Search

Weakness, one of the key characteristics of sarcopenia, is a significant risk factor for functional limitations and disability in older adults. It has long been suspected that reductions in motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) are one of the mechanistic causes of age-related weakness. However, prior work has not investigated the extent to which MUFR is associated with clinically meaningful weakness in older adults. Forty-three community-dwelling older adults (mean: 75.4 ± 7.4 years; 46.5% female) and 24 young adults (mean: 22.0 ± 1.8 years; 58.3% female) performed torque matching tasks at varying submaximal intensities with their non-dominant leg extensors. Decomposed surface electromyographic recordings were used to quantify MUFRs from the vastus lateralis muscle. Computational modeling was subsequently used to independently predict how slowed MUFRs would negatively impact strength in older adults. Bivariate correlations between MUFRs and indices of lean mass, voluntary activation, and physical function/mobility were also assessed in older adults. Weak older adults (n = 14) exhibited an approximate 1.5 and 3 Hz reduction in MUFR relative to non-weak older adults (n = 29) at 50% and 80% MVC, respectively. Older adults also exhibited an approximate 3 Hz reduction in MUFR relative to young adults at 80% MVC only. Our model predicted that a 3 Hz reduction in MUFR results in a strength decrement of 11–26%. Additionally, significant correlations were found between slower MUFRs and poorer neuromuscular quality, voluntary activation, chair rise time performance, and stair climb power (r's = 0.31 to 0.43). These findings provide evidence that slowed MUFRs are mechanistically linked with clinically meaningful leg extensor weakness in older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Weakness is a risk factor for physical limitations and death in older adults (OAs). We sought to determine whether OAs with clinically meaningful leg extensor weakness exhibit differences in voluntary inactivation (VIA) and measures of corticospinal excitability when compared to young adults (YAs) and OAs without clinically meaningful weakness. We also sought to estimate the relative contribution of indices of neural excitability and thigh lean mass in explaining the between-subject variability in OAs leg extensor strength.Methods: In 66 OAs (75.1 ± 7.0 years) and 20 YAs (22.0 ± 1.9 years), we quantified leg extensor strength, thigh lean mass, VIA, and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and silent period (SP) duration. OAs were classified into weakness groups based on previously established strength/body weight (BW) cut points (Weak, Modestly Weak, or Not Weak).Results: The OAs had 63% less strength/BW when compared to YAs. Weak OAs exhibited higher levels of leg extensor VIA than Not Weak OAs (14.2 ± 7.5% vs 6.1 ± 7.5%). Weak OAs exhibited 24% longer SPs compared to Not Weak OAs, although this difference was insignificant (p = .06). The Weak OAs MEPs were half the amplitude of the Not Weak OAs. Regression analysis indicated that MEP amplitude, SP duration, and thigh lean mass explained ~62% of the variance in strength, with the neural excitability variables explaining ~33% of the variance and thigh lean mass explaining ~29%.Conclusion: These findings suggest that neurotherapeutic interventions targeting excitability could be a viable approach to increase muscle strength in order to reduce the risk of physical impairments in late life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately 35% of individuals > 70 years have mobility limitations. Historically, it was posited lean mass and muscle strength were major contributors to mobility limitations, but recent findings indicate lean mass and muscle strength only moderately explain mobility limitations. One likely reason is that lean mass and muscle strength do not necessarily incorporate measures globally reflective of motor function (defined as the ability to learn, or to demonstrate, the skillful and efficient assumption, maintenance, modification, and control of voluntary postures and movement patterns). In this study we determined the relative contribution of lean mass, muscle strength, and the four square step test, as an index of lower extremity motor function, in explaining between-participant variance in mobility tasks.Methods: In community-dwelling older adults (N = 89; 67% women; mean 74.9 ± 6.7 years), we quantified grip and leg extension strength, total and regional lean mass, and time to complete the four square step test. Mobility was assessed via 6-min walk gait speed, stair climb power, 5x-chair rise time, and time to complete a complex functional task. Multifactorial linear regression modeling was used to determine the relative contribution (via semi-partial r2) for indices of lean mass, indices of muscle strength, and the four square step test.Results: When aggregated by sex, the four square step test explained 17-34% of the variance for all mobility tasks (p <  0.01). Muscle strength explained ~ 12% and ~ 7% of the variance in 6-min walk gait speed and 5x-chair rise time, respectively (p <  0.02). Lean mass explained 32% and ~ 4% of the variance in stair climb power and complex functional task time, respectively (p <  0.02). When disaggregated by sex, lean mass was a stronger predictor of mobility in men.Conclusion: The four square step test is uniquely associated with multiple measures of mobility in older adults, suggesting lower extremity motor function is an important factor for mobility performance.Trial Registration: NCT02505529 -2015/07/22. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]