Search

Renal cell carcinoma is the 10th most common type of cancer, accounting for 3.7% of all cancers. Our study examines patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received Axitinib or Nivolumab as second-line treatment. This study was designed as a retrospective analysis. Patients who received Axitinib or Nivolumab as second-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma at the Istanbul University Oncology Institute Medical Oncology outpatient clinic were included in the study. A total of 81 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up period of 18.5 months (2-260 months). Of these patients, 29 (35.8%) received Axitinib as second-line treatment, while 52 (64.2%) received Nivolumab. The median duration of second-line treatment was 14 months (6-52) for Axitinib and 13.5 months (3-77) for Nivolumab. In our study, Nivolumab was found to have statistically better PFS and OS outcomes than Axitinib in male patients, patients diagnosed with metastatic disease, those with a favorable or intermediate International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk score, patients diagnosed with metastatic disease or who developed metastasis within 12 months of diagnosis, those who developed metastasis ≥ 24 months after diagnosis, and patients with metastasis in a single organ. Both drugs are recommended as monotherapy for second-line and later treatments in the current NCCN guidelines for kidney cancers. Although there is no study in the literature showing that axitinib is more effective than nivolumab, nivolumab was found to be much more effective than axitinib in our study. Prospective studies with higher number of patients are needed on this subject., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Transcription factor E3 (TFE3) related renal cell carcinomas constitute a very small percent of all renal tumors in adults. Prognosis mainly depends on the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis which is often poor. There is yet to be a standardized treatment protocol. Treatment options include agents identical to TFE3(-) cell renal carcinoma treatment. We present a case of a young woman with a rapidly progressing metastatic TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma., Case Report: A 31 year old female presented with abdominal mass, distension, nausea. Initial tests and tumor markers found to be normal. Abdominal CT scan revealed a left retroperitoneal mass along with three other neighboring masses in liver manifesting as metastases. Trucut biopsy and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the retroperitoneal mass as TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma. Management and outcome: Sunitinib, pazopanib, nivolumab, axitinib treatments are consecutively given after surgery. It is noteworthy that rapid progression was observed under nivolumab treatment., Discussion: During surveillance, rapid progression is noted under consecutive immunotherapy which was unexpected. Thus, there is a need for more standardized treatment protocols and invention of new agents for management of TFE3 (+) renal cell carcinoma.

We present a case of a teratoma with somatic type malignancy (TSM) in the form of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) within supraclavicular and retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of a testicular pure teratoma. Resection of both masses revealed a teratoma without any other germ cell tumor component. A papillary carcinoma component was also detected intermingled with the teratomatous elements. The carcinoma cells displayed eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli. Groups of foamy histiocytes in the fibrovascular cores was a striking finding that brought pRCC to mind. Immunoreactivity for CK7, PAX8, AMACR, CD10, napsin, and vimentin along with morphologic findings confirmed renal cell differentiation. No radiological evidence of a primary renal cell carcinoma was found in the kidney. Consequently, pRCC arising in a teratoma was diagnosed. TSM is described as teratoma with a malignant component that is typically encountered in other organs and tissues. TSM in the form of pRCC is an extremely rare entity. Our case is the second example of a testicular germ cell tumor metastasis with a somatic malignancy in the form of pRCC. In conclusion, carcinomas of renal cell differentiation should be kept in mind as a rare form of TSM, especially in metastatic germ cell tumors., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

Aim: This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib, a targeted-agent, for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Sixty-three patients with complete clinical data from 13 oncology Centers were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes analyzed were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events., Results: The median age of all patients, 38 men (60.3%) and 25 women (39.7%), was 63 years (range=25-82 years). Histological subtypes included 46 (88%) cases of papillary RCC, 10 of chromophobe, and 7 unclassified cases. Median treatment duration was seven months (range=2-86 months). At the time of this analysis, 52 patients had discontinued treatment, 33 of whom had died. Treatment discontinuation was due to disease progression in 43 patients, and toxicity in nine. Dose interruption was necessary in 22 (34.9%) patients, and dose reduction in 27 (42.9%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 11.1% and 63.5%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI)=5.5-9.7 months) and 22.0 months (95% CI=13.4-30.6 months), respectively, with 1-year rates of 64.7% and 33.7%, respectively., Conclusion: Clinical outcome of the metastatic non-clear cell RCC patients with sunitinib treatment seemed to be worse than the historical data of clear cell RCC patients, in terms of PFS, OS and objective response. New and more effective targeted-therapies and better understanding of the underlying molecular processes are necessary to improve survival outcome for these patients., (Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction/background: Effective cancer biomarkers for early detection, prognosis, or therapy response prediction are urgently need in metastatic RCC. M30 and M65 are released during apoptotic cell death and precisely reflect epithelial tumor cell death. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of plasma M30 and M65 levels in predicting survival rates for patients with metastatic RCC., Patients and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with metastatic RCC and 39 healthy control subjects were included in this study. Serum M30 and M65 levels were measured by ELISA., Results: The median ages of the patients and control subjects were 60 and 58 years, respectively. No difference was detected in the median serum M30 level between the patients and control subjects (53.7 vs. 49.1 U/L; P = .31). The median serum M65 level was significantly higher in patients than in control subjects (334.0 vs. 179.1 U/L; P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the best cutoff value for serum M65 level for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) was 313.6 U/L. The median PFS of patients whose M65 levels were ≤ 313.6 U/L was better than that of patients whose M65 levels were > 313.6 U/L (P = .03)., Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate serum M30 and M65 levels in patients with RCC. Serum M65 levels were significantly elevated in patients with metastatic RCC compared with healthy individuals. In addition, the serum M65 level could be predictive of PFS in patients with RCC., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Therapy targeted against the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway is a standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This study assessed the response rates and toxicity profiles of sunitinib on a continuous once-daily dosing regimen in Turkish patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: Between April 2006 and August 2010, 74 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received sunitinib on a continuous, once-daily dosing regimen were included. Sunitinib was administered daily at a dose of either 37.5 mg (94% of the patients) or 25 mg (6% of the patients), without interruption, either as a second-line treatment after interferon-α or as a first-line treatment. Response, toxicity, progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated., Results: Of the 74 patients, 65 (88%) were diagnosed with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The median treatment duration was 10 months (range, 2-42 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (75%), stomatitis (51%) and hypertension (50%). The most common Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were anemia (10%) and hand-foot syndrome (7%). Dose reductions were required in 50% of the patients, and early treatment discontinuation was necessary in 16% of the patients. Cardiovascular events were the most common adverse events that resulted in drug discontinuation. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 30 and 78%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13 and 25 months, respectively., Conclusions: Continuous, once-daily administration of sunitinib was generally well tolerated in Turkish patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in a daily practice setting. This study's response rates were comparable to those in previous randomized trials.