Search

Background: Although arterial hypertension is a powerful predictor of graft failure, only few studies have evaluated 24-hr blood pressure (BP) profile in renal transplant recipients (RTRs)., Methods: We performed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 94 RTRs (65 men; age 28-71 years) with 1-year functioning grafts. Serum biochemical parameters, daily proteinuria, and transplantation-related data were evaluated in all subjects., Results: ABPM showed that only 5% of RTRs were normotensives (BP<130/80 mm Hg) and identified 29% of patients with nocturnal hypertension. A strong, direct correlation was shown between each set of both systolic BP and diastolic BP measured by ABPM and serum creatinine, daily proteinuria, and serum triglycerides (P at least <0.025 for each). Serum creatinine immediately after transplantation and 1-yr asleep diastolic BP were the only significant predictors of 1-yr creatinine (P<0.0001; r=0.49), whereas awake systolic BP was the only predictor of daily proteinuria (r=0.39; P=0.005) by multiple regression analysis., Conclusions: BP assessed by ABPM proved to be a stronger predictor of renal graft damage than traditional immunologic factors. ABPM improved the diagnostic accuracy of arterial hypertension in RTRs and was the only effective tool in disclosing the association of BP with 1-year renal transplant outcome.

Background: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) after renal transplantation may be affected by immunosuppressive therapy., Study Design: Nonrandomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of sirolimus (SRL) on LVH of renal transplant recipients (RTRs)., Setting & Participants: 13 RTRs without diabetes who had received a single-kidney transplant from a deceased donor with chronic allograft dysfunction and biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy who were converted from calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) to SRL treatment; 26 controls matched for age and year of transplantation who were not converted from CNI to SRL treatment., Intervention: Conversion from CNI to SRL therapy., Outcomes & Measurements: Left ventricular mass determination by using echocardiography at baseline and again 1 year later. Blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin level, serum creatinine level, uric acid level, lipid levels, trough levels of immunosuppressive drugs, and daily proteinuria were assessed at least twice monthly. Conventional antihypertensive therapy was used to achieve BP of 130/80 mm Hg or less., Results: The study population included 26 men and 13 women (age, 25 to 66 years). Changes in BP were similar in the 2 groups (between-group difference, -4 +/- 5 mm Hg; P = 0.5 for systolic BP; -2 +/- 3; P = 0.6 for diastolic BP), whereas left ventricular mass significantly decreased in the SRL group alone (between-group difference, 8.6 +/- 2.4 g/m(2.7); P < 0.001) because of a decrease in both the interventricular septum and left ventricular posterior wall. LVH regressed in 12 of 13 patients on SRL therapy and 10 of 26 controls (P = 0.002)., Limitations: Nonrandomized design. Single-center study with small sample size., Conclusions: Conversion from CNI to SRL therapy may regress LVH in RTRs regardless of BP changes, mainly by decreasing left ventricular wall thickness, thus suggesting nonhemodynamic-effect mechanisms of SRL on left ventricular mass.

Background: Interventional studies of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in renal transplant recipients are scarce and to date evaluated only patients immediately after renal transplantation., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial that assessed the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in regressing persistent LVH after successful transplantation., Setting & Participants: 70 renal transplant recipients (47 men; age, 30 to 68 years) without diabetes previously randomly assigned to either cyclosporine or tacrolimus therapy, with LVH persisting 3 to 6 months after transplantation., Intervention: Subjects were randomly assigned to either lisinopril (ACE-inhibitor group; 36 patients) or no therapy (control group; 34 subjects)., Outcomes: Main outcome was change in left ventricular mass index (LVMi) at month 18., Results: A consistent decrease in both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was observed in both groups (between-group differences, -1.7 +/- 3.3 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.8 to 8.2; P = 0.6 for SBP; 0.3 +/- 2.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.8 to 4.1; P = 0.9 for DBP), whereas LVMi regressed more in the ACE-inhibitor group (between-group difference, 10.1 +/- 16.3 g/m(2.7); 95% CI, 4.2 to 16.1; P < 0.01). A significant interaction of ACE inhibitors with cyclosporine in affecting LVMi change was shown by means of post hoc multiple regression analysis (P < 0.01; differences between cyclosporine and tacrolimus group, 13.3 +/- 3.9 g/m(2.7); 95% CI, 5.3 to 21.2; P < 0.01 in the ACE-inhibitor group; 3.7 +/- 4.2 g/m(2.7); 95% CI, -4.7 to 12.2; P = 0.4 in the control group)., Limitations: Single-center study with small sample size. Interaction of ACE inhibitors with cyclosporine treatment emerged from post hoc analysis., Conclusion: A prolonged course of ACE-inhibitor therapy is effective in regressing the persistent LVH of renal transplant recipients by mechanisms independent of effects on BP. This regression seems to be at least in part the effect of an interaction between ACE inhibitors and cyclosporine.