Search

Background: Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, has been approved as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Europe since 2016. We investigated the toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab as well as potential predictive biomarkers in the Dutch population., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the Dutch national registry of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced RCC. The main outcome parameters included toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and time to treatment failure (TTF). In addition, potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers for outcomes were evaluated., Results: Data on 264 patients were available, of whom 42% were International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) poor risk at start of nivolumab, 16% had ≥ 3 lines of previous therapy, 7% had non-clear-cell RCC, 11% had brain metastases, and 20% were previously treated with everolimus. Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 15% of patients. The median OS was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 13.7-23.7 months). Progression occurred in 170 (64.4%) of 264 patients, with a 6-and 12-months TTP of 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively. The ORR was 18.6% (49 of 264; 95% confidence interval, 14%-23%). Elevated baseline lymphocytes were associated with improved PFS (P = .038) and elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase with poor OS, PFS, and TTF (P = .000). On-treatment increase in eosinophils by week 8 predicted improved OS (P = .003), PFS (P = .000), and TTF (P = .014), whereas a decrease of neutrophils was associated with significantly better TTF (P = .023)., Conclusions: The toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab for metastatic RCC after previous lines of therapy are comparable with the results in the pivotal phase III trial and other real-world data. On-treatment increase in eosinophil count is a potential biomarker for efficacy and warrants further investigation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: For decades, small renal cancers are treated by radical nephrectomy (RN). Current guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy (PN) to preserve renal function and minimize cardiovascular comorbidity. As adherence to guidelines is largely unknown and international comparison to evaluate quality of health care is lacking, an pre-specified guideline evaluation of quality indicators concerning management of cT1 renal cancers was performed., Methods: We performed a cohort study including patients with cT1 renal cancer between 2010 and 2014, identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends and variation in treatment were described. Factors associated with PN in cT1a and laparoscopic RN in cT1b were evaluated with logistic regression analyses., Results: An increase in nephron-sparing treatment strategies (NSS) of cT1a patients (N total = 2436) was observed; in 2014, 67 % underwent NSS (62 % PN and 5 % thermal ablation). Age, a non-central tumor localization and being treated in a high-volume hospital were associated with PN. Although NSS were applied more frequently over time, the majority (70 %) of cT1b patients (N total = 2205) underwent RN in 2014, mainly performed laparoscopically. Increasing tumor size, tumor localization in the right kidney and being treated in a university hospital were associated with a lower probability of a laparoscopic RN versus open. Treatment in a high-volume hospital was associated with a higher probability of laparoscopic RN., Conclusions: Dutch patients with cT1 renal cancer are predominantly treated according to current guidelines. Data of this pre-specified quality indicator analysis of a urological national guideline may serve as a model for international comparison of treatment of cT1 renal cancers.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) can be applied as immunotherapeutic intervention to treat malignant diseases. Here, we describe a patient with progressive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who was treated with T cell depleted non-myeloablative alloSCT and DLI resulting in disease regression accompanied by extensive graft versus host disease (GVHD). We characterized the specificity of this immune response, and detected a dominant T cell population recognizing a novel minor histocompatibility antigen (MiHA) designated LB-FUCA2-1V. T cells specific for LB-FUCA2-1V were shown to recognize RCC cell lines, supporting a dominant role in the graft versus tumor (GVT) reaction. However, coinciding with the gradual disappearance of chronic GVHD, the anti-tumor effect declined and 3 years after alloSCT the metastases became progressive again. To re-initiate the GVT reaction, escalating doses of DLI were given, but no immune response could be induced and the patient died of progressive disease 8.5 years after alloSCT. Gene expression studies illustrated that only a minimal number of genes shared expression between RCC and professional antigen presenting cells but were not expressed by non-malignant healthy tissues, indicating that in patients suffering from RCC, GVT reactivity after alloSCT may be unavoidably linked to GVHD.

The use of targeted agents to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has significantly extended progression-free and overall survival but raises issues relating to the long-term delivery of care and the sustained monitoring of efficacy and toxicities, certain of which have not previously been experienced. In this paper, an expert group of medical oncologists, urologists and oncology nurses and pharmacists review and make informal recommendations on the multidisciplinary management of mRCC in the light of progress made and problems that have arisen. Decentralisation of care, with a shift in emphasis from large to small hospitals and possibly to the community, may offer advantages of cost and convenience. However, the major responsibility for care should continue to lie with clinicians (either medical oncologists or urologists) with extensive experience in mRCC, assisted by specialist nurses, and working in centres with facilities adequate to monitor efficacy and manage toxicities. That said, the extended survival of patients emphasises the importance of compliance and the long-term prevention, detection and management of side effects. Much of this will take place in the community. There is therefore a need for multidisciplinary working to extend beyond specialist centres to include general practitioners, community nurses and pharmacists. Although this paper focuses on mRCC, many of the considerations discussed are also relevant to the management of more common solid tumours in the era of targeted therapy., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may require special treatment considerations, particularly when comorbidities are present. An understanding of the efficacy and safety of targeted agents in elderly patients with mRCC is essential to provide individualized therapy., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in elderly patients (those ≥ 65 and ≥ 70 yr of age) enrolled in RECORD-1., Design, Setting, and Participants: The multicenter randomized RECORD-1 phase 3 trial (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00410124; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) enrolled patients with mRCC who progressed during or within 6 mo of stopping sunitinib and/or sorafenib treatment (n=416)., Intervention: Everolimus 10mg once daily (n=277) or placebo (n=139) plus best supportive care. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity., Measurements: Median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and time to deterioration in Karnofsky performance status (TTD-KPS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was used to compare treatment arms. Other outcomes evaluated included reduction in tumor burden, overall response rate (ORR), and safety., Results and Limitations: In RECORD-1, 36.8% of patients were ≥ 65 yr and 17.5% were ≥ 70 yr of age. PFS, OS, TTD-KPS, reduction in tumor burden, and ORR were similar in the elderly and the overall RECORD-1 population. Everolimus was generally well tolerated in elderly patients, and most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The toxicity profile of everolimus was generally similar in older patients and the overall population; however, peripheral edema, cough, rash, and diarrhea were reported more frequently in the elderly regardless of treatment. The retrospective nature of the analyses was the major limitation., Conclusions: Everolimus is effective and tolerable in elderly patients with mRCC. When selecting targeted therapies in these patients, the specific toxicity profile of each agent and any patient comorbidities should be considered., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Cediranib is a highly potent vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling inhibitor with activity against VEGF receptors 1, 2 and 3. This Phase II, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy of cediranib with placebo in patients with metastatic or recurrent clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had not previously received a VEGF signalling inhibitor., Methods: Patients were randomised (3:1) to cediranib 45 mg/day or placebo. The primary objective was comparison of change from baseline in tumour size after 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary objectives included response rate and duration, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety and tolerability. Patients in the placebo group could cross over to open-label cediranib at 12 weeks or earlier if their disease had progressed. This study has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00423332., Findings: Patients (n=71) were randomised to receive cediranib (n=53) or placebo (n=18). The primary study outcome revealed that, after 12weeks of therapy, there was a significant difference in mean percentage change from baseline in tumour size between the cediranib (-20%) and placebo (+20%) arms (p<0.0001). Eighteen patients (34%) on cediranib achieved a partial response and 25 (47%) experienced stable disease. Cediranib treatment prolonged PFS significantly compared with placebo (hazard ratio (HR)=0.45, 90%confidence interval: 0.26-0.76, p=0.017; median PFS 12.1 versus 2.8 months). The most common adverse events in patients receiving cediranib were diarrhoea (74%), hypertension (64%), fatigue (58%) and dysphonia (58%)., Interpretation: Cediranib monotherapy demonstrated significant evidence of antitumour activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies of cediranib 45 mg., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression, are frequently aberrantly expressed in human cancers. Next-generation deep sequencing technology enables genome-wide expression profiling of known miRNAs and discovery of novel miRNAs at unprecedented quantitative and qualitative accuracy. Deep sequencing was performed on 11 fresh frozen clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and adjacent non-tumoral renal cortex (NRC) pairs, 11 additional frozen ccRCC tissues, and 2 ccRCC cell lines (n = 35). The 22 ccRCCs patients belonged to 3 prognostic sub-groups, i.e. those without disease recurrence, with recurrence and with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Thirty-two consecutive samples (16 ccRCC/NRC pairs) were used for stem-loop PCR validation. Novel miRNAs were predicted using 2 distinct bioinformatic pipelines. In total, 463 known miRNAs (expression frequency 1-150,000/million) were identified. We found that 100 miRNA were significantly differentially expressed between ccRCC and NRC. Differential expression of 5 miRNAs was confirmed by stem-loop PCR in the 32 ccRCC/NRC samples. With respect to RCC subgroups, 5 miRNAs discriminated between non-recurrent versus recurrent and metastatic disease, whereas 12 uniquely distinguished non-recurrent versus metastatic disease. Blocking overexpressed miR-210 or miR-27a in cell line SKCR-7 by transfecting specific antagomirs did not result in significant changes in proliferation or apoptosis. Twenty-three previously unknown miRNAs were predicted in silico. Quantitative genome-wide miRNA profiling accurately separated ccRCC from (benign) NRC. Individual differentially expressed miRNAs may potentially serve as diagnostic or prognostic markers or future therapeutic targets in ccRCC. The biological relevance of candidate novel miRNAs is unknown at present.

The Dutch guideline 'Renal Cell Carcinoma' has been revised on the basis of new literature. With the assistance of the Netherlands Cancer Registry an assessment was made of the current care for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Renal cell carcinoma is a type of cancer for which knowledge of the genetic basis of the different histological subtypes has led to the development of new targeted therapies. By the introduction of these systemic therapies, histological subtyping of renal cell carcinoma has become more important. Although in the previous guideline cytological or histological diagnosis was recommended to determine the nature of the tumourous process in the kidney, in the revision it is advised to use histological needle biopsies to determine the histological subtype and therefore to provide evidence for the choice of systemic therapy. With modern diagnostic techniques, more patients with smaller tumours are identified. For these tumours, less invasive therapies are recommended in order to preserve as much renal tissue as possible.

Each year, more than 1500 new cases of renal cell carcinoma are diagnosed in the Netherlands, and approximately 850 patients die due to this disease. The guideline 'Renal cell carcinoma' contains clinical practice recommendations on the diagnosis (imaging, pathological assessment, histopathological classification) and treatment (surgery, chemo-, immuno-, and radiotherapy) of renal cell carcinoma. For diagnostic imaging, chest and abdominal CT is recommended. Scintigraphy is not recommended. The term 'Grawitz tumour' is obsolete and should be replaced by 'renal cell carcinoma' with histological subtype specification according to the 2004 WHO classification. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is as effective as open surgery for localised tumours (T1 and T2) and possibly also for T3 tumours. The laparoscopic approach is associated with less morbidity due to the less invasive nature of this technique. This operation requires experience. In partial nephrectomy, a small margin of healthy tissue is sufficient. Frozen section examination of the resection edges does not appear to be required. In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are eligible for immunotherapy, removal of the tumour prolongs survival. Metastasectomy prolongs survival in patients with a solitary metastasis. Most currently available cytotoxic agents are ineffective against renal cell carcinoma. Interferon-alpha may have a role in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma and favourable prognostic factors, given the survival advantage demonstrated with this agent in clinical trials. The guideline is available in English at www.oncoline.nl.

Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma is evolving rapidly due to the advent of novel targeted therapies. Improved knowledge of the underlying pathogenesis has led to the development of drugs that modulate the dominant signal transduction pathways for this disease, which results in inhibition of angiogenesis. Recent evidence indicates that the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib prolongs progression-free survival compared with interferon-alpha, especially in patients with intermediate risk. Immunotherapy with interferon-alpha or high-dose interleukin-2 should still be considered for low-risk patients, particularly those with clear-cell tumours and metastases of the lung only. In patients who fail treatment with interferon-alpha, sorafenib has been shown to improve progression-free survival. High-risk patients may benefit from treatment with temsirolimus, which inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase activity and has shown to improve overall survival. These angiogenesis inhibitors did not receive mention in the recently published guideline 'Renal cell carcinoma'.

Sunitinib and sorafenib are both indicated for the treatment of advanced kidney carcinoma of the 'clear cell' type after failure of, or resistance to, other treatments. Both drugs inhibit the tyrosine-kinase activity of a number of growth factor receptors; sorafenib has an additional inhibitory effect on serine/threonine-kinase activity. This mechanism decreases signal transduction and results in an inhibition of tumour cell growth and angiogenesis. The adverse effects of the two drugs are different: sunitinib causes mainly fatigue and gastrointestinal discomfort, whereas sorafenib's most frequent adverse effects are diarrhoea, rash, the palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, and hypertension.

In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma response rates of 7-26% have been achieved with immunotherapy. A high response rate of 48% in 35 patients has been reported for treatment with the combination of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (Atzpodien et al (1993a) Eur J Cancer29A: S6-8). We conducted a multicentre phase II study to confirm these results. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients were treated as outpatients with an 8-week treatment cycle. Recombinant human IL-2 20 MU m(-2) was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) three times a week (t.i.w) in weeks 1 and 4 and 5 MU m(-2) t.i.w. in weeks 2 and 3. Recombinant human IFN-alpha 2a 6 MU m(-2) was administered s.c. once in weeks 1 and 4 and t.i.w. in weeks 2 and 3, and 9 MU m(-2) t.i.w. in weeks 5-8. 5-FU (750 mg m(-2)) was given as a bolus injection intravenous once a week in weeks 5-8. The treatment cycle was repeated once in case of response or minor response. Fifty-two patients entered the study. All had undergone a nephrectomy and had progressive metastatic disease. The median WHO-performance status was 1, the median number of metastatic sites was 2 (range 1-5) and the median time between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and the start of treatment was 12.9 months (range 1-153). Among the 51 patients, including four patients with early progressive disease, who were evaluable for response, the response rate was 11.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-20.7%), with no complete responses. Median duration of response was 8.3 (range 3.8-22.4+) months. Median survival was 16.5 (range 1.8-30.5+) months. Grade 3/4 toxicity (WHO) occurred in 29/52 (55.8%) of the patients in cycle 1 and in 6/16 (37.5%) of the patients in cycle 2. It consisted mainly of anorexia, fatigue, nausea, fever and leucocytopenia. We cannot confirm the high response rate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with the combination of IFN-alpha, IL-2 and 5-FU, as described by Atzpodien et al.

Background: Most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have undergone unilateral- and some bilateral nephrectomy. Because interleukin-2 (IL-2) is thought to be mainly cleared via the kidneys, we investigated whether IL-2 treatment is safe in anephric patients., Patients and Methods: The pharmacokinetics of i.v. bolus, i.v. infusion and s.c. recombinant IL-2 were investigated in two anephric patients with progressive metastatic RCC., Results: Following i.v. bolus administration of IL-2, plasma half-lives of 126 and 84 minutes respectively, and plasma clearances of 151 ml/min and 273 ml/min respectively, were measured in the two patients. In one patient plasma clearance of IL-2 was enhanced to 760 ml/min after continuous i.v. infusion of 4 and 6 million IU IL-2/24 hours, as compared to a clearance of 310 ml/min at a dose of 2 million IU IL-2/24 hours. In the other patient, during IL-2 infusion of 2, 4 or 6 x 10(6) IU/24 hours, each over the course of 3 days, plasma clearance of IL-2 increased from 311 to 761, and to 687 ml/min, respectively. IL-2 could not be detected in haemo- or peritoneal dialysates., Conclusions: IL-2 plasma half-life is only moderately prolonged in anephric patients as compared to patients with normal renal function. Based on our findings, intravenous or subcutaneous treatment of anephric patients with IL-2 seems feasible.

From peripheral blood mononuclear cells of a patient with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we isolated several T-cell clones, which efficiently lyse the autologous RCC cell line (LE-8915-RCC), but not the autologous Epstein Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell line. Most of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clones recognize HLA-A1-positive allogeneic RCC cell lines, indicating that HLA-A1 is the restricting element for these T cells. One CTL clone exclusively recognizes the autologous tumor cells. The HLA-A1-restricted CTL clones can be divided further into two subsets of T-cell clones, one blocked by an HLA-A1-specific monoclonal antibody, the other not. The reactivity of HLA-A1-restricted T-cell clone 6/135 was studied in greater detail. This T-cell clone also recognizes a number of melanoma cell lines, indicating that expression of the antigen seen by this CTL clone is not restricted to RCC. Strikingly, the antigen is not exclusively expressed by tumor cell lines, because primary cultures of proximal tubulus epithelium cells, adult mesangial cells, and normal breast epithelium cells are also lysed. These results corroborate the notion that renal carcinoma cells are immunogenic by virtue of a broadly distributed antigenic structure that may serve as a target for cytotoxic T cells and may be a potential candidate for tumor vaccine development.

Melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) are generally considered to be relatively immunogenic tumor types in humans. In the case of melanoma, many major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) have been isolated from either tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) or autologous peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). In contrast, such CTL have only incidentally been described in the case of RCC. It has often been reported that TIL lines isolated from RCC display non-MHC-restricted and non-specific activity. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of tumor-specific CTL from PBL of one RCC patient and from TIL of another RCC patient. CTL clones 263/17 and 263/45, isolated from the PBL of patient LE-9211, were restricted by HLA-B7. CTL clone 5E, isolated from the TIL of patient LE-8915, was restricted by HLA-B37. The autologous RCC cell lines were efficiently lysed by the CTL clones, whereas normal epithelial cells of the proximal tubuli matched for the restriction element and K562 were not. From a panel of allogeneic RCC cell lines, CTL 5E recognized MZ-1940-RCC. Reactivity to allogeneic RCC sharing HLA-B7 was also observed with CTL 263/17 and 263/45, both of which could lyse the HLA-B7-positive cell line MZ-1851-RCC. Our data provide evidence that common tumor antigens are recognized by CTL on RCC.

Recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2), administered to cancer patients by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion (3 x 10(6) U/m2/d), was found to induce the in vivo production of colony-stimulating factors (CSF). Plasma obtained from patients during IL-2 treatment stimulated in vitro colony formation of normal human bone marrow cells, depleted of mononuclear phagocytes and T lymphocytes. This colony-stimulating activity (CSA) was identified as IL-5, granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), and macrophage CSF (M-CSF), by the ability of specific antibodies against these factors to neutralize their effects. The presence of IL-2-induced GM-CSF and M-CSF was also demonstrated by specific radioimmunoassays. During IL-2 treatment, plasma also contained detectable levels of IL-6, which was measured in a bioassay. Using a cDNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primer sets for the various CSF, we showed that IL-2 treatment induced the expression of mRNA for M-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5, but not for granulocyte CSF (G-CSF) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting differential expression of CSF in vivo in response to IL-2. Furthermore, no negative regulators of hematopoiesis, such as interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), were found in plasma. These data illustrate that in vivo administration of high-dose IL-2 may result in a stimulatory effect on hematopoiesis. The induction of detectable levels of IL-5 and GM-CSF in the circulation may explain the eosinophilia and neutrophilia observed in these patients.

Immunotherapy with recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells has been applied to patients with metastatic cancers for its antitumour activity. In the present study we investigated the effects of in vivo administration of IL-2 (3 x 10(6) U/m2/d, continuously i.v.) on haematopoiesis. Six patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma, treated with IL-2 and LAK cells, were monitored for the numbers of white blood cells and circulating haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC). During IL-2 treatment lymphopenia developed, followed by lymphocytosis after discontinuation of IL-2 infusions. IL-2 administration also resulted in neutrophilia and eosinophilia. Absolute numbers of circulating HPC declined markedly during IL-2 treatment. However, after completing IL-2 infusions, the numbers of circulating erythroid (BFU-E), myeloid (CFU-GM) and multipotential progenitor cells (CFU-GEMM) strongly increased, reaching a maximum after 5 d (day 10 from the start of IL-2 treatment). This increase did not result from repeated leucaphereses, since patients treated with IL-2 alone showed a similar response. In comparison with pretreatment levels the pool of circulating HPC expanded about 20-fold. This study illustrates that IL-2 treatment has a biphasic effect on the frequency of circulating BFU-E, CFU-GM and CFU-GEMM, causing a decrease during IL-2 infusion, followed by an increase after IL-2 administration. The total number of progenitor cells harvested by four consecutive leucaphereses is in the range that is commonly used for peripheral blood stem cell autografting.