Search

1 The anti-hypertensive effects of labetalol have been compared and contrasted with other groups of anti-hypertensive drugs in this review of the published literature. 2 The data show that the pharmacological and haemodynamic profile of labetalol in man is distinctly different from that of other specific anti-hypertensive agents; namely the properties of competitive alpha-and beta-adrenoceptor blockade leading to haemodynamic effects of reduced blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance with little accompanying changes in resting heart rate or cardiac output. 3 The anti-hypertensive effects of labetalol are dose related. In fixed dose comparative studies equivalent anti-hypertensive effects to those of labetalol have been shown for individual drugs of the beta-adrenoceptor-blocking and diuretic groups. In dose titration studies, equivalent anti-hypertensive effects at given doses of labetalol have been demonstrated for drugs of the following types: beta-adrenoceptor blockers, beta-blockers plus diuretics, methyldopa, adrenergic neurone blockers and the combination of beta-blockers plus a peripheral vasodilator. 4 Comparing side-effect liabilities, it is clear that quantitatively labetalol produces no greater burden of side-effects than drugs of the beta-adrenoceptor-blocking group. Qualitative differences, however, do exist; in particular, symptomatic postural hypotension is dose related and is more likely to occur when excessive doses (greater than 2 g daily) are used.

1 The effects of oral propranolol (80 mg), labetalol (400 mg) and placebo on blood pressure, pulse rate and FEV1 at rest and after inhaled histamine, have been compared in six healthy male volunteers. 2 At 90 and 120 min after ingestion propranolol reduced the pulse rate and labetalol reduced the blood pressure, thus confirming absorption of each drug. 3 At 120 min propranolol reduced resting FEV1 and enhanced the fall in FEV1 after histamine, whereas the alterations in FEV1 after labetalol did not differ from placebo. 4 These findings suggest that labetalol is less likely than propranolol to cause bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients.

1. Labetalol was given by incremental intravenous infusion to nineteen severely hypertensive patients, of whom nine were refractory to previous oral antihypertensive therapy. 2. Smooth reduction of arterial pressure was achieved in twelve subjects; one remained resistant to labetalol up to 160 mg/h; a sudden fall in pressure occurred in the remaining six. No serious complications were encountered. Blood pressure control was accompanied by slight byt significant reduction in heart rate and in plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone concentrations. 3. The administration of labetalol in this way appears to be a useful technique in patients requiring rapid reduction of arterial pressure, although close and continuous supervision is necessary.

Isoprenaline dose-response curves plotting increases in heart rate before and after labetalol are suggestive of competitive antagonism at beta-adrenoceptor sites. Phenylephrine dose-response curves using increases in systolic pressure before and after labetalol are suggestive of competitive antagonism at alpha-adrenoceptor sites. The ratio of alpha:beta-adrenoceptor antagonism induced by labetalol is approximately 1:3. Peak pharmacological responses after a single oral dose of labetalol (400 mg) occurred between 90-120 min after administration.

1 The pharmacological effects of labetalol have been studied in normal healthy subjects. The results of these studies are reviewed. 2 In the evaluation of the beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking effects of labetalol various indices of beta-adrenoceptor blockade in man were used. Labetalol administered orally and intravenously competitively antagonized the effects of isoprenaline on heart rate and diastolic blood pressure. The beta-adrenoceptor blockade induced was regarded as 'non-selective'. In addition, labetalol produced dose-related inhibitory effects on exercise-induced increases in heart rate any systolic blood pressure and similar dose-related inhibitory effects on the tachycardia induced by valsalva's manoeuvre. Labetalol had only a modest inhibitory effect on the tachycardia induced by tilting since blood pressure was reduced on a dose-related basis. 3 Labetalol was a specific competitive antagonist of the alpha-adrenoceptor agonist effects of systemically administered phenylephrine and locally infused noradrenaline. In addition, oral and intravenous administration of labetalol reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the supine, standing and sitting positions. 4 The onset and duration of the alpha- and beta-antagonist effects of oral labetalol did not seem to be dissociated in time and there was a close correlation between the change in plasma concentration and pharmacological effects. 5 In comparative studies with propranolol, similar beta-antagonist effects were observed but propranolol was 4-6 times more potent weight for weight. Precise comparison, however, was complicated by the combined alpha- and beta -effects of labetalol, especially as the predominant effect of labetalol in normotensive subjects was to reduce blood pressure; whereas the predominant effect of propranolol was to reduce heart rate. In addition propranolol had inhibitory effects on ventilatory function in normal subjects, whereas labetalol in equivalent beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking doses did not. 6 From the details of the studies reviewed it was concluded that in man labetalol possesses combined alpha- and beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist properties.

In healthy normal subjects following the administration of labetalol the pharmacological effects were measured and compared with the plasma concentrations achieved. The inhibition of exercise induced tachycardia and inhibition of exercise induced increases in systolic pressure were significantly related to the administered dose of labetalol. Labetalol was rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and peak plasma concentrations occurred two hours after oral administration. There was a linear correlation (r = 0.84) between the logarithm of the plasma concentration and the maximum inhibition of exercise tachycardia at two hours. After intravenous administration there was an immediate reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure with a concomitant small increase in heart rate. There was a rapid decline in the associated plasma concentration but the pharmacological effects were maintained in excess of two hours. Our findings are consistent with those of others who have studied the relationship between pharmacological events and plasma concentrations after single doses of other adrenoceptor blocking drugs.

Labetalol 1-5 mg/kg administered intravenously to normal subjects in the supine position produced an immediate mean fall in systolic (16%) and diastolic (25%) blood pressure with a concomitant increase in heart rate (12%). After graded exercise, intravenous labetalol inhibited increases in heart rate and blood pressure. Isoprenaline log dose response curves of increase in heart rate and reduction in diastolic pressure after intravenous labetalol shifted to the right in a parallel manner compared with pre-labetalol response curves suggestive of competitive antagonism at beta-adrenoceptor sites. Similarly, phenylephrine dose response curves of increase in systolic pressure before and after intravenous labetalol were suggestive of competitive antagonism at alpha-adrenoceptor sites. The ratio of relative potency alpha: beta adrenoceptor antagonism after intravenous labetalol was approximately 1:7, whereas in the same subjects after oral labetalol the ratio was approximately 1:3 as previously reported. Using the inhibition of isoprenaline tachycardia to estimate the potency of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonism of labetalol relative to that of propranolol the potency ratio was 1:6. However, using inhibition of Valsalva tachycardia as the index, the estimated ratio was approximately 1:3. Estimates of relative potency using inhibition of tilt tachycardia were complicated by the additional effects upon blood pressure after labetalol not seen after propranolol. Labetalol produced adrenoceptor blockade at both alpha and beta sites in man sufficient to explain its therapeutic antihypertensive effect.

1. Oral labeltalol and propranolol have been compared in healthy men with regard to the effects on heart rate, blood pressure and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) at rest and the changes induced by exercise. 2. Labetalol caused a dose-related reduction in standing diastolic pressure at rest whereas propranolol did not but neither drug altered standing systolic pressure at rest. 3. In the doses compared, propranolol was consistently more potent than labetalol in influencing blood pressure changes induced by exercise, in lowering heart rate at rest and reducing PEFR at rest. 4. Labetalol and propranolol are both beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists and the observed differences in the profiles of the two drugs are probably directly related to the additional alpha-adrenoreceptor blocking property of labetalol not possessed by propranolol. Because of these differences labetalol may be expected to have advantages in the treatment of hypertension.

1 A new anti-hypertensive agent (labetalol) with alpha- and beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking properties has been assessed in 30 patients in a general practice. 2 Significant reduction in blood pressure and pulse rate occurred at a dose of 400 mg/d. A further significant reduction in blood pressure but not of pulse rate occurred at a dose of 800 mg/d. 3 After 4 weeks' treatment on the higher dose the mean fall in systolic and diastolic pressures compared with the pre-trial pressures was 36 and 24 mmHg, respectively. Side-effects were generally mild.

Labetalol reduces blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. The effects of a therapeutic dose of intravenous labetalol upon the cardiovascular responses to intravenous isoproterenol and norepinephrine in 6 normotensive subjects were studied in order to investigate the drug's mode of action. Before labetalol, intravenous isoproterenol increased heart rate and reduced diastolic blood pressure in a dose-dependant manner; likewise, intravenous norepinephrine increased both systolic and diastolic pressure. The order of administration of these agonists was randomized between the subjects before and after labetalol. Following labetalol (1.5 mg/kg intravenously) the effects of isoproterenol were antagonized such that cumulative log-dose response curves of mean isoproterenol-induced increases in heart rate and reductions in diastolic pressure were shifted to the right in a parallel manner to approximately the same extent. At the same time, the mean norepinephrine-induced increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also antagonized in a competitive manner. These responses were compared with others in the same subjects under the same conditions and it was concluded that the antihypertensive effect of labetalol is explained by concurrent blockade of alpha-and beta-adrenoceptors.