Search

Introduction: Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) is the most common cause of long-term allograft loss in kidney transplantation (KT). Therefore, a low human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (MM) load is favorable for KT outcomes. Hitherto, serological or low-resolution molecular HLA typing have been adapted in parallel. Here, we aimed to identify previously missed HLA mismatches and corresponding antibodies by high resolution HLA genotyping in a living-donor KT cohort., Methods: 103 donor/recipient pairs transplanted at the University of Leipzig Medical Center between 1998 and 2018 were re-typed using next generation sequencing (NGS) of the HLA loci -A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB345, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1. Based on these data, we compiled HLA MM counts for each pair and comparatively evaluated genomic HLA-typing with pre-transplant obtained serological/low-resolution HLA (=one-field) typing results. NGS HLA typing (=two-field) data was further used for reclassification of de novo HLA antibodies as "donor-specific"., Results: By two-field HLA re-typing, we were able to identify additional MM in 64.1% (n=66) of cases for HLA loci -A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 that were not observed by one-field HLA typing. In patients with biopsy proven ABMR, two-field calculated MM count was significantly higher than by one-field HLA typing. For additional typed HLA loci -DRB345, -DQA1, -DPA1, and -DPB1 we observed 2, 26, 3, and 23 MM, respectively. In total, 37.3% (69/185) of de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) formation was directed against these loci (DRB345 ➔ n=33, DQA1 ➔ n=33, DPA1 ➔ n=1, DPB1 ➔ n=10)., Conclusion: Our results indicate that two-field HLA typing is feasible and provides significantly more sensitive HLA MM recognition in living-donor KT. Furthermore, accurate HLA typing plays an important role in graft management as it can improve discrimination between donor and non-donor HLA directed cellular and humoral alloreactivity in the long range. The inclusion of additional HLA loci against which antibodies can be readily detected, HLA-DRB345, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1, will allow a more precise virtual crossmatch and better prediction of potential DSA. Furthermore, in living KT, two-field HLA typing could contribute to the selection of the immunologically most suitable donors., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Lehmann, Pehnke, Weimann, Bachmann, Dittrich, Petzold, Fürst, de Fallois, Landgraf, Henschler, Lindner, Halbritter, Doxiadis, Popp and Münch.)

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) of undetermined etiology is highly prevalent and constitutes a significant clinical challenge, particularly in the context of kidney transplantation (KT). Despite the identification of numerous rare hereditary nephropathies over the last few decades, patients with undetermined ESRD are not being systematically investigated for rare genetic causes in clinical practice. To address this, we utilized mutation analysis in patients on the kidney transplant waitlist and scrutinized underlying renal diagnoses of 142 patients in a single center KT-waitlist. This cohort was stratified into 85 cases of determined and 57 cases of undetermined ESRD. The latter patients were analyzed by a renal gene panel for mutations in 209 genes associated with ESRD. The most likely genetic diagnoses in 12% of the tested individuals with undetermined ESRD were established. All of these patients showed mutations in genes encoding components of the glomerular filtration barrier. Taken together, hereditary nephropathies, including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, were identified in 35 of the 142 patients of the waitlist cohort. By significantly increasing the proportion of hereditary diagnoses from 29 to 35 patients, the rate of undetermined ESRD significantly decreased from 57 to 51 patients. This study demonstrates the beneficial use of genetic diagnostics in significantly unraveling undetermined ESRD cases prior to KT. Thus, in the absence of renal histology or the presence of unspecific histological conditions, such as hypertensive nephrosclerosis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or thrombotic microangiopathy, genetic analysis may provide a robust and specific renal diagnosis and allow for optimizing pre- and post-KT management., (Copyright © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

(1) Background: CMV infections remain a problem after kidney transplantation, particularly if patients are refractory or resistant (r/r) to treatment with valganciclovir (VGCV) or ganciclovir (GCV). (2) Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving letermovir (LTV) as rescue therapy for VGCV-/GCV-r/r CMV disease were analyzed regarding CMV history, immunosuppression, and outcomes. (3) Results: Of 201 KTR treated for CMV between 2017 and 2022, 8 patients received LTV following treatment failure with VGCV/GCV. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with VGCV according to the center's protocol, and 7/8 patients had a high-risk (D+/R−) CMV constellation. In seven of eight cases, rising CMV levels occurred during prophylaxis. In seven of eight patients, a mutation in UL97 associated with a decreased response to VGCV/GCV was detected. In four of eight patients, LTV resulted in CMV clearance after 24 ± 10 weeks (16–39 weeks), two of eight patients stabilized at viral loads <2000 cop/mL (6–20 weeks), and two of eight patients developed LTV resistance (range 8–10 weeks). (4) Conclusion: LTV, which is currently evaluated for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplantation, also shows promising results for the treatment of patients with VGCV/GCV resistance despite the risk of developing LTV resistance. Additional studies are needed to further define its role in the treatment of patients with CMV resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]