Search

Introduction: Opioids are often used to manage postoperative pain. Non-narcotic alternatives have increasingly been used to reduce opioid usage. We conducted an open-label randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare non-opioid to opioid therapy for pain management after nephrolithiasis surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing elective ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy between July 2018 and May 2021 were randomized to receive ketorolac (non-opioid) or oxycodone-acetaminophen (opioid). Each patient was surveyed one week postoperatively to assess pain outcomes. Patient demographics, surgical variables, number of pills used, constipation, and adverse events were also assessed. We evaluated whether non-opioid analgesia was non-inferior to opioid analgesia for postoperative pain, assuming a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 in pain score between groups. Results: Analyses were based on 90 patients with postoperative pain data: 44 in the ketorolac group and 46 in the oxycodone-acetaminophen group. The groups were similar regarding demographics, type of surgery, ureteral stent placement, and stone burden. Non-inferiority of non-opioids compared to opioids was demonstrated for all outcomes. At follow-up, the average pain scores were 3.20 ± 1.94 (SD) in the non-opioid group and 4.17 ± 1.84 in the opioid group (difference = − 0.96; 95% CI: − 1.76, − 0.17, p = 0.018). The mean proportions of unused pills were similar between groups (p = 0.47) as were rates of constipation (p = 0.32). Conclusions: Non-opioid analgesia was non-inferior to opioid analgesia in pain management after kidney stone surgery. This trial contributes to the evidence that non-opioid analgesics should be considered an effective option for pain management following non-invasive urologic procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between self-reported food security and kidney stone formation. Methods: Data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a database representative of the United States population. Food security status was assessed using the US Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Characteristics of patients were compared using the Chi-square test and the student t-test. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using a multi-model approach. Results: We analyzed 6,800 NHANES survey respondents. 37.2% of respondents were categorized as having "low food security" (scores 2–4) and 24.0% having "very low food security" (scores 5–6). 8.4% of respondents had a history of kidney stones. We found that people with very low food security had a 42% increased likelihood of developing kidney stones compared to those with high or marginal food security, after controlling for race, age, and comorbidities (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.01–1.99). Between the different food security groups, no significant differences were observed in age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, gout history, osteoporosis history, or coronary artery disease history. Lower food security was associated with slightly younger age (< 1 year difference, p = 0.001), higher poverty-income ratio (p = 0.001), and many comorbidities, including kidney stones (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Our study provides evidence for an association between food access and the risk of kidney stone disease. Given these findings, food insecurity should be investigated as a modifiable risk factor for the development of kidney stone disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Obesity is a risk factor for metabolic syndrome and urolithiasis, particularly uric acid stones. As estimated by visceral fat area, visceral obesity is a more specific measure of the risk of metabolic syndrome than body mass index. We investigated the effects of visceral fat area and other metabolic factors on uric acid stone formation in patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 269 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Visceral fat area was measured in each patient on a CT axial slice at the umbilical level using the Aquarius® iNtuition™ fat analysis tool. Analysis was performed to determine the effect of visceral fat area and other comorbidities on uric acid stone formation. Results: Of the 269 patients analyzed there was no difference in baseline comorbidities between uric acid and nonuric acid stone formers. Patients with uric acid stones had a significantly higher mean visceral fat area (209.3 vs 161.9 cm2, p = 0.001), and rates of hypertension (67.4% vs 47.3%) and coronary artery disease (14.3% vs 4.6%, each p = 0.011). On logistic regression analysis hypertension (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.05–4.45, p = 0.04) and a high visceral fat area (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.22–10.85, p = 0.02) were independent risk factors for uric acid stones. Conclusions: As a marker of visceral obesity, visceral fat area contributes to the risk of metabolic syndrome and urolithiasis. Uric acid stone formers showed a significantly higher hypertension rate and mean visceral fat area, which were independent risk factors for uric acid urolithiasis. Evaluating these characteristics in stone formers may facilitate a tailored metabolic assessment and treatment plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]