Search

Introduction: Obesity impairs patients' quality of life (QoL). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a common procedure for patients with severe obesity; however, studies reporting changes in obesity-related QoL are limited. The aim of this study was to assess changes in obesity-related QoL and food tolerance in the early postoperative period., Methods: We included 20 consecutive patients who underwent LSG between May 2021 and July 2023. We evaluated changes in obesity-related QoL 6 months after surgery using an obesity and weight loss QoL questionnaire (OWLQOL) and a weight related symptom measure (WRSM). Additionally, we assessed eating satisfaction and food tolerance after surgery., Results: The percentages of total weight loss and excess weight loss were 28.5% and 79.1%, respectively. OWLQOL scores and WRSM changed from 36.5 to 73.0 points and from 44.0 to 15.0 points (p = .007, .007), respectively. The food tolerance score decreased from 25 to 21.2 points (p < .001), while eating satisfaction showed no significant change (p = .25)., Conclusion: Obesity-related QoL is enhanced even in the early postoperative period, without sacrificing eating satisfaction. The findings of this study may provide valuable insights for patients when considering LSG., (© 2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Systemic inflammatory response is significant prognostic indicator in patients with various diseases. The relationship between prognostic scoring systems based on the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and achalasia in patients treated with laparoscopic Heller‑myotomy with Dor‑fundoplication (LHD) remains uninvestigated. This study aimed to examine the role of mGPS in patients with achalasia., Methods: 457 patients with achalasia who underwent LHD as the primary surgery between September 2005 and December 2020 were included. We divided patients into the mGPS 0 and mGPS 1 or 2 groups and compared the patients' background, pathophysiology, symptoms, surgical outcomes, and postoperative course., Results: mGPS was 0 in 379 patients and 1 or 2 in 78 patients. Preoperative vomiting and pneumonia were more common in patients with mGPS of 1 or 2. There were no differences in surgical outcomes. Postoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed that severe esophagitis was more frequently observed in patients with mGPS of 1 or 2 (P < 0.01). The clinical success was 91% and 99% in the mGPS 0 and mGPS 1 or 2 groups, respectively (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Although severe reflux esophagitis was more common in patients with achalasia with a high mGPS, good clinical success was obtained regardless of the preoperative mGPS., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric-metabolic surgery (BMS) worldwide, accounting for approximately 90% of BMS procedures in Japan. While numerous studies have reported on the safety and efficacy of LSG, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major postoperative complication. Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is preferred for severe obesity with GERD, it is less suitable for Japanese patients who have a higher risk of gastric cancer due to the remnant stomach which is difficult to observe with esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. To address de novo and exacerbation GERD after LSG, we conducted LSG with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve) for Japanese patients with severe obesity. In our first T-sleeve case, the patient demonstrated sufficient weight loss and improved GERD following surgery. Hence, we suggest that T-sleeve is a feasible option for Japanese patients with obesity and concurrent GERD., (© 2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background/aim: The Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) proctoring system was established to prevent serious pancreatic pressure injuries in Japan in 2019. To safely perform robotic gastrectomy (RG) in our hospital, which has no experience in robotic surgery, we conducted a clinical trial with the support of this proctoring system., Patients and Methods: The present study was a single-center clinical prospective study. The primary endpoint was morbidity determined using Clavien-Dindo classification (C-D) Grade IIIa or higher., Results: Ten patients, seven males and three females, were recruited in this study. RG was performed under the proctoring system of the JSES in the initial six cases and was completed independently for the remaining four patients. We successfully performed the initial ten cases without C-D classification grade IIIa or higher morbidities., Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of a proctoring system for introducing RG to facilities with limited experience in robotic surgery. Despite some limitations, this study demonstrated successful outcomes in the initial ten cases, emphasizing the benefits for both surgeons and patients. This study provides valuable insights into the safety of RG in small institutions and calls for further research in this area., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: While laparoscopic fundoplication is a standard surgical procedure for patients with esophageal hiatal hernias, the postoperative recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias is a problem for patients with giant hernias, elderly patients, or obese patients. Although there are some reports indicating that reinforcement with mesh is effective, there are differing opinions regarding the use thereof. The aim of this study is to investigate whether mesh reinforcement is effective for laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with esophageal hiatus hernias., Methods: The subjects included 280 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication as the initial surgery for giant esophageal hiatal hernias, elderly patients aged 75 years or older, and obese patients with a BMI of 28 or higher, who were considered at risk of recurrent hiatal hernias based on the previous reports. Of the subject patients, 91 cases without mesh and 86 cases following the stabilization of mesh use were extracted to compare the postoperative course including the pathology, symptom scores, surgical outcome, and recurrence of esophageal hiatus hernias., Results: The preoperative conditions indicated that the degree of esophageal hiatal hernias was high in the mesh group (p = 0.0001), while the preoperative symptoms indicated that the score of heartburn was high in the non-mesh group (p = 0.0287). Although the surgical results indicated that the mesh group underwent a longer operation time (p < 0.0001) and a higher frequency of intraoperative complications (p = 0.037), the rate of recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernia was significantly low (p = 0.049), with the rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis also tending to be low (p = 0.083)., Conclusions: Mesh reinforcement in laparoscopic fundoplication for esophageal hiatal hernias contributes to preventing the recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias when it comes to patient options based on these criteria., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Background: In recent years, the number of patients requiring surgery for intra-thoracic stomach (ITS) has been increasing due to the effects of obesity and gibbus due to aging. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of the degree of hernia on the pathological conditions and surgical outcomes in ITS patients., Methods: ITS was defined as cases in which over 50% of the stomach had deviated into the mediastinum by esophagogastric fluoroscopy and/or computed tomography, with 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery as the initial surgery included. We compared the pathological conditions and surgical outcomes by dividing the subjects into 3 groups: Group A: 50%- < 75%; Group B: 75%- < 100%; and Group C: 100% (upside-down stomach), depending on the degree of deviation into the mediastinum of the stomach., Results: The breakdown of patients was 33 in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 11 in Group C. Regarding the preoperative pathological conditions, Group C had a high body mass index (BMI) and a low score for factor V according to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (p = 0.0109, p = 0.0062, respectively). While the surgical results indicated that the operation time was extended depending on the degree of hernia (p = 0.0051), there was no marked difference in other surgical outcomes or the postoperative course among the three groups, with a high degree of satisfaction., Conclusions: In the case of ITS, although the operation time was extended depending on the degree of the hernia, the surgical outcomes were the same, and overall good results were obtained., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Background: Despite a high degree of satisfaction with laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia, some cases show no improvement in postoperative esophageal clearance. We investigated whether an objective evaluation is essential for determining the therapeutic effect of LHD., Methods: We investigated the difference in symptoms, regarding esophageal clearance, using timed barium esophagogram (TBE), in 306 esophageal achalasia patients with high postoperative satisfaction who underwent LHD. Furthermore, these patients were divided into two groups, in accordance with the difference in postoperative esophageal clearance, in order to compare the preoperative pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical results., Results: Although the poor postoperative esophageal clearance group (117 cases, 38%) was mostly male and the ratio of Sigmoid type was high compared to the good postoperative esophageal clearance group (p = 0.046, p = 0.001, respectively); in patients with high surgical satisfaction, there was no difference in terms of preoperative symptom scores and surgical results. However, although the satisfaction level was high in the poor esophageal clearance group, the scores in terms of the postoperative dysphagia and vomiting were high (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.004, respectively). The AUC was 0.9842 upon ROC analysis regarding the presence or absence of clearance at 2 min following postoperative TBE and the postoperative feeling of difficulty swallowing score, with a cut-off value of 2 points (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 100%) in cases with a high degree of surgical satisfaction., Conclusion: The esophageal clearance ability can be predicted by subjective evaluation, based on the postoperative symptom scores; so, an objective evaluation is not essential in cases with high surgical satisfaction., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure and rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with failed Heller myotomy., Methods: We identified patients who had undergone redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure or rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy from August 1996 to September 2019 and assessed the patients' characteristics, timed barium swallow results, symptom scores before/after surgery, surgical outcomes, and postoperative outcomes., Results: Eleven patients underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure, and 14 underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy. Blood loss (p = 0.001) and intraoperative complications rate (p = 0.003) were lower and the operative time (p > 0.001) and observation period (p = 0.009) shorter in patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy than in patients who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. Patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had a higher rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis (p = 0.033) than those who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. After the interventions, the dysphagia symptoms were improved for both groups. Furthermore, both groups expressed satisfaction with their respective procedures., Conclusions: Rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy was associated with better surgical outcomes than redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor for patients with failed Heller myotomy. However, rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had higher rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis., (© 2021. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Peptic esophagitis can occur as a complication of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) among patients with esophageal achalasia. The goal of this study was to identify the characteristics of patients who have developed peptic esophagitis following LHD surgery along with the risk factors associated with the occurrence of peptic esophagitis. Among the 447 cases consisting of esophageal achalasia patients who underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not peptic esophagitis occurred following surgery. We also attempted to use univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors for peptic esophagitis occurring following surgery. Esophagitis following surgery was confirmed in 67 cases (15.0%). With respect to the patient backgrounds for cases in which peptic esophagitis had occurred, a significantly higher number were male patients, with a significantly high occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery in terms of surgical outcomes, along with a high occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias in terms of postoperative course (P = 0.045, 0.041, and 0.022, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in terms of age, BMI, disease duration, preoperative symptoms, esophageal manometric findings, esophageal barium findings, and esophageal clearance. A multivariate analysis indicated independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD as being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias. Peptic esophagitis occurred following LHD in 15% of cases. Independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD included being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias following surgery., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: It is anticipated that surgical treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the elderly will increase. This time, using propensity score matching, we examined the results of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for GERD-related diseases in the elderly., Methods: Of 302 cases which underwent initial LF for GERD-related diseases during the period from June 2008 to February 2019, we classified them into elderly (65 years of age or older) and non-elderly groups (64 years of age or younger). 57 cases each were extracted upon performing propensity score matching regarding five factors including: gender; body mass index; esophageal hiatal hernia; extent of reflux esophagitis; and the use of mesh., Results: With regard to the preoperative disease status, the pH < 4 holding time was indicated as 2.8% (0.5-10.7%) in the elderly group and 3.4% (0.6-8.0%) in the non-elderly group, with no difference in terms of the illness period as well (p = 0.889 and p = 0.263, respectively). Although there was no difference in terms of the operative time (155 vs. 139 min, p = 0.092) and estimated blood loss (both ≒ 0 ml, p = 0.298), postoperative hospital stay was prolonged in the elderly group [7 (7-9) vs. 7 (7-7), p = 0.007]. On the other hand, esophageal hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and acid reflux time in the esophagus were all improved following surgery in both groups (p < 0.001 in both groups)., Conclusion: The treatment results of LF for GERD-related diseases in the elderly were as good as those in the non-elderly, indicating possible safe implementation., (© 2021. The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.)

Background: Laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplication (LHD) is the standard surgical treatment for achalasia; however, surgical outcomes over a period greater than 10 years have not been well-explored. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LHD for achalasia based on a single-center experience., Methods: Patients who underwent LHD between 1994 and 2019 were included. Of these, we excluded patients who had undergone foregut surgery or whose follow-up data were unavailable. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings and postoperative persistent and/or recurrent symptoms had been assessed annually. Disease-free rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: A total of 530 patients (mean age 45.0 years with 267 men) were included. The median follow-up period was 50.5 months. More than 10 years' data were available in 78 patients (14.7%). The cumulative rates of freedom from dysphagia, vomiting, chest pain, and Eckardt score > 3 at 10 years after LHD were 80.1%, 97.5%, 96.3%, and 73.5%, respectively. Probability of esophagitis during 10 years after surgery was 34.4% of patients based on Kaplan-Meier estimation. Approximately 3/4 th of patients who had post-LHD esophagitis showed mild esophagitis of Los Angeles classification grade A. Fifteen patients (2.8%) were required a revision of primary LHD. Six patients (1.2%) developed esophageal cancer with an incidence was as high as 219.8/100,000 person-year. All patients with esophageal cancer were found to have early stage tumors that were successfully resected., Conclusions: Symptomatic relief post-LHD lasted for over 10 years. The incidence rate of esophageal cancer was high. Regular EGD surveillance seems to be helpful for early detection of esophageal cancer early., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: It is common knowledge that esophageal achalasia patients have a high risk of developing esophageal carcinoma. The present study assessed the characteristics of esophageal carcinoma patients following laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia., Method: Among 622 cases which were esophageal achalasia patients and underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not esophageal carcinoma occurred following surgery., Results: Six cases (0.96%) of postoperative esophageal carcinoma were confirmed. The characteristics of the cases in which esophageal carcinoma occurred were older age, longer disease duration (p = 0.0362 and 0.0028, respectively), decreased sphincter pressure of the lower esophagus, a high rate of sigmoid esophagus, and a long esophagus lateral diameter (p = 0.0214, 0.001, and 0.0416, respectively). Moreover, no differences in surgical outcomes were confirmed and there were no differences in symptoms from before and following surgery., Conclusion: The characteristics of esophageal carcinoma patients with achalasia following laparoscopic myotomy were an older age, longer disease duration, and greater progression of disease pathophysiology., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Objectives: The Lyon Consensus was conducted in 2017, leading to a revision of the diagnostic criteria of GERD. Conclusive GERD was defined as cases in which the distal esophageal acid exposure time (AET) is greater than 6% and there exists either peptic esophagitis, constriction, or long-segment Barrett's mucosa with a Los Angeles classification of grade C or D. Borderline GERD is defined as cases in which AET is between 4 and 6% and there exists peptic esophagitis with a Los Angeles classification of either grade A or B. All other cases were defined as Inconclusive GERD. We conducted a retrospective investigation of the treatment results of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for GERD according to the Lyon Consensus and evaluated whether or not it is an effective treatment predictor., Materials and Methods: From among the cases of primary LF conducted on patients with GERD-related illnesses at our university hospital from June 2008 to March 2020, the subjects included 215 individuals who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) testing prior to surgery. We compared the pathophysiology of the Conclusive GERD Group (Group A), Borderline GERD Group (Group B), and Inconclusive GERD Group (Group C), and then investigated the treatment results of each group. We used AFP classification for pathophysiological evaluation. For the acid reflux evaluation, we conducted MII-pH measurements using Sleuth, manufactured by Sandhill. The postoperative evaluation period was set to 3 months following surgery. The data are expressed using median values, with a statistical significance defined as p < 0.05 using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Chi-squared tests., Results: Group A: 92 cases (43%, male 69 cases, age 57), Group B: 48 cases (22%, male 20 cases, age 52), and Group C: 75 cases (35%, male 69 cases, age 57). Regarding the patient backgrounds, while there were no significant differences in terms of gender or disease duration, those in Group A were significantly older than the other two groups, and there was a significant difference in Body Mass Index (BMI) between Group A and Group C. The results of each factor were: A factor (1 vs.1 vs. 1, p < 0.001), F factor (2 vs. 0 vs. 0, p < 0.001), and P factor (2 vs. 1 vs. 0, p < 0.001), with AET of 10.0 vs. 2.9 vs. 0.6, p < 0.001, and the disease had progressed more in Group A. There were also no differences in terms of surgical methods, hemorrhage volume, and intraoperative/postoperative complications; however, the use of mesh was higher and surgery duration was longer in Group A. There were obvious improvements in the A, F, and P factors and AET of each group following surgery (other than F and P of Group C, p < 0.001). The rate of recurrence was 15% in Group A, 8% in Group B, and 6% in Group C. It tended to be higher in Group A, but this was not statistically significant., Conclusion: The classification of GERD pathophysiology based on the Lyon Consensus is satisfactory, with no significant differences in the rate of effect of LF. The Lyon Consensus is effective for ascertaining the severity and pathophysiology of GERD; however, we were unable to forecast the treatment results of LF., (© 2021. The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Introduction: According to the anatomy-function-pathology classification, the recurrence rates of A2 and A3 hiatal hernia (HH) after laparoscopic fundoplication are higher than the rate of A1 HH. Therefore, we introduced mesh reinforcement for A2 and A3 cases. In addition, gastropexy was added to A3 cases. We present the strategy for HH repair., Methods: In all, 537 patients (mean age 55.4 ± 16.7 years, 219 women) who underwent primary laparoscopic fundoplication for HH from January 1995 to October 2019 were included. They were divided into three groups by A factor (A1:A2:A3 = 296:156:85). Their clinical data were collected in a prospective fashion and retrospectively reviewed., Results: The median age (years) of the patients in each group was A1:A2:A3 = 46:63:74 years, and age was directly proportional to the size of HH (P < 0.0001). The proportion of females was significantly higher in A3 than in other classes (P < 0.0001). Preoperative reflux esophagitis was severe in A2 (P < 0.0001) and operation time (min) was directly proportional to HH size (A1:A2:A3 = 135:167:193, P < 0.0001). The recurrence rate of conventional laparoscopic fundoplication was 15% (46/304), and it was higher for A2 and A3 than for A1 (P = 0.027). However, with reinforcement of the hiatus using a mesh and gastropexy, the recurrence rates decreased., Conclusion: Combining mesh reinforcement and gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate of para- and mixed-type HH., (© 2021 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Recently, in pursuit of minimal invasion, needlescopic surgery (NS) using forceps thinner than the previous standard has garnered attention as a surgical approach to various diseases. Objective: We compared the outcomes of NS for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related diseases with the conventional method using propensity score-matched analysis. Subjects and Methods: Among 205 of 328 cases who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for the first time from June 2008 to December 2019, excluding 115 cases using mesh and 8 cases undergoing reduced port surgery, 25 subjects in the NS group and 25 subjects in the conventional group were extracted upon propensity score matching for six factors: age, gender, body mass index, degree of esophageal hiatal hernia, duration of intraesophageal acid reflux, and severity of reflux esophagitis. Results: The NS group used the Toupet method, whereas the conventional group used the Nissen method for 2 cases and the Toupet method for 23 cases. There were no significant differences between them ( P  = .490). Although the operative time (143 versus 112 minutes, P  = .038) was longer in the NS group, there were no differences in the bleeding volume (nearly equal at 0 mL in both groups), laparotomy conversion rate, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications ( P  = .588, P  = 1.000, P  = 1.000, P  = 1.000, respectively). There was also no significant difference in recurrence: 2 cases in the conventional group (8%) and 1 case in the NS group (4%) ( P  = 1.000). Moreover, the degree of esophageal hiatal hernia, the severity of reflux esophagitis, and the duration of intraesophageal acid reflux all improved after the surgery in both groups (NS group: P  = .001, P  < .001, P  = .002; conventional group: P  = .007, P  < .001, P  = .003). Conclusions: The short-term outcomes of NS for GERD-related diseases were good, with a longer operative time but no difference in terms of safety or outcomes compared with the conventional method. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Jikei University School of Medicine [30-238 (9259)].

Purpose: To identify the factors that affect laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) treatment efficacy in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (e-GERD) esophagitis, based on the findings of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) and high-resolution manometry (HRM)., Methods: The subjects were 102 patients with e-GERD diagnosed by endoscopy, who underwent LF as the initial surgery. To analyze the findings of MII-pH and HRM, the patients were divided into two groups: a cured group (CR), comprised of patients whose esophagitis was cured postoperatively; and a recurrence group (RE), comprised of patients who suffered recurrent esophagitis., Results: There were 96 patients in the CR group and 6 in the RE group. MII-pH indicated that the acid reflux time, the longest reflux time, and the number of refluxes longer than 5 min, were significantly higher in the RE group than in the CR group (p = 0.0028, p = 0.0008, p = 0.012, respectively). The HRM indicated that only the distal contractile integral (DCI) was significantly lower in the RE group (p = 0.0109)., Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that esophageal clearance may affect the treatment outcome of LF. Based on the findings of MII-pH, the longest reflux time and the number of refluxes longer than 5 min were important factors influencing the therapeutic effect, whereas based on the HRM, the DCI value was most important., (© 2021. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Purpose: One diagnostic criterion of esophageal achalasia is that the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) measured by high-resolution manometry (HRM) is at least 15 mmHg. Moreover, while the standard surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia is laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD), there have been insufficient investigations concerning the surgical outcomes from the perspective of the preoperative IRP value., Methods: We split 121 cases in which LHD was performed as an initial treatment on patients with esophageal achalasia, into two categories according to the IRP median value, and performed a comparative investigation of the surgical outcomes with regard to the preoperative pathophysiology and symptoms., Results: The IRP median value was 29.6 mmHg. The high IRP group consisted of younger individuals and low BMI (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0273, respectively), and the percentage of Chicago classification Type II and III was high (p = 0.029) and the regurgitation score in the preoperative symptoms was high (p = 0.0043). However, no differences in the surgical outcomes were confirmed., Conclusion: In patients with esophageal achalasia, the degree of the preoperative IRP value affects the age, BMI, preoperative LESP, and preoperative regurgitation symptoms. However, there were no effects on the surgical outcomes, with the surgical outcomes being satisfactory, regardless of the IRP value.

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for mobilization of the stomach and abdominal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy have become standard procedures in Japan. However, the differences in outcomes between LAP and HALS have not been examined. We aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of these techniques in patients undergoing esophagectomy., Methods: We assessed 171 patients who underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction for clinical stage 0 to IVa esophageal cancer; 108 patients were treated with HALS and 63 with LAP. Mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival were compared in all patients who had undergone these surgical procedures and then in 59 propensity score-matched pairs to correct for differences in baseline characteristics., Results: In our analysis, HALS had a shorter abdominal operative time (84.4 ± 26.6 vs 110.0 ± 34.1 minutes, P < .0001), but LAP enabled a larger number of abdominal lymph nodes to be harvested with (17.9 ± 6.6 vs 15.4 ± 7.4, P = .0486). The 5-year overall survival rates were 62.1% and 74.5% (P = .1257) for patients who had undergone HALS and LAP, respectively, and the relapse-free survival rates were 67.0% and 72.3% (P = .7243)., Conclusions: There were no significant differences in postoperative mortality and morbidity between the two groups. This suggests that in addition to having a short operative time, HALS has good technical feasibility and is oncologically safe for patients with esophageal cancer., (© 2020 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and Aim: Achalasia is a disease characterized by inadequate relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and impaired peristalsis, for which esophageal motor function testing is essential in making a definitive diagnosis. However, the diffusion rate of esophageal pressure testing in Japan is low. We, therefore, examined whether achalasia could be identified by esophageal clearance testing with low-density barium (Timed Barium Esophagogram: TBE)., Materials and Methods: 126 cases (62 males, median age of 46 years), excluding those who had not undergone TBE during their initial laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery, were chosen as the subjects from among those who were diagnosed with achalasia from November 2012 when HRM was introduced. The type of dilation, maximum esophageal transverse diameter, and esophageal clearance measurements by TBE were retrospectively examined. With respect to TBE, 200 mL of 45 weight% low-density barium was ingested as quickly as possible, after which the barium column heights (H0, H1, H2, and H5) were measured 1 min, 2 min, and 5 min following ingestion., Results: The types of dilation indicated included: straight type (105 cases, 83%); sigmoid type (20 cases, 16%); and advanced sigmoid type (1 case, 1%). The maximum transverse diameter of the esophagus was 45 (34-54) mm, with Grade I (d < 30 mm) in 33 cases, Grade II (35 mm < d < 60 mm) in 75 cases, and Grade III (d < 60 mm) in 18 cases. The values for H0, H1, H2, and H5 were 162 (117-201) mm, 142 (98-199) mm, 130 (94-183) mm, and 119 (77-178) mm, respectively. 114 cases (90.5%) were not cleared after 5 min, while 12 cases (9.5%) were cleared by 5 min later (H1 = 0 + H2 = 0 + H5 = 0) and 7 cases (5.6%) by 2 min later (H1 = 0 + H2 = 0), with only 6 cases (4.8%) having complete clearance within 1 min (H1 = 0). Moreover, the degree of dilatation in patients with complete clearance within 1 min was three patients (2.4%) each for Grade I and Grade II, respectively., Conclusions: Approximately 2.4% of achalasia cases had mostly normal esophageal clearance and no esophageal dilation. Based on the state of esophageal clearance by TBE and the maximum transverse diameter of the esophagus, it seems by and large possible to identify achalasia cases.

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is considered safe and effective for a gastric submucosal tumors, and reduced-port surgery (RPS) is being increasingly performed to treat these tumors. Herein, we present laparoscopic RPS with the cowboy technique for the removal of gastric submucosal tumors., Materials and Surgical Technique: A single-port access device was inserted at the naval (three 5-mm trocars), and a 5-mm trocar was inserted in the left lateral abdominal wall. A ligature was placed at the neck of the tumor, the loop was then tightened, and the knot was finally secured-a process referred to as the cowboy technique. This technique enables complete surgical excision and can be used for exophytic submucosal tumors of the stomach. Four patients underwent RPS with this technique, and the outcomes were good., Discussion: Our cowboy technique enables the safe full-thickness excision of gastric submucosal tumors with exophytic growth and is very useful in performing RPS., (© 2020 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: To compare the treatment results of needlescopic surgery with those of the conventional method for achalasia, using propensity score-matching., Methods: Propensity score-matching was performed based on five factors: age, gender, body mass index, extended form, and maximum expansion diameter, to extract 28 cases each for a needlescopic group and a conventional group., Results: There were no significant differences between the needlescopic group and the conventional group, in operative time (165 min vs. 170 min, p = 0.682), estimated blood loss (both ≒ 0 ml, p = 0.426), or post-operative hospital stay (4 vs. 4 days, p = 0.248). Although the follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional group (6 vs. 105 months, respectively; p < 0.001), there was no difference in the post-operative symptom scores for difficulty in swallowing and chest pain or the degree of satisfaction (p = 0.563, p = 0.142, p = 0.342, respectively). Furthermore, there was no difference in the post-operative clearance rate, with both groups found to be favorable (p = 0.758, p = 0.790, p = 1.000, p = 1.000, respectively)., Conclusions: The short-term results of needlescopic surgery for achalasia were good and equivalent to those of the conventional method.

Background: Chest pain reduces the quality of life of patients with achalasia. Although laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) is a standard surgical treatment for achalasia, its therapeutic efficacy for chest pain is not clear. The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of LHD for chest pain and tried to identify factors associated with the relief of chest pain., Methods: The study included 244 patients with preoperative chest pain who underwent LHD as the first surgical intervention. The questionnaire-based symptom frequency score was multiplied by the severity score, and the calculated metric was defined as the symptom score. The study population was stratified, by the change in the chest pain symptom score, into Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), and No Remission (NR) groups, which were compared for patient background and surgical outcome. Multivariate analysis was also performed to determine factors associated with the relief of chest pain., Results: As for preoperative clinicopathological conditions, the CR subgroup was older (p = 0.0169) with fewer previous balloon dilatations (p = 0.009). Although no difference was detected in the surgical outcome, the NR group had higher postoperative symptom scores for both difficulty in swallowing and vomiting and a lower score for patient satisfaction with surgery (p = 0.0141). Multivariate analysis detected two factors associated with CR: disease duration over 60 months and less than two previous balloon dilatations., Conclusions: LHD improved chest pain symptoms in 90% of patients with achalasia. The patients who achieved relief of chest pain were characterized by disease duration over 60 months and less than two previous balloon dilatations.

Purpose: There is some debate about whether preoperative balloon dilation influences the outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD), with no consensus opinion as yet. Thus, we investigated if preoperative dilation influences the treatment outcomes of LHD for achalasia., Methods: The subjects of this study were 526 patients with achalasia who underwent LHD as an initial treatment between August 1994 and February 2017. The patients were roughly classified by the status of preoperative balloon dilation and matched with propensity scores for age, sex, BMI, morphologic type, and maximum esophageal transverse diameter. Consequently, 94 subjects each were assigned to the balloon dilation (BD) group and to the non-balloon dilation (non-BD) group. We evaluated patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, and incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis., Results: No differences were found in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of intraoperative mucosal injury, or postoperative hospital stay between the BD and non-BD groups. The mean patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the non-BD group (4.9) than in the BD group (4.7) and the incidence of postoperative esophagitis was significantly lower in the non-BD group (1.1%) than in the BD group (7.4%)., Conclusions: Preoperative balloon dilation had no effect on intraoperative complications but did increase the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing LHD for achalasia.

Background: Surgical results of GERD have mainly been reported from the Western countries, with a few reports found in Japan. We examined the surgical results of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication and clarify the characteristics of recurrent cases., Methods: The subjects included 375 patients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication from June 1997 to December 2016 as the initial surgery. Patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and surgical results were examined. In addition, we compared the patient characteristics and pathophysiology of recurrent cases in comparison with non-recurrent cases., Results: Age 59 (43-70) and male 211 (56.3%). The operation time was 141 min (113-180) and intraoperative complications were found to have onset in 13 subjects (3.5%). Dysphagia after surgery was found in 18 cases (4.8%). The A factor (the degree of hiatal hernia), P factor (the degree of esophagitis), and pH < 4 holding time significantly improved after surgery compared with prior to surgery (p < 0.001 for all), while the LES lengths and abdominal LES lengths were extended (p < 0.001 for each). Recurrence was found in 48 patients (15.1%) among the 318 patients for whom we could confirm the presence or absence of recurrence. The A factor, P factor, and pH < 4 holding time prior to surgery were, respectively, higher in the recurrence group (p = 0.031, p < 0.001, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for GERD could be performed safely, with a response rate as good as 85%. Compared with non-recurrent cases, preoperative clinical conditions such as esophageal hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and acid reflux time were all advanced in recurrent cases.

Purpose: In the present study, we examined how the body mass index (BMI) affected the outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD in patients, whose backgrounds were matched in a propensity score-matched analysis., Methods: We divided the patients into two groups (BMI <25 kg/m 2 and BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 ). The following background information was matched for the propensity score-matched analysis: sex, age, degree of esophageal hiatal hernia, acid exposure time, and degree of reflux esophagitis. In total, 105 subjects were extracted in each group. The surgical outcomes and postoperative outcomes of patients with BMI <25 kg/m 2 (Group A) and those with BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 (Group B) were compared and examined., Results: There were no differences in the surgical procedure, intraoperative complications, or estimated blood loss (p = 0.876, p = 0.516, p = 0.438, respectively); however, the operative time was significantly prolonged in Group B (p = 0.003). The rate of postoperative recurrence in Group A was 17% (15/87 patients), while that in Group B was 11% (12/91 patients), and did not differ to a statistically significant extent (p = 0.533)., Conclusions: Although the operative time for GERD in obese patients was prolonged in comparison with non-obese patients, there was no difference in the rate of postoperative recurrence.

Background: Balloon dilatation is reportedly less effective for young patients with esophageal achalasia than for older patients. However, there is no consensus on the impact of prior balloon dilatation on outcomes of surgical treatment. This study investigated the significance of preoperative balloon dilatation on surgical outcomes in young patients with esophageal achalasia., Methods: Of patients aged less than 40 years who had undergone a laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation for esophageal achalasia, 201 with a postoperative follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. They were divided into two groups with and without a history of balloon dilatation, and compared preoperative pathological conditions and surgical outcomes., Results: This study included 100 men and 101 women with a median age of 31 years, of whom 158 patients without a history of pneumatic dilatation (79%, non-PD group) and 43 with a history of pneumatic dilatation (21%, PD group) The preoperative symptom scores for dysphagia and regurgitation were significantly higher in the non-PD group. Although no differences were observed in surgical outcomes or postoperative course, the esophageal clearance rates calculated on preoperative and postoperative timed barium esophagograms were lower in terms of both height and width of the barium column in the PD group than in the non-PD group. Subjectively, both groups expressed equally high satisfaction., Conclusions: In patients aged less than 40 years with esophageal achalasia, although preoperative balloon dilatation did not affect subjective levels of satisfaction with surgery, postoperative improvement in esophageal clearance in the lower esophagus was inhibited.

Purpose: Esophageal achalasia can be roughly divided into non-sigmoid and sigmoid types. Laparoscopic surgery has been reported to be less than optimally effective for sigmoid type. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the esophageal flexion level on the clinical condition and surgical outcomes of patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia., Methods: The subjects were 36 patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia who had been observed for >1 year after surgery. The subjects were divided into sigmoid type (Sg) and advanced sigmoid type (aSg) groups based on the flexion level of the lower esophagus to compare their clinical parameters and surgical outcomes., Results: The Sg and aSg groups included 26 (72%) and 10 subjects, respectively. There were no marked differences in the clinical parameters or surgical outcomes between the two groups. However, the clearance rate calculated using the timed barium esophagogram was lower in the aSg group than in the Sg group. No differences were found in the postoperative symptom scores between the two groups, and both reported a high level of satisfaction., Conclusions: Although laparoscopic surgery for symptoms of sigmoid esophageal achalasia was highly successful regardless of the flexion level, the improvement in esophageal clearance was lower when the flexion level was higher.

Purpose: Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) has become a standard operative procedure for GERD-related diseases in Japan, although meta-analyses have mainly evaluated findings from Western countries. The propensity score matching method was used to compare and investigate the treatment outcomes of two fundoplication procedures (the Nissen and Toupet methods)., Methods: Among 474 patients who underwent initial LF from December 1994 to April 2016, we extracted 401 cases (Nissen: 92 cases, Toupet: 309 cases), excluding 73 patients in whom follow-up was insufficient. We then matched 126 of these patients (63 per group)., Results: The esophageal acid reflux time (%) was 12.2:2.8, being higher in the Nissen group than in the Toupet group (p < 0.001). Regarding the surgical outcome, the amount of bleeding was higher in the Nissen group (p = 0.001), and the number of hospitalization days following surgery was longer (p = 0.003). Furthermore, a significantly rate of postoperative difficulty in swallowing (%) was observed in the Nissen group, at 13:0 (p = 0.004). The recurrence rate (%) was 8:3, with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.243)., Conclusions: Although there was no marked difference in the recurrence rate between the two procedures, postoperative dysphagia was observed at a higher frequency with the Nissen method than the Toupet method.

Background: Esophageal achalasia is a relatively rare disease that occurs usually in middle-aged patients. The laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD) procedure is the gold-standard surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. There are many studies on the pathology and surgical outcome of esophageal achalasia from various perspectives, but there are no studies on gender differences in both the pathology and surgical outcome., Aims: This study aimed to evaluate gender differences in the surgical outcome with the LHD procedure and in the pathology of esophageal achalasia patients., Methods: The study included 474 LHD-treated patients who were postoperatively followed up for 6 months or more. The patients were divided into 2 groups by gender, to compare the preoperative pathology, surgical outcome, symptom scores before and after LHD, symptom score improvement frequency, and patient satisfaction with the surgery., Results: The study population consisted of 248 male and 226 female, having a mean age of 45.1 years. There were no gender differences in the preoperative pathology, but a significantly lower BMI (p < 0.0001) and a smaller esophageal dilation (p = 0.0061) were observed in the female group. The frequency and severity of chest pain before the surgery were significantly higher in the female group (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0103, respectively), and the improvement in both the frequency and severity of chest pain was significantly higher in the female group (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.003, respectively). No differences were identified in the surgical outcomes and postoperative course. The patient satisfaction with the surgery was high in both groups and comparable (p = 0.6863)., Conclusions: The female patients with esophageal achalasia were characterized by low BMI, less esophageal dilation, and increased frequency and severity of chest pain. LHD improved the chest pain in the female patients, whereas the surgical outcome and satisfaction with the surgery were excellent regardless of gender.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as first-line therapy for reflux esophagitis. Recent studies documented that more than 25 % of patients have some symptoms of GERD despite PPI therapy. In 2015, a newly developed acid inhibitor, potassium-competitive acid blocker(P-CAB), were started marketing. P-CAB, PPIs, and H2 blockers are antisecretory drugs of gastric acid, and no medicine can reduce gastroesophageal reflux(GER). The cause of GER is the insufficiency of antireflux mechanism of the cardia. Only surgical treatment can repair these situations. Most frequent antireflux procedures for GERD are Nissen and Tou- pet fundoplications. As for postoperative dysphagia, our first choice is laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF). We herein report our technique of LTF.

Background: The use of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) and high-resolution manometry (HRM), which are new devices used to examine the esophageal function, has recently become common in Europe and the USA, thus garnering much attention. There have not been enough studies as of yet, however, on the esophageal motor function and the benefits of treatment after these devices have been used in laparoscopic fundoplication., Objective: To use MII-pH and HRM to study the treatment effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication and consider a backflow prevention mechanism for laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication., Materials and Methods: The study looked at 27 of a total of 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication due to reasons of either gastroesophageal reflux disease or esophageal hiatal hernia between October 2012 and February 2014, who underwent a postsurgical HRM examination. Of these, 25 patients whose symptoms disappeared following surgery and who were not orally administered gastric secretion inhibitor (of whom nine were male, average age 55.9 ± 14.9 years, and of whom 76 % underwent MII-pH) were taken as the subjects of the study. The postsurgical evaluation was conducted 3 months after the operation., Results: Using HRM, although no change was noted in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) (p = 0.943), an increase in lower esophageal sphincter pressure integral (p = 0.024) and extensions in both overall length and abdominal length were noted (both p < 0.001), while a significant improvement was noted in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Furthermore, the cases subjected to MII-pH demonstrated a reduced gastroesophageal reflux time, total number of liquid reflux episodes, and total number of reflux episodes (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p = 0.009)., Conclusions: Backflow prevention mechanism of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is thus considered to improve the overall LES function without elevating LESP.

Background: Mucosal injury during myotomy is the most frequent complication seen with the Heller-Dor procedure for achalasia. The present study aimed to examine risk factors for such mucosal injury during this procedure., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent the laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure for achalasia at a single facility. Variables for evaluation included patient characteristics, preoperative pathophysiological findings, and surgeon's operative experience. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. We also examined surgical outcomes and the degree of patient satisfaction in relation to intraoperative mucosal injury., Results: Four hundred thirty-five patients satisfied study criteria. Intraoperative mucosal injury occurred in 67 patients (15.4%). In univariate analysis, mucosal injury was significantly associated with the patient age ≥60 years, disease history ≥10 years, prior history of cardiac diseases, preoperative esophageal transverse diameter ≥80 mm, and surgeon's operative experience with fewer than five cases. In multivariate analysis involving these factors, the following variables were identified as risk factors: age ≥60 years, esophageal transverse diameter ≥80 mm, and surgeon's operative experience with fewer than five cases. The mucosal injury group had significant extension of the operative time and increased blood loss. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of reflux esophagitis or the degree of symptom alleviation postoperatively., Conclusion: The fragile esophagus caused by advanced patient age and/or dilatation were risk factor for mucosal injury during laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. And novice surgeon was also identified as an isolated risk factor for mucosal injury.

In general, the treatment methods for esophageal achalasia are largely classified into four groups, including drug therapy using nitrite or a calcium channel blocker, botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic therapy such as endoscopic balloon dilation, and surgery. Various studies have suggested that the most effective treatment of esophageal achalasia is surgical therapy. The basic concept of this surgical therapy has not changed since Heller proposed esophageal myotomy for the purpose of resolution of lower esophageal obstruction for the first time in 1913, but the most common approach has changed from open-chest surgery to laparoscopic surgery. Currently, the laparoscopic surgery has been the procedure of choice for the treatment of esophageal achalasia. During the process of the transition from open-chest surgery to laparotomy, to thoracoscopic surgery, and to laparoscopic surgery, the necessity of combining antireflux surgery has been recognized. There is some debate as to which type of antireflux surgery should be selected. The Toupet fundoplication may be the most effective in prevention of postoperative antireflux, but many medical institutions have selected the Dor fundoplication which covers the mucosal surface exposed by myotomy. Recently, a new endoscopic approach, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), has received attention. Future studies should examine the long-term outcomes and whether POEM becomes the gold standard for the treatment of esophageal achalasia.

Purpose: To clarify the feasibility and utility of reduced port surgery (RPS) for achalasia., Methods: Between September 2005 and June 2013, 359 patients with esophageal achalasia, excluding cases of reoperation, underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHD) according to our clinical pathway. Three-hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent LHD with five incisions (conventional approach), while the other 32 patients underwent RPS, including eight via SILS. The clinical data were collected in a prospective fashion and retrospectively reviewed. We selected 24 patients matched for gender, age and morphologic type with patients in the RPS group from among the 327 patients (C group). The surgical outcomes were compared between the C and RPS groups., Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the duration of symptoms, dysphagia score, chest pain score, shape of the distal esophagus and esophageal clearance. The operative time was significantly longer in the RPS group than in the C group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay or rates of bleeding, mucosal injury of the esophagus and/or stomach and postoperative complications. The symptom scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the C group and RPS group in terms of the postoperative symptom scores or satisfaction scores after surgery., Conclusions: The surgical outcomes of RPS for achalasia are comparable to those obtained with the conventional method.

We herein report our technique for laparoscopic esophageal myotomy combined with Collis gastroplasty and Nissen fundoplication for severe esophageal stenosis. Our patient had experienced vomiting since childhood, and his dysphagia had gradually worsened. He was referred to our department for surgery because of resistance to pneumatic dilation. He was diagnosed with a short esophagus based on the findings of a preoperative upper gastrointestinal series and GI endoscopy. After exposing the abdominal esophagus, esophageal myotomy around the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) was undertaken to introduce an esophageal bougie into the stomach. Then, stapled wedge gastroplasty was performed, and a short and loose Nissen fundoplication was performed. In addition, the bulging mucosa after myotomy was patched using the Dor method. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Most patients with esophageal stricture require subtotal esophagectomy. Laparoscopic surgery for patients with benign esophageal stricture refractory to repeated pneumatic dilation is challenging. However, our current procedure might abrogate the need for invasive esophagectomy for the surgical management of severe esophageal stenosis.

Purpose: To define the factors predisposing to recurrence and evaluate the results of reoperations for achalasia., Methods: We reviewed the medical records of ten patients (4 men and 6 women; mean age, 51.5 ± 11.0 years), who underwent reoperations for achalasia between August 1994 and August 2010., Results: The primary surgical procedures were Heller-Dor (HD) cardioplasty in nine patients and Heller myotomy in one patient. The factors contributing to failure of the primary operation included inadequate myotomy (n = 2), recurrent adhesion after myotomy (n = 2), reflux esophagitis (n = 2), difficulty in passage caused by tortuosity of the esophagus (n = 2), difficulty in passage through the thoracic esophagus (n = 1), and severe chest pain (n = 1). The reoperations included repeated HD procedures (n = 4), repair of an esophageal hiatal hernia (n = 2), thoracic esophageal myotomy (n = 2), straightening of the lower esophagus with gastropexy (n = 1), and subtotal esophagectomy (n = 1). The success rate of the reoperations for resolving symptoms was 90 % (9 patients)., Conclusion: Selecting surgical procedures based on the causes and conditions of recurrence led to symptomatic improvement and acceptable outcomes.

A 31-year-old man, referred to our hospital for investigation of dysphagia, was found to have a spindle-shaped lower esophagus on a contrasted esophagram. The dysphagia was initially treated conservatively, but after 4 years of unsatisfactory control, he requested surgery. Our surgical team has been performing laparoscopic Heller-Dor fundoplication for achalasia since August, 1994, and 265 patients have undergone this procedure so far. Based on our experience, we decided to perform Heller-Dor fundoplication through a single incision for this patient. The operative time was 236 min with minimal blood loss and there were no perioperative complications. His postoperative course was uneventful and he was discharged on postoperative day 4, completing the clinical pathway used for conventional laparoscopic Heller-Dor fundoplication.

Background: The effect of myotomy for achalasia on chest pain has not been clarified. The current study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic myotomy on chest pain associated with achalasia and to identify prognostic factors for outcomes., Method: Between March 2005 and September 2008, 95 patients were available for detailed interviews and for assessment of clearance by timed barium esophagogram (TBE) before and after surgery. Of the 95 patients, 47 (24 men; mean age, 42.9 ± 13.5 years) who experienced chest pain before surgery were studied. The subjects were asked in detail about dysphagia and chest pain before surgery and 6 months after surgery. The frequency and severity of the symptoms were graded on a scale of 0 to 4. In addition, the values obtained by multiplying the grade for frequency by the grades for severity of the two symptoms were defined as the dysphagia score and the chest pain score, respectively. The patients with chest pain scores of 0 after surgery were defined as group A and those with scores smaller than their preoperative scores as group B. The remaining patients with other scores were defined as group C. The background factors and clinical conditions of the three groups were compared., Results: The mean chest pain score decreased from 5.0 ± 3.2 to 1.0 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001). The score after surgery was 0 for 27 patients and showed a decrease for 15 patients. Although the three groups did not differ in their characteristics, differences were noted in postoperative TBE factors (i.e., groups A and B had significantly shorter barium columns than group C at 1 and 5 min after surgery (p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Laparoscopic myotomy had a therapeutic effect on chest pain associated with achalasia, and improvement in postoperative esophageal clearance may influence the therapeutic effect.

Background: Transient postoperative dysphagia is not uncommon after antireflux surgery and usually runs a self-limiting course. However, a subset of patients report long-term dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for persistent postoperative dysphagia at 1 year after surgery., Methods: All patients who underwent antireflux surgery were entered into a prospectively maintained database. After obtaining institutional review board approval, the database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary antireflux surgery and were at least 1 year from surgery. Postoperative severity of dysphagia was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire (scale 0-3). Patients with scores of 2 or 3 were defined as having significant dysphagia., Results: A total of 316 consecutive patients underwent primary antireflux surgery by a single surgeon. Of these, 219 patients had 1 year postoperative symptom data. Significant postoperative dysphagia at 1 year was reported by 19 (9.1%) patients. Thirty-eight patients (18.3%) required postoperative dilation for dysphagia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified preoperative dysphagia (odds ratio (OR), 4.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-15.5; p = 0.023) and preoperative delayed esophageal transit by barium swallow (OR, 8.2; 95% CI, 1.6-42.2; p = 0.012) as risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Female gender was a risk factor for requiring dilation during the early postoperative period (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-10.2; p = 0.016). No correlations were found with preoperative manometry. There also was no correlation between a need for early dilation and persistent dysphagia at 1 year of follow-up (p = 0.109)., Conclusions: Patients with preoperative dysphagia and delayed esophageal transit on preoperative contrast study were significantly more likely to report moderate to severe postoperative dysphagia 1 year after antireflux surgery. This study confirms that the manometric criteria used to define esophageal dysmotility are not reliable to identify patients at risk for postfundoplication dysphagia, and that there is need for standardization of contrast swallow assessment of esophageal function.

Background: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is the gold standard for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and a well-defined learning curve for the procedure has been described. This study aimed to assess whether the surgeon's experience has an effect on 1-year symptom scores and patient satisfaction., Methods: All the patients who underwent antireflux surgery were entered into a prospectively maintained database including 1-year postoperative symptom scores. The database was queried in June 2008 to identify patients who had been followed up for 1 year. To decrease variability, the patients with a large hiatal hernia (>5 cm), paraesophageal hernia, treatment with partial fundoplication, a required Collis gastroplasty, or treatment with a transthoracic procedure were excluded from the study., Results: From September 2003 to March 2007, 215 consecutive patients underwent primary antireflux surgery. Of these 215 patients, 158 (93 women with a mean age of 50.9 ± 13.6 years; range, 18-87 years) met the inclusion criteria and were divided into three groups: early group (9/2003-10/2004), mid group (10/2004-12/2005), and late group (12/2005-3/2007). Experience significantly decreased the mean operative time (P < 0.05) and the hospital stay (P < 0.05). Additionally, the number of patients who required reoperative intervention also decreased with experience. There was no difference in the patient-reported symptom scores at 1 year for heartburn (mean, 0.3 ± 0.7), regurgitation (mean, 0.1 ± 0.4), or dysphagia (mean, 0.3 ± 0.6) (P > 0.05 for each). However, chest pain (mean, 0.2 ± 0.4) was significantly improved with experience (P < 0.05). The overall patient-reported mean satisfaction was 9.0 ± 1.9 (P > 0.05, scale, 1-10), and 14.5% (19/131) of the patients reported use of acid suppression medications., Conclusions: A high degree of 1-year symptom resolution and satisfaction can be achieved even early in a surgeon's experience provided there is adequate training and maintenance of strict adherence to technique.

A 41-year-old woman was admitted due to dysphagia and weight loss of 6 kg. An upper gastrointestinal radiographic contrast study demonstrated an S-shaped lower esophagus with a peak transverse diameter of 65 mm. Moreover, an epiphrenic diverticulum was also detected in the lower part of the esophagus (50 x 40 mm). The measurement of intraesophageal pressure showed a lower esophageal sphincter pressure of 80 mmHg and a lower esophageal sphincter length of 31 mm. Esophageal clearance assessment via a timed barium esophagogram demonstrated impaired contrast clearance, with a rate of 26% at 5 min. A laparoscopic Heller myotomy, Dor fundoplication, and diverticular introversion suturing were performed. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 4. At the 2-year follow-up, no dysphagia was present. This is the first report of a laparoscopic diverticuloplasty using an introversion buried suture with a Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for achalasia complicated by an epiphrenic diverticulum.

A 72-year-old man with reflux esophagitis visited our department with a chief complaint of coughing at night. Since he had a large sliding esophageal hiatal hernia that was increasing in size, he underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. While dissecting the left side of the esophagus with laparosonic coagulating shears, the wall of the thoracic aorta started to bleed. The procedure was urgently converted to open surgery, and the pinhole aortic injury site was suture-obliterated. Thereafter Toupet fundoplication was performed, and the patient did not develop any postoperative complications. To our knowledge, only one other case of aortic injury unrelated to trocar insertion has been reported.

The occurrence of gastric ulcers after laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease is not uncommon. Between December 1994 and December 2004, we performed laparoscopic fundoplication in 180 patients, of whom 4 (2.2%) men developed a gastric ulcer during follow-up. The ulcers occurred predominantly in the upper part of the lesser curvature of the stomach, which is definitely different from the usual location of gastric peptic ulcers. All cases we experienced had Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication was attempted in all of them. Although eradication was not possible in 1 patient because of adverse effects to the drugs, successful eradication was obtained in the remaining 3 patients. After successful eradication, these 3 patients were placed under observation without medication and the ulcer has not recurred. The eradication of H. pylori may be an effective therapeutic means to prevent gastric ulcers recurrence after fundoplication.

Purpose: The therapeutic effects of a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHD) on the chest pain associated with achalasia were investigated., Methods: Sixty-six patients who were diagnosed to have achalasia underwent LHD. The degree of dilatation was assessed based on the maximum horizontal diameter of the esophagus (Grades I-III). The type of dilatation was assessed based on the shape of the distal esophagus, namely, spindle type (Sp), flask type (Fk), and sigmoid type (Sig). The degree of improvement was classified into three grades as follows: A (complete disappearance), B (partial response), and C (unchanged)., Results: Chest pain improved (A or B) in 22 patients (92%). The statistical results revealed that the improvement of postoperative A or B was significantly better in patients with Sp than in those with Fk or Sig (P = 0.0213). In addition, the results revealed that the improvement of postoperative A or B was significantly better in patients with grade I and grade II than in those with grade III (P = 0.004)., Conclusion: LHD is an effective therapeutic technique for the treatment of chest pain associated with achalasia. These results suggest that both the morphological type and esophageal dilatation are useful predictors for the improvement of chest pain after surgical therapy.

Purpose: Surgical treatments for nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) have not been investigated sufficiently. We examined the results of laparoscopic fundoplication for patients with NERD., Methods: We performed laparoscopic fundoplication for NERD in 22 patients. The severity of esophageal hiatal hernia, morphology of the cardiac orifice, and results of 24-hour continuous esophageal and gastric pH were evaluated. We used a four-point scale for the improvement rating of postoperative symptoms., Results: There were 20 patients (91%) with a sliding hiatal hernia, and 21 patients (95%) with a loose cardiac orifice. Seven patients had acid reflux with 4.0% or higher esophageal fraction of time pH below 4. The surgical techniques used were Nissen fundoplication in 10 patients and Toupet fundoplication in 12 patients. Improvement of postoperative heartburn was rated as excellent in 16 patients, good in 5, and fair in 1. The overall efficacy rating was 95%, and discontinuation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was possible in 21 patients., Conclusion: Our results of performing laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with NERD were excellent. Even if abnormal acid reflux cannot be confirmed preoperatively, sufficient therapeutic efficacy can be expected for patients with esophageal hiatal hernia or a loose cardiac orifice.

Purpose: Although laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHD) is widely performed to address achalasia, little is known about the learning curve for this technique. We assessed the learning curve for performing LHD. Methods: Of the 514 cases with LHD performed between August 1994 and March 2016, the surgical outcomes of 463 cases were evaluated after excluding 50 cases with reduced port surgery and one case with the simultaneous performance of laparoscopic distal partial gastrectomy. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cut-off value for the number of surgical experiences necessary to become proficient with LHD, which was defined as the completion of the learning curve. Results: We defined the completion of the learning curve when the following 3 conditions were satisfied. 1) The operation time was less than 165 minutes. 2) There was no blood loss. 3) There was no intraoperative complication. In order to establish the appropriate number of surgical experiences required to complete the learning curve, the cut-off value was evaluated by using a ROC curve (AUC 0.717, p < 0.001). Finally, we identified the cut-off value as 16 surgical cases (sensitivity 0.706, specificity 0.646). Conclusion: Learning curve seems to complete after performing 16 cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation has been the procedure of choice for the treatment of achalasia. However, because the incidence of achalasia is low, reports on the outcome of surgical treatment for achalasia are limited. In this study, the therapeutic results after laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation for achalasia at a single university hospital were evaluated. Between August 1994 and July 2006, 100 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation. The therapeutic results after laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation were assessed based on complications, operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and the standardized questionnaire for satisfaction by telephone or outpatient clinic interview. With respect to perioperative complications, lower esophageal mucosal perforation occurred in 14 patients, but all of them could be suture-obliterated laparoscopically. One patient was converted to laparotomy because of uncontrolled bleeding from the short gastric artery. The mean operative time was 169 minutes, and the mean perioperative blood loss was 22 mL. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Reflux esophagitis, which was seen in five patients, was treated successfully with a proton pump inhibitor. According to the standardized questionnaire for satisfaction, 77 patients rated their recovery as ‘excellent’, 17 as ‘good’, 4 as ‘fair’, and 2 as ‘poor’; thus, the overall success rate was 94%. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes by morphologic type and severity of esophageal dilatation; however, the success rate deteriorated significantly with progression of the morphologic type. Laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation is a safe and effective surgical treatment for achalasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]