Search

Pancreas transplantation can improve quality of life for patients with type 1 diabetes by eliminating hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic episodes, the need for insulin injections, frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, and dietary restrictions. Increasing evidence suggests that it may slow the progression of long-term diabetic complications. On the other hand, patients risk the adverse effects of lifelong immunosuppression.

Pancreatic transplantation for endocrine replacement is well-established for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Exocrine pancreatic function after pancreas transplantation has been maintained after orthotopic cluster transplants for malignancy, and restoration of adequate exocrine function in a previously deficient patient has been reported in a patient with chronic pancreatitis who developed labile diabetes and steatorrhea after pancreatectomy. We performed a triple organ transplant (pancreas, liver and kidney) in a patient with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and insulin-dependent diabetes related to cystic fibrosis (CF) after he developed hepatic and renal failure. Pancreatic exocrine secretions were drained enterically to the jejunum. At 24-month follow-up, malabsorption is absent. The 3-day stool fat, stool trypsin and chymotrypsin are normal. Serum carotene is within the normal range. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in CF patients can be corrected by pancreas transplantation. However, routine use in CF is precluded by the risks of surgery and immunosuppression. For diabetic patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency who require another organ transplant (e.g., lung, liver, or kidney), simultaneous pancreas transplantation with the exocrine secretions directed into the upper gastrointestinal tract should be considered.

Lipoprotein profiles were measured before and two months after complete withdrawal of prednisone in 34 kidney and 9 kidney-pancreas transplant recipients subsequently maintained on cyclosporine and azathioprine. Withdrawal of steroid therapy was accompanied by a 17% reduction in total serum cholesterol levels. However, there was a parallel reduction in all other measured lipoprotein concentrations, including an 18% reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In diabetic recipients of a kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant, the ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was unchanged after steroid withdrawal. In nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients, this ratio actually increased significantly following withdrawal of prednisone. These observations suggest that it is premature to presume that withdrawal of steroid therapy will reduce the cardiovascular risk related to hyperlipidemia in cyclosporine-treated kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

The effects of complete withdrawal of steroid therapy on blood pressure and other clinical variables were studied in 58 renal transplant recipients subsequently maintained on azathioprine and cyclosporine; 76% of the patients were hypertensive prior to withdrawal of steroids. Cessation of steroids was accompanied by a significant decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and by a reduction in the number of required antihypertensive medications; however, changes in blood pressure were variable among individual patients. Previously normotensive patients exhibited little further decline in blood pressure. Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort of patients showed that the reduction in blood pressure accompanying steroid withdrawal was directly related to the prior severity of hypertension and inversely related to the dose of cyclosporine. We conclude that steroids play an important role in the pathogenesis of posttransplant hypertension in the majority of renal transplant recipients. Withdrawal of steroids generally is accompanied by reduction in blood pressure, but the benefit is greatest in previously hypertensive patients receiving relatively low doses of cyclosporine.

Withdrawal of steroid therapy in renal transplant recipients is associated with a risk of acute allograft rejection. To define clinical risk factors for rejection associated with steroid withdrawal, we analyzed the clinical characteristics of 107 patients with drawn from steroid therapy at various times after transplantation. Both univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that the timing of steroid withdrawal is an important predictor of steroid withdrawal failure. Withdrawal of steroids was successful in only 13 of 32 patients (41%) in whom prednisone was discontinued shortly after transplantation. In contrast, steroid withdrawal has been successful in 59 of 75 patients (79%) in whom prednisone was discontinued at least 6 months after transplantation. Black race and donor-recipient racial mismatch also were significant predictors of rejection associated with steroid withdrawal. In patients undergoing steroid withdrawal at least 6 months posttransplant, serum creatinine concentration also correlated independently with the risk of rejection. Neither age, sex, HLA match, pretransplant PRA, source of the allograft (cadaver vs. living relative), acute tubular necrosis, nor the presence of diabetes was predictive of the outcome of steroid withdrawal.

To clarify the relative influences of cyclosporine (CsA) therapy, corticosteroid therapy, and other clinical variables on posttransplant hypercholesterolemia, total serum cholesterol levels were measured in 107 renal transplant recipients receiving one of three immunosuppression regimens: CsA and azathioprine (AZA) (group I); CsA, AZA, and prednisone (group II); or AZA and prednisone (group III). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that prednisone therapy, CsA therapy, patient age, and pretransplant cholesterol levels correlated independently with posttransplant cholesterol levels at last follow-up (ranging from 13 to 84 months after transplantation). In 32 patients successfully withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy and maintained on AZA and stable doses of CsA, serum cholesterol decreased from 6.55 +/- 1.1 mmol/L (253.5 +/- 43.1 mg/dL) to 5.27 +/- 1.2 mmol/L (203.9 +/- 45.6 mg/dL). Results of this analysis indicate that prednisone and CsA are independent factors in the pathogenesis of posttransplant hypercholesterolemia. Complete withdrawal of corticosteroids partially corrects hypercholesterolemia in CsA-treated renal transplant recipients.

In summary, we believe that our experience with concomitant use of OKT3 and either reduced-dose CyA for treatment of renal allograft rejections or full-dose CyA therapy for treatment of liver allograft rejection is both safe and possibly more effective in reversing allograft rejection than use of the antibody alone. This strategy has also allowed us to use this MAb therapy without incurring the untoward consequence of the development of hightiter anti-OKT3 antibodies that could preclude its subsequent reuse.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) traditionally has been attributed to therapy with steroids--however, several lines of evidence suggest that cyclosporine also is diabetogenic. A retrospective review revealed that PTDM developed in 9 of 70 previously nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients (12.9%) maintained on prednisone, azathioprine, and CsA compared with 8 of 83 nondiabetics (9.6%) maintained on azathioprine and prednisone alone in an earlier era (P = NS). Among patients maintained on triple-drug therapy, complete withdrawal of prednisone was attempted in 7 renal transplant recipients with PTDM and in 1 recipient of a combined kidney-pancreas transplant who exhibited evidence of type II diabetes mellitus. Seven of the 8 patients were able to discontinue insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents within 4 months of discontinuing steroids. Mean glycohemoglobin level declined from 10.6 +/- 3.6% prior to steroid withdrawal to 6.0 +/- 1.3% within 1 month of steroid cessation, while mean CsA dose and trough CsA blood levels remained unchanged. In 2 patients, mild rejection episodes prompted a return to steroid therapy. Although CsA may be diabetogenic, evidence from this study suggests that withdrawal of steroid therapy is a safe and effective approach to the management of PTDM in patients subsequently maintained on CsA and azathioprine.

Outcomes of renal transplantation were reviewed for 26 transplants performed in 25 patients 60 years of age or older between 1985 and 1989. Three grafts were from family donors and 23 were from cadaver donors. Twenty-one were first transplants and five were retransplants. Cyclosporine was used as primary immunosuppression and azathioprine and prednisone were administered to most patients. Overall patient and graft actuarial survival rates were 79% and 71%, respectively, at both 1 and 3 years. Patients (n = 14) free of both diabetes and cardiac disease (low risk) had 1- and 3-year patient and graft survival rates of 91% and 84%, respectively. Conversely, high-risk patients (n = 12) had patient and graft survival rates at 1 and 3 years of 67% and 58%, respectively. Early deaths (less than or equal to 6 months) were caused by sepsis (two patients) or cardiac events (three patients), and four of the five were in high-risk patients. Irreversible rejections and serious infectious complications were not as common as steroid-induced diabetes, which occurred in five patients. This experience suggests that kidney transplantation can be done safely and successfully in patients older than 60 years of age and should be the treatment of choice for low-risk patients in this category.

To investigate the influence of therapy with cyclosporine on the generation of antibodies to OKT3, 51 renal transplant recipients previously maintained on CsA, azathioprine, and prednisone were allocated randomly either to receive 50% of their maintenance dose of CsA (group 1, n = 27) or to discontinue CsA (group 2, n = 24) during treatment with OKT3 for acute renal allograft rejection. In the month following therapy with OKT3, anti-OKT3 antibodies were detected in 11% of patients in group 1 and in 42% of patients in group 2 (P less than 0.02). No patient in group 1 developed antibody titers greater than 1:100, whereas 4 patients in group 2 developed titer greater than or equal to 1:1000. Rejection was reversed in 96% of patients in group 1 and in only 75% of patients in group 2 (P less than 0.03), suggesting that continued administration of reduced doses of CsA during therapy with OKT3 improves the short-term response to this monoclonal antibody. Results of this study suggest that concurrent administration of CsA during therapy with OKT3 inhibits the generation of anti-OKT3 antibodies and improves the response to this monoclonal antibody.

Seventeen patients with type I diabetes and diabetic nephropathy underwent combined kidney and pancreas transplantation. Mean age was 32 +/- 6 years and average duration of diabetes was 21 +/- 6 years. Transplantation was performed through bilateral iliac fossa incisions, and graft duodenocystostomy was used to achieve exocrine pancreas drainage. The actuarial patient and kidney survival rate was 92% and the pancreas survival rate, 88% (follow-up of 3 to 28 months). One patient with functioning grafts died at 10 months owing to a cardiac arrhythmia and one pancreas was "lost" to early thrombosis. Major morbidity was due to pancreas wound infection (53%) that required reoperation, but all patients have had subsequent healing of their wounds. Rehabilitation with return to meaningful activity has been accomplished by 15 patients. This experience demonstrates that combined kidney and pancreas transplantation can be performed safely and successfully.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate early (6-12 days) prednisone withdrawal in cyclosporine- and azathioprine-treated renal transplant recipients. Patients, including 8 recipients of live-related donor kidneys and 59 recipients of cadaver donor kidneys, were prospectively randomized to receive maintenance prednisone (PRED) therapy or not (NOPRED) in addition to antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and azathioprine. Rejection episodes were initially treated with methylprednisolone pulses, and OKT3 monoclonal antibody was used to treat steroid resistant rejections that were verified by biopsy. NOPRED patients were declared protocol failures and returned to PRED therapy if they sustained 2 steroid-sensitive rejection episodes in the first 3 months or an OKT3-treated rejection at any time. Patient and graft survival for the LRD patients in both treatment categories were 100% at 12 months. Patient and graft survival for CAD recipients at one year was 94% and 83% (PRED) and 88% and 77% (NOPRED), respectively. Rejection episodes were more frequent (26 of 32 NOPRED patients vs. 19 of 35 PRED patients P = 0.02) and occurred earlier (4.5 weeks in NOPRED vs. 7.7 weeks in PRED patients) in patients not taking maintenance steroids. Rejection severity was also greater in the NOPRED group, as 15 OKT3-treated rejections occurred in that group whereas only 7 OKT3-treated rejections were observed in the PRED group (P = less than 0.01). The incidence of serious infection was similar in each group. Finally, protocol failure occurred in 40% of the LRD patients and 59% of the CAD patients. These data indicate that initiating maintenance therapy without PRED is safe but is attended by a greater risk of developing rejection. Because of this increased incidence and severity of early rejection episodes in NOPRED patients, we do not advise use of this immunosuppressive strategy in renal transplantation.

With the introduction of more potent immunosuppressive regimens, increasing numbers of kidney transplant recipients traditionally viewed as being at high immunologic risk for rejection and graft loss have been accepted. These include recipients of multiple grafts, sensitized patients as measured by high panel reactive antibody (PRA), and patients with current warm B or historical positive crossmatches. Since November 1983, all recipients of cadaver kidneys have been treated with cyclosporine and prednisone. In addition, most also received a short posttransplant course of antilymphocyte globulin and long-term azathioprine. With these regimens, retransplantation, sensitization, current B-cell crossmatch and historical B- and/or T-cell crossmatch do not affect graft survival.

OKT3 (Ortho Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ) has been employed in a protocol where all patients received cyclosporine as part of their baseline immunosuppressive regimen and, after the diagnosis of rejection was established, were treated with up to three pulses of methylprednisolone before monoclonal antibody therapy was initiated. Use of this protocol has allowed 46% of rejection episodes encountered to be treated on an outpatient basis without resorting to inpatient use of OKT3, but has avoided delaying OKT3 therapy until after all other methods of rejection treatment were found to be ineffective. Of 83 rejection episodes treated with OKT3 between March 1985 and May 1987, 78 (94%) were reversed. Overall graft survival is 84% and patient survival is 96% in OKT3-treated patients. Of the 17 rejection episodes where OKT3 treatment was a second or third exposure to the drug, rejection was successfully reversed in 15 (88%). In cadaver donor allograft recipients transplanted between March 1985 and May 1986, actual 1-year graft survival is 80% for 30 patients requiring no rejection therapy, 80% for 20 patients with rejection episodes responding quickly to steroids, and 82% for 28 patients with OKT3-treated, steroid-insensitive rejections. Mean serum creatinine at 1 year posttransplant is 1.5 +/- 0.5; 1.9 +/- 0.7; and 2.1 +/- 0.8, respectively, for these groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Between 40% and 80% of patients treated with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 develop blocking antibody against its idiotypic region. Thus a major concern with the use of OKT3 as part of a baseline immunosuppressive regimen is that formation of blocking antibodies might preclude its subsequent use. Between 7/86 and 2/87, 32 patients received prophylactic OKT3 in addition to low-dose prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. Prophylactic OKT3 did not prevent rejection, as 21 of 32 patients studied developed rejection. Retreatment of 13 patients with OKT3 successfully reversed 12 rejections and lowered the number of T3-positive cells in spite of a low level of blocking antibody in two patients in this group. Of the patients analyzed, 38% developed blocking antibody on initial exposure to OKT3, but OKT3 reuse was denied only 4 patients due to the presence of these antibodies. Three of these had rejections reversed with steroids alone; the other patient lost the allograft. A high frequency of infectious complications occurred in the retreatment group, with viral infections predominating. Only one patient in the retreated group developed antibodies after the second use. Appearance of blocking antibodies after use of OKT3 as part of a base-line prophylactic immunosuppressive regimen did not significantly compromise access to OKT3 for treatment of subsequent rejection episodes, but multiple exposures to OKT3 did increase the frequency of infectious complications.