Search

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of post-interventional compression therapy on clinical outcomes after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins., Methods: This prospective, controlled, multicenter study in Germany involved 493 varicose vein patients followed-up for 6 months., Results: Compression therapy significantly reduced symptoms compared to no compression (VCSS: 1.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.2 ± 2.2; p = .007). Post-interventional therapy duration of up to 14 days was found to be most effective for improving patient-reported disease severity ( p < .001) and higher quality of life ( p = .001). Patient compliance was high (82%), and non-compliance was linked to worse disease severity (VCSS 1.4 ± 1.5 vs 2.1 ± 2.3, p = .009)., Conclusion: In conclusion, post-interventional compression therapy is beneficial by reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. High patient compliance with the therapy is observed, and non-compliance is associated with worse disease severity., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: This single center prospective randomized study was performed to compare the effect of endovenous laser flush ablation (EVLAf) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) close to the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) with a standard ablation (EVLAs) up to two cm distally of the SFJ on reflux in the GSV stump. Patients and methods: Between April 2013 and January 2016, 146 legs in 146 consecutive patients, meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, were treated by EVLA. All patients were randomized into 2 groups. In group 1 EVLAf started from the SFJ level, and in group 2 EVLAs started two cm below the SFJ. The primary endpoint was reflux in the GSV stump after 900 days. Secondary endpoints were reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV), proximal clinically recurrent varicose veins related to reflux in the stump and/or the AASV. Results: At day 900, 27 patients were lost to follow-up. Reflux in the stump was detected in 3.6% in group 1 and in 22.2% in group 2 (p<0.05). Reflux in the AASV was present in 7.1% in group 1 and in 17.46% in group 2 (p=0.09). Proximal clinically recurrent varicose veins were observed in 8.9% in group 1 and in 19.1% in group 2 (p=0.12). The greatest diameter of the stump was significantly larger in group 2 (group 1: 0.41 cm, group 2: 0.6 cm, p<0.001). Conclusions: EVLAf is associated with a significantly lower incidence of reflux in the GSV stump, with a trend to a lower incidence of reflux in the AASV and with a lower incidence of proximal recurrent varicose veins after 900 days follow-up compared to EVLAs. EVLAf may improve the clinical recurrence rate after EVLA of the GSV.

Introduction: To date, there are no prospective studies evaluating the prevention of recurrent veins by the simultaneous treatment of a sufficient anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) in patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of an insufficient great saphenous vein (GSV). This study will provide important information about the impact of the AASV on the development of recurrent veins after EVLA of the GSV. Additionally, it will be clarified whether patients benefit from a preventive ablation of a sufficient AASV., Methods and Analysis: This is a multicentre, prospective, controlled, exploratory clinical study in 1150 patients with a medical indication for EVLA of a refluxing great saphenous vein. Patients will be enrolled into two study groups: in half of the patients EVLA will be performed on the insufficient GSV only. In the other half of the patients EVLA will be performed on the insufficient GSV and additionally on the sufficient AASV. Within seven study visits, patients will be followed-up over a time period of 5 years. Primary study endpoint is the recurrence rate; secondary endpoints include inter alia, complication rate, postoperative pain intensity, quality of life and patient satisfaction., Ethics and Dissemination: Before initiation of the study, the protocol was presented and approved by the independent ethics committee of the medical faculty of the University of Heidelberg (Ethics approval number S-596/2018). This study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (https://www.germanctr.de/). Research findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at relevant conferences., Trial Registration Number: German Clinical Trial Registry (DRKS00015486)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aim: Endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) procedures are catheter-directed, ultrasound (US)-guided thermal methods for treatment in varicose veins disease. Radiofrequency, laser or steam energy thermally denatures vein wall collagen, leading first to vein wall inflammation, then fibrosis and finally to occlusion. The aim of this guideline is to give evidence-based recommendations for ETA procedures., Methods: These guidelines were drafted during a consensus meeting of a group of experts in the field of ETA in June 2012 (Hvar, Croatia) under the auspices of the International Union of Phlebology (IUP). These guidelines review the present state of knowledge as reflected in peer-reviewed published medical literature. The recommendations of these guidelines are graded according to the American College of Chest Physicians Task Force recommendations on Grading Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines., Results: Recommendations on the use of ETA procedures were made based on the quality of evidence for efficacy, safety, tolerability, cosmetic outcome, patient satisfaction/preference and, where appropriate, on the experts' opinion. Health economics were not considered, since differences in national health systems and pricing make it difficult to form general conclusions that are relevant at an international level., (© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Endoluminal catheter-based procedures enable venous reflex in varicose saphenous veins to be eliminated. The catheter tip is positioned in the sapheno femoral or popliteal junction under ultrasound guidance. The energy necessary to ablate the vein is generated as heat by high-frequency current (radiofrequency) by laser light or by steam. Advantages of this procedure include low invasiveness, subcutaneous infusion anesthesia (SIA), low perioperative morbidity and rapid restoration of mobility of patients.

Background: Major side effects after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) are pain and bruising. Low temperature of the tumescence fluid might cause additional venous constriction and a cooling effect around the vein. The aim of this study was to show outcome and side effects after EVLA of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) with a 1470 nm Diode laser (Ceralas E, biolitec) using cold or warm tumescence fluid for anaesthesia., Patients and Methods: Between August and November 2007, 85 consecutive patients (85 legs) with an incompetent GSV were treated by EVLA. The patients were randomized in two groups. In 42 patients (Group A) a warm (37 degrees C) and in 43 patients (Group B) a cold (5 degrees C) tumescence fluid (TF) was used for local anaesthesia in the track of GSV. All patients were re-examined after 1, 10 and 30 days clinically and by duplex for complications and occlusion in the treated vein segment. Patient's satisfaction was assessed on a 0 to 4 points scale., Results: In each group one patient was lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference concerning gender, age, C of CEAP, BMI or diameter of the treated vein. In Group A a mean of 462 ml TF and in Group B a mean of 428 ml TF were used. In Group A the mean LEED (average linear endovenous energy density) was 114 J / cm and in Group B 115 J / cm. In both groups occlusion of the treated veins was achieved for all patients. The diameter of the GSV at 3 cm below the sapheno-femoral junction shrunk from 1.0 to 0.7 cm in both groups. The modified CEAP clinical score improved in Group A from 2.9 to 0.7 (mean value) and in Group B from 3.0 to 1.1. The mean pain score on a scale from 0 to 4 during day 2 to day 10 was 1.2 in Group A and 1.0 in Group B. At this time patients in Group A took a mean of 3.4 and in Group B 1.7 analgetic tablets. Ecchymoses were rare in both groups (4 in Group A, 7 in Group B)., Conclusions: In this prospective randomized comparative study the temperature of the tumescence fluid did not influence the occlusion rate when a high LEED was used. In both groups pain and ecchymoses are less frequent in this study with a 1470 nm diode laser than reported in studies with 810-980 nm systems. Cold tumescence fluid reduced pain slightly and reduced the intake of analgetics significantly.

Introduction: Most of the published EVLA data concern 810, 940, 980 nm diode lasers and 1064 or 1320 nm Nd:Yag laser systems. Major side effects are postoperative pain and bruising. The aim of this study was to show the outcome one year after EVLA of incompetent saphenous veins with a 1470 nm Diode laser (Ceralas E, biolitec)., Patients and Method: Between December 2006 and February 2007, 134 saphenous veins (108 GSV, 26 SSV) in 117 legs of 100 consecutive patients where treated by EVLA for GSV and SSV incompetence. All patients were examined clinically and with duplex by an experienced phlebologist prior to intervention, and at the follow-up visits for complications, occlusion, flow and reflux in the treated vein segment. The clinical evaluation included clinical CEAP and the presence of recurrent varicose veins. Patient satisfaction was assessed by a 0 to 4 scale., Results: After a mean follow-up period of 184 days (SD 27) 127 treated veins (102 GSV, 25 SSV) of 111 limbs in 94 patients and after 329 days (SD 14) 105 treated veins (94 GSV, 21 SSV) of 105 limbs in 83 patients were reinvestigated. Six patients were lost to follow up after six months and an additional 11 patients after one year. Up to one year follow-up all treated veins remained occluded. At six months, one new insufficient anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) and after 12 months, three new insufficient AASV occurred. After one year 45 patients were very satisfied with the method, 34 were satisfied, three were fairly and one was not satisfied. The mean of all answers was 0.5 (SD 0.5). In three cases phlebitic reactions after 10 days, but no severe complications such as deep vein thrombosis occured. After six months in 9.5% of the legs paresthesia was present in the treated area which reduced to 7.6% after one year. Intake of painkillers was mean 6.7 tablets (SD 3.5). When we compared GSV legs treated with LEED below or above 100 J/cm, the paresthesia rate was significantly lower in the first group with 2.3% compared to 15.5 % in the higher LEED group. The differences for number of days with analgesic intake and for the paraesthetic area were significant. Discussion In this prospective follow-up study with 100 consecutive patients and 134 treated saphenous veins a high occlusion rate of 100% could be demonstrated one year after treatment. However, with LEED > 100 J/cm in this study, the incidence of paresthesia rose significantly. Therefore it seems adequate to stay below 100 J/cm in the future as the occlusion rate was the same below and above 100 J/cm., Conclusion: EVLA of GSV and SSV with a 1470 nm diode laser is a minimally invasive, safe and efficient therapy option with a high success rate.

Aim: Major side effects after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) are pain and bruising. The aim of this study was to compare outcome and side effects after EVLA of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) with a 1 470 nm diode laser (Ceralas E, biolitec) using a power of 15 or 25 W., Methods: Between 28 November 2007 and 15 January 2008, 40 consecutive patients (40 legs) with an incompetent GSV were treated by EVLA. The patients were randomized in two groups. In Group A (20 patients) was used a 15-W-power laser and in Group B (20 patients) a 25-W-power laser was used. All patients were re-examined after 1, 10 and 30 days clinically and by Duplex for complications and occlusion in the treated vein segment in a standardized way., Results: There was no significant difference concerning gender, age, C of CEAP, body mass index or diameter of the treated vein. In Group A a mean of 465 mL tumescence fluid (TF) was used and in Group B TF was of 433 mL. In Group A the mean linear endovenous energy density (LEED) was 109.7 J/cm and in Group B 132.6 J/cm. The subgroup Bsub included 16 patients of Group B with a comparable mean LEED of 115.8 J/cm. In all groups occlusion of the treated veins was achieved for all patients. The diameter of the GSV reduced at 3 cm below the sapheno-femoral junction from 1.1 to 0.6 cm, 1.0 to 0.6 cm and 0.9 to 0.6 cm respectively in the three groups. The modified CEAP clinical score improved significantly in all groups. In Group A patients have been administered analgesic tablets for a shorter period. There was also a trend to less postinterventional pain and analgesic use in Group A, but it was not significant. Ecchymosis was rare in both groups (8 in Group A, 7 in Group B)., Conclusions: In this prospective randomized comparative study the power of the laser did not influence the occlusion rate when a high LEED with comparable values was used. In both groups pain and ecchymoses were less frequent in this study with a 1 470 nm diode laser than reported in studies with 810-980 nm systems. A lower power level significantly reduced use of analgesic tablets.

Aim: To assess the mid-term results after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of saphenous veins by a standardized duplex and clinical protocol., Methods: A non-randomized prospective trial was performed. We included a total of 67 unselected legs of 65 patients with incompetent great or small saphenous veins (GSV and SSV), confirmed by duplex ultrasound. EVLA was carried out with a 980 nm diode laser in pulsed mode and using tumescent local anaesthesia. All patients were given heparin prophylaxis and compression therapy. Patients underwent standard clinical and duplex follow-up examinations with an average of 2.2 years (0.5-3.5 years) after EVLA., Results: Reflux was eliminated in 59 (88.1%) of the 67 treated veins after 2.2 (SD 0.9) years with an average energy density of 48 J/cm vein (19.8-96.1, SD 13.2). 11.9% of the cases demonstrated antegrade flow without reflux. In 8 of 67 treated legs (11.9%) reflux >0.5 s was still present. In these patients the initial vein diameter was significantly (P=0.01) higher than in the successfully treated limbs. Without reflux, the majority of treated veins, 41 of 59 (69.5%), were no longer detectable by ultrasound. In all groups with still visible veins, there was a diameter reduction of about 50%. Clinical classification (CEAP) and pitting edema similarly improved in all groups, and patient satisfaction was very high across the board. Recurrent varicose veins were significantly more frequent in the reflux group. Severe complications such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism did not occur in any of the 67 treated cases., Conclusions: EVLA of the GSV and SSV is a minimally invasive, safe and efficient treatment option with a high mid-term success rate. Not only standardized duplex, but also clinical criteria should be used in assessing the results.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) are minimal invasive methods to treat saphenous varicose veins. The short- and mid-term results are excellent with an occlusion rate for RFA of almost 90% after 5 years and about 95% for EVLT after 2 years. Severe side effects are rare in both cases. Prospective randomised comparative studies are available for RFA and surgery showing comparable short-term results and superiority of RFA concerning short-term quality of life outcome. For laser treatment no prospective randomised comparative studies are available. Endovenous treatment is only a part of the complex treatment concept of varicose veins. Insufficient tributaries have to be treated in addition. The fact that the insufficient saphenous vein is treated without high ligation seems not to influence the short-term and mid-term recurrence rates. More prospective randomised comparative studies comparing endovenous treatment and surgery or foam sclerotherapy are necessary to decide which method is the best for which patient.