Search

Objectives: Although the flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) provides considerable advantages in head and neck procedures, little is known about its safety and efficacy in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the success rate of FLMA and relevant airway complications in FESS under general anaesthesia., Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis was performed from 2015 to 2019. All patients scheduled for FLMA ventilation were identified. Patient characteristics, length of the surgery, FLMA size, failed FLMA cases requiring endotracheal intubation, immediate adverse airway events and delayed airway injuries were recorded. The primary outcomes included the FLMA success rate, which was defined as primary success after induction and final success after the whole surgical procedure. The secondary outcomes were specific clinical factors associated with FLMA failure and airway complications related to FLMA usage., Results: Of the 6661 patients included in our study, primary success was achieved in 6572 (98.7%), and final success was achieved in 6512 (97.8%). Failure occurred in 89 patients (1.3%) during induction, in 14 (0.2%) during surgical preparation and in 46 (0.7%) during the intraoperative procedure. All patients with failed FLMA ventilation were successfully switched to endotracheal intubation. Male sex, advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) and higher body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors associated with failed FLMA. Immediate adverse respiratory events were observed in 0.85% of the patients, and delayed airway injuries associated with use of FLMA were observed in 0.07%., Conclusion: This retrospective study demonstrates a high success rate for FLMA (97.8% in 6661 patients undergoing FESS). Adverse airway events and injuries associated with FLMA are rare, but clinicians should remain vigilant so that early diagnosis and prompt treatment can be provided., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

To investigate the effect of two-step of jaw-thrust technique on the placement of flexible laryngeal mask with both hands. 157 patients scheduled for functional endoscopic sinus surgery were divided into two groups using a random number table method: control group (group C, n = 78) and test group (group T, n = 79). After induction of general anesthesia, the traditional method was applied to insert the flexible laryngeal airway mask in group C, and the two-step of jaw-thrust technique with both hands by the nurse was applied to help place the laryngeal mask in group T. The success rate, alignment status, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of the laryngeal mask, soft tissue injury of the oropharyngeal cavity and postoperative sore throat, and the incidence of adverse airway event were recorded in both groups. Results: The success rate of the first placement of flexible laryngeal masks in group C and group T were 73.8% and 97.5%, and the final success rates were 97.5% and 98.7%, respectively. Compared with group C, the success rate of first placement in group T was higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the final success rate between the two groups (P = 0.56). The alignment score showed that the placement of group T was better than that of group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The OLP of group C was 22.1 ± 2.6 cmH2O, and the OLP of group T was 25.4 ± 3.8 cmH2O. The OLP of group T was significantly higher than that of group C (P < 0.01). The incidence of mucosal injury and postoperative sore throat in group T were 2.5% and 5.0%, which were significantly lower than that of 23.0% and 16.7% in group C (both P < 0.01). There was no adverse airway event in each group. Conclusion: The two-step of jaw-thrust technique with both hands can improve the success rate of the first placement of the flexible laryngeal mask and the positioning of the laryngeal mask, increase the sealing pressure of the laryngeal mask, and reduce the incidence of oropharyngeal soft tissue injury and postoperative pharyngeal pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Flexible laryngeal mask airways (FLMAs) ventilation have been widely used as airway devices during general anesthesia, especially in otologic surgery. However, the current literature reports that the clinical success and failure rates for FLMA usage are quite different, and there remains a paucity of data regarding factors associated with FLMA failure and complications related to FLMA usage. Purpose: To evaluate the success and failure rates of FLMA usage in otologic surgery, the factors associated with FLMA failure and complications related to FLMA usage. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent otologic surgery, including middle ear and mastoid procedures, under general anesthesia at a large tertiary general hospital from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. The primary outcome was the FLMA failure rate, defined as any airway event requiring device removal and tracheal intubation, including primary and secondary failure. The secondary outcomes were specific clinical factors, including patient sex, age, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI) and duration of surgery, which were analyzed as related risk factors. Results: Among 5557 patients with planned FLMA use, the final success rate was 98.5%. Sixty-seven percent of the failures occurred during initial introduction of the FLMA, 8% occurred after head and neck rotation, and 25% occurred during the procedures. Two independent clinical factors associated with FLMA failure were male sex and age. Respiratory complications were observed in 0.61% of patients, and the rate of severe nerve and tissue damage associated with FLMA use was 0.05. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high success rate of 98.5% for FLMA use in adults undergoing otologic surgery with rare adverse airway events and injuries complications. Two independent risk factors require attention and thorough and accurate management is necessary for every clinician. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]