Search

The aim of this study was to evaluate psychological differences and quality of life between kidney recipients from living (mother) and multi-organ donor. Overall, 40 patients who had undergone both living (mother) and multi-organ kidney transplantation 3-6 months before were asked to complete four self-report instruments: Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Short Form Health Survey, Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy, and Attachment Style Questionnaire. A greater difficulty in emotional, social, and mental health functioning was found in recipients receiving kidney from mother living donor. Moreover, in these patients, higher levels of avoidant attachment dimensions were associated with a worse quality of life.

Aim: Aim of this study was to evaluate the association between attachment style, compliance, quality of life and renal function in adult patients after kidney transplantation., Methods: A total of 43 adult patients who received a kidney transplant more than 3 months before were enrolled and were asked to complete two Self-Report questionnaires: Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ-40) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Also compliance was measured using appropriate questions., Results: Linear regression analysis showed associations between the confidence in relationships (ASQ-40) and compliance [beta = -0.37; B = -0.02; t(41) = -2.51; p = 0.02]; aspects of anxious attachment style (ASQ-40) and creatinine levels [beta = 0.3; B = 0.13; t(41) = 2.03; p = 0.04]; aspects of avoidant attachment style (ASQ-40) and compliance [beta = -0.37; B = -3.15; t(41) = -2.35; p = 0.02]. Patients who exhibited avoidant attachment had a significantly better perception of their own general health than patients with anxious [F(2,37) = 6.8; p < 0.05] or secure attachment; however, they had a worse perception regarding role limitations due to emotional problems, compared to patients with anxious attachment [F(2,37) = 6.4; p < 0.05]., Discussion: The results of this study suggest that the evaluation of the attachment style in adult kidney transplant patients can contribute to plan a goal-directed psychological support program for these patients, in order to increase their compliance. The association between aspects of anxious attachment style and creatinine level needs more investigations.

Unlabelled: Recent studies show that alexithymia may influence compliance and quality of life in different clinical situations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between alexithymia or emotional self-efficacy and compliance, quality of life (QoL) and renal function in renal transplant patients., Methods: Forty-three patients were enrolled during a follow-up visit (>3 months post-transplant) and were asked to complete three self-report questionnaires (TAS-20, SF-36, RESE) to answer the following items: "In the past four weeks, how many times did you fail to take your prescribed dose?" and "How would you rate your adherence levels from 0 to 100?" (visual analogue scale)., Results: Alexithymia was positively correlated with non-compliance (r=.314; p=.04), and negatively with QoL dimensions. Analysis of variance confirmed that patients with high levels of alexithymia reported a negative perception of their QoL (mental health: F(1,41)=7,6; p=.008) and lower levels of compliance (F(1,41)=12,5; p=.001) compared with patients with low levels of alexithymia. The self-efficacy in the management of negative emotions was significantly correlated (r=-.314; p=.04) with creatinine levels and positively with the QoL (mental health: r=.421; p=.005)., Discussion: The inability to recognize and express emotions, as well as the ability to manage negative emotions, may influence compliance and QoL of renal transplant patients. Focused psychological support could be useful in these patients in order to increase their compliance and QoL., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Safety in conducting a clinical trial is a prerequisite for patients who will be enrolled into that study. The aim of the present study was to evaluate retrospectively if patient and graft survival were similar among patients who participated in clinical trials versus those who did not., Patients and Methods: We evaluated pretransplant and posttransplant characteristics of 245 kidney transplant (KT) patients who were selected to participate in at least one Phase II/Phase III clinical trial. We compared them with 361 KT patients who were not enrolled or refused to participate in those clinical trials; all studies were conducted at a single transplant center. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were as noted for each individual protocol. Only studies with enrollment at time of graft implant were considered., Results: Selection of patients participating in clinical trials in general exclude high-risk patients. In our experience, only 36% of transplanted patients were selected for a multicenter, prospective, randomized, international study that included changes to the strategies in the administration of immunosuppressive drugs already on the market or development of a new immunosuppressant. After 5 years, graft and patient survival rates were similar between those who participated and those who did not participate in a clinical study. Although our data were collected retrospectively, an alternative design to achieve these conclusions would be a noninferiority study., Conclusions: Our results demonstrated similar rates of graft and patient survival among enrolled patients versus nonenrolled patients. Outcome surveillance offers safety in participating in clinical trials that involve changes in standard immunosuppression therapy and are part of the research necessary to develop patient-centered medical interventions., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The complexity of treatment after solid organ transplantation has been related to non-adherence to therapy prescriptions and to reduced graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the middle-term effects of the conversion from Prograf (TAC), to extended-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) (ADV) in stable kidney transplant recipients., Methods: Conversion from TAC to ADV (dose, 1:1 mg/mg) was planned in 78 kidney transplant patients with stable renal function 71±48 months after renal transplantation. Before conversion, 1 week after conversion, and every 6 months up to 3 years, patients were evaluated clinically and by means of the usual blood chemistry and pharmacologic parameters., Results: Twenty patients (26%) refused to change their pre-existing immunosuppressive therapy; therefore, 58 patients entered the study and 45 (77%) completed the 3-year follow-up. Patient survival was 98% and allograft survival was 96%. Significant reduction in serum creatinine levels and increased glomerular filtration rate were observed after conversion (3-year creatinine: before TAC 1.67±0.47 mg/dL vs after ADV 1.47±0.62 mg/dL, P<.001; glomerular filtration rate, MDRD abbreviated: before TAC 49±15 mL/min vs after ADV 59±24 mL/min, P<.001). The daily dose and C0 blood levels of tacrolimus were stable before and after conversion (dose before vs 3 years after conversion: TAC 3.79±1.81 mg/day vs ADV 3.54±1.86 mg/day, P=ns; C0 tacrolimus blood levels, before vs 3 years after conversion: TAC 6.03±1.75 ng/mL vs ADV: 5.58±1.38 ng/mL, P = NS). One patient in the ADV group had an episode of acute rejection (2%)., Conclusions: Our data support the safety and efficacy of converting from Prograf to Advagraf in stable kidney transplant patients in the middle term. We suggest that the observed improvement in renal function after conversion to ADV is related to the reduction of the 24-hour tacrolimus area under the curve exposure., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The evaluation of a potential living kidney donor (LKD) leads to exclusion of at least 50% of candidates. The aim of this study was to analyze the reasons for exclusion of potential LKDs referred to our center., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed historic and clinical data of all potential LKDs who were evaluated over 7 years from January 2005 to March 2012. Data were obtained by review of an electronic database., Results: Among 79 (50 female, 29 male) candidates, 24 (30.3%) successfully donated, comprising 22 related and 2 unrelated donors. We excluded 45 (56.9%), and 10 (12.6%) are actively undergoing evaluation. Reasons for exclusion were medical (n = 14; 31%), nonmedical (n = 18; 40%), positive cross-match (n = l7.7%), pregnancy (n = 2; 4.4%), and other reasons (n = 3; 6.6%). Of the 14 donors excluded for medical reasons, 75.8% were due to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, or obesity and 21.5% to inadequate renal function, malignancy, or liver disease. Of the 18 (40%) excluded for nonmedical reasons, 6 (33.3%) were because the intended recipient received a deceased-donor transplantation before the evaluation could be completed, 5 (27.7%) because the recipient was no longer a candidate for transplantation, 5 (27.7%) because of donor withdrawal, and 2 (11.1%) for other reasons., Conclusions: Positive cross-match and deceased-donor transplantation during the evaluation process were the 2 most common reasons for LKD exclusion. Evaluation of potential LKDs is time consuming, requiring a remarkable amount of human and material resources. A dedicated pathway for the diagnostic work-up of LKDs may speed- the evaluation process and improve its efficiency, use of ABO-incompatible or paired-exchange donations may increase the yield of donor organs., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study investigated whether switching from the twice-daily (Prograf; TAC) to the once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with extended release (Advagraf; XL) affected quality of life, anxiety, and transplant benefit perception after allogeneic kidney transplantation., Methods: After local Institutional Review Board approval, 78 adult patients prescribed twice-daily tacrolimus for ≥1 year after kidney transplantation were asked to participate in this study. All patients were evaluated at T0 (before the switch), and the 49 who accepted the change were reassessed after 6 months (T1). The following tests were used: (State and Trait Anxiety Inventories Y1 and Y2, (Psychologic General Well-Being Index), and modified Transplant Effect Questionnaire for posttransplantation symptoms. Blood samples for laboratory profiles and determinations of drug concentrations were obtained throughout the study period., Results: There were no significant differences between the psychologic variables at T0 among patients who switched from TAC to XL (n=49) versus those who did not participate (n=29). Eight of the 49 patients who accepted the drug conversion were reswitched to TAC because of adverse events. At T1, the remaining switched patients (n=41) showed an increase in the disclosure of having undergone transplantation (P<.05) versus nonswitched patients; whereas reswitched patients (n=8) showed less positivity and well-being (P<.05) compared with those who remained in the switched regimen., Conclusion: The findings suggested increased disclosure of having undergone transplantation among patients who decided to switch from TAC to XL., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether pretransplant psychological variables included in the CBA 2.0 Primary Scale-fear, personality, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, state and trait anxiety, psychological reactions, and depression-could predict graft rejection among patients undergoing kidney transplantation., Methods: After ethical committee approval we enrolled 33 consecutive adult patients undergoing kidney transplantation. The inclusion criteria were a stable clinical situation in an out-of-hospital setting; Italian language literacy; a minimum of secondary school-level education, and written informed consent. We excluded patients with a psychotic disturbance, neurocognitive deficit, dementia, serious mental delay (IQ <50), current alcohol or drug abuse, recent ideation or attempted suicide or nonadherence to the therapeutic protocol. Acute and/or chronic graft rejection was diagnosed according to clinical and histopathologic criteria. CBA-2,0 "Primary Scale" series of questionnaires were handed out to patients at the time of the examinations to discrem eligibility for transplantation. Analyses of variance were performed to compare psychological scores among patients with versus without graft rejection. Logistic regression analyses of psychological variables were performed to detect possible predictors for graft rejection. The results of the analysis showed that higher psychoticism scores were able to predict graft rejection (P<.05)., Results: The findings of this study suggest that it is mandatory to preoperatively plan an holistic treatment including psychological intervention mainly focused on psychoticism., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. Methods From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005–2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011–2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. Results Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). Conclusions LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]