Search

Although dLPE is not overly rare, isolation of the autonomic nerves from dLPE cannot always be guaranteed. In patients with endometriosis lesions that are embedded in the deep parametrium, nerve-sparing techniques are no longer considered feasible, except for those with unilateral involvement. However, even one-sided radical parametrectomy may actually lead to bladder dysfunction, which seriously affects the quality of life. Therefore, the objective is to demonstrate the anatomical and technical highlights of nerve-sparing laparoscopic surgery for deep lateral parametrial endometriosis (dLPE).Stepwise demonstration of this method with a narrated video footage.An urban general hospital.A 38-year-old woman, para 1, presented with a 5-year history of severe chronic pelvic and gluteal pain, all of which were resistant to pharmacotherapy. The patient showed no neurological disorders, such as bladder dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed right ovarian endometrioma and hydrosalpinx with dLPE reaching the lateral pelvic wall. Based on the dermatome involved, we suspected that the main lesion causing gluteal pain was located around the second and third sacral roots.Laparoscopic excision of dLPE with a pelvic autonomic nerve-sparing technique, decompression of somatic nerves and preservation of all branches of the internal iliac vessels. Assessment of preserved tissue perfusion using indocyanine green. The procedure was performed using 8 steps, as follows: step 1, adhesiolysis and adnexal surgery; step 2, complete ureterolysis; step 3, identification and dissection of the hypogastric nerve and inferior hypogastric plexus with development of the pararectal space; step 4, dissection of the internal iliac vessels; step 5, identification and dissection of the sacral roots S2-S4 and the pelvic splanchnic nerves; step 6, complete removal of dLPE; step 7, hemostasis and assessment of tissue perfusion using indocyanine green; and step 8, application of barrier agents to prevent adhesion. Dissection of the pelvic nerves before dLPE excision revealed the relationship between the lesions and pelvic innervation, thereby reducing the risk of nerve injury, whether by minimizing the risk of neuropraxia or by allowing as many nerve fibers as possible to be spared in patients with some invasion of the pelvic nerve system. We considered even partial preservation of these nerves as beneficial to the resumption of pelvic organ functions. The step-by-step technique should help perform each stage of the surgery in a logical sequence, ensuring easy and safe completion of the procedure.Relief from severe pain, avoidance of postoperative morbidity (including intermittent self-catheterization).The patient developed no perioperative complications, including postoperative bladder, rectal, or sexual dysfunctions. Pain was completely resolved.Nerve-sparing surgery is technically safe and feasible for selected patients with dLPE. Suitably tailored treatment should be provided for each individual based on both latest scientific evidence and life planning for the patient.

Study Objective: To investigate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in patients with ureteral endometriosis (UE).Design: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the ureter endometriosis with hydronephrosis.Setting: A private hospital that provide primary, secondary and tertiary care.Patients: 30 consecutive patients with UE who underwent laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy at our institution between May 2008 and April 2020. Interventions: Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy, if necessary, hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, cystectomy, partial bladder resection, or partial bowel resection were performed.Measurements and Main Results: The most common chief complaint was pelvic pain (40%). Endometriosis affected only the left ureter in 56.7% of patients, only the right ureter in 33.3%, and both ureters in 6.7%. Involvement of the ipsilateral ovary was confirmed in 64.3%. The most frequent location of UE was 1 to 3 cm above the UVJ (46.7%). A psoas hitch was performed in 7 patients (23.3%), and the Boari flap was used in 9 patients (30%). Hysterectomy was performed in 12 patients (40%), and 6 of them had a concomitant bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (20%). In addition, 3 patients (10%) underwent partial bowel resection, and 2 patients (6.7%) underwent partial bladder resection. After surgery, 24 of 27 patients (80.0%) were free of sever hydronephrosis after surgery. Hydronephrosis recurred in a single patient (3.3%), but the grade of hydronephrosis improved significantly after surgery (P

Aim The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer retrospectively in the wake of the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer (LACC) trial. Methods A total of 109 patients with stage IA1 with lymphovascular space involvement, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancers were included in this study. The surgical and oncological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent type C MIRH with a no-touch isolation technique for cervical tumor. Results The median number of resected pelvic lymph nodes was 36 (range, 14-94), and 10 patients (9.2%) had positive nodes. One patient (0.9%) had positive surgical margins. Forty-six patients (42%) underwent adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 73 months (range, 30-146 months). Five patients (4.6%) developed recurrent disease, and 3 patients (2.8%) died of cervical cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 96.3% and 97.2%, respectively. A comparison between patients with tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm (n = 59) and those with tumor diameter > 2 cm (n = 50) did not identify any significant differences, with 5-year disease-free survival 96.6% versus 94.0% and 5-year overall survival 98.3% versus 96.0%, respectively. Conclusion In this retrospective study, MIRH with a no-touch isolation technique for stage IA to IB1 cervical cancer was a safe approach in terms of oncological outcomes. However, every surgeon who treats early-stage cervical cancer should inform each patient of the results of the LACC trial because it has an exceedingly high impact.

Study Objective Some articles have reported the surgical management of Alcock canal syndrome (ACS) using the transperineal [1] , transgluteal [2] , or conventional laparoscopic approach [ 3 , 4 ]. In 2015, Rey and Oderda [5] reported the first robotic neurolysis of the pudendum, providing the advantages of robot-assisted surgery: magnified and 3-dimensional vision and greater precision of movements. However, to our knowledge, there have been no reports on the use of a robotic platform for the treatment of ACS in the field of gynecology. Therefore, the objective of this video is to describe the anatomic and technical highlights of robotic exploration of the somatic nerves in the pelvis and transection of the sacrospinous ligament (nerve decompression) for ACS. Design Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. Setting An urban general hospital. A 48-year-old woman who had no previous surgical history was referred for severe pain when sitting, cyclic pelvic pain, and gluteal and perineal pain, all of which were resistant to medication therapy. Her pain radiated to the posterior aspect of the thigh. Before coming to our hospital, she visited an orthopedic surgeon a few years earlier and was diagnosed with sciatic neuralgia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed adenomyosis with neither deep endometriosis nor vascular entrapment. On the basis of neuropelveologic evaluation, the patient was suspected to be suffering from ACS owing to compression of the pudendal nerve and the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh by the sacrospinous ligament. Interventions The procedure was performed using the following 9 steps while referencing the laparoscopic neuronavigation technique [6] : step 1, opening the peritoneum along the external iliac artery; step 2, exposure of the external iliac artery; step 3, development of the lumbosacral space; step 4, identification of the lumbosacral trunk; step 5, identification of the superior gluteal nerve; step 6, identification of the sciatic nerve; step 7, identification of the inferior gluteal nerve; step 8, identification of the pudendal nerve; and step 9, transection of the sacrospinous ligament. The surgery was completed successfully without any complications, and the postoperative course was uneventful. We considered that there was no relationship between the ACS and endometriosis. The patient reported that her pain decreased gradually at postoperative month 1 and month 3, and finally the neuralgia was completely resolved at month 6. Neuropelveologic evaluation still continues every 6 months. Conclusion Robot-assisted transection of the sacrospinous ligament is a feasible, safe technique for selected patients with ACS. Exploration of the pelvic nerves should be performed for further diagnosis and therapy before prematurely labeling the patient as refractory to the treatment [7] .

AIM Our hospital adopted laparoscopic surgery for early-stage cervical cancer in August 1998, with robot-assisted surgery implemented in October 2013. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes for conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RARH) and assess the technical feasibility of RARH for early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS We retrospectively compared operative time, blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, length of postoperative hospital stay, rate of positive vaginal margin and perioperative complications between two groups of 121 patients (LRH group, n = 57; RARH group, n = 64) with stage IA2 to IIB, among 164 patients who underwent endoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer performed between January 2010 and December 2017 by an expert surgeon, excluding cases of para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS No differences in patient background, in terms of age and body mass index, were identified. For the LRH/RARH groups (mean ± standard deviation), results obtained were as follows: operative time, 211 ± 38/280 ± 59 min (P

Objective To demonstrate anatomic and technical highlights of a robot-assisted nerve plane–sparing eradication of deep endometriosis (DE). Design Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. Setting An urban general hospital. Interventions Laparoscopic nerve-sparing techniques as represented by the Negrar method reportedly result in lower rates of postoperative bladder, rectal, and sexual dysfunctions than classical approaches [1] . In addition, robotic surgery has become available, and 2 meta-analyses have confirmed that robotic surgery is safe and feasible for the treatment of endometriosis, especially in advanced cases [ 2 , 3 ]. However, few papers have shown the surgical techniques for a nerve-sparing procedure using a robotic approach. The patient was a 45-year-old woman who presented with severe chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea resistant to medication therapy. She had no nerve-specific complaints such as pain in the pudendal distribution or a voiding dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple uterine fibromas and adenomyosis with DE, involving the uterosacral ligament and surface of the rectum, with cul-de-sac obliteration. The parametrium was not involved in the DE. Robot-assisted nerve plane–sparing excision of DE with a double-bipolar method was performed using the following 8 steps: step 1, adhesiolysis and adnexal surgery; step 2, checking the ureteral course; step 3, separation of the nerve plane (step 3.1, dissection of the avascular layer below the hypogastric nerve, between the prehypogastric nerve fascia and presacral fascia; and step 3.2, dissection of the avascular layer above the hypogastric nerve, between the prehypogastric nerve fascia and fascia propria of the rectum) [ 4 , 5 ]; step 4, reopening of the pouch of Douglas; step 5, complete removal of DE lesions while avoiding injury to the nerve plane; step 6, hysterectomy (if the patient desires non–fertility-sparing surgery); step 7, checking for rectal injury using an air leakage test; and step 8, barrier agents for adhesion prevention. With regard to step 3, as a result of sharp dissection between avascular layers both above and below the hypogastric nerve, autonomic nerves in the pelvis were separated like a sheet with the surrounding fascia (the nerve plane). We then performed steps 4 to 6 in a step-by-step manner while avoiding injury to the nerve plane. The urinary catheter was removed within 24 hours after the surgery, and no residual urine was seen. The patient developed no perioperative complications; in particular, no postoperative bladder or rectal dysfunctions. The precise sharp dissection of the right embryo-anatomic planes on the basis of the detailed mesoanatomy seems important for improving functional outcomes in nerve-sparing surgery [5] . Conclusion Robot-assisted nerve plane–sparing eradication of DE is as technically feasible as the conventional laparoscopic approach. The step-by-step technique should help surgeons perform each part of the surgery in a logical sequence, making the procedure easier and safer to complete. However, the latent benefits of robot-assisted nerve-sparing surgery in the treatment of DE remain uncertain.

Objective To show technical highlights of a nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis (DE) with posterior compartment peritonectomy. Design Demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. Setting An urban general hospital. A systematic review and meta-analysis has suggested significant advantages of the nerve-sparing technique when considering the relative risk of persistent urinary retention in the treatment of DE [1] . In addition, a recent article has suggested that complete excision of DE with posterior compartment peritonectomy could be the surgical treatment of choice to decrease postoperative pain, improve fertility rate, and prevent future recurrence [2] . However, in DE, nerve-sparing procedures are even more challenging than oncologic radical procedures because the pathology resembles both ovarian/rectal cancer in terms of visceral involvement and advanced cervical cancer in terms of wide parametrial infiltration through the pelvic wall. Interventions The video highlights the anatomic and technical aspects of a fertility- and nerve-sparing surgery in DE with posterior compartment peritonectomy. After adhesiolysis and ovarian surgery, we developed retroperitoneal space at the level of promontory. The hypogastric nerve consists of the upper edge of the pelvic plexus, therefore the autonomic nerves were separated in a “nerve plane” by sharp interfascial dissection of the loose connective tissue layers both above (between the fascia propria of the rectum and the prehypogastric nerve fascia) and below (between the prehypogastric nerve fascia and the presacral fascia) the hypogastric nerve [ 3 , 4 ]. As a result of these dissections, the autonomic nerves in the pelvis were separated like a sheet with surrounding fascia. We then completely resected all DE lesions including peritoneal endometriosis while avoiding injury to the nerve plane. In a small number of our experiences, none of the patients (n = 51) required clean intermittent self-catheterization after this procedure. Conclusion Fertility- and nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of DE with total posterior compartment peritonectomy is a feasible technique and may provide both curability of DE and functional preservation. Our nerve-sparing technique can reproducibly simplify this complex procedure.

Objective To evaluate the effect of dienogest (DNG) in preventing the occurrence of pain and endometriomas after laparoscopic resection of uterosacral ligaments (USLs) with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Study design This retrospective analysis included 126 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of USLs with DIE followed by postoperative administration of DNG or no medication. Every 6 months postoperatively, patients answered questions and underwent ultrasound examination to identify pain and/or endometrioma. Result There were three (5.0%) cases of endometrioma in 59 patients from the DNG group and 21 (31.3%) cases in 67 patients from the no medication group ( P = 0.0002). Pain returned to preoperative levels in eight (11.9%) cases in the no medication group. No recurrence of pain occurred in the DNG group ( P = 0.0061). Conclusion The administration of DNG after resection of USLs with DIE significantly reduces the occurrence rate of endometriosis-related pain and endometriomas.

AIM We compared the short-term outcomes between conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and robot-assisted surgery (RAS) to assess the technical feasibility of the latter for early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS We retrospectively compared the perioperative outcomes between two groups of 223 patients (CLS group, n = 102; RAS group, n = 121) with early-stage endometrial cancer. Surgical procedures included hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. We analyzed the data from intrapelvic surgery alone because para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed via conventional endoscopic extraperitoneal approach without robot for both groups. RESULTS No differences were identified in patients' age and body mass index. The mean operative time was 133 ± 28 versus 178 ± 41 min (P

Our hospital adopted laparoscopic surgery for early-stage cervical cancer in August 1998, with robot-assisted surgery implemented in October 2013. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes for conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RARH) and assess the technical feasibility of RARH for early-stage cervical cancer.We retrospectively compared operative time, blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, length of postoperative hospital stay, rate of positive vaginal margin and perioperative complications between two groups of 121 patients (LRH group, n = 57; RARH group, n = 64) with stage IA2 to IIB, among 164 patients who underwent endoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer performed between January 2010 and December 2017 by an expert surgeon, excluding cases of para-aortic lymphadenectomy.No differences in patient background, in terms of age and body mass index, were identified. For the LRH/RARH groups (mean ± standard deviation), results obtained were as follows: operative time, 211 ± 38/280 ± 59 min (P 0.01); blood loss, 219 ± 114/370 ± 231 mL (P 0.01); number of resected lymph nodes, 38.5 ± 15.9/50.2 ± 18.2 (P 0.01); length of postoperative hospital stay, 11.6 ± 3.3/11.3 ± 4.8 days (P = 0.67); and perioperative complications with Clavien-Dindo classification of grade III or higher, 1.8/7.8% (P = 0.13).The operative time was significantly longer and blood loss greater in the RARH than LRH group. A greater number of lymph nodes were removed in the RARH group. However, these differences seem to be within a clinically acceptable range, showing that RARH is as feasible and safe as LRH in terms of short-term outcomes.

BackgroundPain-relieving effects of dienogest against endometriosis are comparable to leuprolide acetate for 24 weeks. We assessed whether long-term dienogest administration reduces recurrence after endometrioma excision.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 568 women with MRI-based diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma, who underwent laparoscopic stripping between 2008 and 2013, were studied. Recurrence rates and side effects over 5 years were investigated in 417 without postoperative medication and 151 who received dienogest postoperatively at 2 mg. Transvaginal sonography was performed every 3 months, and when cystic lesions ≥2 cm were observed, diagnostic MRI was conducted. Recurrence was defined as a lesion previously diagnosed as endometrioma by MRI, equal in size or larger 3 months later on ultrasonography. Cumulative recurrence rates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and group comparison involved log-rank tests. Blood examinations were completed every 3 months, and bone mineral densit...

Video Objective To demonstrate techniques to regulate and improve the safety and completeness of laparoscopic and robotic radical hysterectomy/radical trachelectomy (L-RH/RT+R-RH/RT=MI-RH/RT) for early invasive cervical cancer. We will present our techniques and skills as well as data on our long-term outcomes for MI-RH/RT patients. Setting Urban general hospital in Japan. Interventions 170 early invasive cervical carcinoma stage IA1(LSVI+)-IB1 who underwent MI-RH/RT between 2006-2015 were reviewed. Cases who underwent neo-adjuvant therapy were excluded from this study. In laparoscopy, knowledge laparoscopic anatomy and how to dissect are the most important points for reaching the goals of the surgery. Setting landmarks for dissection boundaries ensures completeness of dissection. For our type C radical hysterectomy/ trachelectomy, our goal is to remove the full length of the cardinal ligament. This is to prevent recurrence. To prevent the scattering of tumor cells, we create a vaginal cuff as an initial stage of our procedure and don't use a uterine manipulator as there is the concern that this could stimulate any tumors in the vicinity. When extracting the specimen, we use a large protection bag. This bag prevents spillage of tumor cells in the abdominal cavity and prevents possible port site/ extraction site contamination. Of the patients included in this study, disease-free survival is 97.1% and the 5 year overall survival in 98.2%. Conclusion In our retrospective study, minimally invasive approach for early-stage non-bulky cervical cancer is feasible and safe in terms of oncological outcomes.

Objective To assess the obstetric outcomes of our total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy (TLRT) cases for early stage cervical cancer. Materials and methods A total of 56 patients who underwent TLRT between December 2001 and August 2012 were reviewed retrospectively using clinicopathological, surgical, and follow-up data from patients' medical records. Results We performed this operation on 56 patients during the study period. The mean age of these 56 patients was 31.9years (range 22–42years). Fifty-three patients' fertility was preserved without requiring post-operative adjuvant treatment. Twenty-five women attempted to conceive, of whom 13 succeeded for a total of 21 pregnancies (52% pregnancy rate). Ten of these 21 pregnancies were the result of assisted reproductive technologies. Of those, 5 resulted in first trimester miscarriages, 2 in second trimester miscarriages, and 13 in live births. Ten pregnancies reached the third trimester. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (8/13, 61.5%) was the most common complication during pregnancy. The rate of preterm delivery was 47.6%. Three patients delivered at 22–28weeks of gestational age. Two of these babies showed permanent damage: one has cerebral palsy; the other has developmental retardation. One pregnancy is ongoing. Conclusion TLRT is a useful technique associated with an excellent pregnancy rate in fertility-preserving surgery to treat early stage cervical cancer.

Introduction: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy has been reported as having a higher incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence compared with the abdominal and/or vaginal hysterectomy. The cause of vaginal cuff dehiscence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy is not specified, but possible causes may be the use of thermal energy for vaginal incision, reduced suturing width due to magnification, low quality of laparoscopic suturing skills and early resumption of regular activities after surgery. Methods: We performed 677 cases of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases, such as fibroids or adenomyosis, from January 2007 to December 2008 in our institute. We experienced four cases (0.6%) of vaginal cuff dehiscence. We checked the operative parameters for these cases, such as whether the retroperitoneum was sutured or not and intrapelvic adhesion, as well as examined operative duration, blood loss, weight of removed organs, and body mass index. Results: Sexual intercourse was the triggering event for three cases (96 days, 103 days and 47 days after total laparoscopic hysterectomy) and the other case occurred during defecation (18 days and no sexual intercourse after total laparoscopic hysterectomy). There were no significant differences in vaginal cuff dehiscence with or without retroperitoneum suture and intrapelvic adhesion. Conclusion: After these four cases of vaginal cuff dehiscence, we recognized the need to review these cases carefully in order to discover the cause and how to prevent this from occurring in other patients. We do not have the answers to prevent this complication at present, but reducing the power-source and attempting different suturing techniques may be important steps.

Study Objective We describe our ultra-minimally invasive retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy using the extraperitoneal approach. This technique was developed to make traditionally invasive oncologic surgery more patient friendly and safer by eliminating the bowel from the operative field. Design Description of a surgical technique. Canadian Task Force II-3. Setting Urban general hospital in Japan. Patients 320 Women undergoing endoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer from Jan 2001 to Dec 2013. Interventions Patients underwent endoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. We accessed the retroperitoneal space with a visual access cannula (Endotip). This device easily facilitates peritoneal tenting. After expanding the extraperitoneal space by blunt dissection with forceps, carbon dioxide was infused. The upper limit of our dissection was the renal vein and the lower limit was the iliac circumflex vein. The extraperitoneal approach naturally creates a bowel-free operative field, even when dissecting in the pelvis. This approach only requires a 5-mm access hole, making it the least invasive approach to this kind of surgery. Measurements and Main Results The 5-year survival rates for this intervention combined with hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy are extremely favorable at 90% for patients with stage I to III disease, making this technique a viable minimally invasive approach for selected patients. Conclusion We can achieve a total para-aortic and pelvic retroperitoneal dissection with this extraperitoneal approach without the bowel invading the operative field. This procedure is focused on the barrier-free nature of working in the retroperitoneal space, meaning a space that is not hindered by the invasion of the bowel or other intraperitoneal structures.

Surgery and radiotherapy are both regarded as standard treatments for occult cervical cancers. Surgery has several theoretical advantages over radiotherapy; therefore, such cancers, especially in their early stages, are commonly treated with radical parametrectomy. However, postoperative bladder dysfunction is an important potential complication of this type of surgery. This is a case report of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for an occult cervical cancer using our original surgical concept based on detailed anatomical investigation of pelvic nerve networks in a fresh cadaver. We evaluated the validity of our nerve-sparing technique by assessing postoperative bladder function using urodynamic studies.

In gynecologic surgery, there is always the possibility that ureteral injuries will occur intraoperatively. Traditionally, ureteral injuries are treated by laparotomy, which increases morbidity. This inspired us to develop a laparoscopic alternative to deal with accidental intraoperative ureteral injuries.A 49-year-old woman with stage Ia1 cervical cancer found after conization was to undergo a laparoscopic Piver class 2 hysterectomy. Because the ureters could not be effectively mobilized as a result of pelvic fibrosis, the left ureter was accidentally transected. The patient underwent a laparoscopic extravesical ureteroneocystostomy.Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is technically possible and is a viable alternative to open surgery.

Laparoscopic adnexectomy is one of the most commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of ovarian tumor. However, many physicians find it difficult to conduct the resection without rupturing the ovarian tumor, especially in cases with tumor adhesions. In the case we are presenting, we unexpectedly encountered an ovarian tumor adherent to the pelvic sidewall. Because the possibility of a malignancy could not be completely excluded, we decided to concomitantly resect the ovary and its adherent peritoneum, to avoid any potential tumor rupture due to its manipulation. We were successfully able to laparoscopically retrieve the intact ovarian tumor, without its rupture. The pathological diagnosis was of a Grade 2, FIGO stage IIb endometrioid adenocarcinoma of both ovaries. As a result of this diagnosis, we performed a comprehensive staging laparoscopy. Following the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient has showed no signs of recurrent malignancy after 3 years. This case report describes our technique for the surgical management of an ovarian tumor adherent to the pelvic wall. To avoid spillage of the tumor contents, the simultaneous resection of the tumor with its adhered peritoneum is a useful method to consider.

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of perioperative complications and evaluate risk factors for the major complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using an early ureteral identification technique. We describe the technique we standardized and used for TLH, without exclusion criteria.A retrospective study was carried out at Kurashiki Medical Center, Japan, based on 1253 TLH procedures performed from January 2005 to March 2009. We reviewed records to identify the major perioperative complications, including bladder, ureteral, and intestinal injuries, and incidences of reoperation. Risk factors for major complications were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models.A total of 24 patients encountered major complications (1.91%). Complications included 10 intraoperative urologic injuries, five cases of postoperative hydronephrosis, five cases of vaginal dehiscence, one bowel injury, one postoperative hemorrhage, one bowel obstruction, and one ureterovaginal fistula. All 11 cases of intraoperative visceral injury were recognized during the surgery and repaired during the same laparoscopic surgical procedure. Of the risk factors analyzed, a history of abdominal surgery was the only one associated with the occurrence of major complications, with an odds ratio of 2.48 (95% confidence interval 1.23-6.49).While complications are inevitable, even in the hands of the most skilled surgeon, they can be minimized without conversion to laparotomy by a sufficiently developed suturing technique and a precise knowledge of pelvic anatomy. The presented data indicate that our method allows for safe TLH and minimization of ureteral injury, without the use of stringent exclusion criteria.

The development of endoscopic equipment and surgical skills make more complicated procedures possible laparoscopically. The application of these techniques to oncologic surgery, which used to be basically the most invasive procedure, has become an important issue when considering patient well-being. For cervical and endometrial cancer we can perform a simple hysterectomy, type II or a type II radical hysterectomy as well as a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. For ovarian cancer endoscopic procedures are advantageous for surgical staging, and even debulking surgery is possible in selected cases. The short-term outcome is excellent because post-operative recovery is quick, resulting in no delays in adjuvant therapy and a quick return to normal activity. As for the long-term results, although the number of cases and the observation period are limited, at present the outcome does not differ greatly from the results of conventional laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to ascertain the correlation between preserved pelvic nerve networks and bladder function after laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 53 patients underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomies. They were categorized into groups A, B, and C based on the status of preserved pelvic nerve networks: complete preservation of the pelvic nerve plexus (group A, 27 cases); partial preservation (group B, 13 cases); and complete sacrifice (group C, 13 cases). To evaluate bladder function, urodynamic studies were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: No significant difference in sensory function was found between groups A and B. However, the sensory function of group C was significantly lower than that of the other groups. Group A had significantly better motor function than groups B and C. No significant difference in motor function was found between groups B and C. Results showed that the sensory nerve is distributed predominantly at the dorsal half of the pelvic nerve networks, but the motor nerve is predominantly distributed at the ventral half. CONCLUSION: Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies can be tailored to patients with cervical carcinomas.