Search

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of intermittent 6-month courses of leuprolide acetate for the long-term control of symptoms attributed to leiomyomata uteri., Design: Prospective open-label feasibility study., Setting: University department of obstetrics and gynecology., Patient(s): Thirty women with abnormal bleeding or discomfort (pain or pressure) due to leiomyomata uteri., Intervention(s): Patients received an initial 6-month course of the GnRH agonist leuprolide acetate, after which they were observed for symptom recurrence. Symptom recurrence was managed by repeated 6-month courses of leuprolide acetate., Main Outcome Measure(s): Relief of symptoms, responses on a quality-of-life questionnaire, serum lipid levels, blood count, and ferritin level. The number of doses of leuprolide acetate required to maintain symptom control was recorded. Serial bone mineral density measurements were made in selected patients., Result(s): Twenty of the 30 women who began therapy with leuprolide acetate continued in the protocol. Each individual 6-month course of leuprolide acetate therapy was followed by a median of 9 additional months of symptom control (range, 2 to >25 months). Women remaining in the protocol experienced a mean decrease of 2.4% in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine; bone mineral density of the hip did not change., Conclusion(s): Intermittent courses of leuprolide acetate can be used in the nonsurgical management of women with symptomatic leiomyomata uteri. Use of antiresorptive add-back therapy and monitoring of bone mineral density can be considered when repeated courses of leuprolide acetate are given.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and short-term efficacy of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids., Materials and Methods: Bilateral UFE was performed in 61 patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata during a 16-month period. Imaging was performed before the procedure and at 3 months and 1 year after the procedure. Questionnaires were obtained at regular intervals after the procedure to assess patient outcome., Results: All procedures but one were technically successful. Mean clinical follow-up was 8.7 months. Minor complications occurred in five patients during the follow-up period. All were treated without permanent sequelae. Menstrual bleeding was improved in 89%, with 81% of patients moderately to markedly improved. Pelvic pain and pressure was improved in 96% of patients, with moderate to marked improvement in 79%. At initial imaging follow-up (mean, 4.4 months postprocedure), median uterine volume decreased 34% (P = .0001) and the median dominant fibroid volume decreased 50% (P = .0001). Imaging at 1 year (mean, 12.3 months) after the procedure showed continued reduction with a median uterine volume reduction of 48% (P = .0002) and median dominant fibroid volume decrease of 78% (P = .0002)., Conclusion: In the authors' initial clinical experience, UFE appears effective in controlling symptoms and substantially reducing fibroid volume with few complications.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of leuprolide acetate (LA) followed by medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding attributed to leiomyomata uteri., Design: Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial., Setting: Human volunteers in an academic research environment., Patients: Premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding attributed to leiomyomata uteri., Interventions: Subjects received 6 months of LA after which they were randomized to receive MPA or placebo., Main Outcome Measures: Control of bleeding as assessed by menstrual calendar and self-report; hematologic parameters (hemoglobin and ferritin); uterine size by ultrasonography., Results: More than three quarters of subjects became amenorrheic on LA. The proportion of subjects with improvement in the bleeding abnormality after therapy was not different in the group receiving MPA compared with placebo; however, women who received MPA were less likely to be anemic after therapy than women receiving placebo. Among the women assigned to placebo, 55% experienced an improvement in bleeding compared with pre-GnRH agonist therapy that persisted after discontinuation of LA. There was a high dropout rate (51%), largely associated with failure of the regimens to control bleeding symptoms., Conclusions: Approximately one half of women with abnormal bleeding attributed to leiomyomata uteri have sustained symptomatic improvement after 6 months of therapy with LA even when only placebo therapy is given, although MPA decreases the incidence of anemia. Leuprolide acetate with or without subsequent progestin may be useful as a component of nonsurgical management of these tumors, with monitoring of hematologic status. The interpretability of these data is limited by the high rate of therapy discontinuation in women with abnormal bleeding of the severity studied here.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of leuprolide acetate depot plus iron compared with iron alone in the preoperative treatment of anemia due to prolonged or excessive bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas., Methods: This was a phase III, stratified, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week multicenter study. Enrolled patients had hemoglobin levels of 10.2 g/dL or less and/or hematocrit values of 30% or less. Patients were entered into one of two strata based on their pre-study hematocrit level: stratum A, hematocrit less than or equal to 28%, and stratum B, hematocrit greater than 28%. Patients within each stratum were randomized to one of three treatment arms: leuprolide acetate depot 7.5 mg, leuprolide acetate depot 3.75 mg, or placebo. All patients received iron orally. Response was defined as a hemoglobin level of 12 g/dL or more and a hematocrit value of 36% or greater., Results: Three hundred nine patients were entered into the study, of whom 265 were evaluated. Using our response criteria, a significantly greater number of patients in both leuprolide acetate groups (combined strata) responded to therapy than did those in the placebo group: 74% in each leuprolide acetate group versus 46% in the placebo group (P < .001). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-treated patients had a significant reduction in uterine and myoma volume when compared with the placebo group (P < .01). Hot flashes and vaginitis were reported significantly more often (P < .001) in the leuprolide acetate-treated groups than in the placebo group., Conclusion: Both dosages of GnRH agonist plus iron were more effective than iron alone in treating the anemia of patients with uterine leiomyomas, in reducing uterine-myoma volume, and in alleviating bleeding and other leiomyoma-related symptoms.