Search

Background: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal treatment for children with end-stage kidney disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT) and of pretransplant dialysis duration on graft survival among French pediatric kidney transplant recipients., Methods: We analyzed all first pediatric kidney-only transplantations performed in France between 1993 and 2012. A Cox multivariable model was used to investigate the association of PKT and pretransplant dialysis time with the hazard of graft failure defined as death, return to dialysis, or retransplant, whichever occurred first., Results: Patients (n = 1911) were included, of which 380 (19.8%) received a PKT. Median time of follow-up was 7.0 y. PKT was associated with a 55% reduction of the hazard of graft failure at any time after KT compared with patients transplanted after dialysis (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.62), after adjustment for recipient sex and age, primary kidney disease, donor age and type (living or deceased donor), number of HLA mismatches, cold ischemia time, and year of transplantation. A reduction of the hazard of graft failure was found in PKT whatever the compared duration of dialysis, even when <6 mo and whatever the dialysis modality. Results were similar in multiple sensitivity analyses., Conclusions: In France, PKT among pediatric patients is associated with a better graft survival when compared with KT after dialysis, even when <6 mo. Based on these findings, we suggest that PKT should be considered as the treatment of choice for children with end-stage kidney disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

To date, it is important to know more about the population of CKD stage 5 patients in order to better understand the practices of access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) or conservative treatment and to anticipate future needs. In April 2015, at the instigation of the Scientific Committee of REIN, a working group was formed to reflect on the opportunity and feasibility of a data collection on these patients. Between September 2017 and March 2018, 21 participating centers included 390 patients over a period of at least one month. The data collected included the patient's living conditions, level of study, mode of referral, clinical data and the therapeutic project. The median age at baseline was 71.4years (IQR: 58.4-80.4), 39.9% were diabetic. The median eGFR was 12mL/min/1.73m 2 (IQR: 9-14). At inclusion, 77% of the patients were already followed in nephrology, 11% had been referred by a general practitioner. For the majority of patients included (81%), there was a RRT project. In 10% of cases, there was a project of conservative care, in 5% of cases the project was not yet decided and in 7% the project had not been yet discussed. At the latest news (median time 4.0months), 35% of patients were dialyzed, 9 (2%) have been pre-emptively transplanted, 25 (6%) died, 210 (54%) were still with a CKD stage 5. Our pilot study has shown the feasibility and interest of setting up such a data collection. Such a registry will provide important public health information regarding the demographic of nephrologists and advanced practices nurses. At the local level, this information will help the department to organize themselves to set-up pre-RRT information, implementation of care pathway nurses and multidisciplinary meetings for difficult cases. However, our pilot study shows that to ensure the completeness of the collection, the tracking upstream or downstream of nephrology consultations for eligible patients is essential and therefore requires dedicated human time on site., (Copyright © 2019 Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite major technical improvements in the care of children requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) before 2 years of age, the management of those patients remains challenging and transplantation is generally delayed until the child weighs 10 kg or is 2 years old. In this national cohort study, we studied patient and graft survival in children starting RRT before 2 years of age to help clinicians and parents when deciding on RRT initiation and transplantation management., Methods: All children starting RRT before 24 months of age between 1992 and 2012 in France were included through the national Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry. The primary endpoints were patient survival on dialysis and 10-year graft survival., Results: A total of 224 patients were included {62% boys, median age 10.5 months [interquartile range (IQR) 5.8-15.6]}. The 10-year survival rate was 84% (IQR 77-89). Suffering from extrarenal comorbidities was the only factor significantly associated with both an increased risk of death on dialysis [hazard ratio 5.9 (95% confidence interval 1.8-19.3)] and a decreased probability of being transplanted. During follow-up, 174 renal transplantations were performed in 171 patients [median age at first transplantation 30.2 (IQR 21.8-40.7) months]. The 10-year graft survival was 74% (IQR 67-81). Factors associated with graft loss in multivariate analysis were the time spent on dialysis before transplantation, donor/recipient height ratio with an increased risk for both small and tall donors and presenting two human leucocyte antigen-antigen D-related mismatches., Conclusions: This study confirms the good outcome of children starting RRT before 2 years of age. The main question remains when and how to transplant those children. Our study provides data on the optimal morphological and immunological matching in order to help clinicians in their decisions.

Background: Studies in the USA and Europe have demonstrated inequalities in adult access to renal transplants. We previously demonstrate that the centre of treatment was impacting the time to be registered on the renal waiting list. In this study, we sought to ascertain the influence of patient and centre characteristics on the probability of transplantation within 1 year after registration on the waiting list for children., Methods: We included patients <18 years awaiting transplantation from the French ESRD National Registry. The effects of patient and centre characteristics were studied by hierarchical logistic regression. Centre effects were assessed by centre-level residual variance. A descriptive survey was performed to investigate differences in the centres' practices, and linear regression was used to confirm findings of different HLA compatibility requirements between centres., Results: The study included 556 patients treated at 54 centres; 450 (80.9%) received transplants in the year after their listing. HLA group scarcity, time of inactive status during the year, pre-emptive listing and listing after age 18 were associated with lower probabilities of transplantation. Patient characteristics explained most of the variability among centres, but patients treated in paediatric centres had a lower probability of transplantation within 1 year because of higher HLA compatibility requirements for transplants., Conclusions: Although patient characteristics explained most of the inter-centre variability, harmonization of some practices might enable us to reduce some inequalities in access to renal transplantation while maintaining optimal transplant survival and chances to get a second transplant when needed., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)