Search

Objectives: The objective of the study was to analyze the outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) over a 40‐year span. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of patients with ESRD‐RCC diagnosed between 1979 and 2020 at two institutions. We assessed changes in stage, surgical approaches, and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) following nephrectomy according to era between ESRD‐RCC and sporadic RCC. Furthermore, perioperative outcomes in patients with ESRD‐RCC were compared between laparoscopic and open surgery. Results: Patients with ESRD‐RCC (n = 549) were diagnosed at an earlier stage (p = 0.0276), and the ratio of laparoscopic nephrectomy was increased (p < 0.0001) according to eras. Since 2000 (i.e., after implementation of laparoscopic nephrectomy), patients with ESRD‐RCC (n = 305) had significantly shorter CSS (p = 0.0063) after nephrectomy than sporadic RCC (n = 2732). After adjustment by multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, ESRD status was independently associated with shorter CSS (p = 0.0055 and p = 0.0473, respectively). Improved CSS in sporadic RCC (p < 0.0001), but not ESRD‐RCC (p = 0.904), according to era contributed to this difference. Laparoscopic nephrectomy showed favorable outcomes, including shorter surgery time, lower estimated bleeding volumes, transfusion rates, and readmission rates, and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open nephrectomy (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities potentially enable early diagnosis and minimally invasive surgery for patients with ESRD‐RCC. As ESRD‐RCC may not present indolently, careful post‐operative monitoring is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of trial-eligibility criteria on outcome in real-world metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients and Methods: mRCC patients treated with TKIs as first-line systemic therapy were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were determined as trial-ineligible when they met at least 1 following trial-ineligible criteria; Karnofsky performance status score <70, hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL, creatinine >2.4 mg/dL (male) or >2.0 mg/dL (female), calcium >12.0 mg/dL, platelet <100,000 /μL, neutrophil <1,500 /μL, nonclear-cell histology, and brain metastasis. Results: Of 238 patients, 101 patients (42%) were determined as trial-ineligible. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the TKI initiation were significantly shorter in the trial-ineligible patients than in the trial-eligible patients (median PFS: 5.53 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 13.8 vs. 43.4 months, p < 0.0001). Objective response rate was also significantly lower in the trial-ineligible patients (15% vs. 37%, p = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis further showed that the trial-eligibility was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR: 2.39, p < 0.0001). In addition, the number of trial-ineligible factors were negatively correlated with PFS and OS. Conclusions: In real-word, the substantial number of mRCC patients did not meet the trial-eligibility criteria, and their outcome was worse than that in the trial-eligible patients. Further studies focusing on the outcome in real-world trial-ineligible patients in the immune checkpoint inhibitor era are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of nivolumab with that of molecular‐targeted therapy as a second‐line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real‐world data. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who received nivolumab or molecular‐targeted therapy after the failure of first‐line molecular‐targeted therapy between January 2008 and December 2019 at two Japanese institutions. Progression‐free survival and overall survival after the initiation of second‐line therapy were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. Objective response rate was assessed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: Among 159 patients, 43 (27%) and 116 (73%) patients received nivolumab and molecular‐targeted therapy as second‐line therapy, respectively. During follow up (median 11.1 months), 129 (81%) and 98 (62%) patients had disease progression and died, respectively. Progression‐free survival was comparable between the two treatments (median 5.06 vs 5.95 months, P = 0.881), whereas overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab than with molecular‐targeted therapy (not reached vs 13.0 months, P = 0.0008). Multivariate analysis further showed that nivolumab therapy was an independent favorable factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 0.33, P = 0.0007). In 151 patients with eligible radiographic data, the objective response rate was significantly higher in nivolumab than in molecular‐targeted therapy (n = 14/41 [34%] vsn = 20/110 [18%], P = 0.0485). Conclusions: Real‐world data analysis suggests superior efficacy of nivolumab over molecular‐targeted therapy as second‐line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis therapy have a higher incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), which consist of 2 major histopathological types: clear‐cell RCCs (ESRD‐ccRCCs) and acquired cystic disease (ACD)‐associated RCCs. However, their genetic and epigenetic alterations are still poorly understood. Here, we investigated somatic mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs), and DNA methylation profiles in 9 ESRD‐ccRCCs and 7 ACD‐associated RCCs to identify their molecular alterations and cellular origins. Targeted sequencing of 409 cancer‐related genes, including VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, KDM5C, MET, KMT2C (MLL3), and TP53, showed ESRD‐ccRCCs harbored frequent VHL mutations, while ACD‐associated RCCs did not. CNA analysis showed that ESRD‐ccRCCs had a frequent loss of chromosome 3p while ACD‐associated RCCs had a gain of chromosome 16. Beadarray methylation analysis showed that ESRD‐ccRCCs had methylation profiles similar to those of sporadic ccRCCs, while ACD‐associated RCCs had profiles similar to those of papillary RCCs. Expression analysis of genes whose expression levels are characteristic to individual segments of a nephron showed that ESRD‐ccRCCs and ACD‐associated RCCs had high expression of proximal tubule cell marker genes, while chromophobe RCCs had high expression of distal tubule cell/collecting duct cell marker genes. In conclusion, ESRD‐ccRCCs and ACD‐associated RCCs had mutation and methylation profiles similar to those of sporadic ccRCCs and papillary RCCs, respectively, and these 2 histopathological types of RCCs were indicated to have originated from proximal tubule cells of the nephron. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Evidence regarding the prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains limited in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line systemic therapy. Thus, we investigated the association between irAE development and oncological outcomes during nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at our hospital and its affiliated institutions. The associations between irAE development and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rates (ORRs) were assessed after treatment initiation.Results: A total of 60 irAEs occurred in 33 patients (72%), with 24 grade ≥ 3 irAEs developed in 20 patients (43%). PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than that in patients without irAEs (P < 0.0001); however, OS was not different (P = 0.571). Multivariable analysis further revealed that the development of irAEs was an independent predictor of a longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.18, P = 0.0005). A landmark analysis for the initial four cycles of nivolumab plus ipilimumab administration also showed that PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than that in patients without irAEs (P = 0.0386). The ORRs were also higher in patients with irAEs (P = 0.0064). Furthermore, in 22 patients (48%) who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment, the 6-month PFS rate was 87%.Conclusion: This multi-institutional study showed that irAE development was significantly associated with PFS but not with OS in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line therapy. The development of irAEs may be used as a surrogate prognostic marker for PFS in this treatment regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore the real-world data regarding survival following metastasectomy (MS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the postcytokine therapy era.Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) between January 2008 and December 2018 at our institutions were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups according to their MS status: (1) complete MS (cMS), (2) incomplete MS (icMS), and (3) without MS (nonMS). Factors for overall survival (OS) after diagnosis were analyzed.Results: Overall, 314 patients were evaluated. During the follow-up period (median: 25.3 months), a total of 98 patients (31.2%) underwent at least one MS. The cMS group (n = 45, 14.3%) had a significantly longer OS (median: not reached [N.R.]) than the icMS (n = 53, 16.9%) (81.5 months, P= 0.0042) and nonMS groups (28.1 months, P< 0.0001). The icMS group had a significantly longer OS than the nonMS group did (P= 0.0010). Multivariate analysis showed that the MS status was an independent factor for OS (cMS vs. nonMS: P= 0.0004; icMS vs. nonMS: P= 0.0176), together with histopathological type, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk, liver metastasis status, and prior nephrectomy status (all, P< 0.05). In addition, the OS was comparable throughout the eras of systemic therapy (early molecular-targeted therapy, late molecular-targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor eras) in the MS group (median: 121.9 vs. N.R. vs. N.R. months, P= 0.948).Conclusions: MS, especially cMS improved survival in selected patients with mRCC in the postcytokine therapy era. In addition, MS still plays a significant role in the current systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]