Search

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of German Journal of Exercise & Sport Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: This review assesses neurocognitive studies on long-/post-COVID-19 adult patients, highlighting the research gaps. We categorize populations by infection severity, demographics, inclusion of controls, and psychological/biological factors. Methodologically, we analyzed 73 studies (95,600 subjects) from December 2019 to October 2022 using PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the PICO framework. Our findings revealed that most studies lacked control groups (88 %) and reported unclear overall cognitive outcomes (73 %). While the studies frequently assessed executive functions (86 %) and attention (85 %), there were few longitudinal studies. Varied reporting on sample sizes further complicated the analysis. The identified gaps encompass convenience sampling, limited longitudinal studies, and inadequate use of cognitive test batteries, leading to a discrepancy between expected and reported outcomes. The absence of standardized comparisons and inconsistent statistical methods exacerbated these gaps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Ophthalmologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The predicted increase in adults with dementia will pose a major challenge for the German healthcare system. To mitigate this challenge, the early detection of adults with an increased risk of dementia is crucial. In this context, the concept of motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome has been introduced into the English literature but is currently relatively unknown in German-speaking countries. Objective: What are the characteristics and diagnostic criteria of MCR? What is the impact of MCR on health-related parameters? What is the current state of evidence regarding the risk factors and prevention of the MCR? Material and methods: We reviewed the English language literature concerning MCR, the associated risk factors, and protective factors, similarities or differences with the concept of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and its influence on the central nervous system. Results: The MCR syndrome is characterized by subjective cognitive impairment and a slower gait speed. Compared to healthy adults, adults with the MCR have a higher risk of dementia, falls, and mortality. Modifiable risk factors provide a starting point for specific multimodal lifestyle-related preventive interventions. Conclusion: As MCR can be easily diagnosed in practical settings, it could become an important concept for the early detection of adults with an increased risk of dementia in German-speaking countries, although further research is necessary to empirically confirm this assumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Unfallchirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Cognitive sequelae after recovery from an initial COVID-19 disease are present in a subset of affected individuals, coalescing around several important issues such as effects of age, COVID-19 disease severity, comorbidities, and other factors. Some neuropsychological symptoms appear more common among certain patient populations. Comorbidities may complicate neuropsychological assessment as well. Hence, we need a guideline-based evaluation to guide neuropsychological rehabilitation. Drawing from the recent revision of the German National Guideline for the Long- and Post-COVID Syndrome and current advances in international guidance on neuropsychological assessment, this article provides practical and scientifically informed recommendations for the neuropsychological assessment of individuals recovering from coronavirus-related diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cognitive impairments in patients with chronic pain are increasingly attracting interest in scientific research. The consequences of these cognitive impairments on coping with pain, everyday life and the driving ability are rarely included in clinical practice although half of all patients are affected. This article summarizes the current research situation and discusses possibilities of the integration in clinical and therapeutic care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The consensus-based guideline "SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and (early) rehabilitation" for Germany has two sections: In the first part, the guideline addresses infection protection-related procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the second part, it provides practice recommendations for rehabilitation after COVID-19. The specific recommendations for rehabilitation after COVID-19 as issued by 13 German medical societies and two patient-representative organizations are presented together with general background information for their development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of German Journal of Exercise & Sport Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The recent approval of aduhelm/aducanumab by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2021 raised hopes that further substances against Alzheimer's disease might be approved in the near future. Objective: The current status of phase III studies for Alzheimerʼs disease was evaluated. Material and methods: The American database www.clinicaltrials.gov was searched on 7 August 2021 for phase III studies which target the cognitive functions affected by Alzheimerʼs disease. The mode of action of the different substances was classified according to the Common Alzheimerʼs Disease Research Ontology (CADRO). Results: With the applied search criteria 53 studies were found, 32 studies with 25 substances dealt with cognition, which was demonstrated by a cognition test as one of the primary outcome measures, 20 of the studies are recruiting, 4 are not yet recruiting and 8 studies are active but not recruiting. Of the studies seven target amyloid beta-peptide as well as tau protein. For 20 substances a disease modifying action is assumed. In 2022 and 2023 a total of 8 studies each are planned to be terminated. Conclusion: The mode of action of the substances, which are currently in studies, seems broad and for their action a modification of the disease is mostly assumed. Therefore, there is hope that in the next 2 years further drugs against Alzheimerʼs disease might be approved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is closely related to Alzheimer's disease (AD) despite having distinct pathomechanisms. The CAA modulates cognitive impairment within AD by synergistic effects. The pathophysiologic relations are complex and incompletely understood, possibly due to the heterogeneous nature of CAA with its different subtypes. Both diseases are characterized by a pathologic amyloid metabolism but the pathologic processing of amyloid precursor proteins is distinct. The manifestation of vascular and parenchymal amyloid deposits can either overlap or occur independently and isolated. The investigation of the specific contribution of co-occurring CAA within AD to cognitive deficits requires diagnostic methods that sufficiently identify CAA severity and complexity as well as detailed neuropsychological testing to precisely characterize the cognitive deficits and to draw conclusions regarding their etiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Epileptologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Psychotherapeut is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Anaesthesiologie & Intensivmedizin is the property of DGAI e.V. - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Psychotherapeut is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In recent years noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) applications have emerged as a third and novel treatment option alongside psychopharmacology and psychotherapy in the treatment of mental diseases. It is assumed that NIBS could represent a supplement or (in some indications) even replacement to established therapeutic strategies, e.g. in disorders with high resistance to current treatment regimens, such as negative symptoms or cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. Although positive symptoms in schizophrenia can be treated sufficiently with antipsychotic drugs, patients with negative symptoms frequently suffer from persistent lack of impetus, cognitive decline, social withdrawal and loss of global functioning in the activities of daily life; however, in these cases, current treatment strategies exert only moderate effects, and new treatment options are urgently needed. This review article provides a summary of the clinical effects of new electrical NIBS methods, e.g. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. These new NIBS methods could help restore the disrupted neuronal networks and improve disturbed connectivity, especially of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left temporoparietal junction. Promising results are reported for the treatment of negative symptoms with tDCS, tACS and tRNS and could thus represent new therapeutic options in the treatment of schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis is a disease continuum with an initial relapsing remitting course (RRMS) and secondary progression (SPMS) at later stages. Most of the hitherto approved treatments do not adequately control for the phase of secondary progression. Thus, early detection of SPMS conversion is a key issue to initiate SPMS-tailored treatment. In this context, assessment of cognitive functions and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both play an important role in the longitudinal follow-up of MS patients. Objective: To elucidate the importance of cognitive testing and MRI for prediction and detection of SPMS conversion as well as to discuss strategies for disease monitoring and for optimizing treatment in standard clinical care, particularly in outpatient settings. Material and methods: Review article based on a nonsystematic literature review. Results: Standardized cognitive testing can support early diagnosis of SPMS and facilitate disease monitoring. Annual application of sensitive screening tests, such as the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (BVMT‑R) or the entire Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) test battery are recommended in this context. The MRI evidence of persistent inflammatory activity within 3 years of diagnosis as well as evidence of cortical lesions are predictive for SPMS conversion. Standardized MRI monitoring for markers of progression can substantiate clinical and neurocognitive signs of SPMS conversion. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary patient care involving careful clinical examination, neuropsychological testing and MRI monitoring is of great significance for the prediction of SPMS conversion and diagnostics. This enables early treatment adaptation, since pharmacological interventions in SPMS differ from those in RRMS. Continuous clinical, neuropsychological and MRI vigilance enable stringent monitoring of treatment outcomes with respect to neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative activity as well as treatment-related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]