Search

Axial gout is a well-documented but uncommon manifestation of gout. Its mimicking nature and the impracticality of axial joint aspiration might considerably delay its diagnosis. We report a case in a normouricemic renal transplant recipient, whereby the primary symptom of severe neck pain suggested pyogenic spondylodiscitis as an initial tentative diagnosis. Clinical findings included a high C-reactive protein concentration and elevated body temperature. The patient did not respond to empiric antibiotic treatment and suffered consecutive attacks of severe wrist and ankle pain in conjunction with a persistent fever. Blood and joint cultures were negative, but analysis of aspirated ankle joint fluid revealed monosodium urate crystals. A dual-energy computed tomography scan confirmed the presence of monosodium urate crystals in the costovertebral joints. Colchicine treatment dramatically improved the patient's clinical condition. Axial gout should be considered in transplant recipients with severe neck or back pain, fever, and increased inflammatory parameters with a high likelihood of an infectious etiology, despite the presence of paradoxically normal or even decreased serum urate concentrations. Dual-energy computed tomography is a noninvasive technique of possible benefit in the detection of axial gout when joint fluid aspiration is not deemed safe.

Background: Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is an X-linked condition originating from a deficiency in alpha-galactosidase, a lysosomal enzyme. Multi-organ involvement ensues in early adulthood and vital organs are affected: the kidneys, brain, heart. Several reports however suggest that AFD is underdiagnosed., Methods: We screened a kidney transplant population using a two-tier approach. The first tier was the determination of alpha-galactosidase A (AGALA) activity using a dried blood spot on filter paper (DBFP); in the second tier, patients with the lowest alpha-galactosidase levels were further subjected to mutation analysis of the GLA gene., Results: From the database of 2328 patients, 1233 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Finally, after informed consent, 673 patients were screened (54.5%-395 women and 278 men). DBFP analysis resulted in a mean AGALA of 2.63 +/- 2.48 micromol/L/h (2.5 and 97.5 percentile were 0.0001 and 5.07 micromol/L/h, respectively). Eleven patients were subjected to further genetic analysis. In a male patient a pathogenic missense mutation p.Ala143Thr (c.427A>G) was identified., Conclusions: Our results show that the proposed approach can detect AFD patients in a until now seldomly screened high-risk group: kidney transplant patients. We conclude that screening for AFD in high-risk populations is a cost-effective, technically feasible and clinically valuable objective.

Purpose of Review: Delayed graft function is an important determinant of patient and graft survival. A complex of pathologic mechanisms intervenes in the pathophysiology of this outcome. This paper reviews the main processes involved in delayed graft function as they relate to five chronologically related stages: donor tissue quality, brain death and related stress, preservation variables, immune factors, and recipient variables., Recent Findings: Dialyzed delayed graft function and nondialyzed slow graft function both have a negative impact on graft survival and on the incidence of acute rejection. Expanded-criteria donors, older donors, and non-heart-beating donors are more frequently used. The long-term results of the use of well-selected non-heart-beating donors are surprisingly good. The process of ischemia/reperfusion injury is already initiated in the brain-death donor and continues during preservation of the graft. Graft-infiltrating T cells, heat shock proteins, and heme oxygenase-1 are implicated in the process. Modifications in immunosuppressive therapy and pharmacologic modulations have an effect on delayed graft function. Delayed graft function plays a part in the incidence of acute rejection, impaired graft function, and survival of patients and grafts., Summary: This review discusses the current literature on several recent findings of pathophysiologic mechanisms of, and possible therapeutic interventions in, delayed graft function.