Search

Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has been rapidly adopted as a standard approach for surgical treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. Despite additional costs, RALP seems to provide better functional and oncological outcomes and less blood loss compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). However, prospective randomized studies are still missing., Purpose: Based on the current literature, this review reports about the role of RALP in prostate cancer treatment. Its functional and oncologic outcomes as well as complication rates are compared to ORP. Particularly, the role of RALP in nonorgan-confined tumors will be discussed., Results: Based on the current literature, RALP provides better continence and potency rates as compared to ORP. Moreover, the incidence of positive surgical margins seems to be reduced. However, there is conflicting data regarding the role of RALP in nonorgan-confined prostate cancer. Regarding long-term oncologic outcomes, RALP seems to be comparable to ORP.

Background: In recent years, small renal masses (SRM) have been increasingly detected as an incidental finding of radiological or ultrasound studies for other indications. Organ-sparing renal tumor resection as open partial nephrectomy (OPN) is the international standard for renal tumors <7 cm., Results: Due to technical developments, minimally invasive procedures have emerged as an alternative to OPN. In experienced hands, conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has achieved good functional and oncological results comparable to OPN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been performed since 2004. Compared to LPN, RAPN provides a faster learning curve, better visualization and more versatile instrumentation due to the degrees of freedom of the articulated instruments. After about 30 procedures, a level of experience is reached, which is characterized by good functional results, less blood loss, and shorter warm ischemia time of the kidney as compared to LPN. This can relate to a shorter hospital stay and faster recovery. Complications according to the Clavien classification are mostly grade I and II and are mainly treated conservatively., Conclusion: Oncological long-term results are not available yet; so that RAPN cannot be considered as an equivalent treatment to LPN and OPN. Until long-term evidence is available, decisions regarding the surgical technique for organ-sparing renal tumor resection will be determined by patient's wishes and surgeon's preference.

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is a standard procedure for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse of all three compartments and can also be performed minimally invasively without compromising efficacy as by open techniques. In comparison to conventional laparoscopy robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy benefits from several technical stand-alone features, such as three-dimensional view, increased degrees of freedom through angulated instruments, tremor filter and up and down scaling of instrument movements. These advantages facilitate preparation of the vesicovaginal and rectovaginal spaces as well as suturing and reperitonealization, which should lead to decreased operation time and anesthesia time in extreme Trendelenburg position. Surgeon also benefit from the much more ergonomic working conditions of the da Vinci® system: however, comparative studies are rare and conclusions are preliminary. The German reimbursement system (DRG) does not adequately cover da Vinci expenses which, despite the obvious advantages represents the most significant obstacle in the propagation of this technique.