Search

Background: Live donor nephrectomy is an important donor source. Donor nephrectomy can be performed by laparoscopy or hand-assisted laparoscopy. Different types of hand port devices can be used for assistance. In the literature there are few studies about hand-assisted laparoscopy without a hand port. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of not using a hand port for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation., Methods: Patients who were operated on for kidney donation between January 2011 and June 2018 evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, on whom a hand port was used, and group B, whose surgeries did not involve a hand port. The groups were compared for sex, age, body mass index, amount of intraoperative bleeding, warm ischemia time, duration of surgery, perioperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications., Results: There were 159 patients in group A and 146 patients in group B. There was no difference between the groups considering intraoperative bleeding, warm ischemia time, duration of surgery and postoperative early complications (P > .05 for all)., Conclusion: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without a hand port can be considered an easy and effective method of laparoscopic nephrectomy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although the advantages of laparoscopic procedures has been well studied over the last two decade, laparoscopic appendectomy could not to be a standard therapy due to some disadvantages such as longer operative time and higher cost.The objective of our study is to re-evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy with current data., Methods: Between January 2012 and July 2012, the data of the patients who had appendectomy were recorded prospectively. Patients' demographics, duration of procedure, length of hospital stay, need of analgesics, postoperative visual analogue scale scores and morbidity were assessed., Results: Of 241 patients, 120 (49.8%) underwent open and 121(50.2%) laparoscopic appendectomy. The operating time was similar for both groups (p=0.855). The visual analog scale scores of 1st (p=0.001), 6th (p=0.001) and 12th (p=0.028) hours were higher in open the appendectomy group. The total need of analgesics significantly was higher in open group (p=0.001).There was no statistical difference in terms of total morbidity rate between open and laparoscopic appendectomy groups (p=0.617)., Conclusion: Two operative techniques are similar in terms of length of hospital stay, operative time, and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces the need for analgesics and visual analog scale scores; therefore,it should be considered as the gold standard for surgical treatment of acute appendicitis., (Celsius.)

Objective: Ganglioneuromas are rare benign tumors originating from ganglion cells. Ganglioneuromas are detected incidentally because they are asymptomatic. We report a case of laparoscopic excision of a retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma., Case Description: A 49-y-old female was admitted to our medical center with the complaint of abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound showed a hypoechoic solid lesion at the level of the liver hilum, adjacent to the pancreas. Computerized tomography scan confirmed the presence of a thin walled mass 44 mm in diameter, adjacent to the pancreas and liver. Laparoscopic excision of the retroperitoneal mass was planned. The tumor was removed en bloc, and the pathologic diagnosis was ganglioneuroma. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the third postoperative day without any complications., Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery has been shown to be safe and reliable in patients with retroperitoneal tumors.