Search

Background: Immune-combinations have recently become the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study evaluated the applicability of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model in predicting outcomes for patients treated with either immune-oncologic drug doublet (IO-IO) or immune-oncologic drug tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations (IO-TKI). A secondary objective to compare the effectiveness of IO-IO versus IO-TKI within the IMDC risk groups over a short follow-up period., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure 2 (TTF2), and overall survival (OS) were compared between IMDC risk categories. Model fit was assessed using the c-index. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust and compare outcomes between IO-IO and IO-TKI, except for IMDC favorable risk patients due to the small number of IO-IO cases., Results: The IMDC risk model demonstrated a c-index of 0.684 (OS) for entire cohort, 0.600 (PFS), 0.596 (TTF2), and 0.624 (OS) for IO-IO, and 0.667 (PFS), 0.702 (TTF2), and 0.751 (OS) for IO-TKI. In the IMDC intermediate and poor risk groups after IPTW adjustment, PFS (HR 0.72), TTF2 (HR 0.67), and OS (HR 0.74) did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI. Specifically, in the IMDC intermediate risk group, PFS (HR 0.79), TTF2 (HR 0.69), and OS (HR 0.65) were longer in IO-TKI, though the differences were not statistically significant. In the IMDC poor risk group, PFS (HR 0.76), TTF2 (HR 0.77), and OS (HR 1.03) were comparable., Conclusions: The impact of IMDC risk model on survival was modest in IO-IO, while remained statistically substantial in IO-TKI. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI during the short follow-up period., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Ethics Committee of Hokkaido University approved this study (Approval no, 023–0105). Informed consent was waved by using the opt-out method for this retrospective study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: Sei Naito received honoraria from Pfizer Japan Inc., Merk biopharma Japan Inc., Bristol Meier’s squibb Japan Inc., Ono Pharma, MSD Japan, and Eisai Co. as their sponsored speaker. Takahiro Osawa received honoraria from MSD Japan. Nobuo Shinohara received honoraria from Pfizer, Ono, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Novartis, Eisai, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Astellas, as their sponsored speaker and research funds from Ono and Takeda. Tomonori Habuchi received honoraria from Astellas, Ono, Janssen, as their sponsored speaker, and research funds from Sysmex and Mochida. Norihiko Tsuchiya received honoraria from Pfizer Japan Inc. Janssen, Novartis, Ono, Bayer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharm, Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, and Astelas Pharma., as their sponsored speaker and research funds from Pfizer Japan Inc. and Eisai outside the submitted work. The other authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) is the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While approximately 40% of patients treated with NIVO + IPI achieve a durable response, 20% develop primary resistance with severe consequences. Therefore, there is a clinical need for criteria to select patients suitable for NIVO + IPI therapy to optimize its therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, our aim was to evaluate the association between candidate biomarkers measured before treatment initiation and survival., Methods: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study of 183 patients with mRCC treated with systematic therapies between August 2015 and July 2023. Of these, 112 received NIVO + IPI as first-line therapy: mean age, 68 years; men, 83.0% (n = 93), and clear cell histology, 80.4% (n = 90). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate associations between biomarkers and survival., Results: On univariate analysis, high C-reactive protein and systemic index, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and a low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were associated with shorter overall survival (OS). On multivariable analysis, a LMR ≤ 3 was retained as an independent factor associated to shorter OS with the highest accuracy (C-index, 0.656; hazard ratio, 7.042; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-25.0; p = 0.002)., Conclusion: A low LMR may identify patients who would be candidate for NIVO + IPI therapy for mRCC., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background/aim: To evaluate the difference in the clinical efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab between patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), which includes renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and ureteral UC, and those with metastatic lower tract urothelial carcinoma (LTUC)., Patients and Methods: A total of 752 patients who received pembrolizumab for the treatment of chemoresistant UC were retrospectively analyzed. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) in patients with renal pelvic UC, ureteral UC, and LTUC., Results: The median follow-up period was 42.5 [interquartile range (IQR)=35.1-47.4] months. The primary tumor site was in the upper tract in 362 (48.1%) patients [renal pelvis, n=219 (60.5%); ureter, n=143 (39.5%)] and in the lower tract in 390 (51.9%) patients. The estimated glomerular filtration rate before pembrolizumab treatment in the UTUC group was significantly lower than that in the LTUC group (p<0.001). The median PFS in the UTUC and LTUC groups was 3.4 months, respectively (p=0.271). The median OS in the UTUC and LTUC groups was 10.1 months and 11.7 months, respectively (p=0.195). In an analysis of UTUC divided into renal pelvic UC, ureteral UC, and LTUC, patients with renal pelvic UC had a significantly poorer prognosis in comparison to the other two groups (p=0.041). The incidence of any-grade AEs (51.7% vs. 47.9%, p=0.343) and grade ≥3 AEs (12.2% vs. 12.8%, p=0.826) in the two groups was not statistically significantly different., Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the UTUC and LTUC groups with regard to the oncological outcomes and safety of pembrolizumab. Patients with renal pelvic UC had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with other ureteral UCs and LTUCs., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) in Japanese population., Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we compared the time to treatment failure (TTF) for molecular-targeted agents as first-line therapy, or nivolumab therapy as sequential therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC using the data of Japanese metastatic RCC patients registered in the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database., Results: In total, 511 cases of ccRCC and 77 cases of nccRCC were treated with pharmacotherapy. After excluding the patients who received cytokine therapy, chemotherapy, or others, there were 391 ccRCC patients and 60 nccRCC patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 7 ccRCC patients and 7 nccRCC patients who were treated with mammalian-target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs). In addition, 132 ccRCC patients and 16 nccRCC patients received nivolumab. There was no significant difference in IMDC risk classification before first-line therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC groups, or in each subgroup within the nccRCC group. TTF for TKIs (161 days, 95% CI: 75-212 days) and mTORIs (21 days, 95% CI: 9-31 days) didn't differ significantly between nccRCC and ccRCC groups (205 days, 95% CI: 174-243 days and 33 days, 95% CI: 8-113 days, respectively). TTF for TKIs was significantly longer than that for mTORIs in nccRCC group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in TTF between the different TKIs in nccRCC group. In addition, no significant difference in TTF for nivolumab was seen between ccRCC and nccRCC groups., Conclusions: The results showed that the efficacy of molecular-targeted agents as first-line therapy was similar oncological outcomes between metastatic nccRCC and ccRCC in Japanese patients. TKIs may be more effective than mTORIs in metastatic nccRCC patients. Nivolumab administration might also be as effective in nccRCC patients as in ccRCC patients in Japanese population., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The Modified International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Dataset Consortium model (mIMDC) is a preoperative prognostic model for pT3cN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to validate the mIMDC and to construct a new model in a localized and locally advanced RCC (LLRCC)., Methods: A database was established (the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database) consisting of 79 patients who were clinically diagnosed with LLRCC (cT3b/c/4NanyM0) and underwent radical nephrectomy from December 2007 to May 2018. Using univariable and multivariable analyses, we retrospectively analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in this database, constructed a new prognostic model according to these results, and estimated the model fit using c-index on the new and mIMDC models., Results: Independent poorer prognostic factors for both DFS and OS include the following: ≥ 1 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 2.0 mg/dL C-reactive protein, and > upper normal limit of white blood cell count. The median DFS in the favorable (no factor), intermediate (one factor), and poor-risk group (two or three factors) was 76.1, 14.3, and 4.0 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3-year OS in the favorable, intermediate, and poor-risk group were 92%, 44%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The c-indices of the new and mIMDC models were 0.67 and 0.60 for DFS (P = 0.060) and 0.74 and 0.63 for OS (P = 0.012), respectively., Conclusion: The new preoperative prognostic model in LLRCC can be used in patient care and clinical trials., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Several clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cases harbour fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) gene copy number (CN) gains. In this study, we investigated the functional contribution of FGFR4 CN amplification in ccRCC., Methods: The correlation between FGFR4 CN determined via real-time PCR and protein expression evaluated using western blotting and immunohistochemistry was assessed in ccRCC cell lines (A498, A704, and 769-P), a papillary RCC cell line (ACHN), and clinical ccRCC specimens. The effect of FGFR4 inhibition on ccRCC cell proliferation and survival was assessed via either RNA interference or using the selective FGFR4 inhibitor BLU9931, followed by MTS assays, western blotting, and flow cytometry. To investigate whether FGFR4 is a potential therapeutic target, a xenograft mouse model was administered BLU9931., Results: 60% of ccRCC surgical specimens harboured an FGFR4 CN amplification. FGFR4 CN was positively correlated with its protein expression. All ccRCC cell lines harboured FGFR4 CN amplifications, whereas ACHN did not. FGFR4 silencing or inhibition attenuated intracellular signal transduction pathways, resulting in apoptosis and suppressed proliferation in ccRCC cell lines. BLU9931 suppressed tumours at a tolerable dose in the mouse model., Conclusion: FGFR4 contributes to ccRCC cell proliferation and survival following FGFR4 amplification, making it a potential therapeutic target for ccRCC., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

It remains unknown whether the early response to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) management in malignancies links to long-term survival. The objective of this study was to investigate the survival rates and predictive factors of early response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) managed by VEGFR-TKIs. From Jan. 2008 to Oct. 2018, 496 patients were treated with VEGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at the eight Japanese hospitals (Michinoku RCC). Early cessation was defined as VEGFR-TKIs being given up within 3 months after their initiation. The number of patients in early cessation VEGFR-TKIs (Cohort I) was 173 (34.9%), and in long-term use (Cohort II) was 323 (65.1%). The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were better in Cohort II. IMDC Poor-risk was at risk of early cessation of a first-line VEGFR-TKI. Axitinib was the most preferred drug for long-term treatment. On closer examination, both Cohort I and II were divided into two groups, the patients ceased VEGFR-TKI due to adverse events (Group A [67 from Cohort I] and Group C [51 from Cohort II]) and disease progression (Group B [106 from Cohort I] and Group D [272 from Cohort II]). Despite that the cessation was adverse events, CSS and OS in Group A were worse than both Group C and D. Axitinib was administered with the safer profile. IMDC Poor risk was the risk factor for the early disease progression. Managing early adverse events may contribute to a better prognosis in mRCC patients treated VEGFR-TKIs., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

(1) Background: Extracellular signal-regulating kinase 5 (ERK5) has been implicated in many cellular functions, including survival, proliferation, and vascularization. Our objectives were to examine the expression and effect of ERK5 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). (2) Methods: The expressions of ERK5 and its regulating micro-RNA miR-143 were investigated using immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in surgical specimens of ccRCC patients. With invitro and in vivo studies, we used pharmacologic ERK5 inhibitor XMD8-92, RNA interference, pre-miR-143 transduction, Western blotting, MTS assay, apoptosis assay, and subcutaneous xenograft model. (3) Results: A strong ERK5 expression in surgical specimen was associated with high-grade ( p = 0.01), high-recurrence free rate ( p = 0.02), and high cancer-specific survival ( p = 0.03). Expression levels of ERK5 and miR-143 expression level were correlated ( p = 0.049). Pre-miR-143 transduction into ccRCC cell A498 suppressed ERK5 expression. ERK5 inhibition enhanced cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 expression and decreased anti-apoptotic molecules BCL2, resulting in decreased cell proliferation and survival both in ccRCC and endothelial cells. In the xenograft model, ERK5 inhibitor XMD8-92 suppressed tumor growth. (4) Conclusions: ERK5 is regulated by miR-143, and ERK5 inhibition is a promising target for ccRCC treatment.

Accompanied by the development of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the concept of focal treatment, including surgical treatment, has been changing. Although immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy was essentially considered for synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, the CARMENA trial and SURTIME trial revealed the negative impact of immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy. Therefore, immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy is currently considered only for a limited number of patients. Besides, deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy seems to have efficacy for overall survival in prior retrospective studies. Two randomized controlled trials, the PROBE trial (NCT04510597) and the NORDIC-SUN trial (NCT03977571), are underway to elucidate deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. Metastasectomy is also considered in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients because previous studies demonstrated the overall survival benefit of metastasectomy. However, since all reports were retrospective studies, physicians could exclude the patients who were not expected to show the efficacy of metastasectomy. Therefore, an adequate patient selection for metastasectomy is important. A common factor predicting better overall survival was complete resection. Radiotherapies for metastatic lesions during systemic therapy showed approximately 90% local disease control rate at 1 year. However, no report has demonstrated that radiotherapy improves survival so far. Since surgical and focal treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients generally have minimal evidence, further investigations are needed., (© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Background: This retrospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients stratified by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk criteria., Methods: We reviewed the medical records in the Michinoku Database between 2008 and 2019. Patients who received upfront CN, systemic therapy without CN (no CN) and CN after drug therapy (deferred CN) were analyzed. To exclude selection bias due to patient characteristics, baseline clinical data were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Overall survival (OS) was compared between upfront CN and non-upfront CN (no CN plus deferred CN). Associations between time-varying covariates including systemic therapies and OS stratified by IMDC risk criteria were analyzed by IPTW-adjusted Cox regression method., Results: Of 259 patients who fulfilled the selection criteria, 107 were classified in upfront CN and 152 in non-upfront CN group. After IPTW-adjusted analysis, upfront CN showed survival benefit compared to non-upfront CN in patients with IMDC intermediate risk (median OS: 52.5 versus 31.3 months, p < 0.01) and in patients with IMDC poor risk (27.2 versus 11.4 months, p < 0.01). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis of time-varying covariates, upfront CN was independently associated with OS benefit in patients with IMDC intermediate risk (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.93, p = 0.03) and in patients with IMDC poor risk (0.26, 0.11-0.59, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Upfront CN may confer survival benefit in RCC patients with IMDC intermediate and poor risk., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the utility of the scoring system of the Registry for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (REMARCC) model on the overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN)., Methods: A total of 278 patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between January 2008 and November 2019 were identified. The c-index and net benefit between the REMARCC score were compared with the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score in patients with CN (CN group, n = 146). The effect of the REMARCC score on OS was compared between the CN group and patients without CN (non-CN group, n = 132) using Cox regression analysis under the propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to adjust for group imbalances., Results: Of the 146 patients with CN, the c-index of the REMARCC model (0.60) was higher than the IMDC model (0.54). The decision curve analysis showed the advantage of REMARCC model predicting OS compared with the IMDC model. OS was significantly longer in the REMARCC low-score (0-2) than that in the high-score (3-6) among the patients with CN. IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses showed that OS was significantly longer in the CN group than that in the non-CN group among the patients with REMARCC low-score but was not significantly different between the groups among the patients with REMARCC high-score., Conclusions: The REMARCC score may be active for selecting the CN candidate in patients treated with TKIs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We performed subgroup analyses of the AFTER I-O study to clarify the association of time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and discontinuation reason of prior immune-oncology (I-O) therapy, and molecular targeted therapy (TT) regimen with the outcomes of TT after I-O., Methods: The data of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with TT after nivolumab (NIVO) (CheckMate 025) or NIVO + ipilimumab (IPI) (CheckMate 214) were retrospectively analyzed. The objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of TT after I-O were analyzed by subgroups: TTF (<6 or ≥6 months) and discontinuation reason of prior I-O (progression or adverse events), and TT regimen (sunitinib or axitinib). We also analyzed PFS2 of prior I-O and OS from first-line therapy., Results: The ORR and median PFS of TT after NIVO and NIVO+IPI among the subgroups was 17-36% and 20-44%, and 7.1-11.6 months and 16.3-not reached (NR), respectively. The median OS of TT after NIVO was longer in patients with longer TTF of NIVO and treated with axitinib. Conversely, median OS of TT after NIVO+IPI was similar among subgroups. The median PFS2 of NIVO and NIVO+IPI was 36.7 and 32.0 months, respectively. The median OS from first-line therapy was 70.5 months for patients treated with NIVO and NR with NIVO+IPI. The safety profile of each TT after each I-O was similar to previous reports., Conclusions: The efficacy of TT after NIVO or NIVO+IPI was favorable regardless of the TTF and discontinuation reason of prior I-O, and TT regimen., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: The aims of this study were to investigate prognosis and validate prognostic models [Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Data Consortium (IMDC), and Japanese metastatic renal cancer (JMRC) models] in the targeted therapy era in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 692 patients who were diagnosed with mRCC from January 2008 to August 2018 in the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database. Nivolumab as sequential therapy was widely used. Other immune checkpoint inhibitors were excluded from this study., Results: The median overall survival (95% confident interval) in all, MSKCC favorable, intermediate, and poor risk patients was 41.0 months (33.9-46.8), not reached (63.5 to not estimable), 46.8 months (37.1-52.9), and 10.4 months (8.9-14.4), respectively. The median overall survival (95% confident interval) in IMDC favorable, intermediate, and poor risk patients was not reached (61.6 to not estimable), 47.4 months (41.4-56.5), and 11.5 (9.9-16.3), respectively. The c-index of the MSKCC, IMDC, and JMRC models calculated at mRCC diagnosis was 0.680, 0.689, and 0.700, respectively. No statistical differences were found in the c-index among the models., Conclusion: While the real-world overall survival in Japanese patients with mRCC in the targeted therapy era improved compared to that previously reported in the cytokine era, there was no clear difference in the survival of poor risk patients between these eras. There were no differences in the superiority among the models., (© 2021. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Although combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (immuno-oncology [IO]) therapy is the first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it mostly causes resistance and tumor regrowth. Therefore, an optimal second-line therapy is necessary. Such therapy typically comprises vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of two TKIs-axitinib and sunitinib-in mRCC patients. From January 2008 to October 2018, we registered 703 mRCC patients from 8 Japanese institutes. Of these, 408 patients received axitinib or sunitinib as the first-line treatment. Thereafter, efficacy and survival rate were compared between the axitinib and sunitinib groups. To reduce the effects of selection bias and potential confounders, propensity score matching analysis was performed. Axitinib and sunitinib were administered in 274 and 134 patients, respectively. More than 25% of the patients received nivolumab sequence therapy. To calculate the propensity scores for each patient, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis. The objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the axitinib group than in the sunitinib group. Furthermore, the OS was better in the nivolumab-treated patients in the axitinib group. Axitinib showed higher efficacy and afforded greater survival benefits than did sunitinib when administered as first-line therapy in mRCC patients. Thus, from among VEGFR-TKIs, axitinib might be a possible option for application in the middle of IO drug-based treatment sequences., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Guidelines for treatment of mRCC recommend nivolumab monotherapy (NIVO) for treated patients, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy (NIVO+IPI) for untreated IMDC intermediate and poor-risk mRCC patients. Although molecular-targeted therapies (TTs) such as VEGFR-TKIs and mTORi are recommended as subsequent therapy after NIVO or NIVO+IPI, their efficacy and safety remain unclear., Methods: Outcome of Japanese patients with mRCC who received TT after NIVO (CheckMate 025) or NIVO+IPI (CheckMate 214) were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR of the first TT after either NIVO or NIVO+IPI. Secondary endpoints included TFS, PFS, OS and safety of TTs., Results: Twenty six patients in CheckMate 025 and 19 patients in CheckMate 214 from 20 centers in Japan were analyzed. As the first subsequent TT after NIVO or NIVO+IPI, axitinib was the most frequently treated regimen for both CheckMate 025 (54%) and CheckMate 214 (47%) patients. The ORRs of TT after NIVO and NIVO+IPI were 27 and 32% (all risks), and median PFSs were 8.9 and 16.3 months, respectively. During the treatment of first TT after either NIVO or NIVO+IPI, 98% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, including grade 3-4 events in 51% of patients, and no treatment-related deaths occurred., Conclusions: TTs have favorable antitumor activity in patients with mRCC after ICI, possibly via changing the mechanism of action. Safety signals of TTs after ICI were similar to previous reports. These results indicate that sequential TTs after ICI may contribute for long survival benefit., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objectives: The utility of brain metastasis screening in asymptomatic metastatic renal cell carcinoma is controversial. Our study evaluated the utility of routine head computed tomography during systemic therapy., Methods: We retrospectively investigated 152 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who did not initially have brain metastasis at Yamagata University Hospital from January 2008 to July 2019. Patients who routinely received head computed tomography scan together with routine contrast-enhanced chest/abdominal/pelvic computed tomography scan every 2-4 months during systemic therapy ("Routine head computed tomography" group, n = 95) and patients without routine head computed tomography ("No routine head computed tomography" group, n = 57) were compared., Results: Brain metastasis occurred in 16 patients in the "Routine head computed tomography" group and six patients in the "No routine head computed tomography" group. There was no statistical difference in overall survival after metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosis between groups (53.4 vs 37.3 months, respectively, P = 0.357) and neurological symptom-free survival after metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosis (53.4 vs 36.6 months, P = 0.336). Although there was no statistical difference on incidence of unrecovered neurological symptom (25.0% vs 50.0%, P = 0.334), fewer patients in the "Routine head computed tomography" group required craniotomy (0% vs 66.7%, P = 0.002). In the "No routine head computed tomography" group, the neurological symptom resolved for all patients without craniotomy., Conclusions: Routine head computed tomography during systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is not significantly associated with improved brain metastasis prognosis. However, routine head computed tomography enables brain metastasis diagnosis in the asymptomatic phase, which can avoid craniotomy., (© 2021 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objectives: To compare overall survival between patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy and those not treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 278 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors between January 2008 and November 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: a cytoreductive nephrectomy group (immediate or deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy) and a group who received systemic tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies alone without cytoreductive nephrectomy (control group). Overall survival comparisons were made in all patients in the control versus the cytoreductive nephrectomy group, the control versus the immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy group, the control versus the deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy group, and the deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy versus the immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy group. Analyses were weighted using the propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting method to adjust for group imbalances., Results: The median (range) age of the patients was 65 (59-73) years. Of the 278 patients, 132 and 146 were in the control group and the cytoreductive nephrectomy (immediate, n = 107 and deferred, n = 39) group, respectively. A significant difference was noted between the control and cytoreductive nephrectomy groups in age, clinical stage, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk factors, and the number of metastatic sites. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed a significant difference in overall survival between the control and the cytoreductive nephrectomy groups and between the control and the immediate or deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy groups. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the immediate and the deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy groups., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy are more likely to have longer overall survival than those who receive tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy only., (© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Purpose: The present study compared the efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib as first-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mCC-RCC) with favorable or intermediate Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk., Patients and Methods: Treatment-naive patients with mCC-RCC were randomized to receive open-label sunitinib followed by sorafenib (SU/SO) or sorafenib followed by sunitinib (SO/SU). The primary endpoint was first-line progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were total PFS and overall survival (OS)., Results: Of the 124 patients enrolled at 39 institutions from February 2010 to July 2012, 120 were evaluated. The median first-line PFS duration was 8.7 and 7.0 months in the SU/SO and SO/SU groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-1.08). The total PFS and OS were not significantly different between the SU/SO and SO/SU groups (27.8 and 22.6 months; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.428-1.246; and 38.4 and 30.9 months; HR, 0.934; 95% CI, 0.588-1.485, respectively). The subgroup analysis revealed that the total PFS with SU/SO was superior to the total PFS with SO/SU in the patients with favorable MSKCC risk and those with < 5 metastatic sites). SO/SU was superior to SU/SO for patients without previous nephrectomy., Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were found in first-line PFS, total PFS, or OS between the 2 treatment arms (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01481870)., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Despite nivolumab being increasingly used for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), differing findings have been reported about its efficacy and safety in elderly patients. Thus, this study was aimed at evaluating nivolumab's efficacy and safety for treating mRCC in Japanese patients aged ≥ 75 years., Methods: From March 2013 to August 2019, 118 mRCC patients (89 men and 29 women) were treated with nivolumab. The objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between patients aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were also compared between the two age-groups., Results: The median follow-up duration after nivolumab initiation was 10 months. At the time of nivolumab initiation, 22 and 96 patients were aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years, respectively. Intergroup differences in patient characteristics except for age were not significant. Furthermore, intergroup differences in ORR (14 vs 23%; P = 0.367), PFS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37-1.51; P = 0.414), and median OS (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.68-2.46; P = 0.433) were not significant. The incidence of nivolumab discontinuation due to AEs was significantly higher in the ≥ 75 years group (27% vs 7%; P = 0.028), although the intergroup difference in the AE incidence rate was not significant (55% vs 43.8%; P = 0.535)., Conclusions: Nivolumab's effectiveness was comparable between the two patient groups, except for early AE-related discontinuation in the ≥ 75 year group.

Objectives: To create a new model for the prediction of overall survival in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: Medical records of 158 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosed at the Yamagata University Hospital from August 2007 to February 2018 were reviewed. Among them, 77 with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed using the univariate and multivariate analyses. A new prognostic model was constructed, followed by a bootstrap validation to estimate the model fitting. In addition, these prognostic factors were estimated in 67 metachronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients., Results: Five independent prognostic factors were identified in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: cT3/4, cN1, high corrected calcium, >3.6 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and central nerve system metastasis. The number (%) and overall survival (95% confidence interval) in the favorable- (0 or 1 risk factor), intermediate- (2 risk factors) and poor-risk (≥3 risk factors) groups were 29 (45.3%) and 67.4 (31.8-NA), 21 (32.8%) and 16.8 (10.0-27.6), and 14 (21.9%) and 9.1 (7.3-13.7) months, respectively. The C-index was 0.72. Patients in the favorable-risk group had better overall survival with nephrectomy than without nephrectomy (hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.91 with nephrectomy). In metachronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma, these prognostic factors showed no statistical differences in the overall survival., Conclusions: Prognostic factors are completely different between synchronous and metachronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The new model for synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma can predict a good candidate for cytoreductive nephrectomy., (© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which include neutrophilic MDSCs and monocytic MDSCs, exhibit high immunosuppressive activity. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored 80 kD protein (GPI-80) is selectively expressed on mature neutrophils in healthy individuals. Increased GPI-80 expression on monocytes and variations in GPI-80 expression on neutrophils indicate the appearance of MDSCs in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. However, it is still unclear whether GPI-80 expression on myeloid cells, neutrophilic MDSCs and monocytic MDSCs, is correlated with the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of myeloid cells expressing GPI-80 and the implication of GPI-80 expression in the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), in which primary renal cell carcinoma spreads from the kidney to other organs. The study included 20 patients with mRCC (a mean age of 66.0 years) and 16 healthy volunteers (a mean age of 47.8 years). To determine the heterogeneity of myeloid cells in peripheral blood samples, we performed the three-dimensional principal component analysis using the combination of GPI-80, CD16, and latency-associated peptide-1 (LAP), derived from the N-terminal region of transforming growth factor-β1 precursor. The results showed that myeloid cells in mRCC patients were widely distributed and clearly distinguishable from those in the healthy volunteers. The survival analysis revealed that GPI-80 expression on neutrophils and monocytes was correlated with poor prognostic outcomes of patients with mRCC. In conclusion, the expression of GPI-80 on myeloid cells, a useful index for the heterogeneity of MDSCs, serves as a potential prognostic biomarker for mRCC.

Data on the outcomes of third- or fourth-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of therapy beyond the second line. We retrospectively analysed data of mRCC patients who underwent systemic therapy at Yamagata University Hospital. The best objective response (BOR), response rate (RR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for each line of treatment. To investigate the correlation between overall survival (OS) and the number of treatment lines during a patient's lifetime, the median OS was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. In the first-, second-, and third-line therapies, approximately 20% of patients had long PFS of >15 months. In targeted treatments beyond the third line, only one treatment suppressed disease progression for >10 months. Among patients who died during the follow-up period, those treated with triple and quadruple lines had similar OS (42.5 months vs. 48.4 months, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with triple or more lines of therapy had better OS; however, quadruple or more lines of therapy was not an independent prognostic factor. We concluded that third-line systemic therapy could improve OS; however, fourth-line therapy could not.

Background: The objective was to explore the predictive markers of late recurrence (LR) > 5 years after curative nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively examined the data from 303 patients with localized clear cell RCC treated surgically at our institution from 1993 to 2011. Activation of the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1)/eIF4E axis at the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) was evaluated in the tumor specimens. Weak, intermediate, and strong immunohistochemistry staining grades were defined for 4EBP1, phosphorylated 4EBP1, and eIF4E. The effects of clinicopathologic factors and activation level grades on tumor recurrence were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression models. To validate the present findings, we investigated clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and protein/phosphoprotein data from corresponding patients from The Cancer Proteome Atlas., Results: Of the 303 patients, 31 and 16 patients developed early recurrence (ER, ≤ 5 years) and LR, respectively. The activation levels were comparable among the subcategories of pathologic TN stage, Fuhrman grade, and microvascular and capsular invasion. Pathologic stage ≥ T1b, Fuhrman grade 3/4, and an intermediate or strong activation level correlated significantly with overall recurrence and ER. Strong activation of the axis and pathologic stage ≥ T1b were identified as independent predictors of LR. Only 2 patients with weak activation experienced recurrence (1 each with ER and LR). Similar results were confirmed by the analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas and The Cancer Proteome Atlas data., Conclusion: The activation level of the axis in RCC tissues could independently predict for recurrence and differentially affect the timing of recurrence., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer. While cure remains exceptionally infrequent in RCC patients with systemic or recurrent disease, current targeted molecular strategies, including multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), notably changed the treatment paradigm of advanced renal cancer. Yet, complete and durable responses have been noted in only a few cases. Our studies reveal that sunitinib triggers two resistance-promoting signaling pathways in RCC cells, which emanate from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response: a PERK-driven ER stress response that induces expression of the pro-tumorigenic cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, and a TRAF2-mediated NF-κB survival program that protects tumor cells against cell death. PERK blockade completely prevents sunitinib-induced expression of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α, whereas NF-κB inhibition reinstates sensitivity of RCC cells to sunitinib both in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our findings indicate that ER stress response may contribute to sunitinib resistance in RCC patients.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common side effect of the mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus. Most cases of everolimus-induced ILD are mild and reversible. As per guidelines, even if Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1 or 2 everolimus-induced ILD occurs, either continuation of everolimus without dose reduction or readministration at a low dose is possible. However, the pathophysiology of everolimus-induced ILD is unknown. We present a case of everolimus-induced ILD with spontaneous remission during treatment in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. At autopsy, there was no evidence of remodeling or chronic inflammation in the lungs. Cryptogenic interstitual pneumonia and broncholitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia can be suspected as a pattern of mild everolimus-induced ILD. This case report provides evidence that everolimus-induced ILD is reversible fromthe pathological perspective.

Introduction: We evaluated whether nephron sparing surgery (NSS) combined with meticulous suturing of the cut stump under clamping with cooling is beneficial for oncological outcomes and also assessed the relationship between cold ischemia time and deterioration of renal function., Methods: One hundred and six patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were subjected to this procedure. Oncological outcomes and renal function according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the tubular excretion rate on renoscintigraphy before and at 12 months after surgery were evaluated., Results: Cancer recurrences were observed in 2 patients with past history of RCC; however, no patient died of cancer. Renal function was evaluated depending on 4 different ischemia times. All groups did not show a remarkable decrease of renal function in terms of eGFR. Renoscintigraphy revealed the deterioration of the affected kidney in patients with >60 min ischemia., Conclusion: The renoprotective procedure of NSS provided maximum preservation of renal function until 60 min of cold ischemia time., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin 1 (mTORC1) signaling pathway is aberrantly activated in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We previously demonstrated glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) positively regulated RCC proliferation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of GSK-3 in the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 pathway and regulation of the downstream substrates, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1), ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K), and ribosomal protein S6 (S6RP)., Methods: We used human RCC cell lines (ACHN, Caki1, and A498) and, as normal controls, human renal proximal tubular epithelial cell (HRPTEpC) and non-tumorous kidney tissues that were obtained surgically for treatment of RCC patients. Rapamycin-resistant ACHN (ACHN/RR) cells were generated with chronic exposure of ACHN to rapamycin ranging from 1nM finally to 1 μM. Cell viability, cell cycling and direct interaction between GSK-3β and 4EBP1 were evaluated with MTS assay, flowcytometry and in vitro kinase assay with recombinant GSK-3β and 4EBP1products, respectively. Protein expression and phosphorylation of molecules associated with the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 pathway were examined by immunoblotting. Effects of drug combination were determined as the combination index with CompuSyn software., Results: Overexpression and phosphorylation of 4EBP1 and S6RP together with GSK-3 activation were observed in RCC cell lines, but not in human normal kidney cells and tissues. Cell proliferation, p4EBP1 and pS6RP were strongly suppressed by GSK-3 inhibition. Rapamycin and LY294002 sufficiently decreased pS6RP, but only moderately p4EBP1. In vitro kinase assays showed that recombinant GSK-3β phosphorylated recombinant 4EBP1, and the effect was blocked by GSK-3 inhibitors. Different from rapamycin, AR- A014418 remarkably inhibited cell proliferation, and rapidly suppressed p4EBP1 and pS6RP in ACHN and ACHN/RR (in 30 min to 1 h). AR- A014418 and rapamycin combination showed additivity at lower concentrations, but antagonism at higher concentrations., Conclusions: GSK-3β could directly phosphorylate 4EBP1 and activate the mTORC1 downstream signaling cascades to enhance protein biosynthesis and cell proliferation in RCC cell lines independent of rapamycin sensitivity. The direct GSK-3β/4EBP1 pathway might be an important subcellular mechanism as an inherent equipment for RCC cells to acquire clinical chemoresistance to mTORC1 inhibitors.

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare neoplasm composed of mesenchymal-derived spindle cells. Although SFT occurs anywhere in the body, they most frequently affects the thoracic region. Here, we reported an extremely rare case of an extrathoracic SFT occurring primarily in the kidney. To our knowledge, little information has been described on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genetics of renal SFT.A 41-year old Japanese female came to our hospital for further examination of a left kidney mass detected incidentally with ultrasound. Extensive investigation of the tumor, including physical, laboratory, and image examinations led to a clinical diagnosis of renal cancer (cT1aN0M0), which were in most parts imbedded in the lower polar parenchyma. The patient underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The mass was diagnosed pathologically as SFT originating from the kidney, but not as renal carcinoma. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of spindle-shape cells distributed variably in dense collagenous stroma and had a focal hemangiopericytomatous staghorn-like vascular pattern. Mitotic figures, atypical structures, necrosis and hemorrhage were not identified. No adjuvant therapies were given postoperatively. The patient has been free of tumor recurrence for 25 months since the surgery. IHC revealed that the tumor diffusely expressed CD34, CD99, Bcl2, PAX8, NAB2, STAT6, and GRIA2. The tumor stained negatively for desmin, S-100, c-Kit, CK-AE1/AE3, CDK4 and MDM2. A NAB2-SATA6 gene fusion was detected in tumor cells by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, direct sequencing, and an in situ proximity ligation brightfield assay. The gene fusion occurred as an 831 bp truncation of exon 2 in NAB2 connected to the beginning of exon 3 in STAT6. We have reported a case of GRIA2 and PAX8-positive SFT occurring primarily in the kidney with such NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion for the first time. Diffuse expression of PAX8 in the tumor might present with a renal origin. Reportedly, benign histology of SFT cannot necessarily predict favorable clinical prognosis. Genetic alterations recently identified in SFT could possibly refer to risk stratification for tumor recurrence. However, malignant preponderance of extrathoracic SFT over thoracic SFT remains unexplained so far. Long-term follow-up after surgery should be performed in the present case.

A multicenter cooperative study was conducted to clarify the prognosis of Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of molecular-targeted therapy and the clinical usefulness of the Japanese metastatic renal cancer (JMRC) prognostic classification. Of 389 consecutive patients for whom treatment was started between 2008 and 2010 at 23 hospitals in Japan, 357 patients who received vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) or cytokine as initial systemic therapy were the subject of the present study. Patients were classified into three prognostic groups according to the JMRC prognostic classification. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the start of the initial treatment. The median PFS and OS for the entire cohort of 357 patients were 9.1 and 27.2 months, respectively. VEGFR-TKI were selected for patients with multiple organ metastases, those with liver metastasis, and those with bone metastasis. The median PFS and OS were 11.0 and 23.2 months and 5.4 and 38.2 months in the VEGFR-TKI group and the cytokines group, respectively. The JMRC prognostic classification was useful as a prognostic model for PFS and OS (c-indexes: 0.613 and 0.630 in patients who initially received VEGFR-TKI and 0.647 and 0.642 in patients who received cytokines, respectively). The present study showed for the first time the prognosis of Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of molecular-targeted therapy. The JMRC prognostic classification may be clinically useful as a prognostic model., (© 2015 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objective: To investigate the prognosis and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who underwent metastasectomy., Methods: We sent questionnaires to Japanese hospitals. The questionnaires included data of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had their metastatic lesions removed between January 1988 and December 2009. We collected them and retrospectively analyzed these data and calculated the overall survival from the first metastasectomy until death or last follow-up. We also analyzed the relationship between survival and clinico-pathologic features and determined adverse prognostic factors. Furthermore, we identified a poor prognostic group by counting the number of prognostic factors., Results: A sample size of 556 patients from 48 institutions was studied. The median overall survival was 80 months. Four adverse prognostic factors were detected: incomplete resection by metastasectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.15), brain metastasis (HR, 3.73), >1.0 mg/dL C-reactive protein (HR, 2.45), and the highest histologic grade in Japanese classification (nuclei of tumor cells are larger than nuclei of normal tubular cells; HR, 1.88). The median overall survivals of patients with 3 or 4 prognostic factors, 2 factors, and 0 and 1 factors were 10 months, 42 months, and 105 months, respectively., Conclusion: Four adverse prognostic factors for predicting the survival of patients with removed metastases were identified. Patients with 3 or 4 of these adverse prognostic factors had a worse prognosis., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 74-year-old woman who had previously undergone left nephrectomy because of calculi was referred to our department with a right renal mass that was detected by computed tomography (CT) during treatment for pyelonephritis. Repeated CT showed a contrast-enhanced 4.7 cm tumor close to the renal sinus, and no metastatic lesion was detected. Sunitinib was administered as a presurgical therapy ; however, the patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and sunitinib was discontinued. Sorafenib was administered 7 days after discontinuation of sunitinib ; however, the patient experienced febrile neutropenia and rash, and sorafenib was discontinued. Extracorporeal partial nephrectomy and auto-transplantation were performed 24 days after discontinuation of sorafenib. Though peri-graft abscess was suspected to be present and resolved by antibacterial therapy, severe complications were not experienced, and the patient did not require dialysis therapy after surgery. There was no evidence of recurrence at 30 months after the surgery.

Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the systemic treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, sorafenib treatment has a limited effect due to acquired chemoresistance of RCC. Previously, we identified glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) as a new therapeutic target in RCC. Here, we observed that sorafenib inhibits proliferation and survival of RCC cells. Significantly, we revealed that sorafenib enhances GSK-3 activity in RCC cells, which could be a potential mechanism of acquired chemoresistance. We found that pharmacological inhibition of GSK-3 potentiates sorafenib antitumor effect in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that combining GSK-3 inhibitor and sorafenib might be a potential new therapeutic approach for RCC treatment., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 37-year-old male was referred with a huge renal mass and multiple lung lesions. Abdominal and chest computed tomographic scan revealed a 11×15×17. 5 cm right renal tumor and multiple lung metastases. Neither tumor was enhanced, and no lymph adenopathy was detected. Percutaneous needle core biopsy was performed and the tumors were diagnosed as Wilms' tumor histologically supported by immunohistological positive staining to WT-1 and CD56. Since lung metastases were detected and the renal tumor reached the abdominal aorta on the left side, presurgical systemic chemotherapy (ifosphamide＋ carboplatin＋etoposide ; ICEx 4 courses) was performed. The renal tumor and the lung metastases were markedly decreased in size and subjected to a radical nephrectomy. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of Wilms' tumor without anaplastic change categorized as mesenchymal type. As an adjuvant therapy, irradiation to renal bed (40 Gy/20 fr) and bilateral lung (12 Gy/8 fr) were performed. Six months after the end of the therapy, no evidence of recurrence was detected.

Background: Incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) differs among countries. The rates of Asian countries are lower than those of countries in North America or Europe but are exceptionally high in Japanese males. Approximately 30% of patients with RCC have metastasis at initial diagnosis, and another 30% have metastasis after nephrectomy. Clinical studies of risk factors in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) are mainly based on data from non-Asian patients., Objectives: We aimed to investigate the prognosis of Japanese patients and their prognostic factors., Design, Setting, and Participants: The subjects of this study were 1463 patients who were clinically diagnosed with RCC with metastasis in 40 Japanese hospitals between January 1988 and November 2002., Measurements: The primary end point was overall survival calculated from first diagnosis of mRCC to death or last follow-up. We also investigated the relationship between survival and clinical features., Results and Limitations: The median overall survival time was 21.4 mo. The estimated survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 yr were 64.2%, 35.2%, 22.5%, and 9.1%, respectively; they contrasted with data from the United States of 54%, 19%, 10%, and 6%, respectively for the same periods. A high percentage of patients had undergone nephrectomy (80.5%) and metastasectomy (20.8%), both of which were shown to prolong survival., Conclusions: The median survival time in the present study was approximately twice as long as that of previous studies from North America or Europe. Early diagnosis of metastasis, nephrectomy, metastasectomy, and cytokine-based therapy seemed to improve the prognosis of RCC patients in the present study., (Copyright 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)