Search

Doppler ultrasound has been extensively used in detecting reno-vascular diseases, showing to be a non-invasive, safe, low cost and repeatable tool. The Renal Resistive Index (RRI) [(peak systolic velocity - end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity] is a semi-quantitative index derived by Doppler evaluation of renal vascular bed. Normally RRI is in the range of 0.47-0.70, it increases with aging and, usually, it shows a difference between the two kidneys less than 5-8 %. RRI is an important prognostic marker in chronic kidney diseases (CKD), both in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney diseases, because, in longitudinal prospective studies, it significantly correlated with hemodynamic (ABPM, SBP, DBP, pulse pressure) and histopathological parameters (glomerular sclerosis, arteriolosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, interstitial infiltration). In acute kidney injury (AKI) RI is a valid tool in differentiating between pre-renal and renal failure and in predicting renal response to vaso-active agents. In addition a RRI >0.74 can predict the onset of AKI in septic patients. Renal Resistive Index is a useful marker in allograft diseases because it has been widely showed a correlation with histological lesions during worsening of renal function, both in acute rejection and in chronic allograft nephropathy. Recent studies suggest its role in the risk of new onset diabetes after transplantation and it could be one of the parameters to evaluate to shift or withdrawal immunological and/or hypertensive therapy., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interests The authors declare that they have no competing or conflicting interests. Informed consent For this type of study formal consent is not required. Human and animal studies The study described in this article does not contain studies with animal and human subjects performed by any of the authors.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is one of the most interesting and promising clinical applications of imaging and ultrasound. Thanks to the absence of ionizing radiation, the lack of nephrotoxicity and low cost it has the potential to become a reference in imaging of the kidney. This review, besides providing a brief description of the proper methodology, presents possible applications of CEUS in nephrology and urology, including renal ischemia, the differential diagnosis of cystic and solid lesions, follow-up of ablative therapies, kidney trauma, kidney transplant, inflammatory diseases, ischemic nephropathy and vesicoureteral reflux.

Background: Predictors of haemoglobin (Hb) levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in dialysis patients have not yet been clearly defined. Some mainly uncontrolled studies suggest that online haemodiafiltration (HDF) may have a beneficial effect on Hb, whereas no data are available concerning online haemofiltration (HF). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of convective treatments (CTs) on Hb levels and ESA resistance in comparison with low-flux haemodialysis (HD) and to evaluate the predictors of these outcomes., Methods: Primary multivariate analysis was made of a pre-specified secondary outcome of a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled study in which 146 chronic HD patients from 27 Italian centres were randomly assigned to HD (70 patients) or CTs: online pre-dilution HF (36 patients) or online pre-dilution HDF (40 patients)., Results: CTs did not affect Hb levels (P = 0.596) or ESA resistance (P = 0.984). Hb correlated with polycystic kidney disease (P = 0.001), C-reactive protein (P = 0.025), ferritin (P = 0.018), ESA dose (P < 0.001) and total cholesterol (P = 0.021). The participating centres were the main source of Hb variability (partial eta(2) 0.313, P < 0.001). ESA resistance directly correlated with serum ferritin (P = 0.030) and beta2 microglobulin (P = 0.065); participating centres were again a major source of variance (partial eta(2) 0.367, P < 0.001). Transferrin saturation did not predict either outcome variables (P = 0.277 and P = 0.170)., Conclusions: In comparison with low-flux HD, CTs did not significantly improve Hb levels or ESA resistance. The main sources of variability were participating centres, ESA dose and the underlying disease.

Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the role of Doppler ultrasonography (DU) by resistive index (RI) and the difference of the RI (DeltaRI) in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction., Patients and Methods: We studied 36 consecutive patients (12 female, 24 male; mean age 45.6 +/- 8.4 years) with suspected renal colic by intravenous pyelography (IVP) and DU with determination of the RI and the Delta RI. A RI of >= 0.70 and a DeltaRI of >= 0.06 were considered suggestive of obstruction. IVP was considered as the "gold standard"., Results: In the studied population, RI was 0.664 +/- 0.060 in the affected kidney site of symptoms and 0.614 +/- 0.025 in the contralateral one, with an overall Delta RI of 0.049 +/- 0.062. At IVP, 14 patients resulted within normal range (Group A; 39%), 6 patients showed lithiasis without obstruction (Group B; 17%), 8 patients showed delayed excretion of the contrast medium (Group C; 22%), and 8 patients showed a functional exclusion of the kidney (Group D; 22%). One-way analysis of variance showed the IVP group significantly related to Delta RI with the highest values in Groups C (DeltaRI of 0.093 +/- 0.051; p<0.001) and D (DeltaRI of 0.116 +/-0.030; p<0.001) in comparison with Group A (DeltaRI of 0.001 +/-0.038) and Group B (DeltaRI of 0.015 +/-0.024). No differences were detected between Groups C and D (p=0.223) and between Groups A and B (p-0.472). DeltaRI measurement with DU permitted to predict the renal obstruction with a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 95.0% and an accuracy of 94.4%., Conclusions: Intrarenal Doppler ultrasonography represents a sensitive and highly specific test that can significantly contribute to the diagnosis of obstruction in patients with acute renal colic. It should be used as the first line imaging method in suspected acute renal colic, as well as for patients with renal insufficiency, pregnant women or for patients with adverse reactions to contrast media

Over the recent years, it has been clearly documented that hypertension and proteinuria are the major factors responsible for progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, a target BP of at least 130/80 mm Hg has been suggested in order to reduce the rate of progression and cardiovascular mortality. Some antihypertensive agents, such as ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and perhaps calcium channel blockers (CCBs), may also be capable of reducing CKD progression because they halt some of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in renal damage, some of which is unrelated to reduction of proteinuria, per se. Although this specific effect seemed to be partially independent of blood pressure reduction, it remains controversial whether these drugs are really superior to other antihypertensive agents when blood pressure values recommended by guidelines are achieved. This issue is still a matter of debate because in published trials, target and achieved blood pressure values were constantly higher than those recommended today. Nevertheless, available findings seem to indicate that the renoprotective effect of these agents is at least partially independent of a better BP control. The only way to definitely solve this issue would be a new randomized trial. However, the clinical relevance of this trial is debatable, considering that we need all the drugs available to reach these recommended BP values.

Despite an increase in the use and average dose of recombinant human EPO (rh-EPO) over the last 15 years, a substantial percentage of patients still do not achieve hemoglobin targets recommended by international guidelines. The definition of rh-EPO resistance has been introduced to identify those patients in whom the target hemoglobin level is not attained despite a greater-than-usual dose of erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA). In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between dialysis, increased inflammatory stimulus, malnutrition, and ESA response. About 35% to 65% of hemodialysis patients show signs of inflammation that could be a cause of anemia through the suppression of bone marrow erythropoiesis by a number of cytokines. A large proportion of chronic kidney disease patients also have protein-energy malnutrition and wasting; low serum albumin levels, together with other more specific nutritional markers, are predictors of rh-EPO response. A diminished nutritional state could then be a feature of patients who are resistant to ESA treatment, with malnutrition probably being a consequence of a chronic inflammatory state. Starting from the hypothesis that anemia, partially attributable to a reduced response to ESA, could be the link among malnutrition, inflammation, and the poor outcome of chronic kidney disease patients, we designed a multicenter observational study, the Malnutrition-Inflammation-Resistance-Treatment Outcome Study (MIRTOS), aimed at evaluating the impact and possible causes of resistance to ESA in a large sample of hemodialysis patients. We hope the results of MIRTOS will represent a step forward toward a better understanding of the factors influencing the response to ESA in hemodialysis patients.

The concept of dialysis adequacy has to be widened to include medium size and large molecule removal in addition to urea kinetics. The HEMO study found a non-significant trend toward a beneficial effect on mortality of high-flux dialysis compared with low-flux dialysis. In that study, the beneficial effect of convection could have been attenuated by the fact that 'internal filtration' in high-flux haemodialysis (HD) is lower than that expected by convection in haemofiltration (HF) or haemodiafiltration (HDF). To explore the putative beneficial effect of convection, this Italian multicentre study was planned, comparing on-line convective treatments (HF and HDF) with standard, low-flux HD. The enrolled patients will be evaluated prospectively on their usual treatment for 2 months (baseline period) and subsequently randomized to continue either with low-flux HD (50%) or to start on-line convective treatment (50%), HF or HDF according to a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point of the study will be cardiovascular stability and blood pressure control. As secondary aims of the study, the impact on symptoms, morbidity and mortality will be assessed. Feasibility and patient compliance during HF and HDF treatments will also be evaluated. The experimental phase of the study, of at least 2 years, is divided into a 3-month adaptation period and a subsequent evaluation period. A recruitment period of 1 year is planned. The study design has adequate power to detect an absolute reduction of 3% hypotensive episodes with the experimental convective treatments compared with standard low-flux HD.

Some antihypertensive agents may be capable of reducing chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) progression because they halt some of the pathogenic mechanisms involved in renal damage. Although this effect seems to be partially independent of BP reduction, it is still unclear whether these drugs are really superior to other antihypertensive agents when the BP values recommended by the present guidelines are actually achieved. This is particularly true when considering that, in published trials, target and achieved BP values were constantly higher than those nowadays recommended. Furthermore, in the majority of these studies, patients treated with ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I) or Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ATIIRA) achieved lower BP values than those in control groups and BP values during 24 h were not recorded. Anyway, taking into account the role of baseline and follow-up BP values, the treatment effect remained significant in almost all of the multivariate models. These findings suggest that the renoprotective effect of these agents (ACE-I, ATIIRA) is partially independent of better BP control. However, caution should be paid in attributing true biologic renoprotective properties to drugs just on the basis of statistical adjustments of BP values, although robustly performed, without being aware of what those BP values actually reflect.

Introduction. Every week, haemodialysis patients are exposed to ∼400 l of water used for the production of dialysis fluids which, albeit with the interposition of a semi-permeable artificial membrane, come into direct contact with the bloodstream. It is therefore clearly important to know and monitor the chemical and microbiological purity of dialysis water. Methods. In this review, we analyse the sources of chemical and microbiological water contamination, and the problems involved in water purification systems and modalities. We also analyse the compliance of dialysis units with the microbiological standards established by the most widely accepted guidelines relating to the quality of dialysis fluids. Results. The risk of chemical contamination is due mainly to the primary pollution of municipal water, whereas the most important microbiological problem is the control of bacterial growth in the water treatment and distribution system. Dialysis water treatment implies various levels of pre-treatment, a final purification module (which, in many cases, is reverse osmosis: RO) and a hydraulic circuit for the distribution of the purified water. RO-based treatment systems produce water of optimal chemical and microbial quality, and so dialysis units need to concentrate on maintaining this quality level in the long term by means of effective maintenance and disinfection strategies. The most widely accepted standards for water purity are those recommended by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the European Pharmacopea, which respectively allow bacterial growth of <200 and <100 c.f.u./ml, and an endotoxin concentration of <2 and <0.25 IU/ml. However, a number of multicentre studies have reported that 7-35% of water samples have bacterial growth of >200 c.f.u./ml, and up to 44% have endotoxin levels of >5 IU/ml. Conclusions. The results of multicentre studies indicate that the microbial quality of dialysis fluids is still a too often neglected problem, particularly as there is evidence of a possible relationship between dialysis fluid contamination and long-term morbidity. The time has now come to take advantage of innovations in water treatment processes and improvements in dialysis machines in order to modify clinical practices and start improvement processes aimed at decreasing the risk of microbial contamination to the minimum, as it has already been successfully done in the case of chemical contamination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]