Search

The 2018 heart allocation system has significantly influenced heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) utilization. Our study aims to investigate age-related outcomes following LVAD implantation in the post-allocation era. Using the National Inpatient Sample, we analyzed data from 7375 patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2019 and 2020. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality following LVAD implantation, stratified by age categories. The age groups were 18–49, 50–59, 60–69, and over 70. These represented 26%, 26%, 31%, and 17% of patients, respectively. Patients aged 60–69 and those over 70 exhibited higher in-hospital mortality rates of 12% and 17%, respectively, compared to younger age groups (7% for 18–49 and 6% for 50–59). The age groups 60–69 and over 70 were independent predictors of mortality, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.99 (p = 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–3.57) and 2.88 (p = 0.002; 95% CI, 1.45–5.71), respectively. Additionally, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio 1.39; p = 0.02; 95% CI, 1.05–1.84). Additionally, patients above 70 experienced a statistically shorter length of stay. Nonhome discharge was found to be significantly high across all age categories. However, the difference in hospitalization cost was not statistically significant across the age groups. Our study highlights that patients aged 60 and above face an increased risk of in-hospital mortality following LVAD implantation in the post-allocation era. This study sheds light on age-related outcomes and emphasizes the importance of considering age in LVAD patient selection and management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thrombotic events in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to delineate the frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with hypercoagulable states who undergo CF-LVAD implantation.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 168 consecutive patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2013. Chart and laboratory data were reviewed for the presence of a hereditary and/or acquired hypercoagulable state. Adverse outcomes were defined as death, confirmed pump thrombosis, aortic root clot, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used to analyze frequency of adverse outcomes and event free survival, respectively.Results: A hypercoagulable state was identified in 20 patients (11.9%). There were 18 patients with acquired, 1 with a congenital, and 1 with both congenital and acquired hypercoagulable states. The median follow-up was 429 days and 475 days in patients with and without hypercoagulable states, respectively. During the study period, 15% (3/20) of the patients with a hypercoagulable state had a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis vs 3% (4/148) of the patients without a hypercoagulable state (P = .030). Only patients with a hypercoagulable state had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (3/20 vs 0/148; P < .01). The event-free survival was lower in the patients with hypercoagulable states (P = .005).Conclusion: Hypercoagulable states are not uncommon in patients with CF-LVADs and may be associated with increased morbidity. Prospective studies are needed to more accurately identify the incidence, prevalence, and significance of hypercoagulable states in patients being considered for CF-LVAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Common adverse events in patients supported with Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) include infections and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Some studies have suggested a possible association between blood stream infection (BSI) and CVA. Methods and Results: Medical records of patients who received Heartmate II (HMII) CF-LVADs in 2008-2012 at a single center were reviewed. CVA was categorized as either hemorrhagic (HCVA) or ischemic (ICVA). BSI was divided into persistent (pBSI) and nonpersistent (non-pBSI). pBSI was defined as BSI with the same organism on repeated blood culture >72 hours from initial blood culture despite antibiotics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors. A total of 149 patients had HMII implanted; 76% were male, and the overall mean age was 55.4 ± 13 years. There were a total of 19 (13%) patients who had CVA (7 HCVA and 12 ICVA) at a median of 295 days (range 5-1,096 days) after implantation. There were a total of 28 (19%) patients with pBSI and 17 (11%) patients with non-pBSI. Patients with pBSI had a trend toward greater BMI (31 kg/m² vs 27 kg/m²; P = .09), and longer duration of support (1,019 d vs 371 d; P < .001) compared with those with non-pBSI. Persistent BSI was associated with an increased risk of mortality and with all-cause CVA on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 5.97; P = .003) as well as persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (OR 4.54; P = .048). Conclusions: Persistent BSI is not uncommon in patients supported by CF-LVAD and is highly associated with all-cause CVA and increased all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Among LVAD recipients who survived to discharge from index admission, 28.1% had 30-day readmission. • Most of the readmissions occurred in the first 15 days after discharge from the index admission. • The most frequent cause of readmissions was gastrointestinal bleeding, followed by heart failure. • Intracranial bleeding, device thrombosis, and ischemic stroke had the highest mortality. • Readmission rates for gastrointestinal bleeding decreased, whereas device infection increased. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) improve morbidity and mortality in end-stage heart failure patients, but high rates of readmissions remain a problem after implantation. We aimed to assess the incidence, trends, outcomes, and predictors of device-related 30-day readmissions after LVAD implantation. The National Readmission Database was used to identify patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2012 and 2017 and those with 30-day readmissions. The analysis included a total of 16499 adults who survived the index hospitalization for LVAD implantation. Among those, 28.1% were readmitted at 30 days, and the readmission rate has been grossly stable during the study period. Most of the readmissions occurred in the first 15 days after discharge from the index admission. The most frequent cause of readmissions was gastrointestinal bleeding (14.9% of readmissions), followed by heart failure, arrhythmias, device infection, and device thrombosis. Among reasons for readmission, intracranial bleeding was associated with highest mortality (37.6%), followed by device thrombosis (13.1%), and ischemic stroke (7.6%). Intracranial bleeding and device thrombosis were associated with lengthier stay (20.4 and 15.5 days, respectively). Readmission rates for gastrointestinal bleeding decreased, whereas device infection increased. Multivariate logistic regression model revealed the length of stay, oxygen dependence, gastrointestinal bleeding at index admission, depression and ECMO, private insurance as independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Over one-fourth of LVAD recipients have 30-day readmissions, with most of them occurring within 15 days. Most frequent cause of readmission was gastrointestinal bleeding, which was associated with the lowest in-hospital mortality among other complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]