Search

Case Report: The case is presented of a 51 year-old woman with a firm mass at the medial canthus of the right eye of five years onset. A low-grade lymphoproliferative lesion (reactive lymphoid hyperplasia) was diagnosed from an excisional biopsy, Discussion: Lacrimal sac tumors are rare, with a peak incidence in the fifth decade of life. The initial clinical features are epiphora and medial canthus swelling. As it mimics nasolacrimal duct obstruction, up to 40% of these tumors are misdiagnosed until undergoing surgery., (Copyright © 2013 Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the demographic and clinical data of primary tumors of the lacrimal sac presenting as lacrimal obstruction., Methods: Retrospective and descriptive study was conducted between the years 2007 to 2012 on all patients undergoing surgery for low lacrimal obstruction at Dr. Luis Sanchez Bulnes Hospital, an Association for the prevention of blindness in Mexico IAP., Results: Primary tumors of the lacrimal sac represented 2.5% of all lacrimal obstructions, being more common in women than in men (8:1). The large majority (89%) of the cases were non-epithelial, with lymphoid lesions being the most frequent. Benign tumors were presented at a younger age (50 years old) than malignant (70 years old). One-third (33%) of cases were unexpected findings during surgery (100% benign). Just over half (55%) were malignant tumors (1.4% of obstructions), all of them lymphoproliferative lesions. The most frequent clinical tumor was in the inner edge, either with or without epiphora. The progression time varied according to the degree of aggressiveness of the lymphoma (3 months-10 years)., Conclusions: Lacrimal sac tumors are rare, but they must be taken into account in patients with an unusual clinical presentation of lacrimal obstruction., (Copyright © 2013 Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: : To determine the diagnostic accuracy of manual regurgitation on pressure over the lacrimal sac (ROPLAS) versus lacrimal irrigation for screening nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in adults prior to intraocular surgeries.Methods: This cross-sectional study took place in a tertiary eye care hospital in South Tamil Nadu, India. From January to December 2017 and included consecutive patients who presented for routine cataract surgery. Prospective data collection occurred in 8369 eyes of patients who underwent cataract surgery. All patients underwent ROPLAS testing by an ophthalmologist followed by lacrimal irrigation by trained ophthalmic assistants, rechecked or confirmed in equivocal cases by ophthalmologists who were masked to the ROPLAS status. The primary outcome, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values to detect lacrimal occlusion by ROPLAS compared with lacrimal irrigation with 95% confidence intervals was estimated.Results: : A total of 8369 eyes underwent cataract surgery during the time periods of the study. ROPLAS and lacrimal irrigation were performed in all eyes. The sensitivity of ROPLAS to diagnose NLDO correctly was 54.5% (95% CI, 44.8%-63.9%) and its specificity was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%). The positive and negative predictive values were 75.3% (95% CI, 65.6%-83.0%) and 99.4% (95% CI, 99.2%-99.5%), respectively.Conclusion: : We found that ROPLAS when used alone had very low sensitivity and low positive predictive value in detecting NLDO prior to cataract surgery as compared with lacrimal irrigation. Hence, we recommend performing ROPLAS and lacrimal irrigation in every patient as part of the routine preoperative workup prior to cataract surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: The objectives of this study are to report the outcomes of pediatric patients with lacrimal system obstruction who underwent primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR). Study design: The authors conducted a retrospective noncomparative case series. Methods: The operative and postoperative data have been collected in 58 children aged between 3 months and 13 years (mean 4.1 years). The total of 58 primary EDCRs has been performed by two surgeons using a standardized surgical technique. The EDCRs were performed 52 times on one eye, 6 times on both eyes (3 times simultaneously, 3 times at the separate sitting with an interval of 4–6 months). The follow-up evaluations include taking history, clinical examinations including a fluorescein disappearance test. Results: The follow-up interval ranged from 12 to 36 months (mean 17 months, median 15 months). The success rate was 51/58 (87.9%) in all 58 EDCRs. The success rate was 47/51 (92.2%) in the group of postsaccal obstructions, 3/5 (60.0%) in the group of postsaccal and suprasaccal obstrutions and 1/2 (50.0%) in presaccal obstructions. The procedures were successful in all eight children aged under 1 year old (100%) and in 14 of 15 children between 1 and 2 years old (93.3%). The silicone intubation was used in 54 EDCRs. Conclusions: The endoscopic DCR is a safe and effective procedure for most children with the success rate comparable to that achieved in the external DCR and in adults. The success rate of the postsaccal obstructions is significantly higher than in presaccal or combined pre- and postsaccal obstructions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

BACKGROUND After the advent of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), dacryocystectomy (DCT) was regarded as mutilant surgery and reserved for lacrimal sac tumors. PURPOSE To present current indications for dacryocystectomy. METHODS Eighteen eyes from 11 patients subjected to DCT were reviewed retrospectively. Nine patients had chronic dacryocystitis confirmed by dacryocystography and two patients had lacrimal sac tumors. RESULTS The indications for DCT were: three patients with systemic medical problems, three patients with dry eye, two cases of lacrimal sac tumors, two cases of traumatic dacryocystitis and one case of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Dacryocystitis was resolved in 17 of 18 eyes; the two cases of tumor evolved without epiphora. One patient (traumatic dacryocystitis) had recurrence of dacryocystitis. CONCLUSIONS DCT is mainly performed when a lacrimal sac tumor is suspected but, since it avoids the intra- and postoperative complications related to dacryocystorhinostomy, it can be indicated in cases of dacryocystitis with significant lacrimal discharge and an enlarged or altered lacrimal sac. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]