Search

The walktrap algorithm is one of the most popular community-detection methods in psychological research. Several simulation studies have shown that it is often effective at determining the correct number of communities and assigning items to their proper community. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that the walktrap algorithm relies on hierarchical clustering because it was originally developed for networks much larger than those encountered in psychological research. In this paper, we present and demonstrate a computational alternative to the hierarchical algorithm that is conceptually easier to understand. More importantly, we show that better solutions to the sum-of-squares optimization problem that is heuristically tackled by hierarchical clustering in the walktrap algorithm can often be obtained using exact or approximate methods for K-means clustering. Three simulation studies and analyses of empirical networks were completed to assess the impact of better sum-of-squares solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

K-means inverse regression was developed as an easy-to-use dimension reduction procedure for multivariate regression. This approach is similar to the original sliced inverse regression method, with the exception that the slices are explicitly produced by a K-means clustering of the response vectors. In this article, we propose K-medoids clustering as an alternative clustering approach for slicing and compare its performance to K-means in a simulation study. Although the two methods often produce comparable results, K-medoids tends to yield better performance in the presence of outliers. In addition to isolation of outliers, K-medoids clustering also has the advantage of accommodating a broader range of dissimilarity measures, which could prove useful in other graphical regression applications where slicing is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses articles in the issue on topics including traditional Dendritic Cell Algorithm (DCA), missing data in affine subspaces, and potential mislabeled group data.

The emergence of Gaussian model-based partitioning as a viable alternative to K-means clustering fosters a need for discrete optimization methods that can be efficiently implemented using model-based criteria. A variety of alternative partitioning criteria have been proposed for more general data conditions that permit elliptical clusters, different spatial orientations for the clusters, and unequal cluster sizes. Unfortunately, many of these partitioning criteria are computationally demanding, which makes the multiple-restart (multistart) approach commonly used for K-means partitioning less effective as a heuristic solution strategy. As an alternative, we propose an approach based on iterated local search (ILS), which has proved effective in previous combinatorial data analysis contexts. We compared multistart, ILS and hybrid multistart-ILS procedures for minimizing a very general model-based criterion that assumes no restrictions on cluster size or within-group covariance structure. This comparison, which used 23 data sets from the classification literature, revealed that the ILS and hybrid heuristics generally provided better criterion function values than the multistart approach when all three methods were constrained to the same 10-min time limit. In many instances, these differences in criterion function values reflected profound differences in the partitions obtained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of its deterministic nature, K-means does not yield confidence information about centroids and estimated cluster memberships, although this could be useful for inferential purposes. In this paper we propose to arrive at such information by means of a non-parametric bootstrap procedure, the performance of which is tested in an extensive simulation study. Results show that the coverage of hyper-ellipsoid bootstrap confidence regions for the centroids is in general close to the nominal coverage probability. For the cluster memberships, we found that probabilistic membership information derived from the bootstrap analysis can be used to improve the cluster assignment of individual objects, albeit only in the case of a very large number of clusters. However, in the case of smaller numbers of clusters, the probabilistic membership information still appeared to be useful as it indicates for which objects the cluster assignment resulting from the analysis of the original data is likely to be correct; hence, this information can be used to construct a partial clustering in which the latter objects only are assigned to clusters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Steinley (2007) provided a lower bound for the sum-of-squares error criterion function used in K-means clustering. In this article, on the basis of the lower bound, the authors propose a method to distinguish between 1 cluster (i.e., a single distribution) versus more than 1 cluster. Additionally, conditional on indicating there are multiple clusters, the procedure is extended to determine the number of clusters. Through a series of simulations, the proposed methodology is shown to outperlbrm several other commonly used procedures for determining both the presence of clusters and their number. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article provides a large-scale investigation into several of the properties of mixture-model clustering techniques (also referred to as latent class cluster analysis, latent profile analysis, model-based clustering, probabilistic clustering, Bayesian classification, unsupervised learning, and finite mixture models; see Vermunt & Magdison, 2002). Focus is given to the multivariate normal distribution, and 9 separate decompositions (i.e., class structures) of the covariance matrix are investigated. To provide a link to the current literature, comparisons are made with K-means clustering in 3 detailed Monte Carlo studies. The findings have implications for applied researchers in that mixture-model clustering techniques performed best when the covariance structure and number of clusters were known. However, as the information about the shape and number of clusters became unknown, degraded performance was observed for both K-means clustering and mixture-model clustering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

K-means clustering is arguably the most popular technique for partitioning data. Unfortunately, K-means suffers from the well-known problem of locally optimal solutions. Furthermore, the final partition is dependent upon the initial configuration, making the choice of starting partitions all the more important. This paper evaluates 12 procedures proposed in the literature and provides recommendations for best practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using the cluster generation procedure proposed by D. Steinley and R. Henson (2005), the author investigated the performance of K-means clustering under the following scenarios: (a) different probabilities of cluster overlap; (b) different types of cluster overlap; (c) varying samples sizes, clusters, and dimensions; (d) different multivariate distributions of clusters; and (e) various multidimensional data structures. The results are evaluated in terms of the Hubert--Arabie adjusted Rand index, and several observations concerning the performance of K-means clustering are made. Finally, the article concludes with the proposal of a diagnostic technique indicating when the partitioning given by a K-means cluster analysis can be trusted. By combining the information from several observable characteristics of the data (number of clusters, number of variables, sample size, etc.) with the prevalence of unique local optima in several thousand implementations of the K-means algorithm, the author provides a method capable of guiding key data-analysis decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including K-means clustering, effect of model misspecification on determining the number of classes in growth mixture modeling and clustering functional data.