Search

Optimal glycemic control in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes is associated with improved morbidity and better patient and allograft survival. Transplant options for patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and chronic kidney disease who are suitable candidates for kidney transplantation should include consideration of beta-cell replacement therapy: pancreas or islet transplantation. International variation related to national regulatory policies exists in offering one or both options to suitable candidates and is further affected by pancreas/islet allocation policies and transplant waiting list dynamics. The selection of appropriate candidates depends on patient age, coexistent morbidities, the timing of referral to the transplant center (predialysis versus on dialysis) and availability of living kidney donors. Therefore, early referral (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) is of the utmost importance to ensure adequate time for informed decision making and thorough pretransplant evaluation. Obesity, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and frailty are some of the conditions that need to be addressed before acceptance on the transplant list, and ideally before dialysis becoming imminent. This review offers insights into selection of pancreas/islet transplant candidates by transplant centers and an update on posttransplant outcomes, which may have practice implications for referring nephrologists.

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of hyperuricemia and factors predicting its occurrence, and to establish the relationship over time between serial changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and uric acid (UR) concentration in kidney transplant (KT) recipients with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Methods Adult patients who underwent KT at the Asan Medical Center between 1990 and 2008 and maintained eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were retrospectively assessed. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from inpatient and outpatient charts and from the hospital electronic database. Results Of 356 patients, 301 (84.55%) had normal UR levels and 55 (15.45%) had hyperuricemia. After multivariate adjustment, transplant duration, male gender, eGFR, diabetes mellitus (DM), and calcium level were associated with higher mean UR levels. Mean UR level increased significantly and mean eGFR decreased significantly during the first year after transplantation, but there were no significant differences over the next 4 years. Serial UR and eGFR levels changed almost simultaneously. Conclusions Transplantation duration, male gender, eGFR level, DM, and serum calcium level were risk factors for hyperuricemia in kidney recipients with intact graft function. Increased uric acid after KT did not significantly affect graft function.

Background. Lamivudine has been reported to be able to stabilize liver enzyme and hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication with recurrent hepatitis that has been regarded as a frequent and major risk factor for hepatic dysfunction and chronic liver disease in renal transplant recipients. Because large number of hepatitis antigenemia patients among renal transplant patients experience recurrent hepatic dysfunction with HBV recurrence and permanent histological deterioration, preemptive or primary prophylactic use of lamivudine before transplantation may be more beneficial than a trial for the treatment of advanced hepatic dysfunction. Methods. We conducted a double arm study to compare the efficacy of lamivudine between the preemptive (HBV DNA positive) or prophylactic (HBV DNA negative) trial for the maintenance of stable liver function (n=10) and the trial for the salvage of advanced hepatic dysfunction developed after renal transplantation (n=6) in hepatitis B viremia carrier renal transplant recipients. Results. Hepatic dysfunction with recurrent HBV antigenemia developed in 11 of 36 (30.6%) hepatitis antigenemia patients with a mean duration of 8.4 months (range 5-19.4 months). In six patients treated with lamivudine after hepatic dysfunction from recurrent hepatitis B viremia, serum AST and ALT level normalized within 1 month and HBV-DNA disappeared in all cases. HBV-DNA, however, reappeared in three (50%) without any discontinuation of lamivudine. Liver biopsy revealed recurrent chronic active hepatitis with severe activity of fibrosis in four cases, cholestatic fibrosing hepatitis in one, and permanent cirrhotic change in one. In seven patients who had preemptive lamivudine treatment at 9, 6, 2, 2, 1, 0, 0 month before the transplantation, HBV-DNA had converted to negative with a mean follow up of 1.2 months (range 1-2 month) in all case. Three patients who had prophylactic trials with lamivudine have all remained HBV-DNA negative. The recurrence rate of HBV viremia in the preemptive or prophylactic lamivudine treated group is 10.0% (1/10), which is significantly lower than that (42.3%, 11/25) in the nonlamivudinetreated group. The re-recurrence rate of HBV viremia was significantly higher (3/6, 50.0%) in the reactive lamivudine treated group than in prophylactic or preemptive group (1/10, 10%). Conclusion. Although lamivudine treatment after hepatic dysfunction can be a sound conventional treatment modality, this preliminary study may suggest that preemptive or prophylactic trial of lamivudine before hepatic dysfunction might be a more effective strategy for prevention of permanent histological deterioration and recurrence of hepatitis B viremia.

Objective Tacrolimus has been shown to be an important immunosuppressive agent in organ and bone marrow transplantation. Previously, we reported that there were no statistically significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of the oral formulation of generic tacrolimus (TacroBell) and the conventional formulation (Prograf). This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral capsules of TacroBell in de novo renal transplantation. Methods Ninety-six renal transplant recipients from 9 transplantation centers in South Korea were enrolled between November 2005 and July 2007. De novo renal recipients ranged from 19–65 years old. Ninety-four patients who underwent renal transplantation were administered study drug at least one time in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. This phase 4 clinical trial was a 26-week, open-label, noncomparative, multicenter study. Results An acute rejection episode developed in 10/94 recipients (10.6%, 95% confidence interval, 4.4%–16.9%). There were no patient deaths during the study. The 6-month graft survival rate was 96.8%. Conclusion Based on this study, treatment with TacroBell is considered to be efficient and safe after primary renal transplantation.

The proteinuria in renal allograft recipients has been regarded as a sign of poor prognosis. The causes of post-transplant proteinuria include chronic rejection, chronic transplant glomerulopathy, glomerulonephritis (GN), acute rejection, and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Among them, chronic rejection is known to be most frequent. We analyzed the histopathologic findings of renal allograft biopsies in 197 Korean recipients with proteinuria. Among them, 26 patients developed proteinuria over 500 mg/d. All patients received baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporine. From 26 patients with post-transplant proteinuria, 29 biopsies were performed and their histologic diagnoses were immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) in 17, IgAN combined with chronic allograft nephropathy in 1, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 2, crescentic GN in 1, membranous GN in 1, diabetic nephropathy in 1, acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in 1, and chronic rejection in 3 biopsies. The remaining two biopsies showed nonspecific findings. The most common cause of post-transplant proteinuria was IgAN (62% of biopsies). The incidence of chronic rejection was relatively low and predominant cyclosporine-associated changes were not observed. In conclusion, our data suggest that the main causes of post-transplant proteinuria in Korea are primary glomerulonephritides rather than chronic rejection or cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and the kidney allograft biopsies from patients with proteinuria should be handled as native kidney.