Search

Aim: Various equations based on serum creatinine or/and cystatin C, required further validation in a Chinese population. We compared the performance of six Chinese equations (Mascr, Peiscr, Macys, Fengcys, Mascr-cys and Fengscr-cys) with the CKD-EPI equations in multi-centre Chinese subjects and evaluated their applicability in clinical practice., Methods: A total of 1522 adult patients from four different hospitals of China were enrolled in the study. (99m) Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging was used as the reference GFR (rGFR), and serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured by standardized assays. An optimal score system was implemented in the study., Results: The average rGFR of recruited subjects was 67.30±28.89 mL/min per 1.73m(2) . All estimated GFR (eGFR) correlated well with rGFR. In accordance with Bland-Altman analysis, the Fengscr-cys equations achieved optimal overall performance (score 14 vs 0-6), with least bias (median difference, -0.57 mL/min per 1.73m(2) ; median absolute difference, 8.83 mL/min per 1.73m(2) ), best precision (17.99 mL/min per 1.73m(2) ), highest accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 15%, 30% and 50% of the rGFR (P15 , P30 and P50 ; 49.7%, 78.7% and 91.8%, respectively); root-mean-square-error (RMSE, 16.28)). The Fengcys equation, a typical cystatin C based equation, was another well-behaved formula with an impressive performance. The Ma equations performed much poorer than the CKD-EPI equations. Consistent results can be observed in the GFR- /age- and sex-specific subgroups, while none equation yielded ideal accuracy in GFR<60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) subgroup., Conclusion: The Fengscr-cys equation appeared to achieve the best performance for GFR estimation in overall Chinese adult patients. However, further research is warranted to improve the accuracy of available equations in GFR less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) individuals., (© 2015 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Objective: The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) reported two equations in 2012: one based on cystatin C concentration (CKD-EPI2012cys) and the other using both serum creatinine and cystatin C concentrations (CKD-EPI2012Scr-cys). We compared the adaptability of new formulae with other four equations. Methods: Participants (n = 788; median age, 54 [range, 19–94] years) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The reference glomerular filtration rate (rGFR) was measured by a 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated separately by the Chinese adapted Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (C-MDRD), MacIsaac, Ma, serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI equation (CKD-EPI2009Scr), CKD-EPI2012cys and CKD-EPI2012Scr-cys equations. We compared the performance of six equations with rGFR. Results: Median rGFR was 76.35 (interquartile range, 59.03–92.50) mL/min/1.73 m2. Compared with CKD-EPI2009Scr, CKD-EPI2012Scr-cys formula had better diagnostic value with larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC, 0.879, p = 0.006), especially in young participants (ROCAUC, 0.883, p = 0.005). CKD-EPI2012cys equation did not perform better than other available equations. Accuracy (the proportion of eGFR within 30% of rGFR [P30]) of the CKD-EPI2012Scr-cys equation (77.03%) was inferior only to MacIsaac equation (80.2%) in the entire participants, but performed best in young participants with normal or mildly-injured GFR. Neither of the two new CKD-EPI equations achieved any ideal P30 in the elderly participants with moderately-severely injured GFR. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a consistent result. In this study, CKD-EPI2012Scr-cys had a relatively better diagnosis consistency of GFR stage between the eGFR and rGFR in the whole cohort. Conclusion: CKD-EPI2012Scr-cys appeared less biased and more accurate in overall participants. Neither of the new CKD-EPI equations achieved ideal accuracy in senior participants with moderately-severely injured GFR. A large-scale study with more subjects and cooperating centers to develop new formulae for the elderly is assumed to be necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]