Search

Objectives: To evaluate utility of T2*-weighted (T2*W) MRI as a tool for intra-operative identification of ablation zone extent during focal laser ablation (FLA) of prostate cancer (PCa), as compared to the current standard of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1W) MRI., Methods: Fourteen patients with biopsy-confirmed low- to intermediate-risk localized PCa received MRI-guided (1.5 T) FLA thermotherapy. Following FLA, axial multiple-TE T2*W images, diffusion-weighted images (DWI), and T2-weighted (T2W) images were acquired. Pre- and post-contrast T1W images were also acquired to assess ablation zone (n = 14) extent, as reference standard. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and subtracted contrast-enhanced T1W (sceT1W) images were calculated. Ablation zone regions of interest (ROIs) were outlined manually on all ablated slices. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CBR) of the ablation site ROI relative to the untreated contralateral prostate tissue was calculated on T2*W images and ADC maps and compared to that in sceT1W images., Results: CBRs in ablation ROIs on T2*W images (TE = 32, 63 ms) did not differ (p = 0.33, 0.25) from those in sceT1W images. Bland-Altman plots of ROI size and CBR in ablation sites showed good agreement between T2*W (TE = 32, 63 ms) and sceT1W images, with ROI sizes on T2*W (TE = 63 ms) strongly correlated (r = 0.64, p = 0.013) and within 15% of those in sceT1W images., Conclusions: In detected ablation zone ROI size and CBR, non-contrast-enhanced T2*W MRI is comparable to contrast-enhanced T1W MRI, presenting as a potential method for intra-procedural monitoring of FLA for PCa., Key Points: • T2*-weighted MR images with long TE visualize post-procedure focal laser ablation zone comparably to the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. • T2*-weighted MRI could be used as a plausible method for repeated intra-operative monitoring of thermal ablation zone in prostate cancer, avoiding potential toxicity due to heating of contrast agent.

Purpose: To define the role of focal laser ablation (FLA) as clinical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) using the Delphi consensus method., Methods: A panel of international experts in the field of focal therapy (FT) in PCa conducted a collaborative consensus project using the Delphi method. Experts were invited to online questionnaires focusing on patient selection and treatment of PCa with FLA during four subsequent rounds. After each round, outcomes were displayed, and questionnaires were modified based on the comments provided by panelists. Results were finalized and discussed during face-to-face meetings., Results: Thirty-seven experts agreed to participate, and consensus was achieved on 39/43 topics. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as any volume Grade Group 2 [Gleason score (GS) 3+4]. Focal therapy was specified as treatment of all csPCa and can be considered primary treatment as an alternative to radical treatment in carefully selected patients. In patients with intermediate-risk PCa (GS 3+4) as well as patients with MRI-visible and biopsy-confirmed local recurrence, FLA is optimal for targeted ablation of a specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible focus. However, FLA should not be applied to candidates for active surveillance and close follow-up is required. Suitability for FLA is based on tumor volume, location to vital structures, GS, MRI-visibility, and biopsy confirmation., Conclusion: Focal laser ablation is a promising technique for treatment of clinically localized PCa and should ideally be performed within approved clinical trials. So far, only few studies have reported on FLA and further validation with longer follow-up is mandatory before widespread clinical implementation is justified.

Context: In recent years, focal therapy has emerged as a treatment option for a selected group of men with localized prostate cancer. Cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are the most investigated types of focal treatment with other options currently under evaluation., Objective: The objective of the study was to give a comprehensive overview of six available focal treatment options for prostate cancer with their rationale, delivery mechanism, and outcomes., Information Acquisition: The SIU ICUD chapter on available Energies to Treat Prostate Cancer was used as a guide to describe the different technologies. For outcomes, a literature search was conducted using PubMed key words including focal therapy, HIFU, cryotherapy, irreversible electroporation, vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy, laser interstitial therapy, radiofrequency ablation, microwave therapy, and their synonyms in MeSH terms., Conclusion: Focal therapy appears to have encouraging outcomes on quality of life and urinary and erectile function. For oncological outcomes, it is challenging to fully interpret the outcomes due to heterogeneity in patient selection and short-term follow-up.

Purpose: Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer among men in the USA. Focal laser thermal ablation (FLA) has the potential to control small tumors while preserving urinary and erectile function by leaving the neurovascular bundles and urethral sphincters intact. Accurate needle guidance is critical to the success of FLA. Multiparametric magnetic resonance images (mpMRI) can be used to identify targets, guide needles, and assess treatment outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the location of ablation zones relative to targeted lesions in 23 patients who underwent FLA therapy in a phase II trial. The ablation zone margins and unablated tumor volume were measured to determine whether complete coverage of each tumor was achieved, which would be considered a clinically successful ablation., Methods: Preoperative mpMRI was acquired for each patient 2-3 months preceding the procedure and the prostate and lesion(s) were manually contoured on 3 T T2-weighted axial images. The prostate and ablation zone(s) were also manually contoured on postablation 1.5 T T1-weighted contrast-enhanced axial images acquired immediately after the procedure intraoperatively. The lesion surface was nonrigidly registered to the postablation image using an initial affine registration followed by nonrigid thin-plate spline registration of the prostate surfaces. The margins between the registered lesion and ablation zone were calculated using a uniform spherical distribution of rays, and the volume of intersection was also calculated. Each prostate was contoured five times to determine the segmentation variability and its effect on intersection of the lesion and ablation zone., Results: Our study showed that the boundaries of the segmented tumor and ablation zone were close. Of the 23 lesions that were analyzed, 11 were completely covered by the ablation zone and 12 were partially covered. A shift of 1.0, 2.0, and 2.6 mm would result in 19, 21, and all tumors completely covered by the ablation zone, respectively. The median unablated tumor volume across all tumors was 0.1  mm 3 with an IQR of 3.7  mm 3 , which was 0.2% of the median tumor volume (46.5  mm 3 with an IQR of 46.3  mm 3 ). The median extension of the tumors beyond the ablation zone, in cases which were partially ablated, was 0.9 mm (IQR of 1.3 mm), with the furthest tumor extending 2.6 mm., Conclusion: In all cases, the boundary of the tumor was close to the boundary of the ablation zone, and in some cases, the boundary of the ablation zone did not completely enclose the tumor. Our results suggest that some of the ablations were not clinically successful and that there is a need for more accurate needle tracking and guidance methods. Limitations of the study include errors in the registration and segmentation methods used as well as different voxel sizes and contrast between the registered T2 and T1 MRI sequences and asymmetric swelling of the prostate postprocedurally., (© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe the quantitative and qualitative findings of multiparametric prostate MRI performed after MRI-guided focal laser ablation of prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: A total of 27 consenting patients met the study inclusion criteria, which included but were not limited to the presence of clinical category T1c-T2a prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 7 or less, having undergone prostate biopsy before and after focal laser ablation, and having undergone MRI before ablation, immediately after ablation, and 3 and 12 months after ablation. Signal changes were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively and were then correlated with the results of subsequent biopsy performed at 3 and 12 months after ablation., Results: MRI performed immediately after ablation revealed a hypovascular defect in the ablation zone, with patchy or bandlike decreased T2 signal most commonly noted at 3 months (in 66.7% of ablated lesions) and T2 scarring observed in most lesions (66.7%) at 12 months. Patchy or bandlike decreased apparent diffusion coefficient signal and scarlike changes were most prevalent at 3 months after ablation (50.0% of lesions), and these features remained the most commonly observed findings at 12 months after ablation (27.8% of lesions). At 12 months after ablation, 10 patients were found to have recurrent tumor, with three patients found to have persistent cancer when biopsy was performed at the ablation site. All postablation biopsy cases with positive results showed suspicious T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient characteristics, which were considered to be a well-defined nodular intermediate signal on both of these sequences. Two of the patients for whom positive biopsy findings were noted had focal enhancement of the ablation zone. A significant reduction in the forward volume transfer constant after ablation was found at the ablation site on follow-up examination., Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI can reveal postablation changes in the prostate and can be a valuable tool for monitoring patients who have undergone MRI-guided focal laser ablation.

Purpose of Review: Focal laser ablation (FLA) is an emerging treatment paradigm for prostate cancer that aims to successfully eradicate disease while also reducing the risk of side-effects compared with whole-gland therapies., Recent Findings: Preclinical and phase I clinical trials for low-risk prostate cancer have shown that FLA produces accurate, predictable, and reproducible ablation zones with negligible injury to the surrounding tissues. Because FLA is magnetic resonance compatible, the procedure can be monitored with real-time feedback to optimize targeted treatment of cancerous foci and minimize quality-of-life side-effects. The oncologic efficacy of MRI-guided FLA is currently being evaluated in ongoing phase II clinical trials., Summary: FLA is a well tolerated and feasible therapy for low-risk prostate cancer, and the oncologic efficacy of this treatment modality is currently under investigation in phase II clinical trials at several institutions.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided laser-based thermotherapy in men with clinically low-risk prostate cancer and a concordant lesion at biopsy and MR imaging., Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant phase I prospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Transperineal MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for clinically low-risk prostate cancer was performed in patients with a Gleason score of 7 or less in three or fewer cores limited to one sextant obtained with transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy and a concordant lesion at MR imaging. Lesions were targeted with a laser ablation system. Periprocedural complications were recorded. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score were collected before and after the procedure. MR imaging-guided biopsy of the ablation zone was performed 6 months after treatment. The prostate-specific antigen level, IPSS, and SHIM score before and after ablation were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test., Results: Treatment was successfully completed in nine patients (procedure duration, 2.5-4 hours; mean laser ablation duration, 4.3 minutes). Immediate contrast-enhanced posttreatment MR imaging showed a hypovascular defect in eight patients. Self-resolving perineal abrasion and focal paresthesia of the glans penis each occurred in one patient. The mean (± standard deviation) IPSS and SHIM score at baseline were 5.8 ± 5.3 and 19.0 ± 8.0, respectively. Average score changes were not significantly different from zero during follow-up (P = .18-.99). MR imaging-guided biopsy of the ablation zone showed no cancer in seven patients (78%) and Gleason grade 6 cancer in two (22%)., Conclusion: Transperineal MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation appears to be a feasible and safe focal therapy option for clinically low-risk prostate cancer.