Search

Study Objective: To assess the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic management of apical pelvic organ prolapse along with indicated vaginal repairs and anti-incontinence procedures., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Tertiary-care academic center, Boston, MA., Patients: Total of 112 patients seen in the minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and urogynecology clinics with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse., Interventions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, sacrocervico- or sacrocolpopexy along with vaginal prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures as indicated from 2013 to 2017 at Brigham & Women's Hospital and Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital performed by a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and urogynecology team., Measurements and Main Results: Of the 112 patients, 52 were outpatient and 60 were admitted (median stay in admission group = 1 day; range 1-3). Patient baseline characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists' class, and pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage were similar between the outpatient and admitted cohorts. Most patients underwent hysterectomy at the time of the sacropexy (65.4% outpatient vs 73.3% admitted, p = .08). Concomitant apical prolapse repair was more common in the outpatient group (98.1% vs 85%, p = .02). The proportion of outpatient procedures increased from 17% in 2013 to a peak of 70% in 2016. Operating room time was shorter for the outpatient cohort (103.9 minutes vs 115.5 minutes, p = .04), but other perioperative outcomes were similar. There were no intraoperative complications. The numbers of postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperations were low and similar between outpatient and admitted cohorts. No factor was predictive of admission on regression analysis., Conclusion: Laparoscopic apical prolapse repair with concomitant vaginal repairs can be performed safely as an outpatient procedure. A unique team approach may foster a shorter, more efficient procedure without compromising short-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe a technique for uterine-sparing hysteropexy., Case Report: A 50-year-old multiparous woman with pelvic organ prolapse underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy utilizing polypropylene mesh with good clinical result., Conclusions: Placement of mesh arms medial to the uterine vessels during a laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy can be facilitated by using blunt needles to introduce the mesh arms.

Articles on laparoscopic approach to pelvic floor reconstruction continue to proliferate throughout the worldwide literature. Although procedures like laparoscopic Burch seem to be fading fast, other procedures like the laparoscopic paravaginal repair and sacral colpopexy seem to be more common and visible in the literature. This article reviews the pertinent anatomy, surgical procedures, and literature concerning the laparoscopic approach to pelvic floor reconstruction.

Reconstructive pelvic surgery for the treatment of vaginal prolapse continues to evolve as surgeons continue their quest for definitive surgical cure. Though there are three primary routes of access to reconstructive pelvic surgery (abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic) it is the laparoscopic approach that appears to be the least utilized. This is in part due to the great degree of technical difficulty associated with laparoscopic suturing. This paper reviews the general principles and functional anatomy associated with normal vaginal support as well as the laparoscopic surgical approach to pelvic floor support defects.

The present review focuses on the most recently published English language literature, and addresses results and complications associated with the laparoscopic approach to urinary incontinence, anterior vaginal wall prolapse, and lower urinary tract injury. Laparoscopic Burch procedures continue to show equal efficacy, but lower morbidity as compared with conventional open techniques. Lower urinary tract injuries may also be managed effectively using the same techniques as those employed in open procedures. Laparoscopy continues to be considered a mode of surgical access, and is effective in treating urinary incontinence, anterior vaginal wall prolapse, and lower urinary tract injuries.

The objective of this article was to review the available literature on laparoscopic Burch urethropexy cure rates and describe the authors' laparoscopic technique and experience with Burch urethropexy and paravaginal repair. A MEDLINE search (1991 to 1999) was performed for articles describing the laparoscopic Burch urethropexy using suture to elevate and stabilize the paraurethral tissue. Also a retrospective chart review of the authors' 171 consecutive patients between January 1997 and December 1999 was done. The laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and paravaginal repair is described using an open laparoscopic technique with 3 accessory ports for access. A transperitoneal approach is taken to gain access to the space of Retzius. The anterior vaginal wall and its paravaginal defects, if present, are identified. Nonabsorbable sutures are placed in a conventional fashion. The paravaginal repair is used for support of the anterior vaginal wall proximal to the urethral vesical junction and the Burch urethropexy distal to the vesical neck. An average of 6 sutures are used for the paravaginal repair and 4 sutures for the Burch urethropexy. Cystoscopy is performed to ensure no breech of lower urinary tract integrity. In all, 20 articles describing a laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and postoperative cure rate were identified. Cure rates ranged from 69% to 100%. A review of our experience revealed 130 of 171 patients had a Burch urethropexy and paravaginal repair, 23 of 171 patients a Burch urethropexy alone, and 18 of 171 patients a paravaginal repair alone. Of the authors' 171 patients, 4 (2.3%) had injury to the lower urinary tract during laparoscopic Burch urethropexy or paravaginal repair. All 4 injuries were cystotomies, 2 in patients with previous open retropubic urethropexies. No ureteral ligations or intravesical placement of suture was diagnosed. Other surgical parameters for the laparoscopic Burch uethropexy and paravaginal repair include an estimated blood loss of 50 mL, average hospital stay of less than 23 hours, and an average operative time of 70 minutes. All patients had their surgery completed via laparoscopy. The literature review and our personal experience suggests that the laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and paravaginal repair are safe and effective alternatives to traditional laparotomy for the treatment of genuine anatomic stress urine incontinence and cystourethrocele resulting from lateral vaginal wall defects.

Objective: To compare postoperative course and hospital charges of an open versus laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension for the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients undergoing open or laparoscopic Burch colposuspension by the same surgeon over a 2-year period. Patients undergoing additional surgical procedures at the time of colposuspension were excluded from the study. Twenty-one patients underwent open Burch colposuspension and 17 patients underwent laparoscopic colposuspension. Demographic data including age, parity, height, and weight were collected for each group. Both groups also were compared with regard to operative time, operating room charges, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, change in postoperative hematocrit, time required to resume normal voiding, length of hospital stay, and total hospital charges., Results: The laparoscopic colposuspension group had significantly longer operative times (110 versus 66 minutes, P < .01) and increased operating room charges ($3479 versus $2138, P < .001). There was no statistical difference in estimated blood loss or change in postoperative hematocrit between the two groups. No major intraoperative complications occurred in either group. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days for the laparoscopic group and 2.1 days for the open group (P < .005). However, total hospital charges for the laparoscopic group were significantly higher ($4960 versus $4079, P < .01)., Conclusion: Laparoscopic colposuspension has been described as a minimally invasive, cost-effective technique for the surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence. Although the laparoscopic approach was found to be associated with a reduction in length of hospital stay, it had significantly higher total hospital charges than the traditional open approach because of expenses associated with increased operative time and use of laparoscopic equipment.

We describe a percutaneous approach to suprapubic teloscopy that may be used to assess bladder-ureteral integrity during laparoscopic surgery. After access is gained to the hollow of the bladder using a percutaneous suprapubic catheter introducer, a telescope is inserted via the access sheath, and bladder integrity and ureteral patency are confirmed. We describe this technique as a viable alternative to traditional cystoscopy at laparoscopic surgery.