Search

Introduction/objective: Data on long-term treatment with Esketamine Nasal Spray (ESKNS) in real-world patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD) is scarce. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of ESK-NS treatment at 6 and 12-month follow-ups., Methods: This is part of an observational, retrospective, multicentric Italian study (REAL-ESK study). Subjects for the present study underwent psychiatric assessments after 6 and 12 months from the start of ESK-NS treatment. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess changes in continuous variables, such as scores on psychometric scales from baseline to follow-up time points., Results: Of 63 patients who maintained ESK-NS treatment for at least 6 months, 48 were responders or remitters (76.2%). Among 15 non-responders at 6 months, 4 significantly improved at 12-month follow-up. At least one side effect was reported by 71.8% of subjects with a 6-month follow-up assessment. An overall reduction of side effects was noticed as treatment progressed (42% of patients who continued the treatment reported side effects at 12 months). The most common side effects were sedation (31.7%) and dissociation (28.6%) during ESK-NS sessions. Only 2 patients discontinued ESK-NS for tolerability reasons., Conclusion: The results support the effectiveness and safety of esketamine in the mid and long-term treatment of TRD patients. The late clinical response of a subgroup of patients represents a novel finding. Data needs to be confirmed in larger samples and longer observation periods., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Introduction: Intravenous ketamine (KET-IV) and intranasal esketamine (ESK-NS) are effective in the acute treatment of Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Studies comparing KET-IV and ESK-NS concerning their action, safety, and tolerability are currently lacking., Materials and Methods: We combined patients' data from two unipolar TRD cohorts that received KET-IV (n = 171) at the Canadian Rapid Treatment Center of Excellence in Toronto, Canada, or ESK-NS (n = 140) at several TRD clinics in Italy. The Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology-Self-Report-16/QIDS-SR16 in the KET-IV group and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale/MADRS in the ESK-NS group measured depressive symptoms at baseline (T0) and after the acute treatment phase (T1) (i.e., four infusions of KET-IV and eight administrations of ESK-NS). As different scales were used, the primary outcome was to compare the improvement in depression severity in the two cohorts by measuring effect sizes, response and remission rates. Finally, we compare side effects and discontinuation rates., Results: At T1, KET-IV and ESK-NS significantly reduced depressive symptoms (respectively: QIDS-SR16 mean reduction = 5.65, p < 0.001; MADRS mean reduction = 11.41, p = 0.025). KET-IV showed larger effect sizes compared to ESK-NS (1.666 vs. 1.244). KET-IV had higher response rates (36 % vs. 25 %; p = 0.042) but not superior remission rates (13 % vs. 12 %; p = 0.845) than ESK-NS at T1. Despite more reported side effects, KET-IV did not cause more discontinuations for adverse events (4.6 % vs. 2.12 %; p = 0.228) than ESK-NS., Conclusion: KET-IV showed a higher short-term antidepressant effect, whereas ESK-NS exhibited lower side effects. Both were generally well tolerated. Future head-to-head studies should consider the long-term efficacy of these treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Taeho Greg Rhee was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) (#R21AG070666; R21AG078972), National Institute of Mental Health (#R21MH117438), National Institute on Drug Abuse (#R21DA057540) and Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP) of the University of Connecticut. Dr. Rhee serves as a review committee member for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and has received honoraria payments from PCORI and SAMHSA. Dr. Rhee has also served as a stakeholder/consultant for PCORI and received consulting fees from PCORI. Dr. Rhee serves as an advisory committee member for International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders (IAMHRF). Dr. Rhee is currently a co-Editor-in-Chief of Mental Health Science and has received honorarium payments annually from the publisher, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Dr. Giorgio Di Lorenzo has been a speaker and/or a consultant for Angelini, FB-Health, Janssen-Cilag, Livanova, Lundbeck, Neuraxpharm, Otsuka, and Recordati. Dr. Raffaella Zanardi has been a consultant/speaker for Baldacci and Italfarmaco. Dr. Gianluca Rosso has been a speaker and/or consultant from Angelini, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Viatris. Dr. Ileana Andriola was a speaker at Janssen sponsored conference. Dr. Bernardo Maria Dell'Osso has received lecture honoraria from Angelini, Lundbeck, Janssen, Pfizer, Neuraxpharm, Arcapharma, and Livanova. Dr. Rosenblat is the medical director of the Braxia Scientific Corp, which provides ketamine and esketamine treatment for depression; he has received research grant support from the American Psychiatric Association, the American Society of Psychopharmacology, the Canadian Cancer Society, the Canadian Psychiatric Association, the Joseph M. West Family Memorial Fund, the Timeposters Fellowship, the University Health Network Centre for Mental Health, and the University of Toronto and speaking, consultation, or research fees from Allergan, COMPASS, Janssen, Lundbeck, and Sunovion. Dr. Giovanni Martinotti has been a consultant and/or a speaker and/or has received research grants from Angelini, Doc Generici, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, and Recordati. Dr. Roger McIntyre has received research grant support from CIHR/GACD/National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Milken Institute; speaker/consultation fees from Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes, Neumora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sage, Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals, Viatris, Abbvie, Atai Life Sciences. Dr. Roger McIntyre is the CEO of Braxia Scientific Corp. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Bipolar depression accounts for most of the disease duration in type I and type II bipolar disorder (BD), with few treatment options, often poorly tolerated. Many individuals do not respond to first-line therapeutic options, resulting in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD). Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, has recently been approved for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but no data are available on its use in B-TRD., Objectives: To compare the efficacy of esketamine in two samples of unipolar and bipolar TRD, providing preliminary indications of its effectiveness in B-TRD. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of the safety and tolerability of esketamine in B-TRD, focusing on the average risk of an affective switch., Methods: Thirty-five B-TRD subjects treated with esketamine nasal spray were enrolled and compared with 35 TRD patients. Anamnestic data and psychometric assessments (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale/MADRS, Hamilton-depression scale/HAM-D, Hamilton-anxiety scale/HAM-A) were collected at baseline (T0), at one month (T1), and three months (T2) follow up., Results: A significant reduction in depressive symptoms was found at T1 and T2 compared to T0, with no significant differences in response or remission rates between subjects with B-TRD and TRD. Esketamine showed a greater anxiolytic action in subjects with B-TRD than in those with TRD. Improvement in depressive symptoms was not associated with treatment-emergent affective switch., Conclusions: Our results supported the effectiveness and tolerability of esketamine in a real-world population of subjects with B-TRD. The low risk of manic switch in B-TRD patients confirmed the safety of this treatment., (© 2023 The Authors. Bipolar Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

About a third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not have an adequate response to first-line antidepressant treatment, i.e., develop a treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The partial understanding of MDD pathophysiology currently constitutes the major barrier to clinical and research progress on this topic. However, recent advances in genome editing techniques as well as in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) technology are offering unprecedented opportunities in both human disease modelling and drug discovery. These technology progresses have been enabling to set up disease-relevant patient-specific in vitro disease modeling for various mental disorders. The resulting models have the potential to significantly improve pathophysiologic understanding of MDD and then overcome some limitations inherent to animal and post-mortem models. More recently, psychiatry started to deal with the fast acting antidepressant ketamine and its derivates. Although ketamine appears to have the potential to transform the treatment of depression, its specific mechanisms of action are only partially known. Such knowledge is necessary to develop a model to understand the mechanisms behind fast-acting antidepressants, which may enable the discovery of novel glutamatergic compounds for the treatment of MDD. After discussing both the current understanding of ketamine's mechanisms of action, and the state of the art of human iPSC technology, the authors will introduce the implementation of a TRD model based on iPSC human technology and aimed at studying the ketamine's fast acting antidepressant mechanisms of action.

Esketamine (ESK) has been approved as a rapid-acting intranasal treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although existing studies have investigated the efficacy of ESK in the 4-week induction phase, our knowledge about long-term ESK efficacy remains poor. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the available data on long-term ESK efficacy for TRD. A systematic search was performed including articles in English, up to 31 March 2021. The search found 7 relevant studies, involving 1024 adult TRD patients. Continuing treatment with ESK after the 4-week induction phase may be associated with stable efficacy in relapse prevention among TRD patients. Conversely, the long-term antidepressant effectiveness upon discontinuation of ESK might be limited, although data from three studies had a moderate to high risk of bias. Overall, the results on the effectiveness of this compound in the long term are mixed. According to our findings, ESK treatment should be continued following the induction phase to reach a stable efficacy in relapse prevention, while the long-term antidepressant and anti-suicidal effects of ESK after discontinuation are inconsistent. Currently, the level of proof of ESK efficacy in long-term TRD treatment remains low and more RCTs with larger sample sizes and active comparators are needed.