Search

Objective: Latex allergy has become an increasing and clinically important problem. Several recommendation for secondary preventive measures have been advised. The aims of the study were to illustrate the results of the latex-safe protocol and to evaluate in allergic patients the role of risk factors for the development of latex allergy., Methods: Latex-safe treatment was divided into the following phases: anamnestic identification, allergologic assessment, patient selection, intervention programme, preventive medication, operating room equipment, postoperative management, patient and family training, follow-up., Results: Between 1998 and 2004, 6.832 patients underwent 7.333 operations. Anamnestic and diagnostic tests showed that 26 patients had latex allergy. 44 secondary perioperative latex-safe management have been accomplished in 26 children. No allergic event or complications linked to the procedure occurred. Atopy, congenital malformations frequently associated with latex allergy and the presence of 5 or more surgical procedures were the major risk factors recognized. Six out of the 26 patients (23%) had only one risk factor (atopy). Twenty out of 26 children (77%) had several associated risk factors: 8 of them had simultaneously 9 of the 10 analysed risk factors. Our data shows that, the higher their number, the higher the gravity of the allergy., Conclusions: Although latex allergy is a limited phenomenon, it is nevertheless quite frequent within risk groups. Most patients have simultaneously many risk factors for the development of such an allergy, and the occurrence of several risk factors increases severity of the allergy. Latex-safe perioperative management offers guarantees of safety against latex allergy phenomena.

The aim of our research was to evaluate the latex allergy prevalence in 1300 health care workers by means of a self-administered questionnaire, clinical evaluation and specific allergological tests to confirm this condition. The results showed that all the questionnaire were completed, 60 subjects reported work-related symptoms, and 35 subjects out of 60 had latex allergy, 2.7% out of 1300 workers, lower than others studies, all 35 subjects were also atopic. This study confirms that the atopy is an important risk for the development of latex allergy.

Background: Natural rubber latex is a frequent cause of IgE-mediated allergy in hairdressers; but a non-IgE-mediated allergy to latex proteins can also occur. Sixty-one hairdressers, reporting latex glove-related symptoms, were enrolled in the study., Methods: They were evaluated for latex allergy by assessment of serum specific IgE and skin prick tests. Patients were patch tested to a rubber additive series and to latex. Proportions were compared by one-tailed Fisher's exact test; mean values of continuous variables were compared by Student's t-test., Results: A diagnosis of IgE-mediated latex allergy was made in 11 (18%) hairdressers; patch tests with rubber-related antigens were positive in 24 (39.3%) subjects. The most positive patch tests were those with para-phenylenediamine (33%). Two hairdressers (3.3%) showed delayed reactions to the latex sample. Hairdressers with IgE-mediated latex allergy were older and presented a personal history of atopy and local hives after exposure to latex; they were more likely to have a positive response to other allergens on prick or patch testing., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a certain number of false-positive and false-negative results when reported symptoms of possible latex sensitivity were compared to prick and CAP tests to latex, indicating the problems of relying solely on self-report.