Search

Introduction: Typical practitioners choose from among only two to three products when selecting liners for their patients. A lack of comparable objective information about similarities and differences among elastomeric liner products may be part of the reason. Methods: Commonly used, commercially available polyurethane, silicone, and thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) liners were tested for their compressive, shear, tensile, and volumetric elasticities as well as their coefficients of friction (CoFs) and thermal conductivities. Results: Polyurethane and silicone liners tended to be stiffer in compression and shear than TPE liners. Fabric backings contributed primarily to increased tensile elasticity (and thus reduced pistoning). Polyurethane liners demonstrated relatively low CoFs, whereas silicone and TPE liners had higher CoFs and wider ranges. All materials tested were essentially incompressible. Thermal conductivities of all materials were comparable and similar to that of leather. Conclusions: Polyurethane liners are softer and less sticky than 16 years ago, and TPE liners have higher tensile stiffness than previously. A stiff fabric backing can increase tensile stiffness by more than 200%. Compressive stiffness may be used to characterize a liner's ability to flow. Elastomeric liners move heat almost exclusively via conduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this research was to determine how fluid volume changes in the residual limbs of people with transtibial amputation were affected by activity during test sessions with equal durations of resting, standing, and walking. Residual limb extracellular fluid volume was measured using biompedance analysis in 24 participants. Results showed that all subjects lost fluid volume during standing with equal weight-bearing, averaging a loss rate of -0.4%/min and a mean loss over the 25 min test session of 2.6% (standard deviation [SD] 1.1). Sixteen subjects gained limb fluid volume during walking (mean gain of 1.0% [SD 2.5]), and fifteen gained fluid volume during rest (mean gain of 1.0% [SD 2.2]). Walking explained only 39.3% of the total session fluid volume change. There was a strong correlation between walk and rest fluid volume changes (−0.81). Subjects with peripheral arterial disease experienced relatively high fluid volume gains during sitting but minimal changes or losses during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitioning. Healthy female subjects experienced high fluid volume changes during transitioning from sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit. The differences in fluid volume response among subjects suggest that volume accommodation technologies should be matched to the activity-dependent fluid transport characteristics of the individual prosthesis user. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Knowledge of how persons with amputation use their prostheses and how this use changes over time may facilitate effective rehabilitation practices and enhance understanding of prosthesis functionality. Perpetual monitoring and classification of prosthesis use may also increase the health and quality of life for prosthetic users. Existing monitoring and classification systems are often limited in that they require the subject to manipulate the sensor (e.g., attach, remove, or reset a sensor), record data over relatively short time periods, and/or classify a limited number of activities and body postures of interest. In this study, a commercially available three-axis accelerometer (ActiLife ActiGraph GT3X+) was used to characterize the activities and body postures of individuals with transtibial amputation. Accelerometers were mounted on prosthetic pylons of 10 persons with transtibial amputation as they performed a preset routine of actions. Accelerometer data was postprocessed using a binary decision tree to identify when the prosthesis was being worn and to classify periods of use as movement (i.e., leg motion such as walking or stair climbing), standing (i.e., standing upright with limited leg motion), or sitting (i.e., seated with limited leg motion). Classifications were compared to visual observation by study researchers. The classifier achieved a mean +/- standard deviation accuracy of 96.6% +/- 3.0%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adding and removing liquid from socket bladders is a means for people with limb loss to accommodate residual-limb volume change. We fit 19 people with transtibial amputation using their regular prosthetic socket with fluid bladders on the inside socket surface to undergo cycles of bladder liquid addition and removal. In each cycle, subjects sat, stood, and walked for 90 s with bladder liquid added, and then sat, stood, and walked for 90 s again with the bladder liquid removed. The amount of bladder liquid added was increased in each cycle. We used bioimpedance analysis to measure residual-limb fluid volume. Results showed that the preferred bladder liquid volume was 16.8 +/- 8.4 mL (mean +/- standard deviation), corresponding with 1.7% +/- 0.8% of the average socket volume between the bioimpedance voltage-sensing electrodes. Residual-limb fluid volume driven out of the residual limb when bladder liquid was added was typically not recovered upon subsequent bladder liquid removal. Of the 19 subjects, 15 experienced a gradual residual-limb fluid volume loss over the test session. Care should be taken when implementing adjustable socket technologies in people with limb loss. Reducing socket volume may accentuate residual-limb fluid volume loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The objective of this effort was to develop and evaluate an algorithm that used socket and panel dimensions and cable length measurements to quantify socket volume changes of cabled-panel, adjustable socket systems. Methods: Adjustable sockets were fabricated for three participants with transtibial amputation. An apparatus was constructed to measure socket volume under controlled cable length changes using the water displacement method. Socket volume calculations from the algorithm were compared with results from water displacement testing. Results: For the three sockets tested, the algorithm predicted minimum socket volumes that ranged from −7.1% to −6.1% less than the neutral volume (flush panels) and maximum volumes that ranged from +1.7% to +3.6% more than the neutral volume. Root mean square error between model and experimental results for socket volumes less than the neutral volume ranged from 0.3% to 0.5% socket volume. Conclusions: If the algorithm was incorporated into adjustable socket mechanisms and measured users' socket size adjustments, the data may help practitioners identify relationships between patients' clinical status and their socket volume adjustments. Data may also be useful toward the design and operation of automatically adjusting cabled-panel sockets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For people who wear a prosthetic limb, residual-limb fluid volume loss during the day may be problematic and detrimentally affect socket fit. The purpose of this research was to test the capability of a novel liner with adjustable bladders positioned within its wall to mitigate volume loss and facilitate limb fluid volume recovery and retention. Bioimpedance analysis was used to monitor fluid volume changes in the anterior and posterior residual limb of participants with transtibial amputation. Participants underwent six cycles of sitting for 90 s, standing for 90 s, and walking for 5 min with liquid within the bladder-liners. Between the third and fourth cycles, participants sat for 10 min with liquid left within the bladders (Liquid-In) or removed (Liquid-Out). Results showed that participants recovered more fluid volume during the 10 min of sitting with Liquid-Out than Liquid-In (p = 0.09 for anterior and p = 0.04 for posterior). However, those fluid volume recoveries were not well retained in the short term (after the fourth cycle) or the long term (after the sixth cycle). Physiologic differences between sessions, reflected in the rates of fluid volume change at the outset of the session, and excessive stiffness of the bladder-liners may have affected fluid volume retentions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A device using radio frequency identification (RFID) technology was developed to continuously monitor sock use in people who use prosthetic limbs. RFID tags were placed on prosthetic socks worn by subjects with transtibial limb loss, and a high-frequency RFID reader and antenna were placed in a portable unit mounted to the outside of the prosthetic socket. Bench testing showed the device to have a maximum read range between 5.6 cm and 12.7 cm, depending on the RFID tag used. Testing in a laboratory setting on three participants with transtibial amputation showed that the device correctly monitored sock presence during sitting, standing, and walking activity when one or two socks were worn but was less reliable when more socks were used. Accurate detection was sensitive to orientation of the tag relative to the reader, presence of carbon fiber in the prosthetic socket, pistoning of the limb in the socket, and overlap among the tags. Use of ultra-high-frequency RFID may overcome these limitations. With improvements, the technology may prove useful to practitioners prescribing volume accommodation strategies for patients by providing information about sock use between clinical visits, including timing and consistency of daily sock-ply changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]