1. Comparative Risk-Benefit Profiles of Individual Devices for Graft Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Wang Y, Lei G, Zeng C, Wei J, He H, Li X, Zhu Z, Wang H, Wu Z, Wang N, Ding X, and Li H
- Subjects
- Adult, Bayes Theorem, Bone Screws, Female, Humans, Male, Network Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Range of Motion, Articular, Risk, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries surgery, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction adverse effects, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction instrumentation, Femur surgery, Knee surgery, Knee Joint surgery, Tibia surgery
- Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of individual devices for femoral and/or tibial graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction., Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to December 12, 2018. Randomized controlled trials comparing individual devices for ACL graft fixation were included. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy profile using the following outcomes: Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) category, laxity, range of motion, and Tegner score. The incidence of infection, effusion, and graft rupture for each device was reported., Results: We included 57 randomized controlled trials involving 4,304 patients aged 23.8 to 40.9 years. The female proportion ranged from 0% to 100%. The length of follow-up ranged from 6 to 144 months. Of the 13 studied femoral fixation devices, none was significantly different from the others regarding the Lysholm score, IKDC category, range of motion, and Tegner score. Bioabsorbable interference screws (standardized mean difference, 1.3; 95% credible interval, 0.0-2.5) showed higher laxity than the EndoPearl at a borderline level of statistical significance, but the difference varied substantially within multiple sensitivity analyses. Infection (2.0%) was most commonly seen with the EndoPearl, whereas the bone mulch screw had the highest incidence of effusion (5.5%) and graft rupture (5.5%). For the 9 studied tibial fixation devices, no significant difference was observed in the aforementioned efficacy measurements. Bioabsorbable interference screws with staples had the highest incidence of infection (11.1%) and effusion (15.6%), whereas graft rupture was most commonly seen with the bone plug (4.0%)., Conclusions: Graft fixation devices in ACL reconstruction share a similar efficacy profile in terms of the Lysholm score, IKDC category, range of motion, and Tegner score but not laxity. On the other hand, safety profiles seem to vary among different devices. These findings can support surgeons, alongside their experience and preference, as well as the relative cost of each device, in delivering an individualized plan for an optimal operation., Level of Evidence: Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies., (Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF