Search

The closure of port-sites wounds, as the ultimate step of surgical laparoscopic procedures, can be allowed by threads, staples, surgical glue or adhesive sutures. We describe a simple and easy skin suturing technique which saves time and provides significant surgical ergonomics., Competing Interests: Declarations of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We reviewed intraoperative video recordings (IVRs) of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) for inguinal hernia in children blindly to assess performance. Methods: IVRs of 183 LPEC performed between April 2013 and March 2016, graded by the operating surgeon as difficult (D; n  = 8), straightforward (S; n  = 96), or easy (E; n  = 79), were scored by a panel of reviewers with advanced (group A; >400 LPEC cases; n  = 5), intermediate (group I; 50-150 cases; n  = 5), and basic (group B; <10 cases; n  = 5) experience, according to suturing, dissection plane, vas/vessel dissection, bleeding, and peritoneal injury. They also allocated a recurrence risk rank (RRR; highest = 6; lowest = 1) for each IVR. Mean score variance for each IVR was also compared between reviewers. Results: There was one recurrence (R; 4-year-old male; level E). RRR were: 1, 2, and 2 for reviewers A, I, and B, respectively. Reviewer A scores for "suturing" and "bleeding," and reviewer I scores for "dissection plane" and "peritoneal injury" correlated significantly with RRR. No reviewer B scores correlated with RRR. Score variance between A and I and A and B for cases D1 and D2 were statistically significant. Conclusion: Advanced reviewers showed greatest variance, questioning the validity of whether experience alone improves surgical technique.

Study Objective: To investigate why security of identical knot sequences is variable and how to avoid occasionally insecure knots., Design: A factorial design was used to assess factors affecting the security of half knot (H) and half-hitch (S) knot combinations. The effect of tying forces and the risk factors to transform H knots into S knots were investigated. The risk factors evaluated were as follows: starting with an H1 or H2 instead of an H3 knot, inexperience, short sutures, and monomanual knot tying. Security of transformed knots, S2S1 and S2S2 knots, and their recuperation with 2 additional half hitches, SSb or SbSb, were evaluated., Setting: Training center for laparoscopic suturing., Patients: Not applicable., Interventions: Security of knots was evaluated in vitro., Measurements and Main Results: The forces that caused knot combinations to open before breaking of the suture were used to calculate the risk of opening with low forces. Tying more strongly increased the security of half knots (H2H1sH1s) (p <.02) and half hitches (p <.001). The forces needed to transform an H3 into an S3 are higher than those for an H2 (p <.001), and the risk increases when the surgeon is inexperienced (p <.001), when sutures are short (p <.001), and when monomanual knot tying (p <.001) is used. Inadvertently made S2S1 and S2S2 knots are dangerous, with the exception of the symmetric S2S2, which is stable. Unstable knots such as S2S1a and S2S2a knot combinations improve with 2 additional blocking half hitches (SbSb), but S2S2aSbSb remains occasionally insecure., Conclusion: To reduce the risk of accidentally transforming a first H into an S knot, it is recommended to start with an H3, tie with force, avoid short sutures, and use bimanual suturing. This permits the recommendation to use preferentially H3H2 knots or 5 half hitches (SSSbSbSb). When in doubt, half knot combinations should be secured with at least 2 blocking half hitches., (Copyright © 2019 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: As the field of laparoscopic surgery grows, the need for a valid assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills becomes apparent. The objective of this study was to identify laparoscopic suturing skills reflective of performing at an expert level., Methods: A Delphi Study was conducted with expert laparoscopic surgeons. Tasks were considered to meet criteria for consensus after 80% of survey participants answered "strongly agree." Results of the previous round of surveys were shared with participants at the start of the next round. The predefined endpoint for the Delphi was set as maximum of three rounds, reaching 80% consensus on each skill, or if > 50% of initial respondents fail to return for subsequent surveys., Results: After three rounds of surveys completed by 13 advanced laparoscopic surgeons, 8 observed skills met consensus (> 80% selected "strongly agree"): forehand suturing, continuous suturing, avoiding tissue trauma, achieving a technically acceptable final product (tight closure), tying a secure knot at the end of suturing, maintaining/checking for appropriate tightness of running suture, accurate depth perception, and loading the needle in < 3 attempts. Skills that approached consensus (with > 50% ranking them as "strongly agree") included correct penetration of target tissue, ability to create a surgeon's knot, awareness of needle tip position, confined space suturing, following the curve of the needle, smooth movements of instruments, loading the needle correctly, adjusting for tissue thickness, and bimanual dexterity., Conclusions: Using Delphi methodology, we identified the skills that are representative of expert laparoscopic suturing. This information can be used to create an assessment tool for this domain. Validation of such a tool will help advance the surgical field towards true competency-based assessment of expertise.

Objective: Simulation sutures are a low-cost option for training purposes, but they may not perform as well as the more expensive clinical suture. Trainees at our institution have raised concerns about their quality and integrity compared with clinical suture. The objective was to determine whether significant differences in strength of the sutures and knot holding capabilities between low and high-cost sutures existed., Methods: Two sutures were compared: 3-0 braided silk simulation suture (Sim*Vivo LLC, Willsboro, NY) and 3-0 Perma-Hand silk braided clinical suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). The diameter of the suture was assessed with light microscopy. Tensile strength of the suture and knotted suture were assessed. Both sutures were tested dry and wet., Results: Tensile strength of the sutures, knotted or unknotted, were not significantly different. Knot type did not change this comparison. Soaking in saline did not change the tensile strength but did introduce a substantial difference in knot failure mode between sutures. The mean diameter of the Ethicon suture was larger than that of the Sim*Vivo suture, which could influence suture behavior., Conclusions: The applied mechanical tests identified that clinical and simulation sutures differ some in their inherent mechanical characteristics related to suture handling. However, these differences did not translate to a key measure of performance of a sutured junction, namely, the strength of the knotted suture. Based on the results of the study, any subjective impressions of simulation suture strength and knot holding should not negatively impact its use for medical education.

Introduction: The advanced laparoscopic skills (ALS) curriculum was created to address the need for improved laparoscopic training for senior surgical trainees. It focuses on the domain of laparoscopic suturing and consists of 6 tasks with established proficiency benchmarks. Tasks are performed using a standard laparoscopic box trainer. This study examines whether practicing on the ALS curriculum could translate to improved clinical suturing., Methods: Surgery residents from four institutions participated in the study. Performance of the 6 ALS tasks and performance of a porcine gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and Nissen fundoplication were assessed before and after training. Video-recorded performance was de-identified and scored by three experts using both time and a previously published assessment instrument. Paired t-tests examined performance differences before and after the curriculum. Pearson correlations examined the relationship between performance on the porcine and ALS tasks., Results: Twelve residents (PGY1-8) from 4 institutions completed the study. Average practice time on ALS tasks was 6.25 weeks (range 1-14 weeks) and 254 min (range 140-600min). Combined ALS task time decreased from 2748s ± 603s to 1756s ± 281s (p < 0.001). Each of the 6 task times significantly improved (p < 0.05). Total errors decreased from 5.8 ± 3.2 to 3.7 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). Average GJ times decreased from 1043s ± 698s to 643s ± 183s (p = 0.055). Average Nissen times decreased from 990s ± 531s to 685s ± 265s (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Dedicated practice on the six ALS tasks led to decreased suturing time and fewer errors when completing both GJ and Nissen suturing in a porcine model. Further studies will be undertaken to determine the optimal application of the ALS task set in advanced laparoscopic training., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surgeries for benign diseases of the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) are classified as lithotomy ( i.e ., choledocholithotomy) or diversion ( i.e ., choledochojejunostomy). Because of technical challenges, laparoscopic approaches for these surgeries have not gained worldwide popularity. The right upper quadrant of the abdomen is advantageous for laparoscopic procedures, and laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy is safe and feasible. Herein, we summarize tips and pitfalls in the actual procedures of choledocholithotomy. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with primary closure of the transductal incision and transcystic C-tube drainage has excellent clinical outcomes; however, emergent biliary drainage without endoscopic sphincterotomy and preoperative removal of anesthetic risk factors are required. Elastic suture should never be ligated directly on the cystic duct. Interrupted suture placement is the first choice for hemostasis near the EHBD. To prevent progressive laceration of the EHBD, full-layer interrupted sutures are placed at the upper and lower edges of the transductal incision. Cholangioscopy has only two-way operation; using dedicated forceps to atraumatically grasp the cholangioscope is important for smart maneuvering. The duration of intraoperative stone clearance accounts for most of the operative time. Moreover, dedicated forceps are an important instrument for atraumatic grasping of the cholangioscope. Damage to the cholangioscope requires expensive repair. Laparoscopic approach for choledocholithotomy involves technical difficulties. I hope this document with the visual explanation and literature review will be informative for skillful surgeons., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The author has no potential conflict of interest.

Mini-invasive surgery-for example, laparoscopy-has challenged surgeons' skills by extending their usual haptic space and displaying indirect visual feedback through a screen. This may require new mental abilities, including spatial orientation and mental representation. This study aimed to test the effect of cognitive training based on motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) on surgical skills. A total of 28 postgraduate residents in surgery took part in our study and were randomly distributed into 1 of the 3 following groups: (1) the basic surgical skill, which is a short 2-day laparoscopic course + MI + AO group; (2) the basic surgical skill group; and (3) the control group. The MI + AO group underwent additional cognitive training, whereas the basic surgical skill group performed neutral activity during the same time. The laparoscopic suturing and knot tying performance as well as spatial ability and mental workload were assessed before and after the training period. We did not observe an effect of cognitive training on the laparoscopic performance. However, the basic surgical skill group significantly improved spatial orientation performance and rated lower mental workload, whereas the 2 others exhibited lower performance in a mental rotation test. Thus, actual and cognitive training pooled together during a short training period elicited too high a strain, thus limiting potential improvements. Because MI and AO already showed positive outcomes on surgical skills, this issue may, thus, be mitigated according to our specific learning conditions. Distributed learning may possibly better divide and share the strain associated with new surgical skills learning.

Background: Laparoscopic models are increasingly recognized as important tools in surgical training. The purpose of this study was to compare pediatric and adult laparoscopic surgical skills, and gain insight into the upskilling in both groups., Materials and Methods: Adult- and pediatric-sized laparoscopic simulators were fitted with custom-built motion tracking hardware and software. Participants were recruited at the Education Booth of the 2012 combined SAGES/IPEG meeting. They each performed 1 adult and 1 pediatric intracorporeal suturing task. Velocity, acceleration, and range were studied in all degrees of freedom available during laparoscopic surgery (pitch, yaw, roll, and surge). Participants were stratified by expertise based on the traditional metrics of self-reported caseloads., Results: A total of 57 participants (15 novices, 7 intermediates, and 35 experts) were recruited. Experts had significantly higher extreme events in three of the four degrees of freedom when using the pediatric simulator than when using the adult simulator. Few significant differences were seen when comparing novice and intermediate performances on the adult versus pediatric simulator. Linear regression showed no difference between adult and pediatric experts tested on the adult or pediatric simulator., Conclusions: Experts were more challenged with the pediatric than with the adult suturing task. No difference was noted for overall averaged performance metrics comparing adult and pediatric experts suturing in adult versus pediatric simulators. As a participant's level of expertise improves, a model progressing from larger to smaller domains in the performance of defined laparoscopic tasks may, by virtue of its greater challenge, encourage psychomotor development.

Objective:  To assess whether the monomanual or bimanual training of laparoscopic suture following the same technique may interfere with the knots' performance time and/or quality., Methods:  A prospective observational study involving 41 resident students of gynecology/obstetrics and general surgery who attended a laparoscopic suture training for 2 days. The participants were divided into two groups. Group A performed the training using exclusively their dominant hand, and group B performed the training using both hands to tie the intracorporeal knot. All participants followed the same technique, called Romeo Gladiator Rule. At the end of the course, the participants were asked to perform three exercises to assess the time it took them to tie the knots, as well as the quality of the knots., Results:  A comparative analysis of the groups showed that there was no statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.334) between them regarding the length of time to tie one knot. However, when the time to tie 10 consecutive knots was compared, group A was faster than group B ( p  = 0.020). A comparison of the knot loosening average, in millimeters, revealed that the knots made by group B loosened less than those made by group A, but there was no statistically significant difference regarding the number of knots that became untied., Conclusion:  This study demonstrated that the knots from group B showed better quality than those from group A, with lower loosening measures and more strength necessary to untie the knots. The study also demonstrated that group A was faster than B when the time to tie ten consecutive knots was compared., Competing Interests: The authors have none to declare., (Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.)

Bariatric surgery has proven benefits for morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities. Laparoscopic approach is well established for bariatric surgery. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers even more minimally invasive approach for the same with the added advantage of better cosmesis. We have developed and standardised the SILS approach at our institute. We share our experience and technical "tips" and modifications which we have learnt over the years. Technical details of performing sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with special attention to liver retraction, techniques of dissection in difficult areas, creation of anastomoses and suturing have all been described. In our experience and in experience of others, single-incision bariatric surgery is feasible. Use of conventional laparoscopic instruments makes single-incision approach practical for day-to-day practice. Supervised training is essential to learn these techniques.

Background: With experience, certain psychomotor skills should translate from standard laparoscopy to single-incision laparoscopy (SIL). We proposed to compare all surgical postgraduate year (PGY) levels and determine if experience translated to improved SIL skills., Methods: Surgical residents of all PGY levels (1-5) at our institution were included. Baseline surveys were obtained to determine resident level of exposure to both SIL and standard laparoscopic cases. Participants performed the following tasks: running of the bowel, endoloop placement, extracorporeal suture tying, and intracorporeal suture tying. Tasks were performed on a commercially provided simulated inanimate organ model. Participants were given 5 min to complete each task. Data were collected and analyzed by an impartial-certified Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery proctor., Results: A total of 31 residents participated in the study. Overall, there was minimal SIL exposure among all residents. As expected, PGY level correlated with increased ability to complete assigned tasks within the allotted time. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of individuals able to complete a task based on PGY level for all given tasks (P = 0.005). With increased difficulty, the percentage of higher level residents able to complete the task decreased (100% PGY5 completed running of bowel versus 0% intracorporeal knot tying)., Conclusions: Certain psychomotor skills did appear to translate to SIL skills. However, further dedicated SIL training may help to better develop certain laparoscopic skills devoted to SIL., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a comprehensive theoretical and hands-on training program in performing laparoscopic colonic resections under supervision of an expert surgeon., Materials and Methods: Laparoscopic right colectomy was performed in 78 patients (10 with benign disease, 68 with carcinoma). Demographic, intraoperative, pathologic examination, and short-term outcome data were retrospectively compared between 25 patients operated by surgical residents (R group) and 53 patients operated by senior surgeons (S group). The residents who performed surgeries in the R group had between 1 and 6 years after graduation; no experience with open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery was necessary. The residents completed a training program under supervision of a single expert laparoscopic colorectal surgeon, which included 6 steps, from basic skills to certification., Results: There were no differences in patient age, sex, and body mass index between the R and S groups. Significantly more patients in the R group had early cancer and benign lesions (P<0.05). Thirteen of the 16 residents (81.2 %) had not had prior experience with colonic resection. The time of suturing and knot tying in the dry box did not differ between residents and senior surgeons (68 and 69 s, respectively). All the residents performed laparoscopic right colectomy without intraoperative complications. There were no significant differences in operating time (R group: 173±34 min, S group: 172±52 min), mean estimated blood loss (50±111 vs. 49±100 mL), number of lymph nodes dissected (20.8±12.8 vs. 17.1±9.0), and mean postoperative hospital stay (9.1±3.3 vs. 10.7±4.1 d). On the basis of the year of their residency period, all 3 residents at 6 years after graduation had far greater experience than the other residents and therefore performed the surgery with minor verbal support from the expert. However, residents with 1 or 2 years after graduation had to receive guidance provision by the expert during surgery., Conclusions: When supervised and led by an expert laparoscopic surgeon, surgical residents are capable of performing laparoscopic surgery without negative effects on outcomes.

Introduction: Intracorporal knot tying (ICKT) and suturing in minimal invasive surgery (MIS) represent a key skill for advanced procedures such as Nissen fundoplication. Suture placement under tension is particularly challenging during MIS. The aim of this study was to compare ICKT of the common surgical square knot and the slipping knot on a simulated suture placement under tension. Furthermore, we objectively assessed the surgical skill of ICKT following 3hours of hands-on training., Methods: A box trainer was used for laparoscopic knot tying with predefined openings. A 12cm suture was placed in central view. We used a standardized silicon suture pad with a defined wound dehiscence of 0.5cm and marked needle entrance and exit targets next to the incision. Twenty participants were divided among three groups in this study. The first group (n=5) consisted of senior physicians. The second group (n=5) was made up of surgical residents in the first to fourth year of residency training. The third group (n=10) contained medical students between their third and sixth year of study without any prior experience in laparoscopic surgery. Residents and students received a 3-hour hands-on training in surgical square and slipping knot tying. Each participant tied two of each knot types before and after the hands-on training. Knot quality, performance, total time and suture placement accuracy were the parameters for assessment in this study., Results: The knot quality was greater for the slipping knot compared with the square knot in all groups. There were no significant intragroup differences in knot tying performance, task time and accuracy of both suture methods. Students and residents improved in all categories for both ICKT techniques after training., Discussion: We compared ICKT of the surgical square knot with the slipping knot on a simulated suture placement under tension during a standardized training program for medical students and surgical residents. In our study, the average quality of the slipping knot was significantly superior to the square knot in all participants. The knot tying performance, task time, and accuracy of students and residents after hands-on training were not significantly different between both suture methods. This suggests that the two ICKT techniques have similar properties except the quality advantages of the slipping knot. Although students and residents improved in all categories for both ICKT techniques after training, they did not achieve expert level for task times and accuracy., Conclusions: In this pilot trail, the quality of the slipping knot was superior to the surgical square knot during intracorporal suturing under tension. Our 3-hour sequential training program improved laparoscopic suturing and knot tying skills in all participants. Our findings suggest that training centers for MIS using validated training programs should be a continuous and integral part of surgical education., Level of Evidence: USPSTF Level III: monocentric, prospective, pilot Trial., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This abstract profiles the comparison of correlations between previously validated Super Monkey Ball (SMB) and recently introduced Underground (U) video game on the Nintendo Wii U to multiple validated tasks used for developing basic and advanced laparoscopic skills., Methods: Sixty-eight participants, 53 residents and 15 attending surgeons, performed the Top Gun Pea Drop, FLS Peg Pass, intracorporeal suturing, and two video games (SMB and U). SMB is an over-the-counter game, and U was formulated for laparoscopic skill training., Results: Spearman's rank correlations were performed looking at performance comparing the three validated laparoscopic training tasks, and SMB/U. The SMB score had a moderate correlation with intracorporeal suturing (ρ = 0.39, p < 0.01), and the final score involving all three tasks (ρ = 0.39, p < 0.01), but low correlations with Pea Drop Drill and FLS Peg Transfer (ρ = 0.11, 0.18, p < 0.01). The U score had a small correlation with intracorporeal suturing and final score (ρ = 0.09, 0.13, p < 0.01). However, there were correlations between U score and Pea Drop Drill, and FLS Peg Transfer (ρ = 0.24, 0.27, p < 0.01, respectively)., Conclusion: In this study, SMB had a very significant correlation with intracorporeal suturing. U demonstrated more of a correlation with basic skills. At this point, our conclusion would be that both are effective for laparoscopic skill training, and they should be used in tandem rather than alone.

Background: Advanced laparoscopic suturing (LS) tasks were developed based on a needs assessment. Initial validity evidence has been shown. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine expert proficiency benchmarks for these tasks., Methods: 6 tasks were included: needle handling (NH), offset-camera forehand suturing (OF), offset-camera backhand suturing (OB), confined space suturing (CF), suturing under tension (UT), and continuous suturing (CS). Minimally invasive surgeons experienced in LS completed the tasks twice. Mean time and median accuracy scores were used to establish the benchmarks., Results: Seventeen MIS surgeons enrolled, from 7 academic centers. Mean (95% CI) time in seconds to complete each task was: NH 169 (149-189), OF 158 (134-181), OB 189 (154-224), CF 181 (156-205), UT 379 (334-423), and CS 416 (354-477). Very few errors in accuracy were made by experts in each of the tasks., Conclusions: Time- and accuracy-based proficiency benchmarks for 6 advanced LS tasks were established. These benchmarks will be included in an advanced laparoscopic surgery curriculum currently under development., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate, in a simulated suturing task, individual surgeons’ performance using three surgical approaches: open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted. subjects and methods: Six urological surgeons made an in vitro simulated vesico-urethral anastomosis. All surgeons performed the simulated suturing task using all three surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted). The time taken to perform each task was recorded. Participants were evaluated for perceived discomfort using the self-reporting Borg scale. Errors made by surgeons were quantified by studying the video recording of the tasks. Anastomosis quality was quantified using scores for knot security, symmetry of suture, position of suture and apposition of anastomosis., Results: The time taken to complete the task by the laparoscopic approach was on average 221 s, compared with 55 s for the open approach and 116 s for the robot-assisted approach (anova, P < 0.005). The number of errors and the level of self-reported discomfort were highest for the laparoscopic approach (anova, P < 0.005). Limitations of the present study include the small sample size and variation in prior surgical experience of the participants., Conclusions: In an in vitro model of anastomosis surgery, robot-assisted surgery combines the accuracy of open surgery while causing lesser surgeon discomfort than laparoscopy and maintaining minimal access.

Background: Force feedback might improve surgical performance during minimally invasive surgery. This study sought to determine whether training with force feedback shortened the tissue-handling learning curve, and examined the influence of real-time visual feedback compared with postprocessing feedback., Methods: Medical students without experience of minimally invasive surgery were randomized into three groups: real-time force feedback, postprocessing force feedback and no force feedback (control). All performed eight suturing tasks consecutively, of which the first and eighth were the premeasurement and postmeasurement tasks respectively (no feedback). Depending on randomization, either form of feedback was given during the second to seventh task. Time, mean force non-zero and maximum force were measured with a force sensor. Results of the groups were compared with one-way ANOVA, and intragroup improvement using a paired-samples t test., Results: A total of 72 students took part. Both intervention groups used significantly lower interaction forces than the control group during the knot-tying phase of the postmeasurement task and improved their interaction forces significantly during the knot-tying phase. The form of feedback did not influence its effectiveness., Conclusion: The tissue-handling skills of medical students improved significantly when they were given force feedback of their performance. This effect was seen mainly during the knot-tying phase of the suturing task., (© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying (ICKT) in minimal invasive surgery (MIS) represents a key skill for advanced procedures. Different methods exist for measuring knot quality and performance, but the heterogeneity of these methods makes direct comparisons difficult. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of a laparoscopic knot to one that is performed open., Methods: To compare open and laparoscopic knot-tying methods we used a surgeon's square knot. For laparoscopic knot tying we used a Pelvitrainer. The 32 participants were divided among 4 groups of different skill levels. Group 1 consisted of 6 senior physicians. Group 2 was made up of 10 first to fourth year interns. Groups 3 and 4 contained 16 medical students who had never performed either laparoscopic procedures or open sutures before. Group 3 participants received a 1-hour hands-on training in suturing, whereas group 4 participants received no prior training. Total time, knot quality, suture placement accuracy, and performance defined the parameters for assessment in this study., Results: All participants, irrespective of education level were inferior in ICKT compared to open suturing. Only Group 1 showed no significant difference in knot quality and accuracy between the open and laparoscopic suture performance., Conclusion: It is well documented that psychomotor skills need to be developed before more advanced skills can be put into practice. Training centres for minimally invasive surgery should be an integral part of surgical education. The variables in our study are meaningful and easy to implement. They can be used to measure personal progress and as objective parameters in the development of laparoscopic trainee education., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without the use of barbed suture., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study among patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy between February 2008 and August 2012. The parameters evaluated were age, BMI, operative time, hospital stay, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, uterine weight, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications., Results: A total of 202 women underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy; barbed suture (V-Loc) was used in 63 women, and polydioxanone (PDS) in 139. Estimated blood loss, difference in hemoglobin level before and after surgery, operative time, and the duration of hospital stay were comparable between the two groups of patients. The incidence of postoperative fever was higher in the V-Loc group than in the PDS group (P = 0.003). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the incidence of postoperative fever was related to BMI (P = 0.02, r = 0.22) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.004, r = 0.28) and not to age, operative time, or uterine weight., Conclusion: The use of barbed suture to close the vaginal vault after laparoscopic hysterectomy, compared with standard suture, results in similar operative time, blood loss, and duration of hospital stay. The use of barbed suture is technically less demanding than the use of regular sutures.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of intensive laparoscopic training shortening the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing in surgical postgraduate students., Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven surgical postgraduate students participated in this study, including novice (N), junior (JR), and senior (SR) trainees. The N trainees were divided into novice control (NC) and novice experimental (NE) groups. The training curricula contain three stages: Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery tasks, intensive laparoscopic suturing task, and laparoscopic enucleation model training. The NE, JR, and SR groups completed all three stages. The NC group just performed the first and third stages. The performances of each group were recorded and analyzed., Results: For the first stage, the SR group performed better than the N and JR groups. There was no significant difference in the post-test total scores between the N and JR groups, although the N group had lower pretest total scores. For the second stage, no significant difference was found in the post-test scores among the NE, JR, and SR groups, although the SR group had better pretest scores. For the third stage, the NE, JR, and SR groups had better performance than the NC group at the five exercises. There was no significant difference at the fifth exercise among the NE, JR, and SR groups, although the SR group performed better at the former four exercises., Conclusion: This study documented the feasibility of intensive laparoscopic training curricula shortening the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing in surgical postgraduate students, regardless of baseline experience.

Background: The benefits of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery training simulators is a topic of debate in the literature. It is hypothesized that novice surgeons may not benefit from the haptic information, especially during the initial phase of learning a new task. Therefore, provision of haptic feedback to novice trainees in the early stage of training may be distracting and detrimental to learning. A controlled experiment was conducted to examine the effect of haptic feedback on the learning curve of a complex laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying task., Methods: The ProMIS and the MIST-VR surgical simulators were used to represent conditions with and without haptic feedback, respectively. A total of 20 novice subjects (10 per simulator) were trained to perform suturing and knot-tying and practiced the tasks in 18 sessions of 1 h each., Results: At the end of the 3-week training period, the subjects performed equally fast but more consistently with haptics (ProMIS) than without haptics (MIST-VR). The subjects showed a slightly higher learning rate and reached the first plateau of the learning curve earlier with haptic feedback., Conclusion: In general, learning with haptic feedback was significantly better than learning without it for a laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying task, but only during the first 5 h of training. Haptic feedback may not be warranted in laparoscopic surgical trainers. The benefits of a shorter time to the first performance plateau and more consistent initial performance should be balanced with the cost of implementing haptic feedback in surgical simulators.

Objectives: To determine if opening the vaginal cuff during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy influences the rate of mesh exposure., Methods: A total of 390 medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, operative technique, and relevant outcomes., Results: Eleven mesh exposures (2.8%) and 14 suture extrusions (3.6%) were found, none involving visceral organs. Mesh exposure was more common when the vaginal cuff was opened, either during hysterectomy or when allowing transvaginal attachment of mesh in patients with a prior hysterectomy (4.9% vs 0.5%; relative risk [RR], 9.0, P = 0.012). In cases where concomitant hysterectomy was performed, a higher mesh exposure rate was seen in open-cuff hysterectomy (total vaginal hysterectomy/laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy) compared to supracervical hysterectomy (4.9% [9/185] vs 0% [0/92]; P = 0.032). Mesh exposure was more common when the mesh was sutured laparoscopically compared with transvaginally in patients undergoing open-cuff hysterectomy (14.3% [5/35] vs 2.7% [4/150]; RR, 5.4; P = 0.013). Permanent suture extrusion was significantly associated with laparoscopic versus transvaginal suturing of mesh (5.6% vs 0.6%; RR, 8.8; P = 0.010). Five patients underwent reoperation for mesh exposure, whereas most suture extrusions were asymptomatic; and all were managed nonsurgically., Conclusions: We found that preserving the integrity of the vaginal cuff led to a lower incidence of mesh exposure in patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. When hysterectomy is indicated, a supracervical technique should be strongly considered as the mesh exposure rate was significantly lower. If removal of the cervix is indicated, the risk for mesh exposure remains low and should not preclude total hysterectomy, though transvaginal mesh attachment may be preferable.

Objective: To measure the time and subjective quality of individual steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), as RARP performed by trainees has recently become the most common technique of RP in the USA, and although outcomes from expert surgeons are reported, limited data are available to document training experiences., Patients and Methods: The patients studied were from a prospective cohort of 178 participants (124 with training data). Transperitoneal RARP was performed by one faculty surgeon and one assistant from a rotation of four urological oncology fellows and three residents. RARP was divided into 11 steps, and staff times were recorded for each step. Trainee times and quality scores were recorded for each step, the later defined as grade A equal to staff (A+, no verbal coaching); B, minor corrections; and C, major corrections. Short-term outcomes were recorded to assess the safety of the training., Results: The mean (range) console time/case of trainees was 40 (10-123) min. The median console time for a complete case by faculty and by trainees (pooled group) was 128 and 231 min, respectively, an increase in 81%. Individual trainee-performed steps increased in time (compared to staff) by a median range of 50-177%, and the incidence of quality grades < A of 9-100%. Trainee quality grades for basic tissue-dissection steps were higher than for advanced tissue dissection and suturing. There was no downgrading for a major correction. Analysis of short-term outcomes suggested acceptable results in a training environment. The study is limited by no available validated training measurement tools, and a low frequency of beginner trainees advancing to more difficult steps during the rotation., Conclusions: During the initial exposure of trainees to RARP of <40 cases, we measured time and subjective quality grading of basic steps, and introduction to advanced steps. Training requires more procedure time, but does not appear to diminish expected outcomes., (© 2009 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2009 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

Background: Minimal access surgery is associated with increased risk of complications, particularly early in a surgeon's laparoscopic career. This is mostly due to loss of depth cues, degraded tactile feedback from surgical instrument, and the "fulcrum effect". Degraded and restricted image on the monitor makes camera orientation very important. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance., Methods: In two separate studies 100 laparoscopic novices and 7 experienced laparoscopic surgeons ([300 laparoscopic procedures) were asked to perform a simple laparoscopic cutting task and tie intracorporeal square-knots (respectively) under 0, 15, 45, 90, and 180 camera rotation., Results: In study 1 camera rotation significantly degraded performance of laparoscopic novices (p\0.00001) and also increased their error rate (p\0.00001). In study 2 camera rotation significantly increased the length of time it took surgeons to tie an intracorporeal square-knot (p\0.00001) and the number of errors made (p\0.0001)., Conclusions: Unintentional camera rotation during surgery should be avoided to eliminate one potential source for errors.

Background: Development of surgical skills on inanimate models has been popularized by efforts to improve patient safety and efficiency of resident training. We evaluated whether surgical residents' acquisition of videoscopic suturing skill is accelerated by reviewing video of their own previous practice session., Study Design: Fourteen residents from two general surgery training programs received didactic instruction on laparoscopy. Attempts at suturing and knotting were then timed and recorded for each subject, and half of them were provided a video of their attempts to review. After 7 to 10 days, repeat attempts were timed and recorded. Knots were mechanically tested, and videos were reviewed in blinded fashion., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Both groups demonstrated improvement of videoscopic suturing efficiency and quality. On a 27-point scale, suturing and knot quality scores improved by an average of 11.6 (SD 3.9) in the video review group and 2.3 (SD 6.0) in the control group (p = 0.007). Times to complete the tasks were reduced by 30.3% (SD 11%) in the video review group and 3.1% (SD 32%) in the control group (p = 0.075). Eighty-six percent of video review subjects found the videos useful, and 86% of control subjects believed that videos would have been useful., Conclusions: Development of videoscopic suturing skill is augmented by independent review of earlier attempts. Knot quality and technique are improved, with a trend toward increased speed. This minimal-cost method of enhancing skill training for junior residents parallels the effectiveness of video review in fields such as aviation and athletics.

Background: To be an effective training tool, a laparoscopic simulator has to provide metrics that are meaningful and informative to the trainee. Time, path length and smoothness are often used parameters, but are not very informative on the quality of the performance. This study aims to validate a newly developed assessment method for laparoscopic suturing on the ProMIS augmented reality simulator, and compares it with scores of objective observers., Methods: Twenty-four participants practised their suturing skills on the augmented reality suturing module: experienced participants (n = 10), >50 clinical laparoscopic suturing experience; and novice participants (n = 14), without laparoscopic experience. The performances were recorded and assessed by two unrelated observers and compared with the assessment scores. The assessment score was a calculation of time spent in the correct area and quality (strength) of the knot. To test the accuracy of the individual assessment parameters, we compared these with each other., Results: The experienced participants had significantly higher performance scores than the novice participants in the beginner-level mode (mean 95.73 vs. 60.89, standard deviation 2.63 vs. 17.09, p < 0.001, independent t-test). The performance scores of the assessment method (n = 43) correlated significantly with the scorings of the objective observers (Spearman's rho 0.672; p < 0.001). The parameter time spent in correct area had a calculated significant correlation with the strength of the knot (n = 229, Spearman's rho 0.257, p < 0.001), but this was clinically irrelevant., Conclusion: This assessment method is a valid tool for objectively assessing laparoscopic suturing skills. Although assessment parameters can correlate, to provide informative feedback it is important to combine meaningful measurements in the assessment of suturing skills.

Background: Research has demonstrated that practice in surgical simulators leads to improved performance in that simulator. Our hypothesis is that skills acquired in simulators are transferable to the operating room., Materials and Methods: Twenty-three laparoscopically naïve surgical interns performed two standardized tasks in a simulator: pegboard transfer and intracorporeal knot tying. Performance was measured using a validated scoring system. On the same day as this initial assessment, subjects were videotaped performing two tasks in a live porcine model: running the small bowel and intracorporeal knot tying. Performance in the porcine model was measured using a modified version of a validated skills assessment tool by two blinded experts. Following a 6-wk proficiency-based dry lab laparoscopic training course, task performance was re-evaluated. No interval live operative laparoscopic experience occurred between the first and second assessment., Results: After training, mean pegboard transfer scores increased from 118.7 to 181.8 (theoretical maximum = 300; P < 0.01). Dry lab knot tying scores increased from 294.7 to 459.0 (theoretical maximum = 600, P < 0.01). In the porcine model, scores for the bowel running task increased from 8.5 to 13.5 (maximum score = 20 for both porcine tasks, P < 0.01). Knot tying scores increased from 7.3 to 14.3 (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Practice in a simulator leads to improved performance in that simulator and in a live operative model. We believe that this is evidence that laparoscopic skills developed in a dry laboratory setting are transferable to the operating room.

This report aims to describe a new parenchymal continuous suturing technique for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In this new technique, the thread is not tightened or cinched until all stitches are completed. At the final step of the running suture, each thread is tightened and fixed by using Hem-o-lok clips. We performed laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with this procedure on eight patients between January and October 2007. The mean ischemic time was 35 min (range: 28-44 min). The mean time of parenchymal suturing was 9.9 min (range: 7-11 min). This procedure allowed us a clear vision during the suturing.

Background: Music education affects the mathematical and visuo-spatial skills of school-age children. Visuo-spatial abilities have a significant effect on laparoscopic suturing performance. We hypothesize that prior music experience influences the performance of laparoscopic suturing tasks., Methods: Thirty novices observed a laparoscopic suturing task video. Each performed 3 timed suturing task trials. Demographics were recorded. A repeated measures linear mixed model was used to examine the effects of prior music experience on suturing task time., Results: Twelve women and 18 men completed the tasks. When adjusted for video game experience, participants who currently played an instrument performed significantly faster than those who did not (P<0.001). The model showed a significant sex by instrument interaction. Men who had never played an instrument or were currently playing an instrument performed better than women in the same group (P=0.002 and P<0.001). There was no sex difference in the performance of participants who had played an instrument in the past (P=0.29)., Conclusion: This study attempted to investigate the effect of music experience on the laparoscopic suturing abilities of surgical novices. The visuo-spatial abilities used in laparoscopic suturing may be enhanced in those involved in playing an instrument.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of conventional and articulating laparoscopic needle-drivers for performing standardized laparoscopic tasks by medical students with no previous surgical experience., Subjects and Methods: Twenty medical students with no surgical experience were randomly assigned to two equal groups, one using a conventional laparoscopic needle-holder (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) and the other using a first-generation articulating laparoscopic needle-holder (Cambridge Endo, Framingham, MA, USA). Each student performed a series of four standardized laparoscopic tasks, during which speed and accuracy were assessed. The tasks tested needle passage through rings (1), an oblique running suture model (2), a urethrovesical anastomosis model (3) and a model simulating renal parenchymal reconstruction following partial nephrectomy (4)., Results: Tasks 1 and 3 were completed significantly more quickly by those using the conventional instruments (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference for task 2 and 4 (P > 0.05). Those using conventional instruments were significantly more accurate in all of the tasks than those using the articulated instruments (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The conventional laparoscopic needle-driver allowed laparoscopy-naive medical students to complete a series of standardized suturing tasks more rapidly and accurately than with the novel articulating needle-driver. Laparoscopic suturing with first-generation articulating needle-drivers might be more difficult to learn, secondary to the complexity of physical manoeuvres required for their use.

Background: Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging new modality for laparoscopic skills training; however, most simulators lack realistic haptic feedback. Augmented reality (AR) is a new laparoscopic simulation system offering a combination of physical objects and VR simulation. Laparoscopic instruments are used within an hybrid mannequin on tissue or objects while using video tracking. This study was designed to assess the difference in realism, haptic feedback, and didactic value between AR and VR laparoscopic simulation., Methods: The ProMIS AR and LapSim VR simulators were used in this study. The participants performed a basic skills task and a suturing task on both simulators, after which they filled out a questionnaire about their demographics and their opinion of both simulators scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The participants were allotted to 3 groups depending on their experience: experts, intermediates and novices. Significant differences were calculated with the paired t-test., Results: There was general consensus in all groups that the ProMIS AR laparoscopic simulator is more realistic than the LapSim VR laparoscopic simulator in both the basic skills task (mean 4.22 resp. 2.18, P < 0.000) as well as the suturing task (mean 4.15 resp. 1.85, P < 0.000). The ProMIS is regarded as having better haptic feedback (mean 3.92 resp. 1.92, P < 0.000) and as being more useful for training surgical residents (mean 4.51 resp. 2.94, P < 0.000)., Conclusions: In comparison with the VR simulator, the AR laparoscopic simulator was regarded by all participants as a better simulator for laparoscopic skills training on all tested features.

Background: Process measures describing the generation of movement are useful for evaluation and performance feedback purposes. This study aimed to identify process measures that differ between novice and advanced laparoscopists while completing a suturing skill., Methods: A group of junior and a group of senior residents and fellows in surgery (n = 6) placed 10 laparoscopic sutures in a synthetic model. Process measures were quantified using an opto-electric motion/force sensor assembly that recorded: instrument rotation, applied forces, time, and time delays between force application and instrument rotation., Results: Advanced trainees showed increased instrument rotation, higher peak applied force, and faster performance compared to novices (alll p < .01). However, over trials, only novices showed adaptations for instrument rotation and total time (interactions at p < .01) with no adaptation for the force application. The difference between the moments of force application and instrument rotation was not sensitive to participant training., Conclusions: Movement process measures can enhance our understanding of early adaptation processes and how such factors might be used as feedback to facilitate skill acquisition.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a validated suturing curriculum as a free-standing continuing medical education (CME) course., Methods: Eighteen participants (9 practicing surgeons, 9 surgery residents) attended a 4-hour laparoscopic suturing CME course. After viewing an instructional videotape all participants had their baseline performance measured on a fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery-type videotrainer suture model. Participants then practiced on the model with active instruction from 6 proctors until a previously reported proficiency level was achieved or until the course ended. Performance was scored objectively based on time and errors. Precourse and postcourse questionnaires were collected., Results: Participants trained for 2.6 +/- .8 hours and performed 37 +/- 11 repetitions. Although no participant was proficient at baseline, 72% achieved the proficiency level by the end of the course. Participants showed 44% improvement in objective scores and 34% improvement according to subjective self-rating., Conclusions: Although 4 hours may be insufficient for some trainees, an intensive half-day CME course is feasible and effective in significantly improving performance and allowing the majority of participants to achieve proficiency.

Background: The use of simulation for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) skills training has many advantages over current traditional methods. One advantage of simulation is that it enables an objective assessment of technical performance. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the ProMIS augmented reality simulator could objectively distinguish between levels of performance skills on a complex laparoscopic suturing task., Methods: Ten subjects--five laparoscopic experts and five laparoscopic novices--were assessed for baseline perceptual, visio-spatial, and psychomotor abilities using validated tests. After three trials of a novel laparoscopic suturing task were performed on the simulator, measures for time, smoothness of movement, and path distance were analyzed for each trial. Accuracy and errors were evaluated separately by two blinded reviewers to an interrater reliability of >0.8. Comparisons of mean performance measures were made between the two groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Internal consistency of ProMIS measures was assessed with coefficient alpha., Results: The psychomotor performance of the experts was superior at baseline assessment (p < 0.001). On the laparoscopic suturing task, the experts performed significantly better than the novices across all three trials (p < 0.001). They performed the tasks between three and four times faster (p < 0.0001), had three times shorter instrument path length (p < 0.0001), and had four times greater smoothness of instrument movement (p < 0.009). Experts also showed greater consistency in their performance, as demonstrated by SDs across all measures, which were four times smaller than the novice group. Observed internal consistency of ProMIS measures was high (alpha = 0.95, p < 0.00001)., Conclusions: Preliminary results of construct validation efforts of the ProMIS simulator show that it can distinguish between experts and novices and has promising psychometric properties. The attractive feature of ProMIS is that a wide variety of MIS tasks can be used to train and assess technical skills.

Background: The assessment of technical skills should provide objective feedback and judge suitability of progress during training. The aim of this study was to validate two objective assessment techniques for laparoscopic suturing and demonstrate a correlation between them., Methods: Six experts, seven surgeons skilled in laparoscopic suturing, and 13 with no laparoscopic suturing skills were asked to place two or three intracorporeal sutures on a synthetic suture pad. The latter group was given video-based instructions prior to the execution of the sutures. Ergonomic conditions were standardized for all subjects. The procedures were recorded on videotape and two blinded observers rated the first suture of each subject on a 29-point checklist. A motion analysis system, Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device, was used to assess psychomotor skills., Results: There was a significant difference in the time taken (p = 0.000) and total path length (p = 0.000) per suture across the groups. There were also a significant difference in the total checklist score (p = 0.000) and its individual categories. The was a strong correlation between the total path length and the total checklist score (coefficient, 0.78; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: A combination of the motion analysis system and the checklist would make the process of formative feedback during the learning of intracorporeal suturing objective and comprehensive.

Who ever is writing about standards should put himself the question: What is a standard? How is it produced? Who is defining it? How compulsory is it? A standard should only be understood as guiding principles or as following guidelines and never as a dogma, while otherwise every operative technical or therapeutical progress is prohibited. On the basis of the onco-surgical guidelines for the colo-rectal carcinoma is shown how standards can begin to sway. The Turnbull "no-touch isolation technique" does not stand up to the criteria of the evidence based medicine. The usefulness of the high ligation of the veins and the intestinal occlusion has not been proven by any studies. The central ligature of the Arteria mesenterica inferior in left resection is wrong according more recent anatomical knowledge. Ligation near to the aorta leads obligatory to lesions of the plexus hypogastricus. Animal experiments are controversial concerning the dissemination of tumour cells during crushing of the cancer. And a prospective controlled study does not show any advantage of respecting the Turnbull criteria. Independent prognostic factors are the surgeon, the frequency of performing the procedure in the hospital concerned, the pT and N stage, the R-0 resection and according to American pathologists the pre-operative CEA titre. Also are mentioned the infiltration of veins and lymph vessels, micro metastases in lymph nodes and the grading. The resection should if possible be performed in anatomical layers, specially considering the meso-rectum. What should be done in the distal 8 cm till the pelvic floor has not yet been clarified. On the contrary, the laparoscopic surgery has definitively also found its acceptance in oncological surgery. The discussions about port-metastases and tumour-cell-dissemination by the pneumoperitoneum-gas have silenced. Already, partially better long-term results are mentioned. In the beginning of 2003, the pillars of the standard technique of oncological colo-rectal surgery are besides the orthograde intestinal flushing, the pre-operative low molecular Heparin and the antibiotic prophylaxis, the open or laparoscopic R-0 en bloc resection, the minimal safety distance in the low rectum of 1 cm, the ligature of the Arteria mesenterica inferior 2-3 cm distally to its origin from the aorta in case of left resection, respectively the Arteria ilio-colica at its origin from the Arteria mesenterica superior in case of right resection, the cytotoxic intestinal flushing in case of left resection and the flushing of the abdominal cavity as well as the port-site with Taurolin 0.5%. In case of rectum-carcinoma uT3 or uN+, a neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy is administered and adjuvant chemotherapy is given by positive nodal colon-carcinoma.

Background: Laparoscopic suturing is required to develop competency in advanced laparoscopy., Methods: Manuals detailing laparoscopic suturing were give to 17 Surgery residents. One week later they performed a suture on a training model. Time (s), accuracy (mm), and knot strength (lb) were recorded. The residents were blindly randomized to intervention (n = 9) and control (n = 8) groups. The intervention residents attended a 60-min course with lecture, video, and individual proctoring. Two weeks later they performed a stitch with standard laparoscopic instruments and a stitch with a suturing assist device. Statistical analysis included a Wilcoxon rank-sum test., Results: The intervention residents decreased their suturing time from the first to the second stitich (732.4-257.6s), the control and residents decreased their time from 500.2 s to 421.8 s. The time required to perform the second stitch showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.46), but the difference in reduced time between the first and second stitch was significant (p = 0.001). Using the suturing assist device for the third suture, the intervention and control groups both decreased their times significantly. The control residents performed almost as quickly as the intervention residents with the suturing; device (p = 0.11). Accuracy and knot strength were not different in any test., Conclusions: Residents can improve suturing skill with a short didactic course and individual proctoring. A suturing assist device decreases time required by inexperienced surgeons to device perform an intracorporeal tie.

Background: Fixation of the mesh is crucial for the successful laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. In the present experimental study, we used a pig model to compare the tensile strengths of mesh fixation with helical titanium coils (tackers) and transabdominal wall sutures., Methods: Thirty-six full-thickness specimens (5 x 7 cm) of the anterior abdominal wall of nine pig cadavers were randomized for fixation of a polypropylene mesh (7 x 7 cm) by either tackers or transabdominal wall sutures. The number of fixation points varied from one to five per 7-cm tissue length, with distances between fixation points of 2.3, 1.8, 1.4, and 1.2 cm, respectively. The force required to disrupt the mesh fixation (tensile strength) was measured by a dynamometer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test and the Spearman rank correlation test., Results: The mean tensile strength of mesh fixation by transabdominal sutures was significantly greater than that by tackers for each number of fixation points: 67 N vs 28 N for a single fixation point (p <0.001), 115 N vs 42 N for two fixation points (p <0.001), 150 N vs 63 N for three fixation points (p <0.05), 151 N vs 73 N for four fixation points (p <0.05), and 150 N vs 82 N for five fixation points (p <0.05). Increasing the number of fixation points over three per 7 cm (distance between fixation points of 1.8 cm) did not improve tensile strength., Conclusion: The tensile strength of transabdominal sutures is up to 2.5 times greater than the tensile strength of tackers. Therefore, the use of transabdominal sutures for mesh fixation appears to be preferable for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Background: Various randomized studies have evaluated techniques of abdominal fascia closure but controversy remains, leaving surgeons uncertain about the optimal method of preventing incisional hernia., Method: Medline and Embase databases were searched. All trials with a follow-up of at least 1 year that randomized patients with midline laparotomies to closure of the fascia by different suture techniques and/or suture materials were subjected to meta-analysis. Primary outcome was incisional hernia; secondary outcomes were wound dehiscence, wound infection, wound pain and suture sinus formation., Results: Fifteen studies were identified with a total of 6566 patients. Closure by continuous rapidly absorbable suture was followed by significantly more incisional hernias than closure by continuous slowly absorbable suture (P < 0.009) or non-absorbable suture (P = 0.001). No difference in incisional hernia incidence was found between slowly absorbable and non-absorbable sutures (P = 0.75), but more wound pain (P < 0.005) and more suture sinuses (P = 0.02) occurred after the use of non-absorbable suture. Similar outcomes were observed with continuous and interrupted sutures, but continuous sutures took less time to insert., Conclusion: To reduce the incidence of incisional hernia without increasing wound pain or suture sinus frequency, slowly absorbable continuous sutures appear to be the optimal method of fascial closure.

Background: Few comparative studies have evaluated conventional and laparoscopic knots. The objective of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic knot reliability and identify which type of knot is most secure., Methods: Seven types of knots were compared; each one was conventionally tied with four and six throws and similarly by laparoscopy. Dinsmore nomenclature for knots was used. A tension meter was used to evaluate knot reliability, using the loop method, and percentage of failure by slipping and tensile strength was calculated for each group., Results: When S=S=S=S and S=S=S=S=S=S geometry are excluded, there was no difference between laparoscopic and conventional knot. A significant difference between four- and six-throw knots was shown. Excluding S=S=S=S=S=S geometry, all knots in the conventional six-throw group were secure. Intracorporeal 2X1X1X1X1 and 1X1X1X1X1X1 and extracorporeal SXS#SXS#SXS six-throw laparoscopic group knots were secure., Conclusions: Laparoscopic knots are as secure as conventional knots. All knots must be made with six throws because security is maximized.

Objectives: To evaluate the learning curve between robot-assisted and manual laparoscopic suturing, as well as to assess other skills. Laparoscopic reconstructive procedures have been limited by instrumentation, small working spaces, and fixed angles at the trocar level to place sutures. Robot-assisted laparoscopic suture placement may provide one means of increasing dexterity and facilitating laparoscopic reconstructive procedures., Methods: Eight physicians participated in this study. A series of five trials were performed to assess dexterity (task 1) and free-hand suturing (task 2). Each task was performed using robot-assisted and manual laparoscopy. The participants were categorized as novice and experienced laparoscopists. Task 1 involved passing sutures through the eye of seven needles positioned 1 cm apart in a P configuration. Task 2 involved tying one surgeon's knot, followed by two subsequent knots., Results: The average time for trials 1 and 5 of task 1, robot-assisted laparoscopy, was 242.6 and 101.8 seconds, respectively (P <0.001). Both groups demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P <0.001) between the first and last trial. The average time for trials 1 and 5 of task 1, manual laparoscopy, was 205.3 and 169 seconds, respectively. The differences in the learning curves for robot-assisted and manual laparoscopy were statistically significant in favor of robotic assistance. Manual laparoscopic suturing did not demonstrate as much of a difference for the experienced surgeon. Overall, the difference in improvement between robot-assisted and manual laparoscopy was not statistically significant., Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic allows suturing and dexterity skills to be performed quicker than does manual laparoscopy.

Background: Laparoscopic suturing is technically a demanding skill in laparoscopic surgery. Ergonomic experimental studies provide objective information on the important factors and variables that govern optimal endoscopic suturing. Our objective was to determine the optimum physical alignment, visual display, and direction of intracorporeal laparoscopic bowel suturing using infrared motion analysis and telemetric electromyography (EMG) systems., Methods: Ten surgeons participated in the study; each sutured 50-mm porcine small bowel enterotomies toward and away from the surgeon in the vertical and horizontal bowel plane with either isoplanar (image display corresponds with actual lie of the bowel) or nonisoplanar (bowel displayed horizontally but mounted vertically in the trainer and vice versa) display. The end points were the placement error score, execution time, leakage pressure, motion analysis, and telemetric EMG parameters of the surgeon's dominant upper limb., Results: Suturing was demonstrably easier in the vertical than in the horizontal plane, resulting in a better task quality (placement error score, p < 0.0001; leakage pressure, p < 0.005) and shorter execution time (p < 0.05). Nonisoplanar display of the surgical anatomy degrades performance in terms of both task efficiency and task quality. On motion analysis, a wider angle of excursion and lower angular velocity were observed during the vertical suturing with isoplaner display. Compared to horizontal suturing, supination at the wrist was significantly greater during vertical than horizontal suturing (p < 0.05). Within each category (vertical vs horizontal suturing), the direction of suturing (toward/away from the surgeon) did not influence the extent of pronation/ supination at the wrist. In line with the degraded performance, significantly more muscle work was expended during horizontal suturing. This affected the forearm flexors (p < 0.05), arm flexors and extensors (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively), and deltoid muscles (p < 0.005) and was accompanied by significantly more fatigue in the related muscles. Small bowel enterotomies sutured toward the surgeon in both the vertical and the horizontal planes exhibited less placement error score than when sutured away from the surgeon, with no significant difference in the motion analysis and EMG parameters., Conclusions: Optimal laparoscopic suturing (better task quality and reduced execution time) is achieved with vertical suturing toward the surgeon with isoplanar monitor display of the operative field. The poorer task performance observed during horizontal suturing is accompanied by more muscle work and fatigue, and it is not improved by monitor display of the enterotomy in the vertical plane.

Background: The difficulties of minimally invasive reconstructive surgery, laparoscopically or retroperitoneoscopically, are caused by spatial limitation and fixed trocar positions and, therefore, restricted movement and handling of the instruments. In addition to a standardization of the technique, continual training, and improved instrument technologies, optimization of the geometry of reconstructive surgery, such as angles and distances between the working ports or the camera and needle position, are imperative to providing an optimal clinical performance., Materials and Methods: After designing a standardized suturing technique and conducting an experimental analysis of the geometric factors important in reconstructive surgery, we transferred these results to our clinical setting. A series of 116 reconstructive laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic procedures (nephropexy, pyeloplasty, bladder neck suspension, and radical prostatectomy) were analyzed according to the technical realization and quality of reconstruction. Trocar and table positions were adjusted according to our preliminary results, as were the position of the instruments and camera., Results: The trocar and instrument positions are critical for the clinical outcome of reconstructive surgery. Continual training in a standardized suturing technique, together with the clinical application of the important geometric rules, can reduce surgery time by 50%. The time required for suturing single knots could be decreased even more: as much as 75%, thus ensuring efficient and safe reconstructive surgery., Conclusion: Reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty or radical prostatectomy can be standardized and performed in an acceptable amount of time with adequate quality when adhering to a standardized technique and the important geometric rules. Improved performance in terms of time and quality will increase the acceptance of these procedures, which can help to solve the problem associated with a low total number of indications for laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy.

The tension applied to sutures can affect their performance. In laparoscopic procedures, the ability to tension sutures may be compromised by the confined space. The ability to accurately judge tension may also be compromised by lever arms of long instruments and interaction between the instrument and trocar. A miniature suture tensiometer that can be used in open and laparoscopic settings has been developed that demonstrates a maximum error of 0.05 lb over a 2-lb range. This device has been used in laparoscopic surgery to measure suture tension. The suture tension information gathered has been used in the development of a device that reliably delivers a secure knot in a laparoscopic setting.

Background: The 4-S modification of the Roeder knot may be tied laparoscopically as a single-throw knot., Technique: It is tied by adding a fourth wrap around the suture loop and securing the loop in place with a square knot rather than a single half-hitch., Experience: We have used this knot in laparoscopic surgeries for more than 2 years and have not observed knot slippage., Conclusion: This modification results in a knot comparable in strength to the strongest laparoscopic multiple-throw square knots.