Search

Background: Synovial fluid aspiration is a routine practice used by most orthopaedic surgeons to aid in the diagnosis of joint infection. In patients for whom there is a low pretest probability of infection, a positive culture-particularly if it is a broth-only culture-may be considered a contaminant, especially if the bacterial species are skin pathogens. To our knowledge no study has evaluated the incidence of contamination of aspirations from the native knee.Questions/purposes: What is the frequency of false-positive cultures among knee aspirations of the native knee?Methods: Two hundred patients, with a total of 200 knees, with the diagnosis of degenerative osteoarthritis undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified for this study. None of these patients had symptoms, signs, or laboratory studies to suggest the presence of joint infection; a positive culture in this population therefore would be considered contaminated. Thirty-two (16%) patients were excluded secondary to a dry aspiration. One patient was enrolled in the study but did not have the knee aspirated and another patient's specimen was accidentally discarded. Each knee was aspirated under sterile conditions before performing the TKA. The fluid was sent for cell count and culture. If insufficient fluid was obtained for both cell count and culture, culture was performed rather than cell count.Results: There were no false-positive cultures (zero of 166 [0%]) in aspirations of native knees.Conclusions: Our study would indicate that when done properly under sterile technique, cultures taken from knee arthrocentesis in patients without prosthetic joints should not be affected by perceived contaminant species. A positive specimen finding on culture should raise a strong suspicion of bacterial septic arthritis. Future studies should include more specimens as well as knees with prior TKA to help further identify the rate of false-positive cultures in knee arthrocentesis in both populations.Level Of Evidence: Level I, diagnostic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves visibility and reduces intraoperative blood loss. However, tourniquet use may also have a negative impact on early recovery of muscle strength and lower extremity function after TKA.Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was (1) to determine whether tourniquet use affects recovery of quadriceps strength (primary outcome) during the first 3 postoperative months; and (2) to examine the effects of tourniquet application on secondary outcomes: voluntary quadriceps activation, hamstring strength, unilateral limb balance as well as the effect on operative time and blood loss.Methods: Twenty-eight patients (mean age 62 ± 6 years; 16 men) undergoing same-day bilateral TKA (56 lower extremities) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Subjects were randomized to receive a tourniquet-assisted knee arthroplasty on one lower extremity while the contralateral limb underwent knee arthroplasty without extended tourniquet use. In the former group, the tourniquet was inflated just before the incision was made and released after cementation; in the latter group, a tourniquet was not used (10 of 28 [36%]) or inflated only during component cementation (18 of 28 [64%]). The choice of no tourniquet or use just during cementation was based on surgeon choice, because some surgeons felt a tourniquet during cementation was necessary to achieve a dry surgical field to maximize cement fixation. A median parapatellar approach and the identical posterior-stabilized TKA design were used by all four fellowship-trained knee surgeons involved. Isometric quadriceps strength, hamstring strength, voluntary quadriceps activation, and unilateral balance were assessed preoperatively, 3 weeks, and 3 months after bilateral knee arthroplasty. Other factors, including pain, range of motion, and lower extremity girth, were assessed for descriptive purposes at each of these time points as well as on the second postoperative day.Results: Quadriceps strength was slightly lower in the tourniquet group compared with the no-tourniquet group (group difference = 11.27 Nm [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.33-20.20]; p = 0.01), and these differences persisted at 3 months after surgery (group difference = 9.48 Nm [95% CI, 0.43-18.54]; p = 0.03). Hamstring strength did not differ between groups at any time point nor did measures of quadriceps voluntary activation or measures of unilateral balance ability. There was less estimated intraoperative blood loss in the tourniquet group (84 ± 26 mL) than in the no-tourniquet group (156 ± 63 mL) (group difference = -74 mL [95% CI, -100 to -49]; p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in total blood loss between the groups (group difference = -136 mL [95% CI, -318 to 45]; p = 0.13).Conclusions: Patients who underwent TKA using a tourniquet had diminished quadriceps strength during the first 3 months after TKA, the clinical significance of which is unclear. Future studies may be warranted to examine the effects of tourniquet use on long-term strength and functional outcomes.Level Of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]