Search

Epithelial fusion is critical in palatogenesis, and incomplete fusion results in various type of facial cleft, depending on the region that fails to fuse. In mammalian palatogenesis, the bilateral secondary palatal processes fuse in the middle of the face to form the secondary palate. Later, the dorsal side of the secondary palatal shelves fuses with the nasal septum to complete palatogenesis. Importantly, the anterior border of the secondary palatal shelf fuses with the primary palate, which is located at the anterior and ventral border of the nasal septum. While numerous studies have investigated the mechanism of fusion between secondary palatal shelves, very little is known about how the primary palate touches and fuses with the secondary palatal shelves. In this study, we investigate the possible epithelial cell behaviors on the surface of the primary palate using palatal explant cultures of K14-GFP mice. A time-lapse observation of the GFP-labeled epithelium and an SEM analysis revealed that the extrusion epithelium appeared at the region corresponding to the fusing area and expanded rostrally on the nasal septum surface in the absence of the secondary palatal processes. Unlike on the secondary palate surface, cellular migration and subsequent autonomous mesenchymal exposure were not evident on the nasal septum or the primary palate. TUNEL staining revealed that these extrusion epithelia were undergoing apoptosis. These findings indicated that extrusion with apoptosis was autonomously initiated at the presumptive region of the fusion without contact with the opposing secondary palate.

Palatal fusion is a critical step during palatogenesis. In this fusing interface, the epithelial sheets need to be removed in order to achieve mesenchymal continuity. Epithelial cellular migration is one of the possible mechanisms, and live imaging of the labeled epithelium could provide direct evidence for it. However, the removal of medial edge epithelium (MEE) between the bilateral processes takes place in the middle of the dorso-ventral axis of the palatal shelf, and thus it is challenging to capture the cellular behavior directly. Here, we evaluate cellular behavior of MEE cells using a live imaging technique with a mouse model which expresses GFP under the promoter of Keratin14 (K14-GFP) and unpaired palatal shelf culture. Using this approach, we successfully obtained live images of epithelial behavior and detected epithelial cell migration on the surface of the secondary palatal shelf without touching of the opposing shelf. Additionally, the pattern of epithelial elimination resulted in oval-shaped exposed mesenchyme, which recapitulated the situation during secondary palate fusion in vivo. Detailed image processing revealed that most of the MEE migrated in an outward direction at the boundary regions as the oval shape of the exposed mesenchyme expanded. The migration was preceded by the bulging of MEE, and disappearance of GFP signals was not evident in bulging or migrating MEE at the boundary regions. Furthermore, the MEE migration and the subsequent mesenchymal exposure were disturbed by application of ROCK inhibitor. Together, these findings indicated that epithelial cell migration contributed importantly to the MEE removal and the subsequent exposure of the underlying mesenchyme. Furthermore, they indicated that the migration of epithelial cells was regulated in a time- and space-specific manner, since unpaired palatal shelf culture exhibited these cellular behaviors even in the absence of the opposing shelf. Altogether, present data indicated that this new experimental system combining live imaging with GFP-labeled epithelium mice and unpaired palatal shelf culture enabled direct visualization of cellular migration of MEE in vitro and could be a powerful tool to investigate its cellular and molecular mechanisms.