Search

Context: Dramatic gains in our understanding of the molecular biology of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have created a foundation for clinical translation to improve patient care., Objective: To review and contextualize clinically impactful data surrounding genomic biomarkers in ccRCC., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic literature search was conducted focusing on genomic-based biomarkers with an emphasis on studies assessing clinical outcomes., Evidence Synthesis: The advancement of tumor sequencing techniques has led to a rapid increase in the knowledge of the molecular underpinnings of ccRCC and with that the discovery of multiple candidate genomic biomarkers. These include somatic gene mutations such as VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, and BAP1; copy number variations; transcriptomic multigene signatures; and specific immune cell populations. Many of these biomarkers have been assessed for their association with survival and a smaller number as potential predictors of a response to systemic therapy. In this scoping review, we discuss many of these biomarkers in detail. Further studies are needed to continue to refine and validate these molecular tools for risk stratification, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes., Conclusions: While no tissue or blood-based biomarkers for ccRCC have been incorporated into routine clinical practice to date, the field continues to expand rapidly. There remains a critical need to develop and validate these tools in order to improve the care for patients with kidney cancer., Patient Summary: Genomic biomarkers have the potential to better predict outcome and select the most appropriate treatment for patients with kidney cancer; however, further research is needed before any of these currently developed biomarkers are adopted into clinical practice., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown activity in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Data on the activity of these agents in patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) or patients with sarcomatoid/rhabdoid differentiation are limited. In this multicenter analysis, we explored the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with nccRCC or sarcomatoid/rhabdoid differentiation. Baseline and follow-up demographic, clinical, treatment, and radiographic data were collected. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints include time-to-treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and biomarker correlates. Forty-three patients were included: papillary ( n = 14; 33%), chromophobe ( n = 10; 23%), unclassified ( n = 9; 21%), translocation ( n = 3; 7%), and ccRCC with sarcomatoid differentiation ( n = 7, 16%). Of those 43 patients, 11 patients (26%) had sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid differentiation ( n = 7 with ccRCC; n = 4 nccRCC). Overall, 8 patients (19%) objectively responded, including 4 patients (13%) who received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Responses were observed in patients with ccRCC with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid differentiation ( n = 3/7, 43%), translocation RCC ( n = 1/3, 33%), and papillary RCC ( n = 4/14, 29%). The median TTF was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-5.5] and median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.4-not reached). No specific genomic alteration was associated with clinical benefit. Modest antitumor activity for PD-1/PD-L1-blocking agents was observed in some patients with nccRCC. Further prospective studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in this heterogeneous patient population. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(7); 758-65. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with an aggressive biology and a poor prognosis. Poor-risk RCC is defined by clinical prognostic factors and demonstrates similarly aggressive behavior. No standard treatment exists for patients with sarcomatoid RCC, and treatment options for patients with poor-risk disease are of limited benefit. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in clinically aggressive RCC., Methods: This was a phase 2, single-arm trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid or poor-risk RCC. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included the time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker correlatives., Results: Overall, 39 patients had sarcomatoid RCC, and 33 had poor-risk RCC. The ORR was 26% for patients with sarcomatoid RCC and 24% for patients with poor-risk RCC. The median TTP and OS for patients with sarcomatoid RCC were 5 and 10 months, respectively. For patients with poor-risk disease, the median TTP and OS were 5.5 and 15 months, respectively. Patients whose tumors had>10% sarcomatoid histology had a higher clinical benefit rate (ORR plus stable disease) than those with≤10% sarcomatoid histology (P = 0.04). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia (n = 20), anemia (n = 10), and fatigue (n = 7)., Conclusions: These results suggest that antiangiogenic therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy are an active and well-tolerated combination for patients with aggressive RCC. The combination may be more efficacious than either therapy alone and is currently under further investigation., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) originating from the renal medulla. Clinical outcomes are poor, and there are no consensus guidelines to guide therapy., Objective: To determine genomic alterations (GAs) in a series of patients with locally advanced or metastatic CDC for whom genomic profiling was performed during the course of clinical care., Design, Setting, and Participants: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks or slides were obtained for 17 patients with CDC. DNA was extracted and comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a laboratory certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Bayesian algorithms and local alignment algorithms were used to detect substitutions and insertions/deletions, respectively. A comparison to normal control samples was used to detect copy number alterations. Clinically relevant GAs (CRGAs) were defined as those linked to approved or investigational targeted therapies., Results and Limitations: The median age in the cohort was 53 yr (range 26-73), and 14 primary tumors and three metastatic sites assessed. A total of 36 GAs were detected in this series of patients, with an average of 2.1 GAs per case. The most common GAs were in NF2 (5/17, 29%), SETD2 (4/17, 24%), SMARCB1 (3/17, 18%), and CDKN2A (2/17, 12%). Of nine cases assessed for FH GAs, two patients had FH homozygous loss. A limitation is that targeted interrogation of genes known to be implicated in other cancers was performed, so mutations outside of these cannot be excluded., Conclusions: Recurrent CRGAs were detected in this series of CDC cases and suggest a possible benefit from targeted therapy. In particular, mTOR inhibitors may be of interest in patients with NF2 alterations. Alterations in FH and SMARCB1 also occurred in a mutually exclusive manner to NF2 alterations., Patient Summary: This report provides important genomic insights into collecting duct carcinoma, a rare type of renal cell carcinoma with a very aggressive course. These insights could further rationalize the use of targeted therapies for rare tumors according to the individual genomic alterations harbored., (Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We examined the hypothesis that mutations in mTOR pathway genes are associated with response to rapalogs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Experimental Design: We studied a cohort of mRCC patients who were treated with mTOR inhibitors with distinct clinical outcomes. Tumor DNA from 79 subjects was successfully analyzed for mutations using targeted next-generation sequencing of 560 cancer genes. Responders were defined as those with partial response (PR) by RECIST v1.0 or stable disease with any tumor shrinkage for 6 months or longer. Nonresponders were defined as those with disease progression during the first 3 months of therapy. Fisher exact test assessed the association between mutation status in mTOR pathway genes and treatment response., Results: Mutations in MTOR, TSC1, or TSC2 were more common in responders, 12 (28%) of 43, than nonresponders, 4 (11%) of 36 (P = 0.06). Mutations in TSC1 or TSC2 alone were also more common in responders, 9 (21%), than nonresponders, 2(6%), (P = 0.05). Furthermore, 5 (42%) of 12 subjects with PR had mutations in MTOR, TSC1, or TSC2 compared with 4 (11%) of 36 nonresponders (P = 0.03). Eight additional non-mTOR pathway genes were found to be mutated in at least 4 of 79 tumors (5%); none were associated positively with response., Conclusions: In this cohort of mRCC patients, mutations in MTOR, TSC1, or TSC2 were more common in patients who experienced clinical benefit from rapalogs than in those who progressed. However, a substantial fraction of responders (24 of 43, 56%) had no mTOR pathway mutation identified. Clin Cancer Res; 22(10); 2445-52. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Voss and Hsieh, p. 2320., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)