Search

Introduction: The relationship between anterior pelvic tilt and overall sagittal alignment has been well-described previously. However, the relationship between pelvic tilt, frontal, and axial leg alignment remains unclear. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between pelvic tilt and frontal and axial leg alignment in healthy subjects., Material and Methods: Thirty healthy subjects (60 legs) without prior surgery underwent standing biplanar long leg radiograph. Pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion were measured using SterEOS (EOS Imaging) software. EOS was acquired with the feet directing straight anteriorly, which corresponds to a neutral foot progression angle (FPA). The influence of HKA, femoral antetorsion, tibial torsion and gender on pelvic tilt was analyzed in a univariate correlation and multiple regression model., Results: Sixteen female subjects and 14 male subjects with a mean age of 27.1 years ± 10 (range 20-67) were included. HKA, femoral antetorsion, and tibial torsion correlated with anterior pelvic tilt in univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). Anterior pelvic tilt increased 1.1° (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.5) per 1° of knee valgus (p < 0.001) and 0.5° (95% CI: 0.3 to 0.7) per 1° of external tibial torsion (p < 0.001). Overall, linear regression model fit explained 39% of variance in pelvic tilt by the HKA, femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion (R 2  = 0.385; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Valgus alignment and increasing tibial torsion demonstrated a weak correlation with an increase in anterior pelvic tilt in healthy subjects when placing their feet anteriorly. The relationship between frontal, axial leg alignment and pelvic tilt needs to be considered in patients with multiple joint disorders at the hip, knee and spine. Alteration of the frontal, or rotational profile after realignment surgery or by implant positioning might influence the pelvic tilt when the FPA is kept constant., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest One of the author's is a consultant for Medacta SA (Switzerland), Smith & Nephew (United Kingdom), Zimmer Biomet and Karl Storz SE & Co. KG (Germany). The research is supported by the institutional research fund of the author's affiliated hospital., (Copyright © 2022 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate if one level of corrective femoral osteotomy (subtrochanteric or supracondylar) bears an increased risk of unintentional implications on frontal and sagittal plane alignment in a simulated clinical setting., Methods: Out of 100 cadaveric femora, 23 three-dimensional (3-D) surface models with femoral antetorsion (femAT) deformities (> 22° or < 2°) were investigated, and femAT normalized to 12° with single plane rotational osteotomies, perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Change of the frontal and sagittal plane alignment was expressed by the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), respectively. The influence of morphologic factors of the femur [centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle and antecurvatum radius (ACR)] were assessed. Furthermore, position changes of the lesser (LT) and greater trochanters (GT) in the frontal and sagittal plane compared to the hip centre were investigated., Results: Mean femoral derotation of the high-antetorsion group (n = 6) was 12.3° (range 10-17°). In the frontal plane, mLDFA changed a mean of 0.1° (- 0.06 to 0.3°) (n.s.) and - 0.3° (- 0.5 to - 0.1) (p = 0.03) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. In the sagittal plane, PDFA changed a mean of 1° (0.7 to 1.1) (p = 0.03) and 0.3° (0.1 to 0.7) (p = 0.03), respectively. The low-antetorsion group (n = 17) was rotated by a mean of 13.8° (10°-23°). mLDFA changed a mean of - 0.2° (- 0.5° to 0.2°) (p < 0.006) and 0.2° (0-0.5°) (p < 0.001) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. PDFA changed a mean of 1° (- 2.3 to 1.3) (p < 0.01) and 0.5° (- 1.9 to 0.3) (p < 0.01), respectively. The amount of femAT correction was associated with increased postoperative deviation of the mechanical leg axis (p < 0.01). Using multiple regression analysis, no other morphological factors were found to influence mLDFA or PDFA. Internal rotational osteotomies decreased the ischial-lesser trochanteric space by < 5 mm in both the frontal and sagittal plane (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: In case of femAT correction of ≤ 20°, neither subtrochanteric nor supracondylar femoral derotational or rotational osteotomies have a clinically relevant impact on frontal or sagittal leg alignment. A relevant deviation in the sagittal (but not frontal plane) might occur in case of a > 25° subtrochanteric femAT correction., Level of Evidence: IV., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).)

Objective: Ankle joint line orientation (AJLO) is influenced by the subtalar foot and frontal leg alignment. However, the influence of axial leg alignment on AJLO remains unclear. The study aimed to analyze the influence of frontal, axial leg alignment on AJLO in healthy subjects., Methods: Thirty healthy subjects (60 legs) without prior surgery underwent standing biplanar long leg radiograph (LLR) between 2016 and 2020. AJLO was measured in standing long-leg radiographs relative to the ground. Meary's angle and calcaneal pitch were measured. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral antetorsion, and tibial torsion were assessed with SterEOS software (EOS Imaging, Paris, France). LLR was acquired with the feet directing straight anteriorly, which corresponds to a neutral foot progression angle (FPA). The influence of subtalar, frontal, and axial alignment on AJLO was analyzed in a multiple regression model., Results: An increase in knee valgus increased relative valgus AJLO by 0.5° (95% CI: 0.2° to 0.7°) per 1° (P < 0.001). A decrease in femoral antetorsion increased relative valgus AJLO by 0.2° (95% CI: 0.1° to 0.2°) per 1° (P < 0.001), whereas Meary's angle and calcaneal pitch did not influence AJLO., Conclusion: A link between frontal, axial leg alignment, and AJLO could be demonstrated, indicating that a valgus leg alignment and relative femoral retrotorsion are associated with an increase of valgus AJLO in healthy subjects when placing their feet in a neutral position. Alteration of the frontal, or rotational profile after realignment surgery or by implant positioning might influence the AJLO, when the FPA is kept constant., (© 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)