Methods: Simulations were performed with Zemax on the Liou-Brennan schematic model eye. Based on the position of the gradient lens the image plane was determined (best focus). The lens was decentered horizontally from -1.0 mm to 1.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm and tilted with respect to the vertical axis from -10° to 10° in steps of 2° (in total 121 combinations of decentration and tilt). For each combination of decentration and tilt defocus, astigmatism (in 0/180°) and horizontal coma was extracted from wave front error and recorded for a pupil size of 4 mm. After replacement of the gradient lens with an aberration correcting artificial lens implant model with the equatorial plane of the artificial lens aligned to the equatorial plane of the gradient lens, the simulations were repeated for the pseudophakic eye model., Results: For the lens positioned according to the Liou-Brennan schematic model eye the simulation yielded a defocus of 0.026 dpt/-0.001 dpt, astigmatism of -0.045 dpt/-0.018 dpt, and a coma of -0.015 µm/0.047 µm for phakic/pseudophakic eyes. Maximum values were observed for a horizontal decentration of 1.0 mm and a tilt with respect to the vertical axis of 10° with 1.547 dpt/2.982 dpt for defocus, 0.971 dpt/1.871 dpt for astigmatism, and 0.441 µm/1.209 µm for coma. Maximum negative values occurred in phakic/pseudophakic eyes with -0.293 dpt/-1.224 dpt for defocus, for astigmatism -0.625 dpt/-0.663 dpt and for coma -0.491 µm /-0.559 µm, respectively., Conclusion: In this simulation study the effect of a combination of lens decentration in horizontal direction and tilt with respect to the vertical axis on defocus, astigmatism and horizontal coma was analyzed. The results may help to describe in clinical routine if with a decentered or tilted artificial lens implant the postoperative refraction does not match the target refraction or the resulting astigmatism after cataract surgery is not fully explained by measurement of corneal astigmatism., (© 2020. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a straightforward mathematical concept for determination of object to image magnification in both phakic and pseudophakic eyes, based on biometric measures, refractometry and data from an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods: We have developed a strategy for calculating ocular magnification based on axial length measurement, phakic anterior chamber and lens thickness, keratometry and crystalline lens front and back surface curvatures for the phakic eye, and axial length measurement, anterior chamber and lens thickness, keratometry and intraocular lens power, refractive index and shape factor for the pseudophakic eye. Comparing the magnification of both eyes of one individual yields aniseikonia, while comparing the preoperative and postoperative situation of one eye provides the gain or loss in ocular magnification. The applicability of this strategy is shown using a clinical example and a small case series in 78 eyes of 39 patients before and after cataract surgery., Results: For the phakic eye, the refractive index of the crystalline lens was adjusted to balance the optical system. The pseudophakic eye is fully determined and we proposed three strategies for considering a potential mismatch of the data: (A) with spherical equivalent refraction, (B) with intraocular lens power and (C) with the shape factor of the lens. Magnification in the phakic eye was -0.00319 ± 0.00014 and with (A) was -0.00327 ± 0.00013, with (B) was -0.00323 ± 0.00014 and with (C) was -0.00326 ± 0.00013. With A/B/C, the magnification of the pseudophakic eye was on average 2.52 ± 2.83%/1.31 ± 2.84%/2.14 ± 2.80% larger compared with the phakic eye. Magnification changes were within a range of ±10%., Conclusions: On average, ocular magnification does not change greatly after cataract surgery with implantation of an artificial lens, but in some cases, the change could be up to ±10%. If the changes are not consistent between the left and right eyes, then this could lead to post-cataract aniseikonia., (© 2021 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.)

An 89-year-old man had cataract surgery in 2005 in both eyes. At that time, he already had glaucoma that was well regulated with topical therapy and drusen maculopathy with incipient areal atrophy. Fifteen years later, the patient presented with a decrease in visual acuity of his only reading eye, his right eye. Visual acuity 1 year before presentation was reported as 0.5, Jg2 in his right eye, 0.2, Jg15 in his left eye with drusen maculopathy in both eyes, and an atrophic macular scar in the left eye. Slitlamp biomicroscopy showed an inferotemporally decentered and wobbling intraocular lens (IOL)-capsular bag (CB) complex in the right eye, with the bag equator and a capsular tension ring (CTR) visible in a miotic pupil and pseudoexfoliation (PXF) material accumulated along the pupillary margin. The implant specification cards showed an AcrySof MA60BM (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) 18.50 diopters (D) 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL and a 13/11 CTR (Ophtec BV). In the left eye, the IOL was well centered and stable. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 38 mm Hg in the right eye and 13 mm Hg in the left eye with full topical therapy. The optic nerve head exhibited an estimated cup-to-disc ratio in the right eye of 0.7 with a contiguous residual rim and no excavation in the left eye. Optical biometry through the CB periphery measured an axial length of 25.50 mm. Keratometric astigmatism was 0.60 D at 45 degrees. Given that the right eye is the only eye with reading capacity and additionally experiences decompensated PXF glaucoma, what would be your surgical options and preferred approach to optically rehabilitate this patient and reduce IOL to normal levels?, (Copyright © 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To assess rotational stability, axial stability, decentration, and tilt of the Rayner RAO800C single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd) from end of surgery to 4 to 7 months postoperatively., Methods: Surgeries were performed at the Department of Ophthalmology at the Medical University of Vienna. A total of 130 eyes of 68 patients received an aspheric hydrophobic Rayner RAO0800C IOL. IOLs were randomly implanted to the 0 ± 10, 45 ± 10, 90 ± 10, or 135 ± 10 degree axis. Baseline measurement was performed with the patient still supine on the operating table. Axis alignment after 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months was evaluated by retroillumination pictures. Postoperative IOL decentration, tilt, and aqueous depth at 4 months were assessed using an anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography., Results: Absolute median IOL rotation from end of surgery to 4 months was 2.4 degrees (range: 0.0 to 85.0 degrees). Median IOL rotation from end of surgery to 1 hour, 1 hour to 1 week, 1 week to 1 month, and 1 month to 4 months was 1.6 (range: 0.0 to 86.2), 1.1 (range: 0.0 to 28.8), 0.6 (range: 0.0 to 5.2), and 0.7 (range: 0.0 to 2.6) degrees. Respective proportions of IOLs rotating more than 5, 10, and 20 degrees from end of surgery to 4 months were 23.9%, 11.0%, and 6.4%. Horizontal and vertical decentration at 4 months was -0.09 ± 0.14 and 0.09 ± 0.14 mm, respectively. Horizontal and vertical tilt at 4 months was -4.78 ± 1.36 and -1.58 ± 1.10 degrees, respectively. A posterior axial shift of 0.052 ± 0.055 mm was observed from 1 week to 4 months., Conclusions: Although median IOL rotation appeared to be low, a significant proportion of IOLs rotated postoperatively. Decentration and tilt values were generally low. A minimal posterior optic shift was observed after 1 week. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):112-118.]., (Copyright 2021, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To compare rotational stability and its influencing factors in 3 different widely used hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) from the end of surgery (EoS) to 4-7 months (6 months) in over 380 eyes., Design: Prospective interventional comparative clinical study., Methods: Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna., Patient Population: A total of 381 eyes of 199 patients with age-related cataract received an IOL Acrysof SN60WF, Tecnis ZCB00, or Envista MX60 in a consecutive order., Intervention: Implantation of an Acrysof, Tecnis, or Envista IOL randomized to the 0 ± 10, 45 ± 10, 90 ± 10, or 135 ± 10° axis in 1 or both eyes. Baseline measurement was performed with patients supine still on the operating table. Postoperative follow-ups were conducted after 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months., Main Outcome Measures: Difference of absolute rotation from the EoS to 6 months., Results: Absolute rotations from the EoS to 6 months were 1.65 ± 2.1, 2.65 ± 4.1, and 3.18 ± 5.8° for the Acrysof, Tecnis, and Envista group, respectively. Rotational stability was statistically significantly superior in the Acrysof compared with the Envista group (P = .014), but not compared with the Tecnis group (P = .10). No significant difference was found between the Tecnis and Envista groups (P = .761). Maximum values of 15.8, 38.6, and 44.9° were observed for the Acrysof, Tecnis, and Envista group, respectively., Conclusion: The Acrysof IOL showed the least amount of absolute rotation compared with the Tecnis and Envista IOLs. Outliers possibly requiring secondary intervention were observed in all groups. The amount of rotation was greatest during the first postoperative hour., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between 2 similar open-loop single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that differ in the proprietary material characteristics and design features, over a period of 3 years., Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison., Methods: Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Patient Population: Eighty patients (160 eyes) had bilateral cataract surgery and received a Vivinex XY1 IOL in 1 eye and an AcrySof SN60WF IOL in the other eye., Observation Procedures: Follow-up examinations were performed 3 years after surgery. Digital retroillumination images were taken of each eye. The amount of PCO (score: 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (AQUA)., Main Outcome Measure: PCO score (scale, 0-10)., Results: The mean objective PCO score of the Vivinex XY1 IOLs was 0.9 ± 0.8 compared to the PCO score of 1.4 ± 1.1 for the AcrySof SN60WF IOLs (P < .001). Three years postoperatively, 11.4% of patients had an Nd:YAG capsulotomy in the Vivinex XY1 eye and 18.6% had a capsulotomy in the AcrySof SN60WF eye (P = .23)., Conclusion: The new hydrophobic acrylic Vivinex XY1 IOL showed significantly lower PCO rates and lower YAG rates compared to the AcrySof SN60WF IOL. The interaction of various factors such as hydrophobic material, smooth optic surface, and sharp posterior optic edge plays a key role in PCO development., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates following implantation of two hydrophobic acrylic IOLs., Methods: In a randomized, controlled trial, 80 patients with bilateral senile cataract were implanted with the hydrophobic acrylic single-piece intraocular Lenses (IOLs) EyeCee One in one eye and iMics1 in the other. Outcomes of 39 patients (78 eyes) were evaluated after 3 years. Automated Quantification of After-Cataract (AQUA; for PCO occurrence), visual acuity, anterior fibrosis, capsule-optic edge interaction and distance between anterior and posterior capsule IOL surface were analysed., Results: After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 1.95 months, Nd:YAG capsulotomy occurred at a rate of 15.4% and 46.2% in the EyeCee One and iMics1 groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Respective mean PCO scores measured by AQUA were 1.57 ± 1.63 and 2.45 ± 1.44 (p = 0.019). A distinct gap between the anterior capsule and the IOL optic was present in 89% of eyes implanted with EyeCee One and 13% of iMics1 eyes. A gap between the posterior capsule and the posterior surface of the lens was observed in 76% of EyeCee One eyes and 35% of iMics1 eyes., Conclusions: Study findings suggest that PCO and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates are significantly lower in eyes implanted with the EyeCee One IOL compared to the iMics1 IOL. Optic sharpness and lens material seem to be the decisive factors, while the stepped edge beneath the haptic junction appeared to be ineffective.

Purpose: To evaluate the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and YAG laser capsulotomy (YAG-LCT) rates with a plate-haptic acrylic micro-incision intraocular lens (IOL) and the impact of primary posterior capsulorhexis., Methods: A total of 97 patients scheduled for immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery underwent a randomized, prospective intraindividual comparison with the ZEISS Asphina 409MV plate-haptic acrylic IOL with the eyes receiving an additional primary posterior capsulorhexis (PPCR) or not. YAG-LCT and PCO rates were evaluated at 1 and 3 years. Three-year PCO rates were calculated with a 3-scenario method for eyes that underwent YAG-LCT between 1 and 3 years., Results: A total of 56 patients were seen at 1 year, and 57 at 3 years. For the eyes without and with PPCR, YAG-LCT rates were 14.3% and 0% at 1 year, and 59.7% and 3.5% at 3 years, respectively. Opacification rates at 1 year were 0.55 ± 0.99 and 0.05 ± 0.21 for the central 2-mm optic zone. A total of 42 patients completed both the 1- and 3-year follow-up. Three-year opacification rates for the group without PPCR were 1.99 ± 2.20, 2.26 ± 2.66 and 3.66 ± 3.61 for the central 2-mm zone and 2.57 ± 2.07, 3.13 ± 3.03 and 4.09 ± 3.34 for the 4.5-mm zone for the best, extrapolated and worst-case scenarios, respectively., Conclusion: The ZEISS Asphina 409MV plate-haptic acrylic IOL exhibited unusually high YAG-LCT and PCO rates with standard in-the-bag implantation. PPCR was safe and effective in preventing central opacification and the need for YAG laser treatment., (© 2019 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Background: To evaluate rotation and its influencing factors of an aspheric one-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) Vivinex XY1 during 6 months after operation., Methods: In this institutional trial, 122 eyes of 66 patients were implanted with a non-toric aspheric IOL Vivinex XY1 (Hoya Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). IOL alignment was assessed at the end of surgery, 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after implantation. Confounding factors such as axial length, presence of anterior fibrosis and randomised implantation in four different intended axes (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°) were evaluated. Decentration and tilt were measured using a Purkinje metre., Results: Assessment of rotational stability was possible for 103 of 122 implanted IOLs 6 months after eye surgery. The median absolute rotation was 1.1° (range: 0°-5°). Rotation was significantly increased within the first hour after operation compared with later time-points (p<0.001). No correlation was found with axial length and rotation (Spearman's r=0.048, p=0.63). No significant difference was observed regarding different implantation axes (p=0.75). Rotation was not influenced by the presence of anterior fibrosis (p=0.98)., Conclusion: Assessing the true IOL position at the end of surgery is crucial for the evaluation of rotational stability of IOLs. No IOL rotation exceeding 5° could be detected 6 months after surgery., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The Vienna IOL Study Group (RM, CL, SS, DS, LS) received unrestricted research grants from Hoya Surgical Optics (Frankfurt am Main, Germany), Bausch+Lomb (Berlin, Germany) and Carl Zeiss Meditec (Jena, Germany)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background The Haigis formula uses a linear regression with three IOL constants for the prediction of the effective lens position (ELP) of the intraocular lens (IOL), ELP ≈ a 0  + a 1  ACD + a 2  L. It is based on the preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (L). Material and Methods Differences between IOL constant triplets can be judged based on their statistical measurement uncertainty. To investigate, if the estimation of the average ELP with the help of the average ACD and average L according to 〈ELP〉 ≈ a 0  + a 1  〈ACD〉 + a 2  〈L〉 provides a possible alternative, we have compared both methods. The results based on two different strategies for optimisation of the IOL constants a 0 , a 1 , a 2 are used for illustration. Results The estimation of the average ELP is suitable for basic categorisation of the IOL constants. The confidence-volumes in shape of ellipsoids based on the statistical measurement uncertainties of the IOL constant optimisations allow a better comparison between IOL constant triplets a 0 , a 1 , a 2 ., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: To evaluate the differences in the incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and visual and optical performance between 2 hydrophobic acrylic single-piece sharp-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) over 3 years., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Design: Prospective randomized case series., Methods: Patients with bilateral cataract were prospectively randomized to receive an Eyecee One IOL (IOL A) or an Acrysof SN60WF IOL (IOL B) and were followed for 36 months. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and IOL decentration and tilt were measured. The PCO was quantified by analysis of standardized retroillumination images., Results: The study comprised 160 eyes of 80 patients. The PCO incidence was low for both IOLs at all follow-up visits. Three years postoperatively, the median objective PCO score was 1.4 (range 0 to 5.6) for IOL A and 1.5 (range 0 to 5.0) for IOL B (P = .67). The neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rate 3 years after surgery was 16.4% and 6.0% (P = .06), respectively. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity outcomes were also comparable at all follow-up visits., Conclusions: Both IOLs showed good capsular bag performance and low PCO rates 3 years after surgery. Both IOLs also showed comparable results for visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, decentration and tilt, PCO score, slitlamp examination, and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates., (Copyright © 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between two microincision intra-ocular lenses (IOLs) 3 years after surgery., Methods: Sixty-five patients randomly received a Y-60H IOL (HOYA Surgical Optics, Singapore) in one eye and a Micro AY IOL (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) in the contralateral eye during same-day bilateral cataract surgery. Eyes were examined 1 week, 20 months and 3 years after surgery. The amount of PCO (score: 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (aqua). Additionally, the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate was noted., Results: Three years postoperatively, the objective PCO score of Y-60H IOLs was 1.9 ± 1.7 compared to PCO score of 1.7 ± 2.2 for the Micro AY IOLs (p = 0.66). Thirty-four percentage of the Y-60H eyes had undergone Nd:YAG capsulotomy, compared to 49% of the Micro AY eyes (p = 0.04). Significantly, more capsular folds were observed in the Y-60H IOL group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity, rhexis/IOL overlap and anterior capsule opacification 3 years after surgery., Conclusion: Both microincision IOLs showed high YAG rates and comparable PCO scores 3 years after surgery. In the light of this unsatisfying PCO performance, the advantage of the present microincision IOLs over conventional IOLs must be questioned., (© 2014 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To compare the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between 2 microincision intraocular lenses (IOLs) 4 years after surgery., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial., Methods: Patients randomly received a Y-60H 3-piece hydrophobic IOL (hydrophobic group) in 1 eye and an MI60 1-piece hydrophilic IOL (hydrophilic group) in the contralateral eye during simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery. Eyes were examined 1 week, 20 months, and 4 years postoperatively. Digital retroilluminated images of each eye were evaluated using Automated Quantification of After-Cataract software. The Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate was recorded., Results: Sixty patients were enrolled. Objective PCO was significantly higher in the hydrophobic group than in the hydrophilic group before capsulotomy 2 years after cataract surgery (mean score 2.1 ± 1.8 (SD) versus 1.2 ± 1.4) (P =.031). At the 4-year follow-up, the hydrophobic group had a statistically significantly higher Nd:YAG rate than the hydrophilic group (77% versus 50%) (P =.012)., Conclusion: Comparison of 2 microincision IOLs indicated a statistically significant difference in PCO and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates, with very high Nd:YAG rates 4 years after surgery., (Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between 2 similar 1-piece foldable hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) over 3 years., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Design: Randomized prospective patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison., Methods: Patients with bilateral age-related cataract had cataract surgery and implantation of a Tecnis ZCB00 continuous-optic-edge IOL in 1 eye and an Acrysof SA60AT interrupted-optic-edge IOL in the other eye. Postoperative examinations were performed at 6 months and 3 years. Digital retroillumination images were taken of each eye. The amount of PCO (score 0 to 10) was assessed subjectively at the slitlamp and objectively using automated image-analysis software., Results: The study comprised 54 patients (108 eyes). The mean objective PCO score was 1.3 ± 1.7 (SD) for the continuous-optic-edge IOLs and 0.9 ± 1.3 for the interrupted-optic-edge IOLs (P=.10). Three years postoperatively, a neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy was performed in 26.1% of eyes with the continuous-optic-edge IOL and 21.7% with the interrupted-optic-edge IOL (P=.56). There was no significant difference in corrected distance visual acuity, capsulorhexis–IOL overlap, capsule folds, or anterior capsule opacification 3 years after surgery., Conclusions: Both IOLs had comparable PCO and Nd:YAG rates 3 years postoperatively. The optimized barrier function of the continuous-optic-edge IOL and the material properties of the interrupted-optic-edge IOL seemingly outbalanced the effect on lens epithelial cell migration and proliferation beneath the optic.

Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) 3 years after implantation of 2 different 1-piece foldable hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs)., Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison., Methods: One hundred patients with bilateral age-related cataract (200 eyes) had standard cataract surgery with implantation of an iMics1 NY-60 IOL (Hoya Corp) in one eye and an AcrySof SN60WF IOL (Alcon Laboratories) in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week and 3 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The main outcome measure was PCO score (scale, 0 to 10) assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (Automated Quantification of After-Cataract) 3 years after surgery., Results: The objective PCO score (mean ± standard deviation) was 3.0 ± 2.0 for the iMics1 NY-60 IOL and 1.9 ± 1.4 for the AcrySof SN60WF IOL (P < .001). Three years after surgery, 35.6% of patients underwent a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy in the iMics1 NY-60 eye and 13.7% underwent a capsulotomy in the AcrySof SN60WF eye (P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity, rhexis-IOL overlap, capsular folds, or anterior capsule opacification. Glistening formations were found in no iMics1 NY-60 IOLs, but in 97% of the AcrySof SN60WF IOLs., Conclusions: Comparison of 2 sharp-edged single-piece IOLs of similar design and hydrophobic acrylic material indicated a statistically significant difference in PCO and neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy rate 3 years after surgery., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess intraocular lens (IOL) shift along the visual axis induced by ciliary muscle contraction with pilocarpine after cataract surgery and to compare primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis (CCC) and posterior optic buttonholing with IOLs implanted in the bag., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Design: Clinical trial., Methods: Eyes with age-related cataract had cataract surgery with implantation of a nonaccommodating IOL (AF-1 YA-60BB). Surgery was performed with primary posterior CCC and posterior buttonholing in 1 eye (study eyes) and with conventional in-the-bag implantation in the contralateral eye (control eyes). After a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, the anterior chamber depth was assessed with partial coherence interferometry before and after application of pilocarpine 2.0% and, after a washout interval of 1 week, before and after the application of cyclopentolate 1.0%., Results: Forty eyes of 20 patients were enrolled. A slight backward shift of the IOL (+78 μm) in study eyes and in control eyes (+118 μm) was detected after pilocarpine application (both P<.05). No significant difference in IOL shift was found between study eyes and control eyes (P=.19)., Conclusions: Combined primary posterior CCC and posterior optic buttonholing did not affect IOL shift during pharmacologically stimulated ciliary muscle contraction compared with in-the-bag implanted IOLs. Capsule fibrosis diminished with primary posterior CCC but did not seem to be the only limiting factor in the accommodative IOL shift., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the rotational stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) rate in eyes with a 1-piece or 3-piece acrylic intraocular lens (IOL)., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Design: Prospective randomized masked clinical trial., Methods: Patients with age-related cataract received a plate-haptic acrylic IOL (Acri.Smart 46S) in 1 eye and a 3-piece loop-haptic acrylic IOL (Acri.Lyc 53N) in the other eye. Retroillumination images were taken 1 hour, 1 week, and 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Intraocular lens rotation was measured using standard software (Adobe Photoshop). The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slitlamp and objectively using an automated image-analysis software (AQUA)., Results: The study enrolled 80 eyes of 40 patients. The IOL rotation measurements showed excellent reproducibility, with a deviation of less than 0.8 degrees. Both IOLs had comparable and good rotational stability; rotation was less than 4 degrees in 71% of eyes 1 year postoperatively. The mean absolute rotation was 2.6 degrees ± 1.9 (SD) in the plate-haptic IOL group and 3.1 ± 2.4 degrees in the loop-haptic IOL group. The mean AQUA PCO score (scale 0 to 10) was 0.4 in both IOL groups (P = .7)., Conclusion: The 2 IOL models had comparable, excellent rotational stability and low PCO intensity 1 year postoperatively. Thus, the plate-haptic IOL may be a good platform for a toric model., (Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between 2 three-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) both with sharp-optic edges and open loop haptics, one made of silicone and the other made of hydrophobic acrylate, 6 years after surgery., Design: Randomized, controlled, patient- and examiner-masked trial with intra-patient comparison., Methods: One hundred and six eyes in 53 patients were included initially. Forty-four eyes of 22 patients with age-related bilateral cataract were available for the 6 years follow-up. Each patient had standard cataract surgery and randomly received a silicone (CeeOn 911A; AMO, Santa Ana, California, USA) or hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof MA60BM; Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) IOL in the first eye, the other type of IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1, 3, and 6 years after surgery. The intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was assessed using digital retro-illuminated photos and the "automated quantification of after-cataract" (AQUA) software. Neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet-laser capsulotomies (YAG-LC) performed were noted., Results: Six years after surgery, the AQUA scores were 2.3 +/- 1.4 for the silicone and 3.8 +/- 2.0 for the acrylic IOLs (P = .0016). The acrylic IOL eyes also had a significant increase in AQUA score from the 3-year to the 6-year follow-up. YAG-LC were performed in 2 silicone and 6 acrylic IOLs (P = .01)., Conclusions: An angulated three-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL had more PCO 6 years after surgery than a silicone IOL of otherwise similar design. Apart from an optic material effect, differences in haptic design and the degree of optic edge sharpness may play a role.

Purpose: To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy rates 10 years after surgery between two 3-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs): a silicone IOL with round optic edges and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL with sharp optic edges., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria., Methods: Patients having had cataract surgery and implantation of at least 1 study IOL by the same surgeon between 1994 and 1999 were retrospectively examined. The number of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomies performed was noted. The PCO intensity was assessed using digital retroilluminated photographs and Automated Quantification of After-Cataract (AQUA) software. The AQUA scores in eyes with Nd:YAG capsulotomy were estimated with a multiple-imputation procedure. Anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and fibrotic PCO were graded subjectively at the slitlamp., Results: The study evaluated 143 eyes (98 patients). Eight (18%) of 44 eyes with a silicone IOL and 41 (42%) of 99 eyes with an acrylic IOL had Nd:YAG capsulotomy after 10 years (P = .007). The AQUA scores were lower with the silicone IOLs. The median difference in AQUA scores was significantly different after missing values of the Nd:YAG capsulotomies were imputed. There was no difference in ACO. There was more fibrotic PCO with round-edged silicone IOLs than with sharp-edged acrylic IOLs., Conclusions: Ten years after surgery, acrylic IOLs seemed to lose their PCO preventive effect, despite their sharp optic edges. The increasingly longer life expectancy and earlier cataract surgery mandate reconsideration of preferences regarding optic materials and design elements of IOLs.

Purpose: To compare axial position changes of the intraocular lens (IOL) by measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) after small-incision cataract surgery with primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PPCCC) and posterior optic buttonholing (POBH) of the IOL and after conventional cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and in-the-bag IOL implantation., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria., Methods: This prospective comparative study comprised 23 patients (46 eyes) with age-related cataract who had bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of an acrylic IOL (YA-60BB, Hoya). In randomized order, cataract surgery with PPCCC and POBH of the IOL was performed in 1 eye of each patient. In the fellow eyes, conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery with in-the-bag IOL implantation was performed. The ACD was measured 1 to 2, 6, and 24 hours as well as 7 and 30 days postoperatively using high-resolution partial coherence laser interferometry. A baseline measurement was taken preoperatively in all patients., Results: Ten patients completed 10 to 12 months of follow-up. Postoperatively, the axial IOL position was stable in eyes with PPCCC-POBH (P>.05). In contrast, a significant axial shift of the IOL in the anterior direction was observed in control eyes with in-the-bag IOL implantation (P<.001). The resulting refractive shift was significantly higher in control eyes than in eyes with PPCCC-POBH (P<.001)., Conclusion: Combined PPCCC and POBH for cataract surgery significantly reduced postoperative anterior movement of the IOL.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of blue-light-filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a yellow chromophore on color contrast sensitivity by intraindividual comparison with an identically designed IOL without a blue-light filter., Setting: Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna, Austria., Methods: Randomized implantation of an AF-1 (UV) IOL (Hoya) in 1 eye and an AF-1 (UY) IOL (Hoya) in the contralateral eye was performed after phacoemulsification and primary posterior curvilinear capsulorhexis. Three months postoperatively, the best distance-corrected visual acuity was evaluated. Before color contrast sensitivity testing, a heterochromatic flicker test was performed in both eyes to avoid error in brightness matching. Central and peripheral tritan color contrast sensitivities were evaluated using the Moorfields Vision System (CH Electronics)., Results: Visual acuity did not differ significantly between the 2 IOL groups (P>.05). The central color contrast sensitivity threshold also did not differ significantly between eyes with a clear IOL and eyes with a yellow IOL at any tested spatial frequency. The peripheral color contrast sensitivity test showed slightly higher color contrast sensitivity thresholds in eyes with a yellow IOL, although the differences were not statistically significant. Two patients independently reported subjective changes in color perception in the eye with the yellow IOL., Conclusion: In this intraindividual comparison, the implantation of a blue-light-filtering IOL did not lead to a clinically significant change in color contrast sensitivity.

Purpose: To assess the safety, in terms of the intraocular pressure (IOP), of cataract surgery with primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PPCCC) and a postoperative dose of a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination and evaluate the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) haptic angulation., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: In this prospective randomized double-masked bilateral study, 88 eyes of 44 consecutive patients with age-related cataract were included in an intraindividual comparison study. All patients had standardized cataract surgery with PPCCC and IOL implantation in the capsular bag followed by a postoperative dose of a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an ACR6D SE IOL (Laboratoires Cornéal) in 1 eye and a Centerflex (C-flex) 570C IOL (Rayner Surgical GmbH) in the contralateral eye. The IOP was measured at baseline and postoperatively at 6 and 24 hours as well as 1 week., Results: Intraindividual comparison showed statistically significantly higher IOP measurements in the C-flex 570C nonangulated IOL group than in the ACR6D SE angulated IOL group at 24 hours (P = .003) and 1 week (P = .043). The highest IOP spikes (34 mm Hg) were at 6 hours in 2 eyes with a C-flex 570C IOL. The ACR6D SE group had statistically significant changes in IOP between preoperative and all postoperative time points. In the C-flex 570C group, the only statistically significant change in IOP was between preoperatively and 6 hours postoperatively., Conclusions: Cataract surgery with PPCCC was safe in terms of the postoperative IOP course. Haptic angulation slightly decreased the overall IOP rise and the incidence of IOP rises above 30 mm Hg.

Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of the foldable hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) over a 5-year period., Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison., Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes)., Methods: Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a 3-piece AcrySof IOL in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification (score range, 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery., Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10)., Results: There was no significant difference between the 1-piece and 3-piece AcrySof IOL in best-corrected visual acuity, overlap of rhexis and IOL, capsular folds, anterior capsule opacification, and posterior capsule opacification (1-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.7+/-1.7; 3-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.3+/-1.4; P = 0.30)., Conclusions: Modification of the IOL haptic design of the sharp optic edged AcrySof IOL from a 3-piece to a 1-piece haptic design caused no significant change in PCO intensity and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment rate 5 years after surgery.

Purpose: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) inhibiting effect of the round anterior and sharp posterior optic edge profile of the Clariflex silicone intraocular lens (IOL) [AMO Inc, Santa Ana, California, USA] with that of the double-round edge profile of the SI40 (Phacoflex; AMO Inc, Santa Ana, California, USA) silicone IOL over a period of three years., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, bilateral clinical trial., Methods: The study took place at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Fifty-two patients with age-related cataracts (104 eyes) were included in the study. Each patient received an SI40 IOL (round edges) in one eye and a Clariflex IOL with OptiEdge (sharp posterior optic edge) in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were at one week, one month, six months, and one, two, and three years. Digital retroillumination images were taken of each eye. The amount of PCO was subjectively assessed with the slit-lamp and objectively assessed by automated image analysis software (the computer program Automated Quantification of After-Cataract [AQUA]; Vienna, Austria) one, two, and three years after surgery., Results: The Clariflex lens showed markedly less PCO at one, two, and three years after surgery. The mean AQUA PCO score was 1.39 for the SI40 and 0.56 for the Clariflex lens after one year, estimated at 1.64 and 0.57 after two years, and at 2.04 and 0.64, respectively, after three years (scale zero to 10; P < .001). The Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate was far higher in the SI40 group (Five cases vs one case at three years)., Conclusions: The sharp posterior optic edge profile of the Clariflex silicone IOL led to marked and consistently less PCO than the round-edged SI40 IOL one, two, and three years after surgery.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the clinical performance of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with haptic angulation., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: A prospective study of 52 patients with bilateral age-related cataract was conducted. Patients had standard cataract surgery with implantation of the same IOL in both eyes. Randomly, a PCCC was created in 1 eye and the posterior capsule was left intact in the fellow eye. Assessed parameters were visual axis opacification (VAO) in eyes with a PCCC or regeneratory posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in eyes without PCCC (scale 0 to 10) in the central (3.0 mm eccentricity), intermediate (3.0 to 4.5 mm eccentricity), and peripheral (>4.5 mm eccentricity [capsulorhexis edge]) areas; neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy or laser polishing of ongrowing lens epithelium; anterior capsule opacification (ACO); best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and contrast sensitivity., Results: Thirty patients completed the 2(1/2)-year follow-up. Visual axis opacification was significantly lower in the central region in the PCCC group (mean 0.5 +/- 0.7 [SD]) than PCO in the central region of the non-PCCC group (mean 1.1 +/- 1.1) (P = .02). Forty percent in the non-PCCC group had an Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy during the follow-up period; none in the PCCC group had laser polishing. There were no significant differences in ACO, SE, BCVA, or contrast sensitivity. There was no additional gain in BCVA or contrast sensitivity in eyes with a PCCC compared with eyes without a PCCC when VAO and PCO were low., Conclusion: A PCCC significantly reduced PCO formation within the central 3.0 mm eccentricity as well as the need for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in eyes with a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL with angulated haptics.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the intraocular performance of hydrophilic acrylic single-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) with and without haptic angulation., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: A prospective study comprised 52 patients with bilateral age-related cataract who had standard cataract surgery including a PCCC. One eye of each patient was randomized to receive a hydrophilic acrylic IOL with haptic angulation (ACR6D SE, Laboratoires Cornéal) and the contralateral eye, a hydrophilic acrylic IOL without haptic angulation (C-flex 570C, Rayner). The following parameters were assessed: regeneratory posterior opacification (RPO) in the central, intermediate, and peripheral areas (scale 0 to 10); anterior capsule opacification (ACO); best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and contrast sensitivity (CSF)., Results: Thirty-one patients completed the 1(1/2)-year follow-up. In both IOL groups, RPO within the PCCC was slight in the central area, with a mean score of 0.33 +/- 0.84 (SD) in the angulated IOL group and 0.16 +/- 0.57 in the nonangulated IOL group (P = .29). The mean RPO score in the peripheral area was 2.07 +/- 1.37 and 2.35 +/- 1.45, respectively (P = .12). The difference between the central and peripheral areas was 1.74 in the angulated IOL group (P<.00001) and 2.19 in the nonangulated IOL group (P<.00001). Haptic deformation occurred in 9 eyes (29%) with an angulated IOL and no eye with a nonangulated IOL. There was significantly more ACO in the nonangulated IOL group (P = .012). There were no significant differences in BCVA or CSF between the 2 groups., Conclusions: Creating a PCCC led to significantly lower RPO intensity within the PCCC area than in the peripheral area in eyes with hydrophilic acrylic IOLs with and without haptic angulation. Haptic angulation had no apparent significant influence on the intensity of RPO or on BCVA and CSF. Haptic deformation may occur in hydrophilic IOLs with angulated haptics.

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term effects of anterior capsule polishing on regeneratory posterior capsule opacification (PCO), anterior capsule opacification (ACO), and fibrotic PCO with a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) with sharp optic edges., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: This prospective bilateral randomized patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial comprised 130 eyes of 65 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. All eyes had implantation of a 3-piece silicone IOL with a truncated, sharp-edged optic (CeeOn Edge 911A, Advanced Medical Optics). In 1 eye, the anterior capsule was extensively polished using an aspiration curette after phacoemulsification and cortex aspiration. Regenerative PCO was quantified objectively, while ACO and fibrotic PCO were graded subjectively 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postoperatively., Results: The mean ACO score was significantly lower in the eyes in which the anterior capsule had been polished (1 year, P<.02; 2 years, P<.03; 3 years, P<.01; 5 years, P<.01). The mean difference in regeneratory PCO and fibrotic PCO scores between the 2 groups was not statistically significant., Conclusions: Three years after cataract surgery, eyes in which the anterior capsule had been polished had significantly less ACO. However, polishing did not lower PCO intensity when a sharp-edged CeeOn 911A IOL was implanted in the bag. Although results indicate that anterior capsule polishing may enhance the development of regeneratory PCO, this trend did not reach statistical significance.

Purpose: To study the efficacy of posterior optic buttonholing (POBH) through a primary posterior capsulorhexis (PPCCC) to preserve full capsular transparency, and its potential as a routine alternative to standard in-the-bag implantation of sharp-edged optic intraocular lenses (IOLs)., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: After standard cataract removal, a PPCCC 4.0 to 5.0 mm in diameter was performed and the optic of a 3-piece IOL buttonholed posteriorly. One third of the eyes additionally had extensive anterior capsule polishing. All surgeries were performed under topical anesthesia., Results: The first 500 consecutive surgeries were evaluated. In 11 eyes, POBH was not performed as planned. In 4 cases, anterior capsulorhexis fixation of the optic was used as an alternative. In the early series, vitreous entanglement was seen in 5 eyes, of which 1 case prompted translimbal anterior vitrectomy. No case of cystoid macula edema was observed. One case of peripheral retinal detachment in a highly-myopic eye 4 months postoperatively appeared to be unrelated to the surgery. All lenses were well-centered without tilt, and both capsule leaves remained clear especially after additional polishing., Conclusion: Posterior optic buttonholing precludes lens epithelial cells from accessing the retrolental space. The sandwiched posterior capsule blocks optic contact and thus fibrosis of the anterior capsule. Posterior optic buttonholing avoids after-cataract independent of optic edge design. Anterior capsule polishing adds to its efficacy by excluding any residual fibrosis. Surgery under topical anesthesia was well-controlled and safe. Posterior optic buttonholing may become a routine alternative to standard in-the-bag IOL implantation when supported by a longer follow-up.

Purpose: To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction., Design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with intraindividual comparison., Methods: This study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In group 1 (n = 53 patients), a three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with a three-piece silicone IOL. In group 2 (n = 52 patients), the three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with the one-piece acrylic IOL. One year after the operation, standardized digital slit-lamp images of ACO were taken; 1 week and 1 year after the operation, digital retroillumination images were taken to assess capsulorrhexis size. The intensity of ACO was graded objectively (score, 0% to 100%), and the capsulorrhexis area (square millimeters) was determined objectively., Results: One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 21% for the acrylic and 20% for the silicone IOL (P = .4) in group 1 and 18% for both the three-piece and one-piece acrylic IOLs (P = .87) in group 2. Concerning the amount of capsulorrhexis contraction, there was no significant difference between the IOL types that were evaluated in this study (after Bonferroni-Holm correction, P > .05)., Conclusion: In the hydrophobic sharp optic edge IOLs that were examined, neither the optic material nor the haptic design had an influence on the amount of ACO or capsulorrhexis contraction.

Purpose: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) inhibiting effect of a 3-piece polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) with a sharp optic edge design with that of the round-edged version of the same IOL during a 5-year period., Design: Randomized patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison., Participants: Thirty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (64 eyes)., Methods: Each study patient had phacoemulsification cataract surgery in both eyes and received a sharp optic edge PMMA IOL in one eye and a round optic edge PMMA IOL in the fellow eye (both by Dr Schmidt in Germany). Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were taken from each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification was assessed objectively by means of automated image analysis software (Automated Quantification of After-Cataract) at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery., Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score: 0-10., Results: The sharp optic edge IOL showed significantly less regeneratory and fibrotic PCO at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. The mean AQUA PCO score was 5.12 for the round-edge and 2.49 for the sharp-edge IOL (scale, 0-10; P<0.001) at 5 years. The mean difference among patients for the PCO score in the eye implanted with the sharp optic edge versus the score in the eye with the round optic edge was 2.83 at 5 years (95% confidence interval, 1.66-4.00). Due to the large number of neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomies that were performed (12 in the round-edge group and 4 in the sharp-edge group), there was no significant difference in visual acuity between both groups at any time point., Conclusions: Compared with the round-edge version, the sharp optic edge design of a 3-piece PMMA IOL led to significantly less PCO at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. However, the sharp optic edge did not lead to complete PCO prevention during this follow-up period. This finding has implications for the design of PMMA IOLs used for cataract surgery, especially in the developing world.

Purpose: To assess and classify capsular bend configuration at the optic rim and its association with posterior capsule (PCO) and anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorhexis contraction with various intraocular lenses (IOLs)., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: A total of 659 post-cataract surgery eyes of 370 patients from different prospective randomized studies were evaluated. All eyes had standardized phacoemulsification surgery with implantation of an IOL in the capsular bag. The IOLs had a sharp or round optic edge design and were made of silicone, acrylic, or poly(methyl methacrylate) optic materials. One year postoperatively, the configuration of the capsular bend at the optic rim was assessed at the slitlamp, and standardized slitlamp images of ACO and fibrotic PCO were taken. One week, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively, digital retroillumination images were taken for objective quantification of regeneratory PCO and the capsulorhexis area. The outcome measures were the type of capsular bend configuration, ACO score (0% to 100%), regeneratory PCO score (0 to 10), fibrotic PCO score (0 to 3), and amount of capsulorhexis contraction (mm(2))., Results: Four main types of capsular bend configuration were classified: parallel, "Y," right angle, and wrapping. The right-angle type was observed in the most cases (52%). Eyes with a wrapping capsular bend configuration had significantly less PCO, more capsulorhexis contraction, and more ACO than eyes with the other configurations. Wrapping capsule configuration was seen most often (55%) in round-edged silicone IOLs that had a thin optic rim., Conclusion: The design and material of IOLs influenced the long-term capsular bend configuration at the optic rim. The right-angle type was the most common capsular bend configuration. Intraocular lenses with silicone optic material and a thin optic rim caused a wrapping capsule configuration and resulted in more capsulorhexis contraction and ACO, but less PCO.

Purpose: To measure the shift of an accommodating plate-haptic intraocular lens (IOL) along the visual axis induced by ciliary muscle contraction after application of pilocarpine., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: Fifty-four eyes of 28 patients with age-related cataract comprised this prospective study. Each patient received an AT-45 silicone accommodating IOL (Crystalens, Eyeonics Corp.) after standardized cataract surgery. In a subgroup of 24 eyes, capsular bag fibrosis was reduced by extensive polishing of the anterior capsule with a slit cannula. Assessment included measurements of anterior chamber depth, assessed with partial coherence interferometry, before and after application of pilocarpine 2% and evaluation of near visual acuity 1 month and 3 months postoperatively., Results: A slight backward shift of the IOL of 151 mum in the nonpolished group (P < .001) and 122 mum in the polished group (P < .005) could be detected after application of pilocarpine. Polishing the capsule did not influence IOL shift. The median near visual acuity with distance correction 1 month and 3 months postoperatively was J5 and J4, respectively, in the nonpolished group and J6 at both times in the polished group., Conclusions: Pilocarpine induced a counterproductive active backward shift of the AT-45 IOL. Polishing of the capsular bag had no impact on accommodative ability. The reading performance of patients with the AT-45 IOL patients at 1 and 3 months was not significantly different from that of with a standard IOL under similar testing methods.