Search

U radu se raspravlja o senjskoj srednjovjekovnoj baštini u kontekstu umjetnosti istočne obale Jadrana. Nestali i očuvani, ali povijesnoumjetnički slabo valorizirani senjski spomenici hipotetički se tumače u novom ključu, uz prijedloge datiranja te stilske poveznice s područja Kvarnera, ali i šireg jadranskog prostora. Uz isticanje povijesnih okolnosti te analizu grafičkih i pisanih izvora, s naglaskom na komparativnu povijesnoumjetničku analizu, donosi se prijedlog datiranja i stilskoga povezivanja porušenoga srednjovjekovnog tornja ispred pročelja senjske katedrale. Mogući najbliži parnjak i uzor nalazi mu se u Krku. Zatim se uspoređuju dva kronološki i paleografski bliska natpisa s dvije crkve iz prve polovice 14. stoljeća: jedne koja se, prema Anti Glavičiću, nalazila na mjestu sakristije senjske katedrale i druge koja se nalazila na mjestu sakristije krčke katedrale. Zaključno se komparativno raspravlja o procesu urbanizacije, arhitekturi i mogućem izvornom imenu senjske Male place, vjerojatnoga središta komunalnoga života kasnoga senjskog srednjovjekovlja i drugoga težišta (tada već) bicentrično organiziranoga grada te implikacijama koje proizlaze iz postojanja jednog takvog kasnosrednjovjekovnog urbanog težišta odijeljenog od najvažnijeg srednjovjekovnog javnog prostora pred katedralom. Donosi se prijedlog datiranja Gradske lože (tzv. Kampuzije) i iznosi pretpostavka da je njezino oblikovanje nastalo pod direktnim utjecajem Venecije. Za kuću Daničić na Maloj placi pretpostavlja se da je mogla imati odnosno preuzeti funkciju vijećnice kada je podignuta u drugoj polovici 15 stoljeća. Njezina trifora pripisuje se djelatnosti Andrije Alešija., Senj’s heritage in general is historically and artistically extremely poorly researched and interpreted in the wider context of the heritage of the Eastern Adriatic coast. This is especially true of the monuments of the Middle Ages, hidden under completely different later architectural layers in the Early Modern Age of the militarised town. The examples analysed here are hypothetically interpreted in a new way, with suggestions for the dating and stylistic connections from the region of Kvarner, as well as from the wider Adriatic area. Along with the emphasis on the historical circumstances and the analysis of graphic and written sources, a proposal is presented for the dating and stylistic connection of the destroyed mediaeval tower (in the old Croatian Chakavian dialect - turan) in front of the façade of Senj’s cathedral. The possible closest twin and model to the Senj tower is probably located in Krk - insufficient data about the appearance of the Senj tower requires some speculation. All the circumstances that support such an interpretation, in the stylistic and chronological connection of the former Romanesque bell tower of the Krk cathedral from the end of the 12th century and the bell tower in front of Senj’s cathedral are explained exhaustively. It is assumed that, like the Krk bell tower, this one in Senj also had a communal status, so this may have been the reason for the construction of one more bell tower behind the rear of the cathedral, connected to the whole of the bishop of Senj’s historical residence. After this, two chronologically and epigraphically-palaeographically close inscriptions are compared with two churches from the first half of the 14th century, one which according to A. Glavičić was located on the site of the sacristy of Senj’s cathedral and the other which was located on the site of the sacristy of the Krk cathedral. The epigraphicallypalaeographically very close inscriptions, Senj’s "Imie od Raduča" and Krk’s which mentions the donors "Leonard" and "Bogdan", as well as the master craftsman "Mikel", are dated just four years apart. Finally, there is a comparative discussion about the process of urbanisation, architecture and the possible original name of Senj’s Mala Placa, the probable centre of the secular communal life of Senj in the late Middle Ages and the second focal point of the then already bicentrically organised town. Also discussed are the implications arising from the existence of such an urban focal point located next to the quay and completely separated from the most important public space in front of the cathedral. A proposal is presented for the dating of the town Loggia (the socalled "Kampuzija") to the 14th century. The term is interpreted as the name of the Loggia (Loža), but also as the name of the whole area regulated early as a square, in the sense of "campo" - like Krk’s Kamplin. The explicit Venetian method of the shaping of the brick-built Loggia, fitted with characteristic ground floor columns and Gothic monophores on the first floor part of the façade, stands out. One’s attention is drawn to its basement storage area which may have been a storeroom for salt. In this way, an early Venetian contribution (14th century) to the urbanisation of this part of the town located in the immediate vicinity of the quay stands out. For the Daničić house fitted with a luxurious late Gothic triforium, it is assumed that in the late Middle Ages it could have been a town hall and that it could, in fact, have been the town hall whose beauty was praised by J. W.Valvasor. A hypothesis is made about its original dimensions. With a little research luck, this could be confirmed by the conservation-restoration research of the inner face of the house’s masonry, especially the floors at the level of the skilfully carved Late Gothic triforium. The triforium is attributed to the work of Andrija Aleši from the 1550s.

Senj’s heritage in general is historically and artistically extremely poorly researched and interpreted in the wider context of the heritage of the Eastern Adriatic coast. This is especially true of the monuments of the Middle Ages, hidden under completely different later architectural layers in the Early Modern Age of the militarised town. The examples analysed here are hypothetically interpreted in a new way, with suggestions for the dating and stylistic connections from the region of Kvarner, as well as from the wider Adriatic area. Along with the emphasis on the historical circumstances and the analysis of graphic and written sources, a proposal is presented for the dating and stylistic connection of the destroyed mediaeval tower (in the old Croatian Chakavian dialect - turan) in front of the façade of Senj’s cathedral. The possible closest twin and model to the Senj tower is probably located in Krk - insufficient data about the appearance of the Senj tower requires some speculation. All the circumstances that support such an interpretation, in the stylistic and chronological connection of the former Romanesque bell tower of the Krk cathedral from the end of the 12th century and the bell tower in front of Senj’s cathedral are explained exhaustively. It is assumed that, like the Krk bell tower, this one in Senj also had a communal status, so this may have been the reason for the construction of one more bell tower behind the rear of the cathedral, connected to the whole of the bishop of Senj’s historical residence. After this, two chronologically and epigraphically-palaeographically close inscriptions are compared with two churches from the first half of the 14th century, one which according to A. Glavičić was located on the site of the sacristy of Senj’s cathedral and the other which was located on the site of the sacristy of the Krk cathedral. The epigraphicallypalaeographically very close inscriptions, Senj’s "Imie od Raduča" and Krk’s which mentions the donors "Leonard" and "Bogdan", as well as the master craftsman "Mikel", are dated just four years apart. Finally, there is a comparative discussion about the process of urbanisation, architecture and the possible original name of Senj’s Mala Placa, the probable centre of the secular communal life of Senj in the late Middle Ages and the second focal point of the then already bicentrically organised town. Also discussed are the implications arising from the existence of such an urban focal point located next to the quay and completely separated from the most important public space in front of the cathedral. A proposal is presented for the dating of the town Loggia (the socalled "Kampuzija") to the 14th century. The term is interpreted as the name of the Loggia (Loža), but also as the name of the whole area regulated early as a square, in the sense of "campo" - like Krk’s Kamplin. The explicit Venetian method of the shaping of the brick-built Loggia, fitted with characteristic ground floor columns and Gothic monophores on the first floor part of the façade, stands out. One’s attention is drawn to its basement storage area which may have been a storeroom for salt. In this way, an early Venetian contribution (14th century) to the urbanisation of this part of the town located in the immediate vicinity of the quay stands out. For the Daničić house fitted with a luxurious late Gothic triforium, it is assumed that in the late Middle Ages it could have been a town hall and that it could, in fact, have been the town hall whose beauty was praised by J. W.Valvasor. A hypothesis is made about its original dimensions. With a little research luck, this could be confirmed by the conservation-restoration research of the inner face of the house’s masonry, especially the floors at the level of the skilfully carved Late Gothic triforium. The triforium is attributed to the work of Andrija Aleši from the 1550s., U radu se raspravlja o senjskoj srednjovjekovnoj baštini u kontekstu umjetnosti istočne obale Jadrana. Nestali i očuvani, ali povijesnoumjetnički slabo valorizirani senjski spomenici hipotetički se tumače u novom ključu, uz prijedloge datiranja te stilske poveznice s područja Kvarnera, ali i šireg jadranskog prostora. Uz isticanje povijesnih okolnosti te analizu grafičkih i pisanih izvora, s naglaskom na komparativnu povijesnoumjetničku analizu, donosi se prijedlog datiranja i stilskoga povezivanja porušenoga srednjovjekovnog tornja ispred pročelja senjske katedrale. Mogući najbliži parnjak i uzor nalazi mu se u Krku. Zatim se uspoređuju dva kronološki i paleografski bliska natpisa s dvije crkve iz prve polovice 14. stoljeća: jedne koja se, prema Anti Glavičiću, nalazila na mjestu sakristije senjske katedrale i druge koja se nalazila na mjestu sakristije krčke katedrale. Zaključno se komparativno raspravlja o procesu urbanizacije, arhitekturi i mogućem izvornom imenu senjske Male place, vjerojatnoga središta komunalnoga života kasnoga senjskog srednjovjekovlja i drugoga težišta (tada već) bicentrično organiziranoga grada te implikacijama koje proizlaze iz postojanja jednog takvog kasnosrednjovjekovnog urbanog težišta odijeljenog od najvažnijeg srednjovjekovnog javnog prostora pred katedralom. Donosi se prijedlog datiranja Gradske lože (tzv. Kampuzije) i iznosi pretpostavka da je njezino oblikovanje nastalo pod direktnim utjecajem Venecije. Za kuću Daničić na Maloj placi pretpostavlja se da je mogla imati odnosno preuzeti funkciju vijećnice kada je podignuta u drugoj polovici 15 stoljeća. Njezina trifora pripisuje se djelatnosti Andrije Alešija.

U članku se objavljuje dvanaest nepoznatih nacrta i projekata riječkog kipara i altarista Antonija Michelazzija (Gra- disca d’Isonzo, 1707. – Rijeka, 1771.). Najranija dva nacrta su iz 1750. i vezani su za otok Krk, a čuvaju se u Archivio di Stato u Veneciji. Riječ je o tlocrtu i procjeni jedne javne ruševine u gradu Krku te o panoramskom prikazu zaljeva u Omišlju. Novootkriveni dokument pojašnjava Michelazzijev angažman od strane Tršćanske uprave zadužene za gradove Rijeku, Senj i Karlobag budući da ga je 1755. carica Marija Terezija imenovala carsko-kraljevskim arhitektom. U tu svrhu Michelazzi 1757. i 1758. radi desetak planova i projekata za javne gradnje u Senju i Karlobagu. Za Senj crta tlocrt grada s projektom modernizacije gradske luke i njezine obrane od bure. Posebno se izdvaja plan za njegov veliki zahvat, skretanje i gradnju novog korita potoka koji teče kroz grad te se ulijeva u senjsku luku. Tu su i projekti za zatvore u kaštelu, zdravstveni ured, klaonicu te mesnice. U Karlobagu radi projekt obnove kaštela, mesnice, novu cisternu te javni administrativno-stambeni objekt na glavnom gradskom trgu. Posljednji nacrt i projekt nastao je 1770., a riječ je o zgradi nove klaonice s mesnicama u Rijeci. Iako najveći dio Michelazzijevih planova zbog financija nije izveden, ovdje objavljeni nacrti prvi su takvi poznati u njegovom opusu, a on će svakako rasti s obzirom da se je majstor osim kiparstvom te altaristikom bavio i arhitekturom., The article brings twelve unknown designs and projects of Rijeka’s sculptor and altar maker Antonio Michelazzi (Gra- disca d’Isonzo, 1707 – Rijeka, 1771). The earliest two designs, dating from 1750 and linked to the island of Krk, are today preserved at the Archivio di Stato in Venice. One is a ground plan and assessment of a public ruin in the town of Krk, and the other a panoramic view of the Omišalj bay. A newly discovered document clarifies Michelazzi’s commissioning by the Trieste administration in charge of Rijeka, Senj, and Karlobag, since Empress Maria Theresa appointed him the imperial-royal architect in 1755. In that capacity, Michelazzi worked on a dozen plans and projects for public works in Senj and Karlobag during 1757 and 1758. He drew a map of Senj with a project for modernizing the city port and its defence against stormy winds. A particularly important project was his plan to redirect the stream that ran through the town into the harbour of Senj, for which he designed a new riverbed. There were also projects for prisons in the citadel, a health office, a slaughterhouse, and butcher shops. In Karlobag, he made a project for the renovation of the citadel, butcher shops, a new cistern, and a public administrative-residential building on the main town square. His last design and project was a new slaughterhouse with butcher shops in Rijeka in 1770. Although most of Michelazzi’s designs were never put in practice because of the lack of finances, the designs published here are the first of this kind in his known oeuvre, which will certainly grow further, since he was also involved in architecture besides sculpture and altar making.

Autor obrađuje pitanja vlasništva nad neobrađenom zemljom u srednjem vijeku na području Vinodola, Senja i Krka. Pritom se uočava odnos između općine javne vlasti odnosno feudalca. Što je općina slabija, to feudalac ima veća prava nad neobrađenom zemljom i obratno. Na primjeru Vinodola, Krka i Senja vidimo kako su se krčki knezovi, tj. Frankapani neprekidno borili da ograniče prava općine ne korištenje neobrađene zemlje, što im je uspijevalo, ali ovisno o ekonomskoj snazi pojedine općine, a time i njezinoj sposobnosti da se odupre feudalcu. Na ovom pitanju također vidimo srednjovjekovno shvaćanje podijeljenog vlasništva U drugom dijelu rada radi sveobuhvatnosti dan je kratak pregled nekih ograničenja koja je javna vlast odnosno feudalac postavljao u pogledu raspolaganja obrađenom zemljom također u Vinodolu, Senju i Krku. Radi se o zabrani otuđenja zemlje strancima iz kojih opet vidimo želju javne vlasti, tj. feudalca da ekonomsku osnovicu, tj. zemlju očuva u svojim rukama, odnosno rukama svojih podanika koji su mu dužni plaćati podavanja. S druge strane i sama općina može tu naći svoj interes jer im se, npr. može povećati iznos podavanja po pojedincu - poreznom obvezniku ukoliko se zemlja otuđi strancu koji nije dužan davati podavanja.