Search

Background and Purpose: The diagnostic criteria for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG‐IgG)‐associated disease (MOGAD) were published in 2023. We aimed to determine the performance of the new criteria in Latin American (LATAM) patients compared with the 2018 criteria and explore the significance of MOG–IgG titers in diagnosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of LATAM (Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia) adult patients with one clinical MOGAD event and MOG‐IgG positivity confirmed by cell‐based assay. Both 2018 and 2023 MOGAD criteria were applied, calculating diagnostic performance indicators. Results: Among 171 patients (predominantly females, mean age at first attack = 34.1 years, mean disease duration = 4.5 years), 98.2% patients met the 2018 criteria, and of those who did not fulfill diagnostic criteria (n = 3), all tested positive for MOG‐IgG (one low‐positive and two without reported titer). Additionally, 144 (84.2%) patients met the 2023 criteria, of whom 57 (39.5%) had MOG‐IgG+ titer information (19 clearly positive and 38 low‐positive), whereas 87 (60.5%) patients had no MOG‐IgG titer. All 144 patients met diagnostic supporting criteria. The remaining 27 patients did not meet the 2023 MOGAD criteria due to low MOG‐IgG (n = 12) or lack of titer antibody access (n = 15), associated with the absence of supporting criteria. The 2023 MOGAD criteria showed a sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval = 0.80–0.91) and specificity of 100% compared to the 2018 criteria. Conclusions: These findings support the diagnostic utility of the 2023 MOGAD criteria in an LATAM cohort in real‐world practice, despite limited access to MOG‐IgG titration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of our study was to describe the availability of diagnostic tests and treatment for MS and NMOSD in Latin America (LATAM). A survey instrument was used in a sample of physicians from LATAM countries. The goal of the survey was to understand availability of: 1) imaging tests for diagnosing MS and NMOSD and its barriers; 2) diagnostic laboratory tests for diagnosing MS and NMOSD and its barriers; and 3) treatments for MS and NMOSD in the acute and chronic phases of the disease. Responses were received from 80 physicians. AQP4-ab test was available in 54% of the countries and MOG-ab test in 42%. All of countries had available use of high doses of intravenous methylprednisolone, oral steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulins for relapses. For NMOSD, 93% of the countries were able to use azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, and 87% rituximab. In MS, 93% of countries had available to them IFN beta, 69% glatiramer acetate, 75% teriflunomide, 93% fingolimod, 69% dimethyl-fumarate, 75% cladribine, 69% natalizumab, 93% ocrelizumab and 81% alemtuzumab. The most common challenge and barrier identified was the cost of medications. The present study allows an understanding of the delivery of care for MS and NMOSD in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the property of Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated in many autoimmune conditions as a biomarker of inflammation and/or disease activity. The role of NLR in AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is far from clear. In this study, NLR was evaluated in patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD at disease onset and its prognostic impact was subsequently assessed. Methods: In this multicenter study, we retrospectively included all recent/newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD (n=90) from three different countries in Latin America (LATAM): Argentina, Ecuador, and Mexico. NLR was compared between AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and healthy controls (HC, n = 365). Demographic, clinical, paraclinical (including imaging), and prognostic data at 12 and 24 months were also evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was used to describe and identify independent associations between the log-transformed NLR and clinical (relapses and EDSS) and imaging (new/enlarging and/or contrast-enhancing MRI lesions) outcomes. Results: NLR was higher in NMOSD patients during the first attack compared with HC (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 0.6; p<0.0001). Regardless of immunosuppressant's initiation at disease onset, NLR remained higher in NMOSD patients at 12 (2.8 ± 1.3; p<0.0001) and 24 (3.1 ± 1.6; p<0.0001) months. No association was found at 12 and 24 months between the log-transformed NLR and the presence of relapses, new/enlarging and/or contrast-enhancing MRI lesions, and/or physical disability. Conclusions: In this cohort of LATAM patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, NLR was abnormally high in attacks but also during follow-up. However, a high NLR was not an independent predictor of clinical or imaging outcomes in our models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Despite the availability of a large amount of information regarding the management and care of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients, there is scant information about recommendations on how to care for primary progressive MS (PPMS) patients. The objective of this study was to review how PPMS patients should be assessed and cared for in Latin America (LATAM). Methods A panel of neurology experts from LATAM dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients gathered virtually during 2017 and 2018 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the diagnosis and treatment of PPMS patients in LATAM. To achieve consensus, the methodology of “formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method” was used. Results Recommendations focused on disease management, and specific and symptomatic disease treatment were determined. The main consensus was that the 2017 McDonald criteria should be used for diagnosis but that the exclusion of regional diseases is strongly recommended; that specific considerations should be taken regarding immunotherapy treatments used in MS due to the scarce evidence available; and that a general approach that considers symptomatic treatment and rehabilitation should be performed in affected patients to improve their status. Conclusions The recommendations of these consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the health care and management of PPMS patients in LATAM. Highlights • 17 experts from LATAM carry out a consensus recommendation on the diagnosis and treatment of PPMS patients in LATAM. • The the 2017 McDonald criteria should be used for diagnosis but exclusion of regional diseases is strongly recommended • Specific considerations should be taken regarding immunotherapy treatments used in MS due to the scarce evidence available • A general approach that considers symptomatic treatment and rehabilitation should be performed to improve their status [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel epidemiological data has appeared in recent years in Latin America (LATAM) regarding the epidemiology of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, most of this information is related to all MS subtypes, and no specific data was collected regarding the primary progressive form of MS (PPMS). The objective of this study was to perform an updated systematic review of the epidemiology of PPMS in LATAM. Methods We conducted a systematic review of published epidemiological articles of PPMS from January 1997 to June 2017. Results No incidence data were found regarding PPMS. Differentiated prevalence was reported in 7 studies and ranged from 0.13 to 1.1 cases of PPMS per 100,000 inhabitants. Regarding subtype frequency, PPMS was observed in 10% of affected patients in proportional meta-analysis. No data about mortality were found. Conclusion The study provides information on discriminated epidemiological features of PPMS in the region. The frequency observed was low in terms of prevalence. Follow up studies considering survival milestones and incidence data could provide a better understanding of the disease in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The emergence of therapeutic options in multiple sclerosis has led to the need for the consideration of infections risk. • LATAM is especially vulnerable to suffer from endemic infectious diseases and those with epidemic and pandemic potential. • The healthcare infrastructure has limited capacity and is highly variable within the LATAM. • LATAM has extensive endemic microbial diversity for a wide array of infectious agents and is at particularly high risk of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. The emergence of several therapeutic options in multiple sclerosis (MS), which significantly modify the immune system functioning, has led to the need for the consideration of additional factors, such as risk of infections, in the decision-making process. The aim of these consensus recommendations was to discuss and perform a practical guide to Latin American neurologists on the risk of infections at diagnosis, follow-up and prior to initiation of DMDs. A panel of Latin American neurologists, experts in demyelinating diseases and dedicated to management and care of MS patients, gathered during 2021 and 2022 to make consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in PwMS treated with DMDs in Latin America. The RAND/UCLA methodology was developed to synthesize the scientific evidence and expert opinions on health care topics and was used for reaching a formal agreement. Recommendations were established based on relevant published evidence and expert opinion, focusing on: 1- baseline infection disease and vaccination status; 2- opportunistic infections; 3- progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; 4- genitourinary system infections; 5- respiratory tract infections; 6- digestive system infections, 7-others local infections and 8- COVID-19. The recommendations of this consensus seek to optimize the care, management and treatment of PwMS in Latin America. The standardized evidence-based care of pwMS infections will allow better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study describes the therapeutic strategies in NMOSD and MOGAD adopted by neurologists to treat both conditions in Latin America (LATAM) with main focus on rituximab (RTX) and the disease outcome. retrospective study in a cohort of NMOSD and MOGAD patients followed in specialized MS/NMOSD centers from eight countries and 14 LATAM reference centers. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected. RTX strategies on naïve (for rituximab) patients were summarized as follows: scheme A: two 1000 mg infusions 15 days apart and repeated every 6 months; scheme B: four 375 mg/m2 infusions every week for 4 weeks and repeated every 6 months; scheme C: one 1000 mg infusions and repeated every 6 months; scheme D: other scheme used. Relapse rate and adverse events during follow-up were analyzed considering the different RTX schemes. Poisson and logistic regression analysis were used to assess baseline aspects and disease activity during follow-up. A total of 217 patients were included. 197 were NMOSD patients (164, 83.2% AQP4-IgG seropositive and 16.7% seronegative) and 20 were MOGAD patients. The most frequent long-term treatment was RTX in both groups (48.2% and 65% for NMOSD and MOGAD patients, respectively). The most common RTX regimen used in 79 (83.1%) patients was two 1000 mg infusions 15 days apart and repeat every 6 months. Relapses under RTX treatment were observed in 21 (22.1%) patients. Relapses after RTX treatment were associated with higher EDSS (OR 1.75, 95%CI 1.44–2.34, p = 0.03) and higher ARR pre-RTX (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.72–3.12, p = 0.002) but not with RTX regimen (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.89–1.21, p = 0.60). the most strategy used in LATAM was RTX with two 1000 mg infusions 15 days apart. Relapses during follow up were not associated with RTX regimen used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• NMOSD is associated with increased health care utilization and with a significant financial burden. • 100 NMOSD patients from Argentina were included and AQP4-Ab and/or MOG-Ab testing were requested in 91% of patients. • Health insurance covered AQP4-Ab and/or MOG-Ab test partially in 15% of cases, but 33% of patients paid it in full of their own pocket. • Private insurance (OR=3.84, p=0.01) was the only factor independently associated with appropriate access to long-term NMOSD-specific medications. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but severe neuroimmunological condition associated with a significant financial burden. NMOSD is also associated with increased health care utilization, including neurology outpatient visits, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use, long-term medication, among others. We aimed to evaluate real-world patient experiences in access to care and NMOSD burden in an Argentinean cohort. This cross-sectional study used a self-administered survey and was conducted in Argentina (2022). Patients with NMOSD were divided into three groups: private health insurance (PHI), social health insurance (SHI), and public health insurance (PHI, Ministry of Public Health). Differences in access and health care barriers were assessed. One hundred patients with NMOSD (74 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 38.7 years were included. Their EDSS was 2.8 and they were followed for 5.2 years. Of them, 51%, 11%, and 13% were employed (full-time: 57.5%), currently unemployed and retired by NMOSD, respectively. 55% of them visited between 2-3 specialists before NMOSD diagnosis. Aquaporin-4-antibody and/or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody testing was requested in 91% (health insurance covered this partially in 15.3% and 32.9% of the time the test was entirely paid by patient/family). Patients with NMOSD receiving private medical care reported greater access to MRI, outpatient visits, and fewer issues to obtain NMOSD medications compared to those treated at public institutions. A longer mean time to MRI and neurology visit was found in the PHI group when compared with the other two subgroups. Regression analysis showed that private insurance (OR=3.84, p=0.01) was the only independent factor associated with appropriate access to NMOSD medications in Argentina. These findings suggest that barriers to access and utilization of NMOSD care services in Argentina are common. NMOSD patients experienced problems to receive NMOSD medication properly, especially those from the public sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the burden of malaria in Latin America and the Caribbean countries through a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature, gray literature, and information from countries’ public health authorities for the period 1990 to 2009. Methods The random-effects meta-analysis of the prospective studies, carried out in very highly endemic areas, showed an annual incidence rate of 409.0 malaria episodes/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 263.1–554.9), considering all ages, which was 40-fold the one estimated from areas with passive surveillance only. Results Overall, the most prevalent species was Plasmodium vivax (77.5%; 95% CI 75.6–79.4) followed by Plasmodium falciparum (20.8%; 95% CI 19.0–22.6) and Plasmodium malariae (0.08%; 95% CI 0.07–0.010). Data from regional ministries of health yielded an estimated pooled crude annual mortality rate of 6 deaths/100,000 people, mainly associated with P. falciparum . Conclusion This study represents the first systematic review of the burden of malaria in Latin America and the Caribbean, with data from 21 countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the property of Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

• This survey explores diverse aspects of the impact of NMOSD in Latin America • This is the first study on this subject providing data from all Latin American countries • This study is the largest NMOSD regional series thus far reported • The study was designed to identify NMOSD diagnostic and management aspects in the Americas requiring further attention Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an increasing diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in Latin America (LATAM). Despite the heterogeneity of this population, ethnic and socioeconomic commonalities exist, and epidemiologic studies from the region have had a limited geographic and population outreach. Identification of some aspects from the entire region are lacking. To determine ethnic, clinical characteristics, and utilization of diagnostic tools and types of therapy for patients with NMOSD in the entire Latin American region. The Latin American Committee for Treatment and Research in MS (LACTRIMS) created an exploratory investigational survey addressed by Invitation to NMOSD Latin American experts identified through diverse sources. Data input closed after 30 days from the initial invitation. The questionnaire allowed use of absolute numbers or percentages. Multiple option responses covering 25 themes included definition of type of practice; number of NMOSD cases; ethnicity; utilization of the 2015 International Panel criteria for the diagnosis of Neuromyelitis optica (IPDN); clinical phenotypes; methodology utilized for determination of anti-Aquaporin-4 (anti- AQP4) antibodies serological testing, and if this was performed locally or processed abroad; treatment of relapses, and long-term management were surveyed. We identified 62 investigators from 21 countries reporting information from 2154 patients (utilizing the IPDN criteria in 93.9% of cases), which were categorized in two geographical regions: North-Central, including the Caribbean (NCC), and South America (SA). Ethnic identification disclosed Mestizos 61.4% as the main group. The most common presenting symptoms were concomitant presence of optic neuritis and transverse myelitis in 31.8% (p=0.95); only optic neuritis in 31.4% (more common in SA), p<0.001); involvement of the area postrema occurred in 21.5% and brain stem in 8.3%, both were more frequent in the South American cases (p<0.001). Anti-AQP4 antibodies were positive in 63.9% and anti-Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies in 4.8% of total cases. The specific laboratorial method employed was not known by 23.8% of the investigators. Acute relapses were identified in 81.6% of cases, and were treated in 93.9% of them with intravenous steroids (IVS); 62.1% with plasma exchange (PE), and 40.9% with intravenous immunoglobulin-G (IVIG). Therapy was escalated in some cases due to suboptimal initial response. Respondents favored Rituximab as long-term therapy (86.3%), whereas azathioprine was also utilized on 81.8% of the cases, either agent used indistinctly by the investigators according to treatment accessibility or clinical judgement. There were no differences among the geographic regions. This is the first study including all countries of LATAM and the largest cohort reported from a multinational specific world area. Ethnic distributions and phenotypic features of the disease in the region, challenges in access to diagnostic tools and therapy were identified. The Latin American neurological community should play a determinant role encouraging and advising local institutions and health officials in the availability of more sensitive and modern diagnostic methodology, in facilitating the the access to licensed medications for NMOSD, and addressing concerns on education, diagnosis and management of the disease in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As human and economic resources are limited, especially in Latin America (LATAM), it is important to identify research priorities to improve multiple sclerosis (MS) patients care in the region. The objective was to generate a multidisciplinary consensus on research priorities in MS for patients care in LATAM by involving healthcare professionals and MS patient associations. consensus was reached through a four-step modified Delphi method designed to identify and rate research priorities in MS in LATAM. The process consisted of two qualitative assessments, a general ranking phase and a consensus meeting followed by a more detailed ranking phase a total of 62 participants (35 neurologists, 4 nurses, 12 kinesiologists, 7 neuropsychologists and 4 patient association members) developed the process. At the final ranking stage following the consensus meeting, each participant provided their final rankings, and the top priority research questions were outlined. 11 research priorities were identified focusing on healthcare access, costs of the disease, physical and cognitive evaluation and rehabilitation, quality of life, symptoms management, prognostic factors, the need of MS care units and patient's management in emergencies like COVID-19. this work establishes MS research priorities in LATAM from multiple perspectives. To pursue the actions suggested could launch the drive to obtain information that will help us to better understand the disease in our region and, especially, to better care for affected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the study was to compare the interval from first symptom of MS to diagnosis, and the interval between date of diagnosis and DMD initiation with the introduction of upgraded MS diagnosis criteria. retrospective cohort study. To be included, data concerning date of disease onset (first relapse), date of diagnosis (confirmed disease) and date of DMD initiation had to be available. Kaplan-Meier estimator and plots were applied. Survival probabilities were evaluated for the 2 diagnosis epoch groups according to the diagnostic criteria advised at the time: group 1, for diagnosis performed between 2005-2009 (2005 revised McDonald criteria) and group 2, for diagnosis performed between 2010-2017 (2010 revised McDonald criteria). 654 patients were included (278 in group 1 and 308 in group 2). The mean time from disease onset to diagnosis in group 1 was 11 ± 4 vs. 7 ± 3 months (p = 0.001). Mean time from disease diagnosis to first DMD was 2.9 ± 1.1 months in group 1 vs. 6.8 ± 1.5 months in group 2 (p = 0.002). although a shortening in time of diagnosis was described, a trend to increase the time to initiate a DMD was noted in group 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Interval from disease onset to diagnosis with updated criteria in LATAM patients was evaluated • Survival probabilities were evaluated for 5 diagnosis epoch groups 1188 (75.6% females) RRMS patients were included • Significant shortening of interval was observed by using updated diagnosis criteria (p<0.001), The objective was to evaluate the interval from first symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) to diagnosis with the introduction of MS diagnostic criteria in a Latin American (LATAM) population. Methods: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) completed a survey in 12 LATAM countries. Date of disease onset (first relapse) and date of diagnosis (confirmed disease) were required. Survival probabilities were evaluated for 5 diagnosis epoch groups: group 1: 1983-2000 Poser; group 2: 2001-2004 McDonald's first version; group 3: 2005-2009 revisions of 2005; group 4: 2010-2016 revisions of 2010; and group 5: 2017-2019 revisions of 2017. Results: 1188 (75.6% females) patients were included. Mean time from disease onset to diagnosis in group 1 was 21 ± 8 months; in group 2, 19 ± 7 months; in group 3, 16 ± 10 months; in group 4, 9.6 ± 8.5 months; and in group 5, 8.2 ± 10 months. Significant differences were observed between groups 1, 2, 3 vs. 4 and 5 (p<0.001), while no differences were observed between groups 4 and 5 (p=0.08). Conclusion: We observed a significant shortening of time from MS onset to diagnosis with the adoption of new diagnostic criteria in LATAM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We evaluated 89 aquaporin-4-IgG-positive NMOSD patients from Latin America. • A positive correlation between age at onset and EDSS score at the last follow-up (Spearman r = 0.28, p = 0.007) was observed. • Age at onset have important implications for the long-term prognosis for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, there are several reasons to promote worldwide the concept of multiple sclerosis care units (MSCU) for a better management of affected patients. Ideally, the MSCU should have some human and technical resources that distinguish and improve the care of affected patients; however, local, and regional aspects should be considered when recommending how these units should operate. The objective of these consensus recommendations was to review how MSCU should work in Latin America to improve long-term outcomes in MS patients. A panel of neurology experts from Latin America dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients gathered virtually during 2019 and 2020 to carry out a consensus recommendation about objectives and functioning implementation of MSCU in Latin America. To achieve consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used. Recommendations focused on the objectives, human and technical resources, and the general functioning that MSCU should have in Latin America. The recommendations of these consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the health care and management of MS patients by setting how MSCU should work in our region. • MS Care Units (MSCU) promotes a better management of patients. • We made a consensus about how MSCU should work in Latin America. • A formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method was used for the objective. • Recommendations focused on the human, technical resources, and the general functioning that should have. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]