Search

The evaluation of dairy cow feed efficiency using residual feed intake accounts for known energy sinks. However, behavioral traits may also contribute to the variation in feed efficiency. Our objective was to estimate the heritability and repeatability of behavioral traits and their genetic correlations with feed efficiency and its components in lactating Holstein cows. The first dataset consisted of 36,075 daily rumination and lying time records collected using a SMARTBOW ear-tag accelerometer (Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ) and 6,371 weekly feed efficiency records of 728 cows from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The second dataset consisted of 59,155 daily activity records, measured as number of steps, recorded by pedometers (AfiAct; SAE Afikim, Kibbutz Afikim, Israel) and 8,626 weekly feed efficiency records of 635 cows from the University of Florida. Feed efficiency and its components included DMI, change in BW, metabolic BW, secreted milk energy, and residual feed intake. The statistical models included the fixed effect of cohort, lactation number, and days in milk, and the random effects of animal and permanent environment. Heritability estimates for behavioral traits using daily records were 0.19 ± 0.06 for rumination and activity, and 0.37 ± 0.07 for lying time. Repeatability estimates for behavioral traits using daily data ranged from 0.56 ± 0.02 for activity to 0.62 ± 0.01 for lying time. Both heritability and repeatability estimates were larger when weekly records instead of daily records were used. Rumination and activity had positive genetic correlations with residual feed intake (0.40 ± 0.19 and 0.31 ± 0.22, respectively) and lying time had a negative genetic correlation with this residual feed intake (-0.27 ± 0.11). These results indicate that more efficient cows tend to spend more time lying and less time active. Additionally, less efficient cows tend to eat more and therefore also tend to ruminate longer. Overall, sensor-based behavioral traits are heritable and genetically correlated with feed efficiency and its components and, therefore, they could be used as indicators to identify feed-efficient cows within the herd., (The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Objectives of this experiment were to study the effect of infusing utero-pathogenic bacteria to induce endometrial inflammation on productive performance in early lactation and subsequent reproduction. Although endometritis is associated with perturbed reproduction, numerous factors may contribute to the observed association. It was hypothesized that induced endometrial inflammation, resulting in localized and systemic inflammatory responses, compromises production and reproduction. Holstein cows without clinical disease and with less than 18% polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) in endometrial cytology on d 31 ± 3 postpartum had their estrous cycle synchronized. Cows were blocked by parity and genomic breeding value for cow conception rate and, within block, assigned randomly to remain as untreated controls (CON; n = 37) or to receive an intrauterine infusion of 5.19 × 10 8 cfu Escherichia coli and 4.34 × 10 8 cfu Trueperella pyogenes during the luteal phase to induce endometrial inflammation (INF; n = 48). Endometrial cytology was taken on d 2 and 7 after treatment to evaluate the proportion of PMN. Rectal temperature, dry matter intake, and yields of milk and components were measured in the first 7 d after treatment. Blood serum was analyzed for concentration of haptoglobin. Leukocytes were isolated from blood on d 2 and 7 after treatment and on d 19 after artificial insemination (AI) and mRNA was quantified for a select group of genes. Cows received AI and reproduction was followed for 300 d postpartum. Bacterial infusion induced endometrial inflammation with increased proportions of PMN in the endometrial cytology on d 2 (4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 26.3 ± 2.8%) and 7 (10.9 ± 1.7 vs. 17.4 ± 2.1%) after treatment, resulting in increased mean prevalence of subclinical endometritis (>10% PMN; 23.3 ± 6.3 vs. 80.9 ± 5.1%). Rectal temperature did not differ between CON and INF, but the concentration of haptoglobin in serum tended to increase in INF compared with CON (113 ± 14 vs. 150 ± 16 µg/mL). Induced endometrial inflammation reduced yields of milk (44.9 ± 0.8 vs. 41.6 ± 0.8 kg/d), protein (1.19 ± 0.03 vs. 1.12 ± 0.03 kg/d), and lactose (2.17 ± 0.04 vs. 2.03 ± 0.04 kg/d) and tended to reduce dry matter intake (20.7 ± 0.5 vs. 19.4 ± 0.6 kg/d) in the first 7 d after treatment. Indeed, the reduction in milk yield lasted 4 wk. However, treatment did not affect yields of energy-corrected milk or fat because treatment with INF increased the concentration of fat in milk (3.54 ± 0.10 vs. 3.84 ± 0.10%). Induced endometrial inflammation reduced pregnancy per AI at all inseminations (33.4 ± 5.1 vs. 21.6 ± 3.7%) and the hazard of pregnancy (0.61; 95% CI = 0.36-1.04), which extended the median days open by 24 d. Blood leukocytes from INF cows had increased mRNA expression of the pro-inflammatory gene IL1B on d 2 and 7 after treatment, but reduced expression of the IFN-stimulated genes ISG15 and MX2 on d 19 after AI. Induced endometrial inflammation depressed production and caused long-term negative effects on reproduction in lactating dairy cows., (The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Objectives were to determine the effects of 3 levels of dietary cation-anion difference (DCAD) fed prepartum to nulliparous cows on productive and reproductive performance. We enrolled 132 pregnant nulliparous Holstein cows at 250 (248-253) d of gestation in a randomized block design. Cows were blocked by genomic merit of energy-corrected milk yield and assigned randomly to diets varying in DCAD, +200 (P200; n = 43), -50 (N50; n = 45), or -150 (N150; n = 44) mEq/kg of dry matter (DM). Dietary treatments were fed during the last 22 d of gestation and, after calving, postpartum cows received the same lactation diet. Productive performance was evaluated for the first 14 wk of lactation, and reproduction was assessed until 305 d postpartum. Intake of DM prepartum decreased linearly (results presented in sequence as least squares means ± standard error of the mean, P200 vs. N50 vs. N150) with a reduction in DCAD (9.0 vs. 8.9 vs. 8.4 ± 0.1 kg/d), which resulted in linear decreases in net energy balance (0.34 vs. 0.20 vs. -0.36 ± 0.20 Mcal/d), body weight change (1.1 vs. 0.8 vs. 0.3 ± 0.1 kg/d), and mean body weight (652 vs. 649 vs. 643 ± 2 kg) prepartum. Treatment did not affect yield of colostrum (6.3 vs. 5.8 vs. 5.1 ± 0.6 kg) or the contents or yields of fat, protein, lactose, IgG, Ca, or Mg in colostrum. Intake of DM (19.4 vs. 19.2 vs. 19.0 ± 0.2 kg/d), yields of milk (36.6 vs. 36.7 vs. 35.8 ± 0.6 kg/d) or energy-corrected milk (36.7 vs. 36.3 vs. 35.9 ± 0.5 kg/d), feed efficiency (1.93 vs. 1.92 vs. 1.93 ± 0.03 kg of energy-corrected milk per kilogram of DM intake), and content and yield of milk components did not differ among treatments during the first 14 wk of lactation. Prepartum DCAD did not affect the cumulative milk yield by 305 d of lactation (9,653 vs. 10,005 vs. 9,918 ± 196 kg). Of the 132 cows, 40 P200, 45 N50, and 43 N150 received at least 1 artificial insemination (AI), and treatment did not affect pregnancy per AI at first (32.5 vs. 35.6 vs. 37.2%) or all AI (30.6 vs. 33.9 vs. 40.2%), although reducing the DCAD increased the proportion of cows pregnant by 305 d postpartum (76.7 vs. 88.9 vs. 93.2%) without altering the rate of pregnancy. Collectively, manipulating the DCAD of prepartum diets, from +200 to -150 mEq/kg of DM, fed to late gestation nulliparous cows did not affect subsequent lactation productive performance, but may have provided some benefit to reproduction, which warrants further confirmation., (Copyright © 2021 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)