Search

The impact of self-reported metal allergy (SRMA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. In the absence of objective tests, SRMA is often used as a screening tool for implant selection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of SRMA on early outcomes after TKA. Between 2010 and 2014, 168 patients with SRMA underwent TKA; 150 (89%) received nickel-free implants, and 18 (11%) received cobalt-chrome implants that contained nickel. Mean age was 67 years, and 95% were female. A cohort of 858 TKA patients (mean age, 68 years) without SRMA matched by sex served as the control group. Outcomes included Knee Society Score (function [KSS-F] and knee [KSS-K]), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, knee flexion, further surgery, and complications. No differences were seen in KSS-F and KSS-K between patients with and without SRMA. The mean WOMAC pain scores were 89.1 for patients with SRMA and 85.2 for patients without SRMA (P=.030). Stiffness and physical function scores were similar. Knee flexion was similar. No differences were found between nickel-free and cobalt-chrome SRMA groups. Patients with SRMA and those without demonstrated similar early functional outcomes. Patients with SRMA who received standard cobalt-chrome implants had no significant difference in functional outcomes compared with patients with nickel-free implants. Better identifiers of patients at risk for adverse events due to implant material are needed. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):330-334.]., (Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: The association between patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes after cartilage repair is not well understood., Purpose: To investigate the association of patient satisfaction with pain, function, activity level, and quality of life after fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation in the knee., Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: This study comprised 371 patients (396 knees) who underwent primary OCA transplantation for osteochondral lesions in the knee between 1997 and 2015. Mean ± SD patient age was 31.8 ± 11.6 years, and 62% were male. The majority of grafts (62%) were located on the femoral condyle; the mean number of grafts per knee was 1.5 ± 0.8; and the median graft area was 6.9 cm 2 (range, 1.8-50 cm 2 ). Pain, function, activity level, and quality of life were evaluated pre- and postoperatively via International Knee Documentation Committee scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. Patient satisfaction with the results of the OCA transplantation was assessed postoperatively. All follow-up evaluations occurring at postoperative 1 year or later were included in the analysis., Results: The mean follow-up time was 5.5 years. Overall, the satisfaction rate was 88.1%, and this rate was constant over time. Satisfaction rates varied by diagnosis, age, sex, and anatomic location of the allograft. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee pain, function, and total scores differed between patients who were satisfied and not satisfied (all P < .001). All Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale results differed between those who were satisfied and not satisfied (all P < .001). Having a diagnosis of osteochondritis dissecans was the only variable that predicted which patients would be satisfied with the results of the allograft, after controlling for age, sex, anatomic location of the graft, and number of grafts., Conclusion: A consistently high and durable patient satisfaction rate after OCA transplantation was found. Satisfied patients reported lower pain and higher function, activity levels, and quality of life as compared with patients who were not satisfied. Patients with osteochondritis dissecans had a particularly high level of satisfaction with the OCA procedure.

Background: Few studies have evaluated the influence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on the outcome of cartilage repair. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to investigate the association between ACL reconstruction and functional outcomes after osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. The hypothesis was that patients treated with OCA transplantation who had a history of ACL reconstruction would have inferior clinical outcomes and lower osteochondral graft survivorship when compared with a matched group of patients undergoing OCA transplantation without a history of ACL reconstruction., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: This study compared 31 knees that underwent OCA transplantation with a history of ACL reconstruction (OCA and ACL group) and 62 knees treated with isolated OCA transplantation (OCA group) that had an intact ACL. Groups were matched by age, diagnosis, year of surgery, and graft size. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Frequency and type of reoperation were assessed. Clinical failure was defined as revision OCA transplantation or conversion to arthroplasty. Subjective outcome measures included International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, and patient satisfaction., Results: Clinical failure occurred in 3 of 31 knees (9.7%) in the OCA and ACL group and 6 of 62 knees (9.7%) in the OCA group ( P ≤ .999). Five- and 10-year survivorship of the OCA was 94.7% and 82.3% for the OCA and ACL group and 93.4% and 79.6% for OCA group, respectively ( P = .979). Mean follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.3 years among all knees with grafts in situ. Changes from preoperative to latest follow-up visit (difference scores) on all subjective outcome measures were greater in the OCA group; however, none of the difference scores were statistically significant. Satisfaction with the results of OCA transplantation was reported in 78.3% of the OCA and ACL group and 71.7% of the OCA group ( P = .551)., Conclusion: Treatment of cartilage lesions with OCA transplantation proved to be reliable and effective regardless of a history of ACL reconstruction as demonstrated by the improvements in outcome scores, long survivorship, and high satisfaction rates. History of ACL reconstruction did not influence outcome of OCA transplantation.

Objective To evaluate the outcome of patients who have undergone simultaneous osteotomy and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Our hypothesis is that use of high tibial osteotomy and fresh OCA in a combined procedure is safe and effective without increasing morbidity in comparison to OCA alone. Design A case series of 17 patients underwent tibial osteotomy and simultaneous OCA during a single surgery. Osteotomy was indicated when axial alignment was within the affected compartment. Patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after surgery. The mean graft size was 8.7 cm 2 , with 82% located on the medial femoral condyle alone and 18% involving the medial femoral condyle and one or more other sites. Data collection included demographics, osteotomy correction, graft site(s) and area, and clinical evaluation. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty. Results Two of 17 patients (12%) failed at a mean of 9.3 years. The remaining 15 patients (88%) had intact allografts with mean survival of 8.1 years (SD 3.3). Five patients (29%) had an additional procedure, all undergoing osteotomy hardware removal. Of those with surviving allografts, mean pain and function scores improved significantly from the preoperative to postoperative assessment and International Knee Documentation Committee total scores improved significantly from 40.9 ± 15.4 preoperative to 75.5 ± 24.0 at latest follow-up ( P = 0.003); 92% of patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery. No postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion Combining high tibial osteotomy and OCA in properly selected patients is safe and effective.

Background: Cartilage repair algorithms use lesion size to choose surgical techniques when selecting a cartilage repair procedure. The association of fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) size with graft survivorship and subjective patient outcomes is still unknown., Purpose: To determine if lesion size (absolute or relative) affects outcomes after OCA transplantation., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: The study included 156 knees in 143 patients who underwent OCA transplantation from 1998 to 2014 for isolated femoral condyle lesions. The mean age was 29.6 ± 11.4 years, and 62.9% were male. The majority of patients (62.2%) presented for cartilage repair because of osteochondritis dissecans. The mean graft area, used as a surrogate for absolute size of the lesion, was 6.4 cm 2 (range, 2.3-11.5 cm 2 ). The relative size of the lesion was calculated as the tibial width ratio (TWR; ratio of graft area to tibial width) and affected femoral condyle ratio (AFCR; ratio of graft area to affected femoral condyle width) using preoperative radiographs. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Further surgical procedures were documented, and graft failure was defined as revision OCA transplantation or conversion to arthroplasty. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores were obtained. Satisfaction with OCA transplantation was assessed., Results: The mean follow-up among patients with grafts remaining in situ was 6.0 years (range, 1.9-16.5 years). The OCA failure rate was 5.8%. Overall survivorship of the graft was 97.2% at 5 years and 93.5% at 10 years. No difference in postoperative outcomes between groups was found in absolute or relative size. Change in IKDC scores (from preoperative to latest follow-up) was greater for knees with large lesions compared to knees with small lesions, among all measurement methods. Overall satisfaction with the results of OCA transplantation was 89.8%., Conclusion: The size of the lesion, either absolute or relative, does not influence outcomes after OCA transplantation for isolated femoral condyle lesions of the knee.

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is an integral part of the cartilage repair paradigm, but insufficient data are available regarding return to sport or recreational activity after the procedure., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if athletic patients undergoing OCA transplantation returned to sport, assess reasons for not returning to sport, and ascertain patient and graft-related characteristics that differed between those who returned or did not return to sport. The secondary aims were to assess graft survivorship and patient-reported subjective outcome measures (pain, function, satisfaction) among athletic patients undergoing OCA transplantation., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: We identified 149 knees in 142 patients who participated in sport or recreational activity before a cartilage injury (45% highly competitive athletes and 55% well-trained and frequently sporting) and underwent OCA transplantation in the knee. The mean age was 31.2 years and 58.4% were male. Information on preinjury and postoperative participation in sport or recreational activity was collected. Patients not returning to sport after OCA transplantation were mailed a questionnaire to assess why. Postoperative pain, function, and satisfaction scores were obtained, and further surgery on the operative knee was documented., Results: At a mean follow-up of 6 years, 75.2% of knees returned to sport or recreational activity. Among those who did not return to sport, knee-related issues and lifestyle changes were cited as reasons why. Patients who did not return to sport were more likely to be female, have injured their knee in an activity other than sport, and have a larger graft size. The diagnosis and anatomic location also differed. Overall, 71% of knees reported having "very good" to "excellent" function, and 79% were able to participate in a high level of activity (moderate, strenuous, or very strenuous) postoperatively. After OCA transplantation, 25.5% of knees underwent further surgery; 14 knees (9.4% of entire cohort) were considered allograft failures. Among the 135 knees that had the graft remaining in situ, pain and function improved from preoperatively to the latest follow-up on all measures, and 91% of patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery., Conclusion: OCA transplantation is a successful treatment option for athletes and highly active patients who sustain a cartilage injury to their knee. The majority of patients returned to sport or recreational activity.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee can be difficult to treat. Cartilage restoration techniques are often indicated when the lesion or fragment cannot be salvaged and the patient remains symptomatic. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation can restore both bone and cartilage defects characteristic of OCD., Hypothesis: We hypothesized that osteochondral allografting is a successful method for treating OCD of the knee., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: This study comprised 135 patients (149 knees) who underwent OCA for OCD of the knee (type III or IV) between 1997 and 2013 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The median age was 21 years (range, 12-55 years) and 75.8% of the patients were male. The mean allograft size was 7.3 cm 2 (range, 2.2-25 cm 2 ). Evaluation included the following: frequency and type of reoperations; modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel (18-point) scale; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores; and Knee Society function (KS-F) and knee (KS-K) scores. Clinical failure was defined as revision OCA or conversion to arthroplasty. Graft survivorship was determined., Results: The median follow-up time was 6.3 years (range, 1.9-16.8 years) and 62% of participants had more than 5-year follow-up. Thirty-four of 149 knees (23%) had reoperations, of which 12 (8%) were classified as allograft failures (7 OCA revisions, 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, and 2 total knee arthroplasties). OCA survivorship was 95% at 5 years and 93% at 10 years. Of the 137 knees whose grafts were still in situ at the latest follow-up, the mean modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel (18-point) score was 16.8; IKDC pain, function, and total scores were 2.1, 8.1, and 82.3; and KS-F and KS-K scores were 95.7 and 94.3, respectively. The majority of patients (95%) reported being satisfied with the outcome of their procedure., Conclusion: OCA transplantation was an effective treatment for OCD of the knee, with a low rate of graft failure, significant improvement in pain and function scores, and high patient satisfaction., (© 2016 The Author(s).)

The objective was to determine the safety, feasibility, and effects of anti-gravity gait training on functional outcomes (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], the Timed Up and Go test [TUG], Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] for pain) with the AlterG® Anti-Gravity Treadmill® device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation. Subjects (N = 30) were randomized to land-based vs anti-gravity gait training over 4 weeks of physical therapy after TKA. Adverse events, complications, and therapist satisfaction were recorded. All patients completed rehabilitation protocols without adverse events. KOOS, TUG, and NRS scores improved in both groups with no significant differences between groups. For the AlterG group, Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life subscales of the KOOS had the most improvement. At the end of physical therapy, TUG and NRS pain scores improved from 14 seconds to 8 seconds and from 2.8 to 1.1, respectively. Subjectively, therapists reported 100% satisfaction with the AlterG. This initial pilot study demonstrated that the AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill device was safe and feasible. While functional outcomes improved over time with use of the anti-gravity gait training, further studies are needed to define the role of this device as an alternative or adjunct to established rehabilitation protocols.

Background: In most treatment algorithms, osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is regarded as an alternative salvage procedure when other, previous reparative treatments have failed., Purpose: To compare the outcomes of a retrospective matched-pair cohort of (1) primary OCA transplantation and (2) OCA transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: An OCA database was used to identify 46 knees that had OCA transplantation performed as a primary treatment (group 1) and 46 knees that underwent OCA transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation (group 2). All patients had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Patients in each group were matched for age (±5 years), diagnosis (osteochondral lesion, degenerative chondral lesion, traumatic chondral injury), and graft size (small, <5 cm2; medium, 5-10 cm2; large, >10 cm2). The groups had similar body mass indexes, sex distributions, and graft locations (femoral condyle, patella, and trochlea. The number and type of further surgeries after the OCA transplantation were assessed; failure was defined as any reoperation resulting in removal of the graft. Functional outcomes were evaluated by use of the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society function (KS-F) scale. Patient satisfaction, according to a 5-point scale from "extremely satisfied" to "dissatisfied," was recorded at the latest follow-up., Results: Eleven of 46 knees (24%) in group 1 had reoperations, compared with 20 of 46 knees (44%) in group 2 (P = .04). The OCA was classified as a failure in 5 knees (11%) in group 1 and 7 knees (15%) in group 2 (P = .53). At 10 years of follow-up, survivorship of the graft was 87.4% and 86% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Both groups showed improvement in pain and function on all subjective scores from preoperatively to the latest follow-up (all P < .001). Results showed that 87% of patients in group 1 and 97% in group 2 were "satisfied" or "extremely satisfied" with the OCA transplantation., Conclusion: Favorable results were shown in both groups with significant improvement of functional scores and excellent survivorship. Despite the higher reoperation rate in the previously treated group, previous subchondral marrow stimulation did not adversely affect the survivorship and functional outcome of OCA transplantation., (© 2015 The Author(s).)

Background: The treatment of patellofemoral cartilage injuries can be challenging. Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has been used as a treatment option for a range of cartilage disorders., Purpose: To evaluate functional outcomes and survivorship of the grafts among patients who underwent OCA for patellar cartilage injuries., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: An institutional review board-approved OCA database was used to identify 27 patients (28 knees) who underwent isolated OCA transplantation of the patella between 1983 and 2010. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 33.7 years (range, 14-64 years); 54% were female. Twenty-six (92.9%) knees had previous surgery (mean, 3.2 procedures; range, 1-10 procedures). The mean allograft area was 10.1 cm(2) (range, 4.0-18.0 cm(2)). Patients returned for clinical evaluation or were contacted via telephone for follow-up. The number and type of reoperations were assessed. Any reoperation resulting in removal of the allograft was considered a failure of the OCA transplantation. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) scale, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores, and the Knee Society function (KS-F) score. Patient satisfaction was assessed at latest follow-up., Results: Seventeen of the 28 knees (60.7%) had further surgery after the OCA transplantation; 8 of the 28 knees (28.6%) were considered OCA failures (4 conversions to total knee arthroplasty, 2 conversions to patellofemoral knee arthroplasty, 1 revision OCA, 1 patellectomy). Patellar allografting survivorship was 78.1% at 5 and 10 years and 55.8% at 15 years. Among the 20 knees (71.4%) with grafts in situ, the mean follow-up duration was 9.7 years (range, 1.8-30.1 years). Pain and function improved from the preoperative visit to latest follow-up, and 89% of patients were extremely satisfied or satisfied with the results of the OCA transplantation., Conclusion: OCA transplantation was successful as a salvage treatment procedure for cartilage injuries of the patella., (© 2015 The Author(s).)

Background: Primary fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful treatment option for osteochondral lesions in the knee. Clinical failure of primary osteochondral allograft transplantation may require further surgery, including revision osteochondral allograft transplantation., Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of patients who have undergone revision osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: This series included 33 patients (33 knees) who underwent revision osteochondral allograft transplantation between 1983 and 2012, were at least 2 years out from surgery, and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical evaluations included the International Knee Documentation Committee pain, function, and total scores; Knee Society function score; and modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scale. Failure of the revision allograft was defined as conversion to partial or total knee arthroplasty., Results: The mean follow-up after revision osteochondral allograft transplantation was 10 years, with 75% of patients having more than 5 years' follow-up. Thirteen patients (39%) had failed results after revision osteochondral allograft transplantation, with a mean time to failure of 5.5 years. The remaining 20 patients (61%) had surviving revision allografts, with a mean graft survival of 10 years. Mean pain and function scores at the last follow-up were improved. Survivorship of the revision allograft was 61% at 10 years., Conclusion: Revision osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes, although they were inferior to primary allograft transplantation procedures. Revision osteochondral allograft transplantation may be considered an option for patients with a failed primary osteochondral allograft.

Background: Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is an increasingly common treatment option for chondral and osteochondral lesions in the knee, but the long-term outcome is unknown., Questions/purposes: We determined (1) pain and function, (2) frequency and types of reoperations, (3) survivorship at a median of 13.5 years, and (4) predictors of osteochondral allograft failure in the distal femur., Methods: We evaluated 122 patients (129 knees) who underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral condyle. Mean age was 33 years and 53% were male. Clinical evaluation included the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point), IKDC, and Knee Society function (KS-F) scores. We defined graft failure as revision osteochondral allografting or conversion to arthroplasty. We determined whether patient characteristics or attributes of the graft influenced failure. Minimum followup was 2.4 years (median, 13.5 years); 91% had more than 10 years of followup., Results: Mean modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved from 12.1 to 16, mean IKDC pain score from 7.0 to 3.8, mean IKDC function score from 3.4 to 7.2, and mean KS-F score from 65.6 to 82.5. Sixty-one knees (47%) underwent reoperations. Thirty-one knees (24%) failed at a mean of 7.2 years. Survivorship was 82% at 10 years, 74% at 15 years, and 66% at 20 years. Age of more than 30 years at time of surgery and having two or more previous surgeries for the operated knee were associated with allograft failure., Conclusions: Followup of femoral condyle osteochondral allografting demonstrated durable improvement in pain and function, with graft survivorship of 82% at 10 years.

Flexion following total knee arthroplasty in the US population generally falls between 100° and 120°. Because of these relatively low flexion arcs, total knee arthroplasty prosthetic designs emerged allowing "high flexion" (≥125°). We hypothesized that a high-flexion implant design, Scorpio Non-Restrictive Geometry cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis, would allow clinical early maximum flexion of at least 125°. A prospective observational cohort study enrolled 87 unselected patients (94 knees) evaluated preoperation and 3 months and 1 year postoperation for clinical flexion, arc of motion, and Knee Society scores. At 1 year, 67% of knees had improved flexion and 23% achieved flexion of at least 125°. Clinically, flexion improved by 6.9° and total arc of motion improved by 10.6° from preoperation to 1-year postoperation. Although this high-flexion design allows increased flexion, many patients fail to achieve flexion of at least 125°., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)