Search

Introduction: At present, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or an ICI and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are the main treatment options as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Among them, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was recently launched in Japanese clinical practice., Area Covered: In this review, the efficacies and safety profiles of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for mRCC between Japanese and global populations are compared. In addition, lenvatinib is currently available for the treatment of not only mRCC but also of endometrial, thyroid, thymic, and hepatocellular cancers. We briefly summarized the characteristics of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or lenvatinib monotherapy for these malignancies. Finally, the characteristics of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for mRCC in the Japanese population are briefly elucidated., Expert Opinion: In order to develop optimal personalized treatment for mRCC patients, it is necessary for physicians who treat mRCC patients to possess in-depth knowledge of not only the efficacy and safety profile of the respective therapies but also of the interpatient heterogeneities between Japanese and global populations.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made an appearance in clinical practice, and the treatment outcome of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has dramatically improved as a result. Currently, most patients are treated with a combination of ICIs or a combination of ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These new therapeutic tools need to be organized and summarized in order to realize and advance personalized therapy for mRCC., Area Covered: In this review, the characteristics of five regimens (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, avelumab plus axitinib, and nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib) are briefly elucidated and their efficacies and safety profiles are compared. For ICI-unfit patients, the current choices are examined. In addition, the potential second-line regimens after these combination therapies are introduced as sequential treatment. Finally, in the future direction section, ongoing clinical trials are also introduced., Expert Opinion: ICIs are rapidly being introduced for the treatment of mRCC. Currently, most patients are treated with a combination of ICIs or a combination of ICI and TKIs. In order to develop optimal personalized treatment for our patients, it is necessary for the physicians who treat mRCC patients to possess in-depth knowledge of these new therapeutic tools.

Background: We report two cases in which severe skin disorders developed during sorafenib treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had previously received nivolumab., Case Report: Case 1: A 50-year-old man with RCC received nivolumab as the fifth-line therapy followed by sorafenib as the sixth-line therapy. On day 15 of sorafenib administration, the patient was hospitalized with systemic erythema multiforme, acne-like skin rash, and hand-foot syndrome. Case 2: A 40-year-old man with RCC received nivolumab as the second-line therapy followed by sorafenib as the fifth-line treatment. On day 12 of sorafenib administration, the patient was hospitalized with an acne-like skin rash and hand-foot syndrome. The skin disorders in the two cases improved within 2-3 weeks after sorafenib discontinuation and the start of treatment with topical and oral steroids., Conclusion: When using sorafenib in patients previously treated with nivolumab, close attention should be paid to the onset of serious skin disorders., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Accurate prediction of the prognosis of RCC using a single biomarker is challenging due to the genetic heterogeneity of the disease. However, it is essential to develop an accurate system to allow better patient selection for optimal treatment strategies. ARL4C, ECT2, SOD2, and STEAP3 are novel molecular biomarkers identified in earlier studies as survival-related genes by comprehensive analyses of 43 primary RCC tissues and RCC cell lines., Methods: To develop a prognostic model based on these multiple biomarkers, the expression of four biomarkers ARL4C, ECT2, SOD2, and STEAP3 in primary RCC tissue were semi-quantitatively investigated by immunohistochemical analysis in an independent cohort of 97 patients who underwent nephrectomy, and the clinical significance of these biomarkers were analyzed by survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves. The prognostic model was constructed by calculation of the contribution score to prognosis of each biomarker on Cox regression analysis, and its prognostic performance was validated., Results: Patients whose tumors had high expression of the individual biomarkers had shorter cancer-specific survival (CSS) from the time of primary nephrectomy. The prognostic model based on four biomarkers segregated the patients into a high- and low-risk scored group according to defined cut-off value. This approach was more robust in predicting CSS compared to each single biomarker alone in the total of 97 patients with RCC. Especially in the 36 metastatic RCC patients, our prognostic model could more accurately predict early events within 2 years of diagnosis of metastasis. In addition, high risk-scored patients with particular strong SOD2 expression had a much worse prognosis in 25 patients with metastatic RCC who were treated with molecular targeting agents., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a prognostic model based on four novel biomarkers provides valuable data for prediction of clinical prognosis and useful information for considering the follow-up conditions and therapeutic strategies for patients with primary and metastatic RCC.

Background: Severe adverse events frequently occur in patients treated with pazopanib, necessitating dose reduction and discontinuation. However, information on the exposure-toxicity relationship is limited., Patients and Methods: For this retrospective and observational clinical study, we examined 27 patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with pazopanib and enrolled between October 2014 and March 2018. The primary goal was to evaluate the association between trough pazopanib concentration and occurrence of grade ≥ 3 toxicities, and secondarily, to estimate the association between trough pazopanib concentration and objective response rate., Results: Mean trough pazopanib concentration was significantly higher in the grade ≥ 3 toxicity group (n = 9) than in the grade ≤ 2 toxicity group (n = 18). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the threshold value of trough pazopanib concentration for predicting grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 50.3 μg/mL (area under the curve, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.99; P < .05). In the pazopanib < 20.5 μg/mL group (n = 3), no patient experienced an objective response. Objective response rates between patients with 20.5 to 50.3 μg/mL pazopanib (n = 11) and patients with ≥ 50.3 μg/mL (n = 13) were similar (45.5% vs. 46.2%)., Conclusion: From results of this study, the target trough pazopanib concentration range may be 20.5 to 50.3 μg/mL for patients with renal cell carcinoma., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An ectopic kidney is a common congenital anomaly of the urogenital system, but malignant tumor in an ectopic kidney has been rarely reported. We report a case of ureteral carcinoma arising from an ectopic kidney in an 83-year-old male. He visited a hospital complaining of gross hematuria. Computed tomography revealed right ectopic kidney, right ureteral tumor and bladder tumor around the right ureteral orifice. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed and histopathological diagnosis was urothelial carcinoma. He was referred to our clinic for surgery of the right ureteral tumor. We performed open right nephroureterectomy and partial cystectomy. The histopathological diagnosis was a high grade urothelial carcinoma of the right ureter, pT3N0. Four months postoperatively, there was no evidence of recurrence. We discuss the clinical and pathological features of the malignancy in an ectopic kidney.

Background: Sunitinib has been approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib pharmacokinetics shows a large interpatient variability., Patients and Methods: A retrospective, observational clinical study of 21 patients with RCC was performed. Sunitinib was administered for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle for the first cycle. We evaluated the association of sunitinib-induced toxicities and clinical outcomes with the trough total sunitinib concentration in a steady state during the first cycle., Results: The median total sunitinib concentration was 91.8 ng/mL (range, 49.8-205 ng/mL). There was an association between total sunitinib concentration and the severity of thrombocytopenia, anorexia, and fatigue. Patients with ≥ 100 ng/mL total sunitinib (n = 8), compared with patients with < 100 ng/mL (n = 13), had a greater incidence of Grade ≥ 3 toxicities (6 patients [75.0%] vs. 3 patients [23.1%]). Patients with < 100 ng/mL total sunitinib had significantly longer time to treatment failure (TTF) and progression-free survival (PFS) time than patients with ≥ 100 ng/mL (median TTF, 590 vs. 71 days; P = .04; median PFS, 748 vs. 238 days; P = .02)., Conclusion: Results of this study suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring of sunitinib could be useful for avoiding severe toxicities. Dose reduction might be needed, especially when the total sunitinib concentration is ≥ 100 ng/mL, to avoid unnecessary early discontinuation of treatment., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 52-year-old man who had been treated with sorafenib for lung metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presented to our hospital with iron-deficiency anemia. He had undergone right nephrectomy for RCC (clear cell carcinoma, pT1bN0M0) 11 years ago and lung metastasis developed 6 years after the surgery. Although upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy were performed on suspicion of gastrointestinal bleeding, no abnormality was detected. Capsule endoscopy and single balloon small bowel endoscopy disclosed a hemorrhagic submucosal tumor in the jejunum. Laparoscopic partial jejunectomy was performed, and pathological examination indicated metastatic RCC to the small intestine. After the operation, anemia improved but he died 8 months later because of intrabronchial bleeding from the metastatic lesion of the lung. Metastatic RCC of the small intestine is relatively rare, its diagnosis is difficult. Recently, new diagnostic tools such as capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted endoscopy have been developed, and they are useful in diagnosing gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) which can not be detected by traditional enteroscopy. If patients with advanced RCC show gastrointestinal bleeding of uncertain etiology, we should perform aggressive examination of the digestive tract with these diagnostic tools.

A 65-year-old man presented with gross hematuria in 2004. Computed tomography (CT) showed a left renal mass, and he underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Pathological diagnosis was clear cell carcinoma (pT2N0M0, G2＞G3). Four years later, a right adrenal tumor was disclosed by follow-up CT. Then laparoscopic adrenectomy was performed. Histology showed metastasis of the renal clear cell carcinoma. In 2009, he noticed gross hematuria, and cystoscopy revealed a 2cm solitary, non-papillary tumor at the anterior wall of the bladder. At the same time, small solitary liver metastasis (6 mm) was observed on abdominal CT. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor and resection of liver tumor was performed, and pathological diagnosis was clear cell carcinoma both in vesical and hepatic masses. Nine months after the last surgery, he is living with no obvious tumor recurrence. To our knowledge this case is the 34th case of bladder metastasis from renal cell carcinoma in the Japanese literature. We reviewed literature and discuss the clinical features of bladder metastasis of renal cell carcinoma.

Crossed renal ectopia with fusion is a rare anomaly of the kidney. The present case report describes a 67-year-old man with renal tumor who had been diagnosed as having a crossed ectopic kidney with fusion for 25 years. The pathological diagnosis of the primary tumor specimen was Wilms' tumor with favorable histology. Upon tumor recurrence, molecular detection of SYT-SSX2 fusion transcripts lead to the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma of the kidney. To our knowledge, this is the first case of primary synovial sarcoma arising from a crossed ectopic kidney with fusion.