Search

Objective: To evaluate the use of the intracervical balloon compared with locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening for induction in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes., Methods: Monocentric, retrospective (from 2002 to 2017) observational cohort study of singleton pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes and induced between 34 and 37 weeks. The primary outcome measure was balloon catheter efficiency evaluated by Cesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes were : interval from induction to delivery, labor duration, oxytocin use, intrauterine infection rate, maternal complications (i.e., postpartum hemorrhage and endometritis), and neonatal complications., Results: 60 patients had cervical ripening with prostaglandins alone and 58 had balloon catheter. Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups, except for induction term and neonatal weight. There was not a significant difference in occurrence of Cesarean section rate (p = 0.14). Nor were there significant differences in time from induction to birth (p = 0.32) or in intrauterine infection rate (p = 0.95). Labor duration was shorter (p = 0.006) and total oxytocin dose lower (p = 0.005) in patients induced by prostaglandins alone. Concerning neonatal outcomes, there were more transfers to intensive care (p = 0.008) and more respiratory distress (p = 0.005) among newborns induced by prostaglandins., Conclusion: Compared with locally applied prostaglandins, balloon catheter induction is not associated with an increase of Cesarean section rate in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe induction of labor practices in France and to identify factors associated with the use of different methods., Methods: The data came from the French prospective population-based cohort MEDIP (MEthodes de Déclenchement et Issues Périnatales), including consecutively during one month in 2015 all women with induction of labor and a live fetus in 7 perinatal networks. The characteristics of women, maternity units, gestational age, Bishop's score, decision mode, indication and methods of labor induction were described. Factors associated with the use of different methods were sought in univariate analyzes., Results: The rate of induction of labor during the study was 21% and 3042 women were included (95.9% participation rate). The two main indications were prolonged pregnancy (28.7%) and premature rupture of the membranes (25.4%). More than one-third of women received intravenous oxytocin in first method, 57.3% prostaglandins, 4.5% balloon catheter and 1.4% another method. Among the prostaglandins, the vaginal device of dinoprostone was the most used (71.6%) then the gel (20.7%) and the vaginal misoprostol (6.7%). Women with a balloon were more often of higher body mass index and multiparous with scarred uterus. The balloon and misoprostol were mainly used in university public hospitals., Conclusions: The evolution of induction of labor methods, due to new data from the literature and the development of new drugs or devices, invites to regularly repeat population-based studies on induction of labor., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of single balloon catheter with double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and labor induction on unfavourable cervix., Methods: this is a comparative, retrospective, one-center trial. Were included singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation. Were excluded cicatricial uterus. The outcomes were vaginal delivery rate, caesarean section rate, modification in Bishop score, time from induction to delivery, second time prostaglandin E2 resort, oxytocin administration resort, maternal or neonatal adverse events., Results: Were included 108 patients: 45 in single balloon catheter group, 32 in double balloon catheter group, 31 in dinoprostone insert group. Vaginal delivery rate was similar in single balloon catheter group (78 %) compared with others groups (75 % in double balloon catheter and 71 % in dinoprostone insert group respectively). Oxytocin administration resort was superior in single balloon catheter group. There was no significant difference on others outcomes. Labor induction costs were 9euros in single balloon catheter group, versus 55 and 81 euros in double balloon catheter group and dinoprostone insert group respectively., Conclusions: Single balloon catheter seems just as effective as double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert with its major asset the low cost for labor induction., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In 2016, 22.0% of deliveries in France were induced. The current lack of high level of evidence data about the methods and indications for induction of labour has promoted heterogeneous and non-recommended practices. The extent of these different practices is not adequately known in France today, although they may influence perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to report current practices of induction of labour in France., Material and Methods: This study surveyed 94 maternity units in seven perinatal networks. A questionnaire was sent by email to either the department head or delivery room supervisor of these units to ask about their methods for induction and their attitudes in specific obstetric situations., Results: The rate of induction varied between maternity units from 7.7% to 33% of deliveries. Most units used two (39.4%) or three or more (35.1%) agents for cervical ripening. In all, 87 (92.6%) units reported using dinoprostone as a vaginal slow-released insert, 59 units dinosprostone as a vaginal gel (62.8%) and 46 units a balloon catheter (48.9%). Only three units reported using vaginal misoprostol. Inductions without medical indication were reported by 71 (75.5%) maternity units, and 22 (23.4%) units even when the cervix was unfavourable. Obstetric attitudes in cases of breech presentation, previous caesareans, fetal growth restriction or macrosomia and prelabour rupture of the membranes varied widely., Discussion: The variability of practices for induction of labour and the persistence of disapproved practices call for an assessment of the effectiveness and the safety of the different strategies., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare efficiency of a double-balloon to vaginal prostaglandins for cervical ripening in patients with unfavourable cervix., Patients and Methods: Fifty patients induced with a double-balloon were compared to 50 patients receiving vaginal prostaglandins. Matching criteria were age, parity, history of uterine scar, gestational age and Bishop score. The primary outcome was failure induction. Secondary outcomes included improvement in Bishop score, ripening-to-delivery interval, caesarean section rate, maternal and neonatal morbidity., Results: Risk of failed induction (16% in the double-balloon group vs. 14% in the prostaglandins group) and caesarean section rate (28% vs. 36%) were similar in the two groups. The proportion of favourable cervix and the time to obtain a better Bishop score were similar with the two methods. Maximal pain score during cervical ripening was significantly lower in the double-balloon group (P<0.001). Ripening-to-delivery interval (30.4 h ± 15.6h vs. 28.9 h ± 20.5h) was not different between the two groups. There was no difference about maternal and neonatal outcomes., Discussion and Conclusion: The double-balloon was as efficient as vaginal prostaglandins. The ripening-to-delivery interval was not different between the two groups. The main advantage of this device could be a better tolerance favourishing patient satisfaction., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Study, based on the literature, of the use of misoprostol for induction of labor in cases of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy and define the different mode of administration., Materials and Methods: Bibliographic review using the Medline and Pubmed databases and the guidelines of the international professional societies. Selection of papers in French and English. Keywords used: misoprostol, termination of pregnancy, mid and third trimester, scarred uterus, previous cesarean section, uterine rupture., Results: Misoprostol is effective for induction of labor in case of second or third fetal death or termination of pregnancy. Comparing to oral route, vaginal route reduces the induction-expulsion time and the rate of patients remaining undelivered in the first 24 hours without increasing side effects. Oral route is a possible alternative if preferred by the patient. Sublingual route seems interesting but data are limited. The use of moderate doses (800-2400 μg/day) every 3 to 6 hours seems to be the best compromise between efficiency and tolerance. It is not possible to recommend a specific dosing schedule. The risk of uterine rupture in case of previous cesarean section justifies the use of minimum effective dose for these patients. In this case, it is recommended not to exceed a dose of 100 μg for each dose. The induction-birth period and doses of misoprostol required to induce labor are reduced when combined with mifepristone administered 36 to 48 hours before., Conclusion: Misoprostol is effective and safe for induction of labor in case of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and risks of labor induction in patients previously delivered by at least one low transverse cesarean section. To define how labor should be managed in patients attempting a vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC)., Methods: A literature search was performed using the Pubmed(®) and Cochrane(®) databases. Foreign societies guidelines were also consulted., Results: Labor induction is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture that could be estimated at 1% with oxytocine and 2% with vaginal prostaglandins (Level 2). Mechanical methods have been insufficiently studied. Misoprostol seems to dramatically increase the risk of uterine rupture (Level 3). The routine use of intrauterine pressure catheter does not prevent uterine rupture (Professional agreement). A moderate increase of uterine rupture was also found with augmentation (Level 3). The risk of uterine rupture increases when cervical dilatation is arrested for 3 hours or more when a good uterine dynamic is obtained (Professional agreement). The use of epidural analgesia should be encouraged (Grade C). Routine digital exploration of the uterine scare postpartum is not necessary (Grade C)., Conclusion: Women attempting a VBAC should be aware of the modalities of labor management. When labor induction is warranted, women should also be informed of the indication and the increased risk of uterine rupture. The choice of labor induction method should take into consideration maternal and obstetrical characteristics., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)